This patch removes the explicit call graph for CUDA/HIP/OpenMP deferred
diagnostics generated during parsing since it is error prone due to
incomplete information about function declarations during parsing. In stead,
this patch does a post-parsing AST traverse and emits deferred diagnostics
based on the use graph implicitly generated during the traverse.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70172
Add fixits for messaging self in MRR or using super, as the intent is
clear, and it turns out people do that a lot more than expected.
Allow for objc_direct_members on main interfaces, it's extremely useful
for internal only classes, and proves to be quite annoying for adoption.
Add some better warnings around properties direct/non-direct clashes (it
was done for methods but properties were a miss).
Add some errors when direct properties are marked @dynamic.
Radar-Id: rdar://problem/58355212
Signed-off-by: Pierre Habouzit <phabouzit@apple.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73755
Converting a pointer to an integer whose result cannot represented in the
integer type is undefined behavior is C and prohibited in C++. C++ already
has a diagnostic when casting. This adds a diagnostic for C.
Since this diagnostic uses the range of the conversion it also modifies
int-to-pointer-cast diagnostic to use a range.
Fixes PR8718: No warning on casting between pointer and non-pointer-sized int
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72231
This swaps out the OpenMPDefaultClauseKind enum with a
llvm::omp::DefaultKind enum which is stored in OMPConstants.h.
This should not change any functionality.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74513
This patch implements an almost complete handling of OpenMP
contexts/traits such that we can reuse most of the logic in Flang
through the OMPContext.{h,cpp} in llvm/Frontend/OpenMP.
All but construct SIMD specifiers, e.g., inbranch, and the device ISA
selector are define in `llvm/lib/Frontend/OpenMP/OMPKinds.def`. From
these definitions we generate the enum classes `TraitSet`,
`TraitSelector`, and `TraitProperty` as well as conversion and helper
functions in `llvm/lib/Frontend/OpenMP/OMPContext.{h,cpp}`.
The above enum classes are used in the parser, sema, and the AST
attribute. The latter is not a collection of multiple primitive variant
arguments that contain encodings via numbers and strings but instead a
tree that mirrors the `match` clause (see `struct OpenMPTraitInfo`).
The changes to the parser make it more forgiving when wrong syntax is
read and they also resulted in more specialized diagnostics. The tests
are updated and the core issues are detected as before. Here and
elsewhere this patch tries to be generic, thus we do not distinguish
what selector set, selector, or property is parsed except if they do
behave exceptionally, as for example `user={condition(EXPR)}` does.
The sema logic changed in two ways: First, the OMPDeclareVariantAttr
representation changed, as mentioned above, and the sema was adjusted to
work with the new `OpenMPTraitInfo`. Second, the matching and scoring
logic moved into `OMPContext.{h,cpp}`. It is implemented on a flat
representation of the `match` clause that is not tied to clang.
`OpenMPTraitInfo` provides a method to generate this flat structure (see
`struct VariantMatchInfo`) by computing integer score values and boolean
user conditions from the `clang::Expr` we keep for them.
The OpenMP context is now an explicit object (see `struct OMPContext`).
This is in anticipation of construct traits that need to be tracked. The
OpenMP context, as well as the `VariantMatchInfo`, are basically made up
of a set of active or respectively required traits, e.g., 'host', and an
ordered container of constructs which allows duplication. Matching and
scoring is kept as generic as possible to allow easy extension in the
future.
---
Test changes:
The messages checked in `OpenMP/declare_variant_messages.{c,cpp}` have
been auto generated to match the new warnings and notes of the parser.
The "subset" checks were reversed causing the wrong version to be
picked. The tests have been adjusted to correct this.
We do not print scores if the user did not provide one.
We print spaces to make lists in the `match` clause more legible.
Reviewers: kiranchandramohan, ABataev, RaviNarayanaswamy, gtbercea, grokos, sdmitriev, JonChesterfield, hfinkel, fghanim
Subscribers: merge_guards_bot, rampitec, mgorny, hiraditya, aheejin, fedor.sergeev, simoncook, bollu, guansong, dexonsmith, jfb, s.egerton, llvm-commits, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71830
Summary:
Zero-parameter K&R definitions specify that the function has no
parameters, but they are still not prototypes, so calling the function
with the wrong number of parameters is just a warning, not an error.
The C11 standard doesn't seem to directly define what a prototype is,
but it can be inferred from 6.9.1p7: "If the declarator includes a
parameter type list, the list also specifies the types of all the
parameters; such a declarator also serves as a function prototype
for later calls to the same function in the same translation unit."
