Since D17854 LinkerSubsectionsViaSymbols is unnecessary.
It is interfering with ThinLTO implementation of CFI-ICall, where
the aliases used on the !LinkerSubsectionsViaSymbols branch are
needed to export jump tables to ThinLTO backends.
llvm-svn: 304582
Summary:
The constant folding code currently assumes that the constant expression will always be on the left and the simple null will be on the right. But that's not true at least on the path from InstSimplify.
This patch adds support to ConstantFolding to detect the reversed case.
Reviewers: spatel, dberlin, majnemer, davide, joey
Reviewed By: joey
Subscribers: joey, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33801
llvm-svn: 304559
Summary:
Optimization passes may remove llvm.coro.suspend intrinsic while leaving matching llvm.coro.save intrinsic orphaned.
Make sure we clean up orphaned coro.saves. The bug manifested with a crash similar to this:
```
llvm_unreachable("Unknown type!");
llvm::MVT::getVT (Ty=0x489518, HandleUnknown=false)
llvm::EVT::getEVT
llvm::TargetLoweringBase::getValueType
llvm::ComputeValueVTs
llvm::SelectionDAGBuilder::visitTargetIntrinsic
```
Reviewers: GorNishanov
Subscribers: EricWF, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33817
llvm-svn: 304518
builtin_expect applied on && or || expressions were not
handled properly before. With this patch, the problem is fixed.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D33164
llvm-svn: 304517
The added test case is to check whether the simplified value is passed to
getGEPCost().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33779
llvm-svn: 304454
The lowerer wrongly assumes the ICMP instruction
1) always has a constant operand;
2) the operand has value 0.
It also assumes the expected value can only be one, thus
other values other than one will be considered 'zero'.
This leads to wrong profile annotation when other integer values
are used other than 0, 1 in the comparison or in the expect intrinsic.
Also missing is handling of equal predicate.
This patch fixes all the above problems.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D33757
llvm-svn: 304453
Summary:
Sort OpsToRename before iterating to make iteration order deterministic.
Thanks to Daniel Berlin for the sorting logic.
Reviewers: dberlin, RKSimon, efriedma, davide
Reviewed By: dberlin, davide
Subscribers: sanjoy, davide, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33265
llvm-svn: 304447
Summary: Also see D33429 for other ThinLTO + New PM related changes.
Reviewers: davide, chandlerc, tejohnson
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, Prazek, cfe-commits, inglorion, llvm-commits, eraman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33525
llvm-svn: 304378
This reverts commit r304310.
It caused build failures in polly and mingw
due to undefined reference to
llvm::RTLIB::getMEMCPY_ELEMENT_ATOMIC.
llvm-svn: 304315
Summary:
Expanding the loop idiom test for memcpy to also recognize unordered atomic memcpy.
The only difference for recognizing
an unordered atomic memcpy and instead of a normal memcpy is
that the loads and/or stores involved are unordered atomic operations.
Background: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-May/112779.html
Patch by Daniel Neilson!
Reviewers: reames, anna, skatkov
Reviewed By: reames
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mzolotukhin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33243
llvm-svn: 304310
r303763 caused build failures in some out-of-tree tests due to an assertion in
TTI. The original patch updated cost estimates for induction variable update
instructions marked for scalarization. However, it didn't consider that the
incoming value of an induction variable phi node could be a cast instruction.
This caused queries for cast instruction costs with a mix of vector and scalar
types. This patch includes a fix for cast instructions and the test case from
PR33193.
The fix was suggested by Jonas Paulsson <paulsson@linux.vnet.ibm.com>.
Reference: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33193
Original Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33457
llvm-svn: 304235
Summary:
I believe https://reviews.llvm.org/rL302576 introduced two bugs:
1) it produces duplicate distinct variables for every: dbg.value describing the same variable.
To fix the problme I switched form getDistinct() to get() in DebugLoc.cpp: auto reparentVar = [&](DILocalVariable *Var) {
return DILocalVariable::getDistinct(
2) It passes NewFunction plain name as a linkagename parameter to Subprogram constructor. Breaks assert in:
|| DeclLinkageName.empty()) || LinkageName == DeclLinkageName) && "decl has a linkage name and it is different"' failed.
#9 0x00007f5010261b75 llvm::DwarfUnit::applySubprogramDefinitionAttributes(llvm::DISubprogram const*, llvm::DIE&) /home/gor/llvm/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/DwarfUnit.cpp:1173:3
#
(Edit: reproducer added)
Here how https://reviews.llvm.org/rL302576 broke coroutine debug info.
Coroutine body of the original function is split into several parts by cloning and removing unneeded code.
All parts describe the original function and variables present in the original function.
For a simple case, prior to Split, original function has these two blocks:
```
PostSpill: ; preds = %AllocaSpillBB
call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %x, i64 0, metadata !14, metadata !15), !dbg !13
store i32 %x, i32* %x.addr, align 4
...
and
sw.epilog: ; preds = %sw.bb
%x.addr.reload.addr = getelementptr inbounds %f.Frame, %f.Frame* %FramePtr, i32 0, i32 4, !dbg !20
%4 = load i32, i32* %x.addr.reload.addr, align 4, !dbg !20
call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %4, i64 0, metadata !14, metadata !15), !dbg !13!14 = !DILocalVariable(name: "x", arg: 1, scope: !6, file: !7, line: 55, type: !11)
```
Note that in two blocks different expression represent the same original user variable X.
Before rL302576, for every cloned function there was exactly one cloned DILocalVariable(name: "x" as in:
```
define i8* @f(i32 %x) #0 !dbg !6 {
...
!6 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "f", scope: !7, file: !7, line: 55, type: !8, isLocal: false, isDefinition: true, scopeLine: 55, flags: DIFlagPrototyped,
...
!14 = !DILocalVariable(name: "x", arg: 1, scope: !6, file: !7, line: 55, type: !11)
define internal fastcc void @f.resume(%f.Frame* %FramePtr) #0 !dbg !25 {
...
!25 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "f", scope: !7, file: !7, line: 55, type: !8, isLocal: false, isDefinition: true, scopeLine: 55, flags: DIFlagPrototyped, isOptimized: false, unit: !0, variables: !2)
!28 = !DILocalVariable(name: "x", arg: 1, scope: !25, file: !7, line: 55, type: !11)
```
After rL302576, for every cloned function there were as many DILocalVariable(name: "x" as there were "call void @llvm.dbg.value" for that variable.
This was causing asserts in VerifyDebugInfo and AssemblyPrinter.
Example:
```
!27 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "f", linkageName: "f.resume", scope: !7, file: !7, line: 55, type: !8, isLocal: false, isDefinition: true, scopeLine: 55,
!29 = distinct !DILocalVariable(name: "x", arg: 1, scope: !27, file: !7, line: 55, type: !11)
!39 = distinct !DILocalVariable(name: "x", arg: 1, scope: !27, file: !7, line: 55, type: !11)
!41 = distinct !DILocalVariable(name: "x", arg: 1, scope: !27, file: !7, line: 55, type: !11)
```
Second problem:
Prior to rL302576, all clones were described by DISubprogram referring to original function.
```
define i8* @f(i32 %x) #0 !dbg !6 {
...
!6 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "f", scope: !7, file: !7, line: 55, type: !8, isLocal: false, isDefinition: true, scopeLine: 55, flags: DIFlagPrototyped,
define internal fastcc void @f.resume(%f.Frame* %FramePtr) #0 !dbg !25 {
...
!25 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "f", scope: !7, file: !7, line: 55, type: !8, isLocal: false, isDefinition: true, scopeLine: 55, flags: DIFlagPrototyped,
```
After rL302576, DISubprogram for clones is of two minds, plain name refers to the original name, linkageName refers to plain name of the clone.
```
!27 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "f", linkageName: "f.resume", scope: !7, file: !7, line: 55, type: !8, isLocal: false, isDefinition: true, scopeLine: 55,
```
I think the assumption in AsmPrinter is that both name and linkageName should refer to the same entity. It asserts here when they are not:
```
|| DeclLinkageName.empty()) || LinkageName == DeclLinkageName) && "decl has a linkage name and it is different"' failed.
