Commit Graph

15 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Jinsong Ji 01edae1271 [AsmPrinter] Print FP constant in hexadecimal form instead
Printing floating point number in decimal is inconvenient for humans.
Verbose asm output will print out floating point values in comments, it
helps.

But in lots of cases, users still need additional work to covert the
decimal back to hex or binary to check the bit patterns,
especially when there are small precision difference.

Hexadecimal form is one of the supported form in LLVM IR, and easier for
debugging.

This patch try to print all FP constant in hex form instead.

Reviewed By: RKSimon

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73566
2020-02-07 16:00:55 +00:00
Sjoerd Meijer 8cba99e2aa [ARM][MVE] Tail-Predication: rematerialise iteration count in exit blocks
This patch uses helper function rewriteLoopExitValues that is refactored in
D72602 to rematerialise the iteration count in exit blocks, so that we can
clean-up loop update expressions inside the hardware-loops later in
ARMLowOverheadLoops, which is necessary to get actual performance gains for
tail-predicated loops.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72714
2020-01-20 10:26:36 +00:00
David Green 5e51f75542 [ARM] Favour post inc for MVE loops
We were previously not necessarily favouring postinc for the MVE loads
and stores, leading to extra code prior to the loop to set up the
preinc. MVE in general can benefit from postinc (as we don't have
unrolled loops), and certain instructions like the VLD2's only post-inc
versions are available.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70790
2020-01-20 06:57:07 +00:00
Sam Parker 42350cd893 [ARM][MVE] Tail Predicate IsSafeToRemove
Introduce a method to walk through use-def chains to decide whether
it's possible to remove a given instruction and its users. These
instructions are then stored in a set until the end of the transform
when they're erased. This is now used to perform checks on the
iteration count (LoopDec chain), element count (VCTP chain) and the
possibly redundant iteration count.

As well as being able to remove chains of instructions, we know also
check that the sub feeding the vctp is producing the expected value.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71837
2020-01-17 13:19:14 +00:00
Momchil Velikov 173b711e83 [ARM][MVE] MVE-I should not be disabled by -mfpu=none
Architecturally, it's allowed to have MVE-I without an FPU, thus
-mfpu=none should not disable MVE-I, or moves to/from FP-registers.

This patch removes `+/-fpregs` from features unconditionally added to
target feature list, depending on FPU and moves the logic to Clang
driver, where the negative form (`-fpregs`) is conditionally added to
the target features list for the cases of `-mfloat-abi=soft`, or
`-mfpu=none` without either `+mve` or `+mve.fp`. Only the negative
form is added by the driver, the positive one is derived from other
features in the backend.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71843
2020-01-09 14:03:25 +00:00
Roman Lebedev 3d492d7503
[DAGCombine][X86][Thumb2/LowOverheadLoops] `A - (A & C)` -> `A & (~C)` fold (PR44448)
While we do manage to fold integer-typed IR in middle-end,
we can't do that for the main motivational case of pointers.

There is @llvm.ptrmask() intrinsic which may or may not be helpful,
but i'm not sure it is fully considered canonical yet,
not everything is fully aware of it likely.

Name: PR44448  ptr - (ptr & C) -> ptr & (~C)
%bias = and i32 %ptr, C
%r = sub i32 %ptr, %bias
  =>
%r = and i32 %ptr, ~C

See
  https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44448
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D71499
2020-01-03 17:55:45 +03:00
David Green b4abe7afbf [ARM] Sink splat to ICmp
This adds ICmp to the list of instructions that we sink a splat to in a
loop, allowing the register forms of instructions to be selected more
often. It does not add FCmp yet as the results look a little odd, trying
to keep the register in an float reg and having to move it back to a GPR.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70997
2019-12-30 12:58:14 +00:00
Sjoerd Meijer d97cf1f889 [ARM][LowOverheadLoops] Remove dead loop update instructions.
After creating a low-overhead loop, the loop update instruction was still
lingering around hurting performance. This removes dead loop update
instructions, which in our case are mostly SUBS instructions.

To support this, some helper functions were added to MachineLoopUtils and
ReachingDefAnalysis to analyse live-ins of loop exit blocks and find uses
before a particular loop instruction, respectively.

