Commit Graph

6 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Sanjay Patel 0c37b19331 [CGP, x86] update test checks; NFC
This was auto-generated using an older version of the script,
and that version does not work with phis, so if we enable
expansion it will go bad.

llvm-svn: 307267
2017-07-06 15:31:38 +00:00
Sanjay Patel 4b23fa0abf [CGP] add specialization for memcmp expansion with only one basic block
llvm-svn: 306485
2017-06-27 23:15:01 +00:00
Sanjay Patel 70b36f193d [CGP] eliminate a sub instruction in memcmp expansion
As noted in D34071, there are some IR optimization opportunities that could be 
handled by normal IR passes if this expansion wasn't happening so late in CGP.

Regardless of that, it seems wasteful to knowingly produce suboptimal IR here, 
so I'm proposing this change:
  %s = sub i32 %x, %y
  %r = icmp ne %s, 0
    =>
  %r = icmp ne %x, %y

Changing the predicate to 'eq' mimics what InstCombine would do, so that's just
an efficiency improvement if we decide this expansion should happen sooner.

The fact that the PowerPC backend doesn't eliminate the 'subf.' might be 
something for PPC folks to investigate separately.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34416

llvm-svn: 306471
2017-06-27 21:46:34 +00:00
Sanjay Patel deed579140 [x86] set the datalayout to match the RUN line triple; NFC
I don't think there's any visible difference from having the wrong layout
for the 32-bit case at this point, but that could change in the future.

llvm-svn: 305931
2017-06-21 17:06:24 +00:00
Sanjay Patel 0656629b87 [x86] enable CGP memcmp() expansion for 2/4/8 byte sizes
There are a couple of potential improvements as seen in the IR and asm:
1. We're unnecessarily extending to a larger type to compare values.
2. The codegen for (select cond, 1, -1) could avoid a cmov.
(or we could change the order of the compares, so we have a select with 0 operand)

llvm-svn: 305802
2017-06-20 15:58:30 +00:00
Sanjay Patel bc6d8b0f51 [CGP, x86] add tests for potential memcmp expansion; NFC
No IR tests were added with rL304313 ( https://reviews.llvm.org/D28637 ),
so I want these for extra coverage if we enable memcmp expansion for x86.
As shown, nothing is expanded for x86 in CGP yet.

Also fundamentally, we're doing an IR transform, so we should have IR tests 
for just that part. If something goes wrong, we need to know if the bug is
in CGP or later lowering.

llvm-svn: 305011
2017-06-08 20:40:39 +00:00