#9 0x00007f5010261b75 llvm::DwarfUnit::applySubprogramDefinitionAttributes(llvm::DISubprogram const*, llvm::DIE&) /home/gor/llvm/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/DwarfUnit.cpp:1173:3
```
After this fix, behavior (with respect to coroutines) reverts to exactly as it was before and therefore making them debuggable again, or even more importantly, compilable, with "-g"
Reviewers: dblaikie, echristo, aprantl
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33614
llvm-svn: 304079
Summary:
This fixes introduction of an incorrect inttoptr/ptrtoint pair in
the included test case which makes use of non-integral pointers. I
suspect there are more cases like this left, but this takes care of
the one I was seeing at the moment.
Reviewers: sanjoy
Subscribers: mzolotukhin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33129
llvm-svn: 304058
The recommit is to fix a bug about ExtractValue and InsertValue ops. For those
ops, some varargs inside GVN::Expression are not value numbers but raw index
numbers. It is wrong to do phi-translate for raw index numbers, and the fix is
to stop doing that.
Right now scalarpre doesn't have phi-translate support, so it will miss some
simple pre opportunities. Like the following testcase, current scalarpre cannot
recognize the last "a * b" is fully redundent because a and b used by the last
"a * b" expr are both defined by phis.
long a[100], b[100], g1, g2, g3;
__attribute__((pure)) long goo();
void foo(long a, long b, long c, long d) {
g1 = a * b;
if (__builtin_expect(g2 > 3, 0)) {
a = c;
b = d;
g2 = a * b;
}
g3 = a * b; // fully redundant.
}
The patch adds phi-translate support in scalarpre. This is only a temporary
solution before the newpre based on newgvn is available.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32252
llvm-svn: 304050
The tests here are have operands commuted to provide more coverage. I also commuted one of the instructions in the scalar tests so the 4 tests cover the 4 commuted variations
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33599
llvm-svn: 304021
The patch rL303730 was reverted because test lsr-expand-quadratic.ll failed on
many non-X86 configs with this patch. The reason of this is that the patch
makes a correctless fix that changes optimizer's behavior for this test.
Without the change, LSR was making an overconfident simplification basing on a
wrong SCEV. Apparently it did not need the IV analysis to do this. With the
change, it chose a different way to simplify (that wasn't so confident), and
this way required the IV analysis. Now, following the right execution path,
LSR tries to make a transformation relying on IV Users analysis. This analysis
is target-dependent due to this code:
// LSR is not APInt clean, do not touch integers bigger than 64-bits.
// Also avoid creating IVs of non-native types. For example, we don't want a
// 64-bit IV in 32-bit code just because the loop has one 64-bit cast.
uint64_t Width = SE->getTypeSizeInBits(I->getType());
if (Width > 64 || !DL.isLegalInteger(Width))
return false;
To make a proper transformation in this test case, the type i32 needs to be
legal for the specified data layout. When the test runs on some non-X86
configuration (e.g. pure ARM 64), opt gets confused by the specified target
and does not use it, rejecting the specified data layout as well. Instead,
it uses some default layout that does not treat i32 as a legal type
(currently the layout that is used when it is not specified does not have
legal types at all). As result, the transformation we expect to happen does
not happen for this test.
This re-enabling patch does not have any source code changes compared to the
original patch rL303730. The only difference is that the failing test is
moved to X86 directory and now has requirement of running on x86 only to comply
with the specified target triple and data layout.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33543
llvm-svn: 303971
Right now scalarpre doesn't have phi-translate support, so it will miss some
simple pre opportunities. Like the following testcase, current scalarpre cannot
recognize the last "a * b" is fully redundent because a and b used by the last
"a * b" expr are both defined by phis.
long a[100], b[100], g1, g2, g3;
__attribute__((pure)) long goo();
void foo(long a, long b, long c, long d) {
g1 = a * b;
if (__builtin_expect(g2 > 3, 0)) {
a = c;
b = d;
g2 = a * b;
}
g3 = a * b; // fully redundant.
}
The patch adds phi-translate support in scalarpre. This is only a temporary
solution before the newpre based on newgvn is available.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32252
llvm-svn: 303923
There's probably a lot more like this (see also comments in D33338 about responsibility),
but I suspect we don't usually get a visible manifestation.
Given the recent interest in improving InstCombine efficiency, another potential micro-opt
that could be repeated several times in this function: morph the existing icmp pred/operands
instead of creating a new instruction.
llvm-svn: 303860
This patch provides an initial prototype for a pass that sinks instructions based on GVN information, similar to GVNHoist. It is not yet ready for commiting but I've uploaded it to gather some initial thoughts.
This pass attempts to sink instructions into successors, reducing static
instruction count and enabling if-conversion.
We use a variant of global value numbering to decide what can be sunk.
Consider:
[ %a1 = add i32 %b, 1 ] [ %c1 = add i32 %d, 1 ]
[ %a2 = xor i32 %a1, 1 ] [ %c2 = xor i32 %c1, 1 ]
\ /
[ %e = phi i32 %a2, %c2 ]
[ add i32 %e, 4 ]
GVN would number %a1 and %c1 differently because they compute different
results - the VN of an instruction is a function of its opcode and the
transitive closure of its operands. This is the key property for hoisting
and CSE.
What we want when sinking however is for a numbering that is a function of
the *uses* of an instruction, which allows us to answer the question "if I
replace %a1 with %c1, will it contribute in an equivalent way to all
successive instructions?". The (new) PostValueTable class in GVN provides this
mapping.
This pass has some shown really impressive improvements especially for codesize already on internal benchmarks, so I have high hopes it can replace all the sinking logic in SimplifyCFG.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24805
llvm-svn: 303850
instrumenting code.
This is important in the new pass manager. The old pass manager's
inliner has a small DCE routine embedded within it. The new pass manager
relies on the actual GlobalDCE pass for this.
Without this patch, instrumentation profiling with the new PM results in
massive code bloat in the object files because the instrumentation
itself ends up preventing DCE from working to remove the code.
We should probably change the instrumentation (and/or DCE) so that we
can eliminate dead code even if instrumented, but we shouldn't even
spend the time generating instrumentation for that code so this still
seems like a good patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33535
llvm-svn: 303845
pass.
The original logic only considered direct successors of the hoisted
domtree nodes, but that isn't really enough. If there are other basic
blocks that are completely within the subtree, their successors could
just as easily be impacted by the hoisting.
The more I think about it, the more I think the correct update here is
to hoist every block on the dominance frontier which has an idom in the
chain we hoist across. However, this is subtle enough that I'd
definitely appreciate some more eyes on it.
Sadly, if this is the correct algorithm, it requires computing a (highly
localized) dominance frontier. I've done this in the simplest (IE, least
code) way I could come up with, but that may be too naive. Suggestions
welcome here, dominance update algorithms are not an area I've studied
much, so I don't have strong opinions.
In good news, with this patch, turning on simple unswitch passes the
LLVM test suite for me with asserts enabled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32740
llvm-svn: 303843
Summary:
Frontend generates store instructions after allocas, for example:
```
define i8* @f(i64 %this) "coroutine.presplit"="1" personality i32 0 {
entry:
%this.addr = alloca i64
store i64 %this, i64* %this.addr
..
%hdl = call i8* @llvm.coro.begin(token %id, i8* %alloc)
```
Such instructions may require spilling into coro.frame, but, coro-frame address is only available after coro.begin and thus needs to be moved after coro.begin.
The only instructions that should not be moved are the arguments of coro.begin and all of their operands.
Reviewers: GorNishanov, majnemer
Reviewed By: GorNishanov
Subscribers: llvm-commits, EricWF
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33527
llvm-svn: 303825
The swapped operands in the first test is a manifestation of an
inefficiency for vectors that doesn't exist for scalars because
the IRBuilder checks for an all-ones mask for scalars, but not
vectors.
llvm-svn: 303818
Summary: This code was migrated from InstCombine a few years ago. InstCombine had nearby code that would move Constants to the RHS for these, but InstSimplify doesn't have such code on this path.
