Commit Graph

6 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Sanjay Patel 7227276d41 [InstCombine] canonicalize icmp predicate feeding select
This canonicalization was suggested in D33172 as a way to make InstCombine behavior more uniform. 
We have this transform for icmp+br, so unless there's some reason that icmp+select should be 
treated differently, we should do the same thing here.

The benefit comes from increasing the chances of creating identical instructions. This is shown in
the tests in logical-select.ll (PR32791). InstCombine doesn't fold those directly, but EarlyCSE 
can simplify the identical cmps, and then InstCombine can fold the selects together.

The possible regression for the tests in select.ll raises questions about poison/undef:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-May/113261.html

...but that transform is just as likely to be triggered by this canonicalization as it is to be 
missed, so we're just pointing out a commutation deficiency in the pattern matching:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL228409

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34242

llvm-svn: 306435
2017-06-27 17:53:22 +00:00
Craig Topper dffbbcb3fd [InstCombine] Teach foldSelectICmpAndOr to recognize (select (icmp slt (trunc (X)), 0), Y, (or Y, C2))
Summary:
InstCombine likes to turn (icmp eq (and X, C1), 0) into (icmp slt (trunc (X)), 0) sometimes. This breaks foldSelectICmpAndOr's ability to recognize (select (icmp eq (and X, C1), 0), Y, (or Y, C2))->(or (shl (and X, C1), C3), y).

This patch tries to recover this. I had to flip around some of the early out checks so that I could create a new And instruction during the compare processing without it possibly never getting used.

Reviewers: spatel, majnemer, davide

Reviewed By: spatel

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34184

llvm-svn: 306029
2017-06-22 16:23:30 +00:00
Craig Topper ae86cc725d [InstCombine] Don't let folding (select (icmp eq (and X, C1), 0), Y, (or Y, C2)) create more instructions than it removes
Summary:
Previously this folding had no checks to see if it was going to result in less instructions. This was pointed out during the review of D34184

This patch adds code to count how many instructions its going to create vs how many its going to remove so we can make a proper decision.

Reviewers: spatel, majnemer

Reviewed By: spatel

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34437

llvm-svn: 305926
2017-06-21 16:07:13 +00:00
Craig Topper ca73ba019b [InstCombine] Add test cases to demonstrate instcombine increasing instruction count when trying to fold (select (icmp eq (and X, C1), 0), Y, (or Y, C2))->(or (shl (and X, C1), C3), y) when the pieces have multiple uses.
llvm-svn: 305509
2017-06-15 21:38:44 +00:00
Craig Topper 82e4c2dfd2 [InstCombine] Add test cases demonstrating failure to handle (select (icmp eq (and X, C1), 0), Y, (or Y, C2)) when the icmp portion gets turned into a truncate and a signed compare with 0.
InstCombine has an optimization that recognizes an and with the sign bit of legal type size and turns it into a truncate and compare that checks the sign bit. But the select handling code doesn't recognize this idiom.

llvm-svn: 305338
2017-06-13 23:30:41 +00:00
Sanjay Patel 2419d670c2 [InstCombine] auto-generate checks for select+bitwise logic tests; NFC
llvm-svn: 288254
2016-11-30 17:07:21 +00:00