This patch adds a generic DAGCombine for vector-predicated (VP) nodes.
Those for which we can determine that no vector element is active can be
replaced by either undef or, for reductions, the start value.
This is tested rather trivially at the IR level, where it's possible
that we want to teach instcombine to perform this optimization.
However, we can also see the zero-evl case arise during SelectionDAG
legalization, when wide VP operations can be split into two and the
upper operation emerges as trivially false.
It's possible that we could perform this optimization "proactively"
(both on legal vectors and before splitting) and reduce the width of an
operation and insert it into a larger undef vector:
```
v8i32 vp_add x, y, mask, 4
->
v8i32 insert_subvector (v8i32 undef), (v4i32 vp_add xsub, ysub, mask, 4), i32 0
```
This is somewhat analogous to similar vector narrow/widening
optimizations, but it's unclear at this point whether that's beneficial
to do this for VP ops for any/all targets.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109148
APInt is used to describe a bit mask in a variety of value tracking and demanded bits/elts functions.
When traversing through dst/src operands, we have a number of places where these masks need to widened/narrowed to translate through bitcasts, reductions etc. to a different type.
This patch add a APIntOps::ScaleBitMask common helper, adds unit test coverage, and updates a number of cases to use the the helper instead of their own implementation.
This came up on D109065 where we currently have to add yet another implementation of the same code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109683
Soft deprecrate isNullValue/isAllOnesValue and update in tree
callers. This matches the changes to the APInt interface from
D109483.
Reviewed By: lattner
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109535
This renames the primary methods for creating a zero value to `getZero`
instead of `getNullValue` and renames predicates like `isAllOnesValue`
to simply `isAllOnes`. This achieves two things:
1) This starts standardizing predicates across the LLVM codebase,
following (in this case) ConstantInt. The word "Value" doesn't
convey anything of merit, and is missing in some of the other things.
2) Calling an integer "null" doesn't make any sense. The original sin
here is mine and I've regretted it for years. This moves us to calling
it "zero" instead, which is correct!
APInt is widely used and I don't think anyone is keen to take massive source
breakage on anything so core, at least not all in one go. As such, this
doesn't actually delete any entrypoints, it "soft deprecates" them with a
comment.
Included in this patch are changes to a bunch of the codebase, but there are
more. We should normalize SelectionDAG and other APIs as well, which would
make the API change more mechanical.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109483
Followup to D99355: SDAG support for vector-predicated load/store/gather/scatter.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105871
If all demanded elements of the BUILD_VECTOR pass a isGuaranteedNotToBeUndefOrPoison check, then we can treat this specific demanded use of the BUILD_VECTOR as guaranteed not to be undef or poison either.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107174
This patch extends support for (scalable-vector) splats in the
DAGCombiner via the `ISD::matchBinaryPredicate` function, which enable a
variety of simple combines of constants.
Users of this function may now have to distinguish between
`BUILD_VECTOR` and `SPLAT_VECTOR` vector operands. The way of dealing
with this in-tree follows the approach added for
`ISD::matchUnaryPredicate` implemented in D94501.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106575
I've setup the basic framework for the isGuaranteedNotToBeUndefOrPoison call and updated DAGCombiner::visitFREEZE to use it, further Opcodes can be handled when we have test coverage.
I'm not aware of any vector test freeze coverage so the DemandedElts (and the Depth) args are not being used yet - but they are in place.
SelectionDAG::isGuaranteedNotToBePoison wrappers have also been added.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106668
The existing rule about the operand type is strange. Instead, just say
the operand is a TargetConstant with the right width. (Legalization
ignores TargetConstants, so it doesn't matter if that width is legal.)
Highlights:
1. I had to substantially rewrite the AArch64 isel patterns to expect a
TargetConstant. Nothing too exotic, but maybe a little hairy. Maybe
worth considering a target-specific node with some dagcombines instead
of this complicated nest of isel patterns.
2. Our behavior on RV32 for vectors of i64 has changed slightly. In
particular, we correctly preserve the width of the arithmetic through
legalization. This changes the DAG a bit. Maybe room for
improvement here.
3. I explicitly defined the behavior around overflow. This is necessary
to make the DAGCombine transforms legal, and I don't think it causes any
practical issues.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105673
RISCV would prefer a sign extended constant since that works better
with our constant materialization. We have an existing TLI hook we
use to control sign extension of setcc operands in type legalization.