Reviewers: spatel, majnemer, davide
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33473
llvm-svn: 303774
For non-uniform instructions marked for scalarization, we should update
`VectorTy` when computing instruction costs to reflect the scalar type. In
addition to determining instruction costs, this type is also used to signal
that all instructions in the loop will be scalarized. This currently affects
memory instructions and non-pointer induction variables and their updates. (We
also mark GEPs scalar after vectorization, but their cost is computed together
with memory instructions.) For scalarized induction updates, this patch also
scales the scalar cost by the vectorization factor, corresponding to each
induction step.
llvm-svn: 303763
As noted in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33138 and
the comments, there are multiple ways to view this. If we
choose not to solve this in InstCombine, these tests will
serve as documentation of that choice.
llvm-svn: 303755
The solution for PR26702 ( https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26702 )
added a canonicalization rule, but the minimal regression tests don't
demonstrate how that rule interacts with other folds.
llvm-svn: 303750
The loop vectorizer usually vectorizes any instruction it can and then
extracts the elements for a scalarized use. On SystemZ, all elements
containing addresses must be extracted into address registers (GRs). Since
this extraction is not free, it is better to have the address in a suitable
register to begin with. By forcing address arithmetic instructions and loads
of addresses to be scalar after vectorization, two benefits result:
* No need to extract the register
* LSR optimizations trigger (LSR isn't handling vector addresses currently)
Benchmarking show improvements on SystemZ with this new behaviour.
Any other target could try this by returning false in the new hook
prefersVectorizedAddressing().
Review: Renato Golin, Elena Demikhovsky, Ulrich Weigand
https://reviews.llvm.org/D32422
llvm-svn: 303744
When folding arguments of AddExpr or MulExpr with recurrences, we rely on the fact that
the loop of our base recurrency is the bottom-lost in terms of domination. This assumption
may be broken by an expression which is treated as invariant, and which depends on a complex
Phi for which SCEVUnknown was created. If such Phi is a loop Phi, and this loop is lower than
the chosen AddRecExpr's loop, it is invalid to fold our expression with the recurrence.
Another reason why it might be invalid to fold SCEVUnknown into Phi start value is that unlike
other SCEVs, SCEVUnknown are sometimes position-bound. For example, here:
for (...) { // loop
phi = {A,+,B}
}
X = load ...
Folding phi + X into {A+X,+,B}<loop> actually makes no sense, because X does not exist and cannot
exist while we are iterating in loop (this memory can be even not allocated and not filled by this moment).
It is only valid to make such folding if X is defined before the loop. In this case the recurrence {A+X,+,B}<loop>
may be existant.
This patch prohibits folding of SCEVUnknown (and those who use them) into the start value of an AddRecExpr,
if this instruction is dominated by the loop. Merging the dominating unknown values is still valid. Some tests that
relied on the fact that some SCEVUnknown should be folded into AddRec's are changed so that they no longer
expect such behavior.
llvm-svn: 303730
Otherwise we don't revisit an instruction that could be simplified,
and when we verify, we discover there's something that changed, i.e.
what we had wasn't a maximal fixpoint.
Fixes PR32836.
llvm-svn: 303715
Also, rename the tests and the file, add comments, and add more tests
because there are no existing tests for some of these folds.
These patterns are particularly important for crippled vector ISAs that
have limited compare predicates (PR33138).
llvm-svn: 303652
This patch builds over https://reviews.llvm.org/rL303349 and replaces
the use of the condition only if it is safe to do so.
We should not blindly RAUW the condition if experimental.guard or assume
is a use of that
condition. This is because LVI may have used the guard/assume to
identify the
value of the condition, and RUAWing will fold the guard/assume and uses
before the guards/assumes.
Reviewers: sanjoy, reames, trentxintong, mkazantsev
Reviewed by: sanjoy, reames
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33257
llvm-svn: 303633
The default behavior of -Rpass-analysis=loop-vectorizer is to report only the
first reason encountered for not vectorizing, if one is found, at which time the
vectorizer aborts its handling of the loop. This patch allows multiple reasons
for not vectorizing to be identified and reported, at the potential expense of
additional compile-time, under allowExtraAnalysis which can currently be turned
on by Clang's -fsave-optimization-record and opt's -pass-remarks-missed.
Removed from LoopVectorizationLegality::canVectorize() the redundant checking
and reporting if we CantComputeNumberOfIterations, as LAI::canAnalyzeLoop() also
does that. This redundancy is caught by a lit test once multiple reasons are
reported.
Patch initially developed by Dror Barak.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33396
llvm-svn: 303613
When presented with an icmp/select pair, we can end up asking what would happen
if we replaced one constant with another in an instruction. This is a mistake,
while non-constant Values could become a constant, constants cannot change and
trying to do so can lead to completely invalid IR (a GEP referencing a
non-existant field in the original case).
llvm-svn: 303580
Summary:
With instrumentation profiling, when updating the VP metadata after
an inline, VP metadata on the inlined copy was inadvertantly having
all counts zeroed out. This was causing indirect calls from code inlined
during the call step to be marked as cold in the ThinLTO summaries and
not imported.
The CallerBFI needs to be passed down so that the CallSiteCount can be
computed from the profile summary info. With Sample PGO this was working
since the count is extracted from the branch weight metadata on the
call being inlined (even before we stopped looking at metadata for
non-sample PGO in r302844 this largely wasn't working for instrumentation
PGO since only promoted indirect calls would be getting inlined and have
the metadata).
Added an instrumentation PGO test and renamed the sample PGO test.
Reviewers: danielcdh, eraman
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33389
llvm-svn: 303574
Taken from PR32845. Dan removed the most dominating leader check
in r303443, but we check this test anyway to make sure things
don't regress.
llvm-svn: 303515
Otherwise we end up miscompiling, transforming:
define i8 @tinky() {
%sext = sext i1 1 to i16
%hibit = lshr i16 %sext, 15
%tr = trunc i16 %hibit to i8
ret i8 %tr
}
into:
%sext = sext i1 1 to i8
ret i8 %sext
and the first get folded to ret i8 1, while the second gets folded
to ret i8 -1.
Eventually we should get rid of this transform entirely, but for now,
this at least fixes a know correctness bug.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33338
llvm-svn: 303513
As discussed in:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D33338
...we may be able to remove a wider pattern match by doing these more
basic canonicalizations.
llvm-svn: 303504
Summary: This allows pthread_self to be pulled out of a loop by LICM.
Reviewers: hfinkel, arsenm, davide
Reviewed By: davide
Subscribers: davide, wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32782
llvm-svn: 303495
In the case where we have an operand defined by a lod of the
same memory location. Historically this was a VariableExpression
because we wanted to make sure they ended up in the same class,
but if we create the right expression, they end up in the same
class anyway.
Fixes PR32897. Thanks to Dan for the detailed discussion and the
fix suggestion.
llvm-svn: 303475
Refactor the strlen optimization code to work for both strlen and wcslen.
This especially helps with programs in the wild where people pass
L"string"s to const std::wstring& function parameters and the wstring
constructor gets inlined.
This also fixes a lingerind API problem/bug in getConstantStringInfo()
where zeroinitializers would always give you an empty string (without a
length) back regardless of the actual length of the initializer which
did not work well in the TrimAtNul==false causing the PR mentioned
below.
Note that the fixed getConstantStringInfo() needed fixes to SelectionDAG
memcpy lowering and may lead to some cases for out-of-bounds
zeroinitializer accesses not getting optimized anymore. So some code
with UB may produce out of bound memory reads now instead of just
producing zeros.
The refactoring "accidentally" fixes http://llvm.org/PR32124
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32839
llvm-svn: 303461
This is a complicated bug involving two issues:
1. What do we do with phi nodes when we prove all arguments are not
live?
2. When is it safe to use value leaders to determine if we can ignore
an argumnet?
llvm-svn: 303453
Summary:
NewGVN: Handle equivalence between phi of ops and op of phis.
This makes our GVN mostly-complete. It would be complete, modulo some
deliberate choices we make. This means it detects roughly all herband
equivalences in polynomial time, including cases notoriously hard for
other GVN's to detect. It also detects a very large swath of the
cases we currently rely on instcombine to detect that involve folding
upwards through phis.
Fixes PR 31125, 31463, PR 31868
Reviewers: davide
Subscribers: Prazek, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32151
llvm-svn: 303444
We can have cycles between PHIs and this causes singleReachablePhi()
to call itself indefintely (until we run out of stack). The proper
solution would be that of computing SCCs, but it's not worth for
now, so just keep a visited set and give up when we find a cycle.
Thanks to Dan for the discussion/help with this.