This refers to 6.7.6.3p5: "If, in the declaration “T D1”, D1 has
the form
D(parameter-type-list)
or
D(identifier-list_opt)
[...]". Later in 6.11.7 it also refers only to the parameter-type-list
variant as prototype: "The use of function definitions with separate
parameter identifier and declaration lists (not prototype-format
parameter type and identifier declarators) is an obsolescent feature."
We already correctly treat an empty parameter list as non-prototype
declaration, so we can just take that information.
GCC also warns about this with -Wstrict-prototypes.
This shouldn't affect C++, because there all FunctionType's are
FunctionProtoTypes. I added a simple test for that.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66919
According to OpenMP 5.0, cancel and cancellation point constructs are
supported in taskloop directive. Added support for cancellation in
taskloop, master taskloop and parallel master taskloop.
We previously checked the constraints of instantiated function templates even in cases where
PartialOverloading was true and not all template arguments have been deduced, which caused crashes
in clangd (bug 44714).
We now check if all arguments have been deduced before checking constraints in partial overloading
scenarios.
directive.
According to OpenMP 5.0, The atomic_default_mem_order clause specifies the default memory ordering behavior for atomic constructs that must be provided by an implementation. If the default memory ordering is specified as seq_cst, all atomic constructs on which memory-order-clause is not specified behave as if the seq_cst clause appears. If the default memory ordering is specified as relaxed, all atomic constructs on which memory-order-clause is not specified behave as if the relaxed clause appears.
If the default memory ordering is specified as acq_rel, atomic constructs on which memory-order-clause is not specified behave as if the release clause appears if the atomic write or atomic update operation is specified, as if the acquire clause appears if the atomic read operation is specified, and as if the acq_rel clause appears if the atomic captured update operation is specified.
Added restrictions for atomic directive.
1. If atomic-clause is read then memory-order-clause must not be acq_rel or release.
2. If atomic-clause is write then memory-order-clause must not be
acq_rel or acquire.
3. If atomic-clause is update or not present then memory-order-clause
must not be acq_rel or acquire.
The C++ rules briefly allowed this, but the rule changed nearly 10 years
ago and we never updated our implementation to match. However, we've
warned on this by default for a long time, and no other compiler accepts
(even as an extension).
New intrinisics are implemented for when we need to port SIMD code from other
arhitectures and only load or store portions of MSA registers.
Following intriniscs are added which only load/store element 0 of a vector:
v4i32 __builtin_msa_ldrq_w (const void *, imm_n2048_2044);
v2i64 __builtin_msa_ldr_d (const void *, imm_n4096_4088);
void __builtin_msa_strq_w (v4i32, void *, imm_n2048_2044);
void __builtin_msa_str_d (v2i64, void *, imm_n4096_4088);
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73644
1) Fix a regression in llvmorg-11-init-2485-g0e3a4877840 that would
reject some cases where a class name is shadowed by a typedef-name
causing a destructor declaration to be rejected. Prefer a tag type over
a typedef in destructor name lookup.
2) Convert the "type in destructor declaration is a typedef" error to an
error-by-default ExtWarn to allow codebases to turn it off. GCC and MSVC
do not enforce this rule.
Also add extension warnings for the cases that are disallowed by the
current rules for destructor name lookup, refactor and simplify the
lookup code, and improve the diagnostic quality when lookup fails.
The special case we previously supported for converting
p->N::S<int>::~S() from naming a class template into naming a
specialization thereof is subsumed by a more general rule here (which is
also consistent with Clang's historical behavior and that of other
compilers): if we can't find a suitable S in N, also look in N::S<int>.
The extension warnings are off by default, except for a warning when
lookup for p->N::S::~T() looks for T in scope instead of in N (or N::S).
That seems sufficiently heinous to warn on by default, especially since
we can't support it for a dependent nested-name-specifier.
Summary:
Due to a recent (but retroactive) C++ rule change, only sufficiently
C-compatible classes are permitted to be given a typedef name for
linkage purposes. Add an enabled-by-default warning for these cases, and
rephrase our existing error for the case where we encounter the typedef
name for linkage after we've already computed and used a wrong linkage
in terms of the new rule.
Reviewers: rjmccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74103
Address space conversion changes pointer representation.
This commit disallows such conversions when they are not
legal i.e. for the nested pointers even with compatible
address spaces. Because the address space conversion in
the nested levels can't be generated to modify the pointers
correctly. The behavior implemented is as follows:
- Any implicit conversions of nested pointers with different
address spaces is rejected.
- Any conversion of address spaces in nested pointers in safe
casts (e.g. const_cast or static_cast) is rejected.