This is a first version that removes a SUBS instruction when there are no other
uses inside and outside the loop block, but there are some more interesting
cases in test/CodeGen/Thumb2/LowOverheadLoops/mve-tail-data-types.ll which
shows that there is room for improvement. For example, we can't handle this
case yet:

    ..
    dlstp.32  lr, r2
  .LBB0_1:
    mov r3, r2
    subs  r2, #4
    vldrh.u32 q2, [r1], #8
    vmov  q1, q0
    vmla.u32  q0, q2, r0
    letp  lr, .LBB0_1
  @ %bb.2:
    vctp.32 r3
    ..

which is a lot more tricky because r2 is not only used by the subs, but also by
the mov to r3, which is used outside the low-overhead loop by the vctp
instruction, and that requires a bit of a different approach, and I will follow
up on this.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71007
2019-12-11 10:20:19 +00:00
David Green b1aba0378e [ARM] Enable MVE masked loads and stores
With the extra optimisations we have done, these should now be fine to
enable by default. Which is what this patch does.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70968
2019-12-09 11:37:34 +00:00
David Green b5315ae8ff [Codegen][ARM] Add addressing modes from masked loads and stores
MVE has a basic symmetry between it's normal loads/store operations and
the masked variants. This means that masked loads and stores can use
pre-inc and post-inc addressing modes, just like the standard loads and
stores already do.

To enable that, this patch adds all the relevant infrastructure for
treating masked loads/stores addressing modes in the same way as normal
loads/stores.

This involves:
- Adding an AddressingMode to MaskedLoadStoreSDNode, along with an extra
   Offset operand that is added after the PtrBase.
- Extending the IndexedModeActions from 8bits to 16bits to store the
   legality of masked operations as well as normal ones. This array is
   fairly small, so doubling the size still won't make it very large.
   Offset masked loads can then be controlled with
   setIndexedMaskedLoadAction, similar to standard loads.
- The same methods that combine to indexed loads, such as
   CombineToPostIndexedLoadStore, are adjusted to handle masked loads in
   the same way.
- The ARM backend is then adjusted to make use of these indexed masked
   loads/stores.
- The X86 backend is adjusted to hopefully be no functional changes.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70176
2019-11-26 16:21:01 +00:00
Sam Parker 28166816b0 [ARM][ReachingDefs] Remove dead code in loloops.
Add some more helper functions to ReachingDefs to query the uses of
a given MachineInstr and also to query whether two MachineInstrs use
the same def of a register.

For Arm, while tail-predicating, these helpers are used in the
low-overhead loops to remove the dead code that calculates the number
of loop iterations.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70240
2019-11-26 10:27:46 +00:00
Sam Parker 8978c12b39 [ARM][MVE] Tail predication conversion
This patch modifies ARMLowOverheadLoops to convert a predicated
vector low-overhead loop into a tail-predicatd one. This is currently
a very basic conversion, with the following restrictions:
- Operates only on single block loops.
- The loop can only contain a single vctp instruction.
- No other instructions can write to the vpr.
- We only allow a subset of the mve instructions in the loop.

TODO: Pass the number of elements, not the number of iterations to
dlstp/wlstp.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69945
2019-11-19 08:22:18 +00:00
David Green 91b0cad813 [ARM] Use isFMAFasterThanFMulAndFAdd for MVE
The Arm backend will usually return false for isFMAFasterThanFMulAndFAdd,
where both the fused VFMA.f32 and a non-fused VMLA.f32 are usually
available for scalar code. For MVE we don't have the non-fused version
though. It makes more sense for isFMAFasterThanFMulAndFAdd to return
true, allowing us to simplify some of the existing ISel patterns.

The tests here are that non of the existing tests failed, and so we are
still selecting VFMA and VFMS. The one test that changed shows we can
now select from fast math flags, as opposed to just relying on the
isFMADLegalForFAddFSub option.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69115
2019-11-04 15:05:41 +00:00
Sam Parker 3ff961cabd [ARM][MVE] Change VPST to use, not def, VPR
Unlike VPT, VPST just uses the current value of VPR.P0.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69037

llvm-svn: 375087
2019-10-17 08:46:31 +00:00
Sam Parker ef7990a88a [NFC][ARM][MVE] More tests
Add some tail predication tests with fast math.

llvm-svn: 373331
2019-10-01 13:02:14 +00:00