Fixes PR33014.
llvm-svn: 303393
Currently m_Not only works the canonical xor X, -1 form that InstCombine produces. InstSimplify can't rely on this canonicalization.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33331
llvm-svn: 303379
The testcase in PR33077 generates a LSR Use Formula with two SCEVAddRecExprs for the same
loop. Such uncommon formula will become non-canonical after GenerateTruncates adds sign
extension to the ScaledReg of the Formula, and it will break the assertion that every
Formula to be inserted is canonical.
The fix is to call canonicalize for the raw Formula generated by GenerateTruncates
before inserting it.
llvm-svn: 303361
Summary:
We have a bug when RAUWing the condition if experimental.guard or assumes is a use of that
condition. This is because LazyValueInfo may have used the guards/assumes to identify the
value of the condition at the end of the block. RAUW replaces the uses
at the guard/assume as well as uses before the guard/assume. Both of
these are incorrect.
For now, disable RAUW for conditions and fix the logic as a next
step: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33257
Reviewers: sanjoy, reames, trentxintong
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33279
llvm-svn: 303349
The missing optimization for xor-of-icmps still needs to be added, but by
being more efficient (not generating unnecessary logic ops with constants)
we avoid the bug.
See discussion in post-commit comments:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D32143
llvm-svn: 303312
We already handled all of the new tests identically, but several
of those went through a lot of unnecessary processing before
getting folded.
Another motivation for grouping these cases together is that
InstCombine needs a similar fold. Currently, it handles the
'not' cases inefficiently which can lead to bugs as described
in the post-commit comments of:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D32143
llvm-svn: 303295
There should be a slight efficiency improvement from handling icmp/fcmp with one matcher and reducing duplicated code.
The larger motivation is that there are questions about how predicate canonicalization is handled, and the refactoring
should make it easier if we want to change any of that behavior.
1. As noted in the code comment, we've chosen 3 of the 16 FCMP preds as not canonical. Why those 3? It goes back to
rL32751 from what I can tell, but I'm not sure if there's a justification for that rule.
2. We currently do not canonicalize integer select conditions. Should we use the same rule that applies to branches
for selects?
3. We currently do canonicalize some FP select conditions, and those rules would conflict with the rule shown here.
Should one or both be changed?
No-functional-change-intended, but adding tests anyway because there's no coverage for most of the predicates.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33247
llvm-svn: 303261
If we need to spill the result of the PHI instruction, we insert the spill after
all of the PHIs and EHPads, however, in a catchswitch block there is no
room to insert the spill. Make room by splitting away catchswitch into a separate
block.
Before the fix:
catch.dispatch:
%val = phi i32 [ 1, %if.then ], [ 2, %if.else ]
%switch = catchswitch within none [label %catch] unwind label %cleanuppad
After:
catch.dispatch:
%val = phi i32 [ 1, %if.then ], [ 2, %if.else ]
%tok = cleanuppad within none []
; spill goes here
cleanupret from %tok unwind label %catch.dispatch.switch
catch.dispatch.switch:
%switch = catchswitch within none [label %catch] unwind label %cleanuppad
https://reviews.llvm.org/D31846
llvm-svn: 303232
We would eventually catch these via demanded bits and computing known bits in InstCombine,
but I think it's better to handle the simple cases as soon as possible as a matter of efficiency.
This fold allows further simplifications based on distributed ops transforms. eg:
%a = lshr i8 %x, 7
%b = or i8 %a, 2
%c = and i8 %b, 1
InstSimplify can directly fold this now:
%a = lshr i8 %x, 7
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33221
llvm-svn: 303213
Update threshold based on callee's hotness only when BFI is not available.
Otherwise use only callsite's hotness. This makes it easier to reason about
hotness related threshold updates.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33157
llvm-svn: 303210
The referenced tests are derived from:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32791
and:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D33172
The motivation for including negative tests may not be clear, so I'm adding an explanatory comment here.
In the post-commit thread for r303133:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20170515/453793.html
...it was mentioned that we don't want to add redundant tests. This is a valid point. But in this case,
we have a patch under review (D33172) that demonstrates that no existing regression tests are affected by
a proposed code change, but these are. Therefore, I think these tests have value not visible in any
existing regression tests regardless of whether they show a transform.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33242
llvm-svn: 303185
Summary:
RewritePHIs algorithm used in building of CoroFrame inserts a placeholder
```
%placeholder = phi [%val]
```
on every edge leading to a block starting with PHI node with multiple incoming edges,
so that if one of the incoming values was spilled and need to be reloaded, we have a
place to insert a reload. We use SplitEdge helper function to split the incoming edge.
SplitEdge function does not deal with unwind edges comping into a block with an EHPad.
This patch adds an ehAwareSplitEdge function that can correctly split the unwind edge.
For landing pads, we clone the landing pad into every edge block and replace the original
landing pad with a PHI collection the values from all incoming landing pads.
For WinEH pads, we keep the original EHPad in place and insert cleanuppad/cleapret in the
edge blocks.
Reviewers: majnemer, rnk
Reviewed By: majnemer
Subscribers: EricWF, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31845
llvm-svn: 303172
There's no need (& a bit incorrect) to mask off the high bits of the
register reference when describing a simple bool value.
Reviewers: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31062
llvm-svn: 303117
ARM Neon has native support for half-sized vector registers (64 bits). This
is beneficial for example for 2D and 3D graphics. This patch adds the option
to lower MinVecRegSize from 128 via a TTI in the SLP Vectorizer.
*** Performance Analysis
This change was motivated by some internal benchmarks but it is also
beneficial on SPEC and the LLVM testsuite.
The results are with -O3 and PGO. A negative percentage is an improvement.
The testsuite was run with a sample size of 4.
** SPEC
* CFP2006/482.sphinx3 -3.34%
A pretty hot loop is SLP vectorized resulting in nice instruction reduction.
This used to be a +22% regression before rL299482.
* CFP2000/177.mesa -3.34%
* CINT2000/256.bzip2 +6.97%
My current plan is to extend the fix in rL299482 to i16 which brings the
regression down to +2.5%. There are also other problems with the codegen in
this loop so there is further room for improvement.
** LLVM testsuite
* SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/ReedSolomon -10.75%
There are multiple small SLP vectorizations outside the hot code. It's a bit
surprising that it adds up to 10%. Some of this may be code-layout noise.
* MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/beamformer/beamformer -8.40%
The opt-viewer screenshot can be seen at F3218284. We start at a colder store
but the tree leads us into the hottest loop.
* MultiSource/Applications/lambda-0.1.3/lambda -2.68%
* MultiSource/Benchmarks/Bullet/bullet -2.18%
This is using 3D vectors.
* SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/Shootout-C++-lists +6.67%
Noise, binary is unchanged.
* MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/anagram/anagram +4.90%
There is an additional SLP in the cold code. The test runs for ~1sec and
prints out over 2000 lines. This is most likely noise.
* MultiSource/Applications/aha/aha +1.63%
* MultiSource/Applications/JM/lencod/lencod +1.41%
* SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/richards_benchmark +1.15%
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31965
llvm-svn: 303116
This caused PR33053.
Original commit message:
> The new experimental reduction intrinsics can now be used, so I'm enabling this
> for AArch64. We will need this for SVE anyway, so it makes sense to do this for
> NEON reductions as well.
>
> The existing code to match shufflevector patterns are replaced with a direct
> lowering of the reductions to AArch64-specific nodes. Tests updated with the
> new, simpler, representation.
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32247
llvm-svn: 303115
Summary:
The following loops should be recognized:
i = 0;
while (n) {
n = n >> 1;
i++;
body();
}
use(i);
And replaced with builtin_ctlz(n) if body() is empty or
for CPUs that have CTLZ instruction converted to countable:
for (j = 0; j < builtin_ctlz(n); j++) {
n = n >> 1;
i++;
body();
}
use(builtin_ctlz(n));
Reviewers: rengolin, joerg
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D32605
From: Evgeny Stupachenko <evstupac@gmail.com>
llvm-svn: 303102
verifyMemoryCongruency() filters out trivially dead MemoryDef(s),
as we find them immediately dead, before moving from TOP to a new
congruence class.
This fixes the same problem for PHI(s) skipping MemoryPhis if all
the operands are dead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33044
llvm-svn: 303100
Summary:
If the Worklist build causes an IR change this change flag currently factors into the flag for running another iteration of the iteration loop. But only changes during processing should trigger another loop.