- Conversion in low level C-style or reinterpret_cast is accepted
but with a warning (this aligns with OpenCL C behavior).
Fixes PR39674
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73360
constant initialization.
Removing this zeroing regressed our code generation in a few cases, also
fixed here. We now compute whether a variable has constant destruction
even if it doesn't have a constant initializer, by trying to destroy a
default-initialized value, and skip emitting a trivial default
constructor for a variable even if it has non-trivial (but perhaps
constant) destruction.
We would incorrectly check whether the type-constraint had already been initialized, causing us
to ignore the invented template type constraints entirely.
Also, TemplateParameterList would store incorrect information about invented type parameters
when it observed them before their type-constraint was initialized, so we recreate it after
initializing the function type of an abbreviated template.
Apply the fix of f780e15caf ("[OpenCL] Fix support for
cl_khr_mipmap_image_writes", 2020-01-27) also to the TableGen OpenCL
builtin function definitions.
We did not have a CXXThisScope around constraint checking of functions and
function template specializations, causing a crash when checking a constraint
that had a 'this' (bug 44689).
Recommit after fixing test.
We did not have a CXXThisScope around constraint checking of functions and
function template specializations, causing a crash when checking a constraint
that had a 'this' (bug 44689)
Summary:
Changes:
- Calls to consteval function are now evaluated in constant context but IR is still generated for them.
- Add diagnostic for taking address of a consteval function in non-constexpr context.
- Add diagnostic for address of consteval function accessible at runtime.
- Add tests
Reviewers: rsmith, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: mgrang, riccibruno, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63960
Align `Type` names to their actual OpenCL C type names, such that we
can print OpenCL C types from TableGen. This is particularly helpful
for completeness comparisons with `opencl-c.h`.
Drop the "Name" field from `TypeList`, as it is unused.
Minor formatting changes.
We previously instantiated type-constraints of template type parameters along with the type parameter itself,
this caused problems when the type-constraints created by abbreviated templates refreneced other parameters
in the abbreviated templates.
When encountering a template type parameter with a type constraint, if it is implicit, delay instantiation of
the type-constraint until the function parameter which created the invented template type parameter is
instantiated.
Reland after fixing bug caused by another flow reaching SubstParmVarDecl and instantiating the TypeConstraint
a second time.
We previously instantiated type-constraints of template type parameters along with the type parameter itself,
this caused problems when the type-constraints created by abbreviated templates refreneced other parameters
in the abbreviated templates.
When encountering a template type parameter with a type constraint, if it is implicit, delay instantiation of
the type-constraint until the function parameter which created the invented template type parameter is
instantiated.
Summary: Just like templates, they are excepted from the ODR rule.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68923
types are needed to compute the return type of a defaulted operator<=>.
This raises the question of what to do if return type deduction fails.
The standard doesn't say, and implementations vary, so for now reject
that case eagerly to keep our options open.
We previously would not correctly for the initial parameter mapping for variadic template parameters in Concepts.
Testing this lead to the discovery that with the normalization process we would need to substitute into already-substituted-into
template arguments, which means we need to add NonTypeTemplateParmExpr support to TemplateInstantiator.
We do that by substituting into the replacement and the type separately, and then re-checking the expression against the NTTP
with the new type, in order to form any new required implicit casts (for cases where the type of the NTTP was dependent).
Add fixits for messaging self in MRR or using super, as the intent is
clear, and it turns out people do that a lot more than expected.
Allow for objc_direct_members on main interfaces, it's extremely useful
for internal only classes, and proves to be quite annoying for adoption.
Add some better warnings around properties direct/non-direct clashes (it
was done for methods but properties were a miss).
Radar-Id: rdar://problem/58355212
Signed-off-by: Pierre Habouzit <phabouzit@apple.com>
A constrained function with an auto return type would have it's definition
instantiated in order to deduce the auto return type before the constraints
are checked.
Move the constraints check after the return type deduction.
when building a defaulted comparison.
As a convenient way of asking whether `x @ y` is valid and building it,
we previouly always performed overload resolution and built an
overloaded expression, which would both end up picking a builtin
operator candidate when given a non-overloadable type. But that's not
quite right, because it can result in our finding a user-declared
operator overload, which we should never do when applying operators
non-overloadable types.
Handle this more correctly: skip overload resolution when building
`x @ y` if the operands are not overloadable. But still perform overload
resolution (considering only builtin candidates) when checking validity,
as we don't have any other good way to ask whether a binary operator
expression would be valid.
In passing, split it up into three values (no explicit functions /
explicit conversion functions only / any explicit functions) in
preparation for using that in a future change.
Yaxun (Sam) Liu