That hook happens to do the right check we need here, but might be
straying from its original purpose. With only RISCV defining this
hook in tree, I wasn't sure if it was worth adding another hook
with identical behavior.
This is an alternative to D105785 where I tried to handle this in
the RISCV backend by not creating ANY_EXTENDs in some places.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105918
This reverts commit 2a419a0b99.
The result of a shufflevector must not propagate poison from any element
other than the one noted in the shuffle mask.
The regressions outside of fptoui-may-overflow.ll can probably be
recovered some other way; for example, using isGuaranteedNotToBePoison.
See discussion on https://reviews.llvm.org/D106053 for more background.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106222
Add an assertion that we've calling MaskedElementsAreZero with a vector op and that the DemandedElts arg is a matching width.
Makes the error a lot easier to grok when something else accidentally gets used.
This is mostly a minor convenience, but the pattern seems frequent
enough to be worthwhile (and we'll probably add more uses in the
future).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105850
This sets the AllowTruncation flag on isConstOrConstSplat in
isNullOrNullSplat, allowing it to see truncated constant zeroes on
architectures such as AArch64, where only a i32.i64 are legal. As a
truncation of 0 is always 0, this should always be valid, allowing some
extra folding to happen including some of the cases from D103755.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103756
This patch extends the SelectionDAG's ability to constant-fold vector
arithmetic to include support for SPLAT_VECTOR. This is not only for
scalable-vector types but also for fixed-length vector types, which
helps Hexagon in a couple of cases.
The original RISC-V test case was in fact an infinite DAGCombine loop.
The pattern `and (truncate v1), (truncate v2)` can be combined to
`truncate (and v1, v2)` but the truncate can similarly be combined back
to `truncate (and v1, v2)` (but, crucially, only when one of `v1` or
`v2` is a constant vector).
It wasn't exposed in on fixed-length types because a TRUNCATE of a
constant BUILD_VECTOR was folded into the BUILD_VECTOR itself, whereas
this did not happen for the equivalent (scalable-vector) SPLAT_VECTOR.
Reviewed By: RKSimon, craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103246
- When memory intrinsics, such as memcpy, the attached scoped AA
metadata is not passed down to the backend. As a result, the backend
cannot schedule relevant memory operations around them following that
hint. In this patch, SelectionDAG is enhanced to propagate that
metadata (scoped AA only) when they are lowered into loads and stores.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102215
Unlike normal loads these don't have an extension field, but we know
from TargetLowering whether these are sign-extending or zero-extending,
and so can optimise away unnecessary extensions.
This was noticed on RISC-V, where sign extensions in the calling
convention would result in unnecessary explicit extension instructions,
but this also fixes some Mips inefficiencies. PowerPC sees churn in the
tests as all the zero extensions are only for promoting 32-bit to
64-bit, but these zero extensions are still not optimised away as they
should be, likely due to i32 being a legal type.
This also simplifies the WebAssembly code somewhat, which currently
works around the lack of target-independent combines with some ugly
patterns that break once they're optimised away.
Re-landed with correct handling in ComputeNumSignBits for Tmp == VTBits,
where zero-extending atomics were incorrectly returning 0 rather than
the (slightly confusing) required return value of 1.
Re-landed again after D102819 fixed PowerPC to correctly zero-extend all
of its atomics as it claimed to do, since the combination of that bug
and this optimisation caused buildbot regressions.
Reviewed By: RKSimon, atanasyan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101342
The use of `SelectionDAG::getSplatValue` isn't guaranteed to return a
type-legal splat value as it may implicitly extract a vector element
from another shuffle. It is not permitted to introduce an illegal type
when lowering shuffles.
This patch addresses the crash by adding a boolean flag to
`getSplatValue`, defaulting to false, which when set will ensure a
type-legal return value. If it is unable to do that it will fail to
return a splat value.
I've been through the existing uses of `getSplatValue` in other targets
and was unable to find a need or test cases showing a need to update
their uses. In some cases, the call is made during `LegalizeVectorOps`
which may still produce illegal scalar types. In other situations, the
illegally-typed splat value may be quickly patched up to a legal type
(such as any-extending the returned `extract_vector_elt` up to a legal
type) before `LegalizeDAG` notices.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102687
Unlike normal loads these don't have an extension field, but we know
from TargetLowering whether these are sign-extending or zero-extending,
and so can optimise away unnecessary extensions.