This patch captures the worklist creation change flag into the outside the loop flag currently used for DbgDeclares and only sends that flag up to the caller. Rerunning the loop only depends on IC.run() now.
This uses the debug output of InstCombine to determine if one or two iterations run. I couldn't think of a better way to detect it since the second spurious iteration shoudn't make any visible changes. Just wasted computation.
I can do a pre-commit of the test case with the CHECK-NOT as a CHECK if this is an ok way to check this.
This is a subset of D31678 as I'm still not sure how to verify the analysis behavior for that.
Reviewers: davide, majnemer, spatel, chandlerc
Reviewed By: davide
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32453
llvm-svn: 302982
Tests with target intrinsics are inherently target specific, so it
doesn't actually make sense to run them if we've excluded their
target.
llvm-svn: 302979
I bet the change is correct but this test seems to expose some underlying
problem that manifest only on some buildbots, and I'm not able to reproduce
locally. Unfortunately I can't debug right now but I don't want to annoy
people with spurious failures, so I'll XFAIL until I can take a look (over
the weekend).
llvm-svn: 302976
Implemented frequency based cost/saving analysis
and related options.
The pass is now in a state ready to be turne on
in the pipeline (in follow up).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D32783
llvm-svn: 302967
This code was missing a check for stores, so we were thinking the
congruency class didn't have any memory members, and reset the
memory leader.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33056
llvm-svn: 302905
invariant PHI inputs and to rewrite PHI nodes during the actual
unswitching.
The checking is quite easy, but rewriting the PHI nodes is somewhat
surprisingly challenging. This should handle both branches and switches.
I think this is now a full featured trivial unswitcher, and more full
featured than the trivial cases in the old pass while still being (IMO)
somewhat simpler in how it works.
Next up is to verify its correctness in more widespread testing, and
then to add non-trivial unswitching.
Thanks to Davide and Sanjoy for the excellent review. There is one
remaining question that I may address in a follow-up patch (see the
review thread for details) but it isn't related to the functionality
specifically.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32699
llvm-svn: 302867
Summary:
Don't use the metadata on call instructions for determining hotness
unless we are in sample PGO mode, where it is needed because profile
counts are not accurate. In instrumentation mode this is not necessary
and does more harm than good when calls have VP metadata that hasn't
been properly scaled after transformations or dropped after constant
prop based devirtualization (both should be fixed, but we don't need
to do this in the first place for instrumentation PGO).
This required adjusting a number of tests to distinguish between sample
and instrumentation PGO handling, and to add in profile summary metadata
so that getProfileCount can get the summary.
Reviewers: davidxl, danielcdh
Subscribers: aemerson, rengolin, mehdi_amini, Prazek, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32877
llvm-svn: 302844
I ran the test-suite (including SPEC 2006) in PGO mode comparing cold
thresholds of 225 and 45. Here are some stats on the text size:
Out of 904 tests that ran, 197 see a change in text size. The average
text size reduction (of all the 904 binaries) is 1.07%. Of the 197
binaries, 19 see a text size increase, as high as 18%, but most of them
are small single source benchmarks. There are 3 multisource benchmarks
with a >0.5% size increase (0.7, 1.3 and 2.1 are their % increases). On
the other side of the spectrum, 31 benchmarks see >10% size reduction
and 6 of them are MultiSource.
I haven't run the test-suite with other values of inlinecold-threshold.
Since we have a cold callsite threshold of 45, I picked this value.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33106
llvm-svn: 302829
The approach I followed was to emit the remark after getTreeCost concludes
that SLP is profitable. I initially tried emitting them after the
vectorizeRootInstruction calls in vectorizeChainsInBlock but I vaguely
remember missing a few cases for example in HorizontalReduction::tryToReduce.
ORE is placed in BoUpSLP so that it's available from everywhere (notably
HorizontalReduction::tryToReduce).
We use the first instruction in the root bundle as the locator for the remark.
In order to get a sense how far the tree is spanning I've include the size of
the tree in the remark. This is not perfect of course but it gives you at
least a rough idea about the tree. Then you can follow up with -view-slp-tree
to really see the actual tree.
llvm-svn: 302811
// (X ^ C1) | C2 --> (X | C2) ^ (C1&~C2)
This canonicalization was added at:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL7264
By moving xors out/down, we can more easily combine constants. I'm adding
tests that do not change with this patch, so we can verify that those kinds
of transforms are still happening.
This is no-functional-change-intended because there's a later fold:
// (X^C)|Y -> (X|Y)^C iff Y&C == 0
...and demanded-bits appears to guarantee that any fold that would have
hit the fold we're removing here would be caught by that 2nd fold.
Similar reasoning was used in:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL299384
The larger motivation for removing this code is that it could interfere with
the fix for PR32706:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32706
Ie, we're not checking if the 'xor' is actually a 'not', so we could reverse
a 'not' optimization and cause an infinite loop by altering an 'xor X, -1'.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33050
llvm-svn: 302733
The new experimental reduction intrinsics can now be used, so I'm enabling this
for AArch64. We will need this for SVE anyway, so it makes sense to do this for
NEON reductions as well.
The existing code to match shufflevector patterns are replaced with a direct
lowering of the reductions to AArch64-specific nodes. Tests updated with the
new, simpler, representation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32247
llvm-svn: 302678
The first test in this file is duplicated exactly in and.ll -> test33.
We have commuted and vector variants there too.
The second test is a composite of 2 folds. The first fold is tested
independently in add.ll -> flip_and_mask (including vector variant).
After that transform fires, the IR is identical to the first transform.
llvm-svn: 302676
The script at utils/update_test_checks.py has (had?) a bug when variables
start with the same sequence of letters (clearly, not all of the time).
llvm-svn: 302674
This is another step towards favoring 'not' ops over random 'xor' in IR:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32706
This transformation may have occurred in longer IR sequences using computeKnownBits,
but that could be much more expensive to calculate.
As the scalar result shows, we do not currently favor 'not' in all cases. The 'not'
created by the transform is transformed again (unnecessarily). Vectors don't have
this problem because vectors are (wrongly) excluded from several other combines.
llvm-svn: 302659
This pass doesn't correctly handle testing for when it is legal to hoist
arbitrary instructions. The whitelist happens to make it safe, so before
it is removed the pass's legality checks will need to be enhanced.
Details have been added to the code review thread for the patch.
llvm-svn: 302640
Summary:
This fixes the immediate crash caused by introducing an incorrect inttoptr
before attempting the conversion. There may still be a legality
check missing somewhere earlier for non-integral pointers, but this change
seems necessary in any case.
Reviewers: sanjoy, dberlin
Reviewed By: dberlin
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32623
llvm-svn: 302587
The way we currently define congruency for two PHIExpression(s) is:
1) The operands to the phi functions are congruent
2) The PHIs are defined in the same BasicBlock.
NewGVN works under the assumption that phi operands are in predecessor
order, or at least in some consistent order. OTOH, is valid IR:
patatino:
%meh = phi i16 [ %0, %winky ], [ %conv1, %tinky ]
%banana = phi i16 [ %0, %tinky ], [ %conv1, %winky ]
br label %end
and the in-memory representations of the two SSA registers have an
inconsistent order. This violation of NewGVN assumptions results into
two PHIs found congruent when they're not. While we think it's useful
to have always a consistent order enforced, let's fix this in NewGVN
sorting uses in predecessor order before creating a PHI expression.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32990
llvm-svn: 302552
The comment says to avoid the case where zero bits are shifted into the truncated value,
but the code checks that the shift is smaller than the truncated value instead of the
number of bits added by the sign extension. Fixing this allows a shift by more than the
value size to be introduced, which is undefined behavior, so the shift is capped at the
value size minus one, which has the expected behavior of filling the value with the sign
bit.
Patch by Jacob Young!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32285
llvm-svn: 302548
Summary:
In first order recurrence vectorization, when the previous value is a phi node, we need to
set the insertion point to the first non-phi node.
We can have the previous value being a phi node, due to the generation of new
IVs as part of trunc optimization [1].
[1] https://reviews.llvm.org/rL294967
Reviewers: mssimpso, mkuper
Subscribers: mzolotukhin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32969
llvm-svn: 302532
Summary:
r284533 added hot and cold section prefixes based on profile
information, to enable grouping of hot/cold functions at link time.
However, it used "cold" as the prefix for cold sections, but gold only
recognizes "unlikely" (which is used by gcc for cold sections).
Therefore, cold sections were not properly being grouped. Switch to
using "unlikely"
Reviewers: danielcdh, davidxl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32983
llvm-svn: 302502
This is another step towards getting rid of dyn_castNotVal,
so we can recommit:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL300977
As the tests show, we were missing the lshr case for constants
and both ashr/lshr vector splat folds. The ashr case with constant
was being performed inefficiently in 2 steps. It's also possible
there was a latent bug in that case because we can't do that fold
if the constant is positive:
http://rise4fun.com/Alive/Bge
llvm-svn: 302465
Transforms/IndVarSimplify/2011-10-27-lftrnull will fail if this regresses.
Transforms/GVN/PRE/2011-06-01-NonLocalMemdepMiscompile.ll has been changed to still test what it was
trying to test.
llvm-svn: 302446
This patch uses KnownOnes of the input of ctlz/cttz to bound the value that can be returned from these intrinsics. This makes these intrinsics more similar to the handling for ctpop which already uses known bits to produce a similar bound.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32521
llvm-svn: 302444
Summary:
Re-applying r301766 with a fix to a typo and a regression test.
The log message for r301766 was:
==================================================================================
InstructionSimplify: Canonicalize shuffle operands. NFC-ish.
Summary:
Apply canonicalization rules:
1. Input vectors with no elements selected from can be replaced with undef.
2. If only one input vector is constant it shall be the second one.
This allows constant-folding to cover more ad-hoc simplifications that
were in place and avoid duplication for RHS and LHS checks.
There are more rules we may want to add in the future when we see a
justification. e.g. mask elements that select undef elements can be
replaced with undef.
==================================================================================
Reviewers: spatel, RKSimon
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32863
llvm-svn: 302373
We can simplify (or (icmp X, C1), (icmp X, C2)) to 'true' or one of the icmps in many cases.
I had to check some of these with Alive to prove to myself it's right, but everything seems
to check out. Eg, the deleted code in instcombine was completely ignoring predicates with
mismatched signedness.
This is a follow-up to:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL301260https://reviews.llvm.org/D32143
llvm-svn: 302370
Loop Idiom recognition was generating memset in a case that
would result generating a division operation to an unsafe location.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32674
llvm-svn: 302238
The sibling folds for 'and' with casts were added with https://reviews.llvm.org/rL273200.
This is a preliminary step for adding the 'or' variants for the folds added with https://reviews.llvm.org/rL301260.
The reason for the strange form with constant LHS in the 1st test is because there's another missing fold in that
case for the inverted predicate. That should be fixed when we add the ConstantRange functionality for 'or-of-icmps'
that already exists for 'and-of-icmps'.
I'm hoping to share more code for the and/or cases, so we won't have these differences. This will allow us to remove
code from InstCombine. It's also possible that we can remove some code here in InstSimplify. I think we have some
duplicated folds because patterns are not matched in a general way.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32876
llvm-svn: 302189
Change checkRippleForAdd from a heuristic to a full check -
if it is provable that the add does not overflow return true, otherwise false.
Patch by Yoav Ben-Shalom
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32686
llvm-svn: 302093
Fixes PR31789 - When loop-vectorize tries to use these intrinsics for a
non-default address space pointer we fail with a "Calling a function with a
bad singature!" assertion. This patch solves this by adding the 'vector of
pointers' argument as an overloaded type which will determine the address
space.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31490
llvm-svn: 302018
Summary:
Currently, loop deletion deletes loop where the only values
that are used outside the loop are loop-invariant.
This patch adds logic to delete loops where the loop is proven to be
never executed (i.e. the only predecessor of the loop preheader has a
constant conditional branch as terminator, and the preheader is not the
taken target). This will remove loops that become dead after
loop-unswitching generates constant conditional branches.
The next steps are:
1. moving the loop deletion implementation to LoopUtils.
2. Add logic in loop-simplifyCFG which will support changing conditional
constant branches to unconditional branches. If loops become unreachable in this
process, they can be removed using `deleteDeadLoop` function.
Reviewers: chandlerc, efriedma, sanjoy, reames
Reviewed by: sanjoy
Subscribers: mzolotukhin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32494
llvm-svn: 302015
We should always expect values to be named before running the module summary
analysis (see NameAnonGlobals pass), so it's fine if we crash in that case.
llvm-svn: 301991
This was originally checked in here:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL301923
And reverted here:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL301924
Because there's a clang test that would fail after this. I fixed/removed the
offending CHECK lines in:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL301928
So let's try this again. Original commit message:
This is the fold that causes the infinite loop in BoringSSL
(https://github.com/google/boringssl/blob/master/crypto/cipher/e_rc2.c)
when we fix instcombine demanded bits to prefer 'not' ops as in https://reviews.llvm.org/D32255.
There are 2 or 3 problems with dyn_castNotVal, and I don't think we can
reinstate https://reviews.llvm.org/D32255 until dyn_castNotVal is completely eliminated.
1. As shown here, it transforms 'not' into random xor. This transform is harmful to SCEV and codegen because 'not' can often be folded while random xor cannot.
2. It does not transform vector constants. This is actually a good thing, but if you don't believe the above argument, then we shouldn't have excluded vectors.
3. It tries to avoid transforming not(not(X)). That's nice, but it doesn't match the greedy nature of instcombine. If we DeMorganize a pattern that has an extra 'not' in it: ~(~(~X) & Y) --> (~X | ~Y)
That's just another case of DeMorgan, so we should trust that we'll fold that pattern too: (~X | ~ Y) --> ~(X & Y)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32665
llvm-svn: 301929
This is the fold that causes the infinite loop in BoringSSL
(https://github.com/google/boringssl/blob/master/crypto/cipher/e_rc2.c)
when we fix instcombine demanded bits to prefer 'not' ops as in D32255.
There are 2 or 3 problems with dyn_castNotVal, and I don't think we can
reinstate D32255 until dyn_castNotVal is completely eliminated.
1. As shown here, it transforms 'not' into random xor. This transform is
harmful to SCEV and codegen because 'not' can often be folded while
random xor cannot.
2. It does not transform vector constants. This is actually a good thing,
but if you don't believe the above argument, then we shouldn't have
excluded vectors.
3. It tries to avoid transforming not(not(X)). That's nice, but it doesn't
match the greedy nature of instcombine. If we DeMorganize a pattern
that has an extra 'not' in it:
~(~(~X) & Y) --> (~X | ~Y)
That's just another case of DeMorgan, so we should trust that we'll fold
that pattern too:
(~X | ~ Y) --> ~(X & Y)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32665
llvm-svn: 301923
This change caused buildbot failures, apparently because we're not
passing around types that InstSimplify is used to seeing. I'm not overly
familiar with InstSimplify, so I'm reverting this until I can figure out
what exactly is wrong.
llvm-svn: 301885
In particular (since it wouldn't fit nicely in the summary):
(select (icmp eq V 0) P (getelementptr P V)) -> (getelementptr P V)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31435
llvm-svn: 301880
In the testcase attached, we believe %tmp1 implies %tmp4.
where:
br i1 %tmp1, label %bb2, label %bb7
br i1 %tmp4, label %bb5, label %bb7
because Wwhile looking at PredicateInfo stuffs we end up calling
isImpliedTrueByMatchingCmp() with the arguments backwards.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32718
llvm-svn: 301849
If we have ~(~X & Y), it only makes sense to transform it to (X | ~Y) when we do not need
the intermediate (~X & Y) value. In that case, we would need an extra instruction to
generate ~Y + 'or' (as shown in the test changes).
It's ok if we have multiple uses of ~X or Y, however. In those cases, we may not reduce the
instruction count or critical path, but we might improve throughput because we can generate
~X and ~Y in parallel. Whether that actually makes perf sense or not for a target is something
we can't answer in IR.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32703
llvm-svn: 301848
We may not be able to rewrite indirect branch target, but we also want to take it into
account when folding, i.e. if it and all its successor's predecessors go to the same
destination, we can fold, i.e. no need to thread.
llvm-svn: 301816
Summary: [JumpThread] Do RAUW in case Cond folds to a constant in the CFG
Reviewers: sanjoy
Reviewed By: sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32407
llvm-svn: 301804
retainAutoreleasedReturnValue that retains the returned value.
This commit fixes a bug in ARC optimizer where it moves a release
between a call and a retainAutoreleasedReturnValue, causing the returned
object to be released before the retainAutoreleasedReturnValue can
retain it.
This commit accomplishes that by doing a lookahead and checking whether
the call prevents the release from moving upwards. In the long term, we
should treat the region between the retainAutoreleasedReturnValue and
the call as a critical section and disallow moving anything there
(possibly using operand bundles).
rdar://problem/20449878
llvm-svn: 301724
Eliminates some more cases where some subset of the addressing
computation remains flat. Some cases with addrspacecasts
in nested constant expressions are still left behind however.
llvm-svn: 301704
Summary:
The motivation example is like below which has 13 cases but only 2 distinct targets
```
lor.lhs.false2: ; preds = %if.then
switch i32 %Status, label %if.then27 [
i32 -7012, label %if.end35
i32 -10008, label %if.end35
i32 -10016, label %if.end35
i32 15000, label %if.end35
i32 14013, label %if.end35
i32 10114, label %if.end35
i32 10107, label %if.end35
i32 10105, label %if.end35
i32 10013, label %if.end35
i32 10011, label %if.end35
i32 7008, label %if.end35
i32 7007, label %if.end35
i32 5002, label %if.end35
]
```
which is compiled into a balanced binary tree like this on AArch64 (similar on X86)
```
.LBB853_9: // %lor.lhs.false2
mov w8, #10012
cmp w19, w8
b.gt .LBB853_14
// BB#10: // %lor.lhs.false2
mov w8, #5001
cmp w19, w8
b.gt .LBB853_18
// BB#11: // %lor.lhs.false2
mov w8, #-10016
cmp w19, w8
b.eq .LBB853_23
// BB#12: // %lor.lhs.false2
mov w8, #-10008
cmp w19, w8
b.eq .LBB853_23
// BB#13: // %lor.lhs.false2
mov w8, #-7012
cmp w19, w8
b.eq .LBB853_23
b .LBB853_3
.LBB853_14: // %lor.lhs.false2
mov w8, #14012
cmp w19, w8
b.gt .LBB853_21
// BB#15: // %lor.lhs.false2
mov w8, #-10105
add w8, w19, w8
cmp w8, #9 // =9
b.hi .LBB853_17
// BB#16: // %lor.lhs.false2
orr w9, wzr, #0x1
lsl w8, w9, w8
mov w9, #517
and w8, w8, w9
cbnz w8, .LBB853_23
.LBB853_17: // %lor.lhs.false2
mov w8, #10013
cmp w19, w8
b.eq .LBB853_23
b .LBB853_3
.LBB853_18: // %lor.lhs.false2
mov w8, #-7007
add w8, w19, w8
cmp w8, #2 // =2
b.lo .LBB853_23
// BB#19: // %lor.lhs.false2
mov w8, #5002
cmp w19, w8
b.eq .LBB853_23
// BB#20: // %lor.lhs.false2
mov w8, #10011
cmp w19, w8
b.eq .LBB853_23
b .LBB853_3
.LBB853_21: // %lor.lhs.false2
mov w8, #14013
cmp w19, w8
b.eq .LBB853_23
// BB#22: // %lor.lhs.false2
mov w8, #15000
cmp w19, w8
b.ne .LBB853_3
```
However, the inline cost model estimates the cost to be linear with the number
of distinct targets and the cost of the above switch is just 2 InstrCosts.
The function containing this switch is then inlined about 900 times.
This change use the general way of switch lowering for the inline heuristic. It
etimate the number of case clusters with the suitability check for a jump table
or bit test. Considering the binary search tree built for the clusters, this
change modifies the model to be linear with the size of the balanced binary
tree. The model is off by default for now :
-inline-generic-switch-cost=false
This change was originally proposed by Haicheng in D29870.
Reviewers: hans, bmakam, chandlerc, eraman, haicheng, mcrosier
Reviewed By: hans
Subscribers: joerg, aemerson, llvm-commits, rengolin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31085
llvm-svn: 301649
Summary:
Skip memops if the total value profiled count is 0, we can't correctly
scale up the counts and there is no point anyway.
Reviewers: davidxl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32624
llvm-svn: 301645
EarlyCSE should not just ignore assumes. It should use the fact that its condition is true for all dominated instructions.
Reviewers: sanjoy, reames, apilipenko, anna, skatkov
Reviewed By: reames, sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32482
llvm-svn: 301625
If a condition is calculated only once, and there are multiple guards on this condition, we should be able
to remove all guards dominated by the first of them. This patch allows EarlyCSE to try to find the condition
of a guard among the known values, and if it is true, remove the guard. Otherwise we keep the guard and
mark its condition as 'true' for future consideration.
Reviewers: sanjoy, reames, apilipenko, skatkov, anna, dberlin
Reviewed By: reames, sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32476
llvm-svn: 301623
Currently, this pass only focuses on *trivial* loop unswitching. At that
reduced problem it remains significantly better than the current loop
unswitch:
- Old pass is worse than cubic complexity. New pass is (I think) linear.
- New pass is much simpler in its design by focusing on full unswitching. (See
below for details on this).
- New pass doesn't carry state for thresholds between pass iterations.
- New pass doesn't carry state for correctness (both miscompile and
infloop) between pass iterations.
- New pass produces substantially better code after unswitching.
- New pass can handle more trivial unswitch cases.
- New pass doesn't recompute the dominator tree for the entire function
and instead incrementally updates it.
I've ported all of the trivial unswitching test cases from the old pass
to the new one to make sure that major functionality isn't lost in the
process. For several of the test cases I've worked to improve the
precision and rigor of the CHECKs, but for many I've just updated them
to handle the new IR produced.
My initial motivation was the fact that the old pass carried state in
very unreliable ways between pass iterations, and these mechansims were
incompatible with the new pass manager. However, I discovered many more
improvements to make along the way.
This pass makes two very significant assumptions that enable most of these
improvements:
1) Focus on *full* unswitching -- that is, completely removing whatever
control flow construct is being unswitched from the loop. In the case
of trivial unswitching, this means removing the trivial (exiting)
edge. In non-trivial unswitching, this means removing the branch or
switch itself. This is in opposition to *partial* unswitching where
some part of the unswitched control flow remains in the loop. Partial
unswitching only really applies to switches and to folded branches.
These are very similar to full unrolling and partial unrolling. The
full form is an effective canonicalization, the partial form needs
a complex cost model, cannot be iterated, isn't canonicalizing, and
should be a separate pass that runs very late (much like unrolling).
2) Leverage LLVM's Loop machinery to the fullest. The original unswitch
dates from a time when a great deal of LLVM's loop infrastructure was
missing, ineffective, and/or unreliable. As a consequence, a lot of
complexity was added which we no longer need.
With these two overarching principles, I think we can build a fast and
effective unswitcher that fits in well in the new PM and in the
canonicalization pipeline. Some of the remaining functionality around
partial unswitching may not be relevant today (not many test cases or
benchmarks I can find) but if they are I'd like to add support for them
as a separate layer that runs very late in the pipeline.
Purely to make reviewing and introducing this code more manageable, I've
split this into first a trivial-unswitch-only pass and in the next patch
I'll add support for full non-trivial unswitching against a *fixed*
threshold, exactly like full unrolling. I even plan to re-use the
unrolling thresholds, as these are incredibly similar cost tradeoffs:
we're cloning a loop body in order to end up with simplified control
flow. We should only do that when the total growth is reasonably small.
One of the biggest changes with this pass compared to the previous one
is that previously, each individual trivial exiting edge from a switch
was unswitched separately as a branch. Now, we unswitch the entire
switch at once, with cases going to the various destinations. This lets
us unswitch multiple exiting edges in a single operation and also avoids
numerous extremely bad behaviors, where we would introduce 1000s of
branches to test for thousands of possible values, all of which would
take the exact same exit path bypassing the loop. Now we will use
a switch with 1000s of cases that can be efficiently lowered into
a jumptable. This avoids relying on somehow forming a switch out of the
branches or getting horrible code if that fails for any reason.
Another significant change is that this pass actively updates the CFG
based on unswitching. For trivial unswitching, this is actually very
easy because of the definition of loop simplified form. Doing this makes
the code coming out of loop unswitch dramatically more friendly. We
still should run loop-simplifycfg (at the least) after this to clean up,
but it will have to do a lot less work.
Finally, this pass makes much fewer attempts to simplify instructions
based on the unswitch. Something like loop-instsimplify, instcombine, or
GVN can be used to do increasingly powerful simplifications based on the
now dominating predicate. The old simplifications are things that
something like loop-instsimplify should get today or a very, very basic
loop-instcombine could get. Keeping that logic separate is a big
simplifying technique.
Most of the code in this pass that isn't in the old one has to do with
achieving specific goals:
- Updating the dominator tree as we go
- Unswitching all cases in a switch in a single step.
I think it is still shorter than just the trivial unswitching code in
the old pass despite having this functionality.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32409
llvm-svn: 301576
Just calling dropAllReferences leaves pointers to the ConstantExpr
behind, so we would eventually crash with a null pointer dereference.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32551
llvm-svn: 301575
also a discussion about exactly what we should do prior to re-enabling
it.
The current bug is http://llvm.org/PR32821 and the discussion about this
is in the review thread for r300200.
llvm-svn: 301505
This patch is part of D28975's breakdown.
induction.ll encodes the specific (and rather arbitrary) numbers given to
predicated basic blocks by the unique naming mechanism, which makes it
sensitive to changes in LV's instruction generation order. This patch replaces
those specific numbers with a numeric pattern.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32404
llvm-svn: 301345
The code Sanjay Patel moved over from InstCombine doesn't work properly if the 'and' has both inputs as nots because we used a commuted op matcher on the 'and' first. But this will bind to the first 'not' on 'and' when there could be two 'not's. InstCombine could rely on DeMorgan to ensure the 'and' wouldn't have two 'not's eventually, but InstSimplify can't rely on that.
This patch matches the xor first then checks for the ands and allows a not of either operand of the xor.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32458
llvm-svn: 301329
The matching here wasn't able to handle all the possible commutes. It always assumed the not would be on the left of the xor, but that's not guaranteed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32474
llvm-svn: 301316
One of the fast-math optimizations is to replace calls to standard double
functions with their float equivalents, e.g. exp -> expf. However, this can
cause infinite loops for the following:
float expf(float val) { return (float) exp((double) val); }
A similar inline declaration exists in the MinGW-w64 math.h header file which
when compiled with -O2/3 and fast-math generates infinite loops.
So this fix checks that the calling function to the standard double function
that is being replaced does not match the float equivalent.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31806
llvm-svn: 301304
We need to do this to prevent a miscompile which sinks an objc_retain
past an objc_release that releases the object objc_retain retains. This
happens because the top-down and bottom-up traversals each determines
the insert point for retain or release individually without knowing
where the other instruction is moved.
For example, when the following IR is fed to the ARC optimizer, the
top-down traversal decides to insert objc_retain right before
objc_release and the bottom-up traversal decides to insert objc_release
right after clang.arc.use.
(IR before ARC optimizer)
%11 = call i8* @objc_retain(i8* %10)
call void (...) @clang.arc.use(%0* %5)
call void @llvm.dbg.value(...)
call void @objc_release(i8* %6)
This reverses the order of objc_release and objc_retain, which causes
the object to be destructed prematurely.
(IR after ARC optimizer)
call void (...) @clang.arc.use(%0* %5)
call void @objc_release(i8* %6)
call void @llvm.dbg.value(...)
%11 = call i8* @objc_retain(i8* %10)
rdar://problem/30530580
llvm-svn: 301289
We can simplify (and (icmp X, C1), (icmp X, C2)) to one of the icmps in many cases.
I had to check some of these with Alive to prove to myself it's right, but everything
seems to check out. Eg, the code in instcombine was completely ignoring predicates with
mismatched signedness.
Handling or-of-icmps would be a follow-up step.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32143
llvm-svn: 301260
Summary:
Ensure that the new merge BB (which contains the rest of the original BB
after the mem op being optimized) gets a profile frequency, in case
there are additional mem ops later in the BB. Otherwise they get skipped
as the merge BB looks cold.
Reviewers: davidxl, xur
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32447
llvm-svn: 301244
This reverts commit r300732. This breaks a few tests.
I think the problem is related to adding more uses of
the condition that don't yet exist at this point.
llvm-svn: 301242
The current Loop Unroll implementation works with loops having a
single latch that contains a conditional branch to a block outside
the loop (the other successor is, by defition of latch, the header).
If this precondition doesn't hold, avoid unrolling the loop as
the code is not ready to handle such circumstances.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32261
llvm-svn: 301239
Summary:
llvm.invariant.group.barrier returns pointer that mustalias
pointer it takes. It can't be marked with `returned` attribute,
because it would be remove easily. The other reason is that
only Alias Analysis can know about this, because if any other
pass would know it, then the result would be replaced with it's
argument, which would be invalid.
We can think about returned pointer as something that mustalias, but
it doesn't have to be bitwise the same as the argument.
Reviewers: dberlin, chandlerc, hfinkel, sanjoy
Subscribers: reames, nlewycky, rsmith, anna, amharc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31585
llvm-svn: 301227
This is a straight cut and paste, but there's a bigger problem: if this
fold exists for simplifyOr, there should be a DeMorganized version for
simplifyAnd. But more than that, we have a patchwork of ad hoc logic
optimizations in InstCombine. There should be some structure to ensure
that we're not missing sibling folds across and/or/xor.
llvm-svn: 301213
When the location description of a source variable involves arithmetic
on the value itself, it needs to be marked with DW_OP_stack_value since it
is not describing the variable's location, but rather its value.
This is a follow-up to r297971 and fixes the source testcase quoted in
the comment in debuginfo-dce.ll.
rdar://problem/30725338
This reapplies r301093 without modifications.
llvm-svn: 301210
There is logic to track the expected number of instructions
produced. It thought in this case an instruction would
be necessary to negate the result, but here it folded
into a ConstantExpr fneg when the non-undef value operand
was cancelled out by the second fsub.
I'm not sure why we don't fold constant FP ops with undef currently,
but I think that would also avoid this problem.
llvm-svn: 301199
Summary:
Instead of keeping a variable indicating whether there are early exits
in the loop. We keep all the early exits. This improves LICM's ability to
move instructions out of the loop based on is-guaranteed-to-execute.
I am going to update compilation time as well soon.
Reviewers: hfinkel, sanjoy, efriedma, mkuper
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mzolotukhin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32433
llvm-svn: 301196
Summary:
The return value of these intrinsics should always have 0 bits for
inactive threads. This means that when all arguments are constant
and the comparison evaluates to true, the intrinsic should return
the current exec mask.
Fixes some GL_ARB_shader_ballot tests.
Reviewers: arsenm
Subscribers: kzhuravl, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, llvm-commits, t-tye
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32344
llvm-svn: 301195
We handled all of the commuted variants for plain xor already,
although they were scattered around and sometimes folded less
efficiently using distributive laws. We had no folds for not-xor.
Handling all of these patterns consistently is part of trying to
reinstate:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL300977
llvm-svn: 301144
Summary:
In case all predecessor go to a single successor of current BB. We want to fold (not thread).
I failed to update the phi nodes properly in the last patch https://reviews.llvm.org/rL300657.
Phi nodes values are per predecessor in LLVM.
Reviewers: sanjoy
Reviewed By: sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32400
llvm-svn: 301139
There's probably some better way to write this that eliminates the
code duplication without hurting readability, but at least this
eliminates the logic holes and is hopefully slightly more efficient
than creating new instructions.
llvm-svn: 301129
When the location description of a source variable involves arithmetic
on the value itself, it needs to be marked with DW_OP_stack_value since it
is not describing the variable's location, but rather its value.
This is a follow-up to r297971 and fixes the source testcase quoted in
the comment in debuginfo-dce.ll.
rdar://problem/30725338
llvm-svn: 301093
The bug was introduced by r301018 "[InstCombine] fadd double (sitofp x), y check that the promotion is valid". The patch didn't expect that fadd can be on vectors not necessarily scalars. Add vector support along with the test.
llvm-svn: 301070
Evgeniy Stepanov