This was noticed on RISC-V, where sign extensions in the calling
convention would result in unnecessary explicit extension instructions,
but this also fixes some Mips inefficiencies. PowerPC sees churn in the
tests as all the zero extensions are only for promoting 32-bit to
64-bit, but these zero extensions are still not optimised away as they
should be, likely due to i32 being a legal type.
This also simplifies the WebAssembly code somewhat, which currently
works around the lack of target-independent combines with some ugly
patterns that break once they're optimised away.
Re-landed with correct handling in ComputeNumSignBits for Tmp == VTBits,
where zero-extending atomics were incorrectly returning 0 rather than
the (slightly confusing) required return value of 1.
Reviewed By: RKSimon, atanasyan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101342
This seems to have broken sanitizers, giving lots of
Assertion `NumBits <= MAX_INT_BITS && "bitwidth too large"' failed.
failures across multiple targets (currently X86 and PowerPC). Reverting
until I have a chance to reproduce and debug.
This reverts commit 6e876f9ded.
Unlike normal loads these don't have an extension field, but we know
from TargetLowering whether these are sign-extending or zero-extending,
and so can optimise away unnecessary extensions.
This was noticed on RISC-V, where sign extensions in the calling
convention would result in unnecessary explicit extension instructions,
but this also fixes some Mips inefficiencies. PowerPC sees churn in the
tests as all the zero extensions are only for promoting 32-bit to
64-bit, but these zero extensions are still not optimised away as they
should be, likely due to i32 being a legal type.
This also simplifies the WebAssembly code somewhat, which currently
works around the lack of target-independent combines with some ugly
patterns that break once they're optimised away.
Reviewed By: RKSimon, atanasyan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101342
Previously we used an i32 constant to store the saturation width, but i32 isn't
legal on RISCV64. This wasn't a big deal to fix, but it is extra work for the
type legalizer.
This patch uses a VTSDNode to store the type similar to SEXT_INREG. This makes
it opaque to the type legalizer.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101262
It is proper to relax non-negative limitation of step_vector.
Also this patch adds more combines for step_vector:
(sub X, step_vector(C)) -> (add X, step_vector(-C))
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100812
This patch relaxes the requirement that the STEP_VECTOR step constant
must be of a type at least as large as the vector element type. This
does not permit its use on targets which have legal vector element types
larger than the largest legal scalar type, such as i64 vectors on RV32.
As such, the requirement has been loosened so that the step operand must
be any scalar type so long as the constant immediate is non-negative and
the value fits inside the vector element type.
This limits combining optimizations in certain circumstances but in
practice it's unlikely to be a hindrance.
Reviewed By: paulwalker-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100660
During SelectionDAG, we must track the SDNodes that each SDDbgValue depends on
to compute its value. These are ultimately derived from the location operands to
the SDDbgValue, but were stored in a separate vector prior to this patch. This
resulted in cases where one of the lists was updated incorrectly, resulting in
crashes during compilation. This patch fixes the issue by directly recomputing
the dependency list from the SDDbgOperands in getDependencies().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99423
This allows FoldConstantArithmetic to handle SPLAT_VECTOR in
addition to BUILD_VECTOR. This allows it to support scalable
vectors. I'm also allowing fixed length SPLAT_VECTOR which is
used by some targets, but I'm not familiar enough to write tests
for those targets.
I had to block this function from running on CONCAT_VECTORS to
avoid calling getNode for a CONCAT_VECTORS of 2 scalars.
This can happen because the 2 operand getNode calls this
function for any opcode. Previously we were protected because
CONCAT_VECTORs of BUILD_VECTOR is folded to a larger BUILD_VECTOR
before that call. But it's not always possible to fold a CONCAT_VECTORS
of SPLAT_VECTORs, and we don't even try.
This fixes PR49781 where DAG combine thought constant folding
should be possible, but FoldConstantArithmetic couldn't do it.
Reviewed By: david-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99682
In order to bring up scalable vector support in LLVM incrementally,
we introduced behaviour to emit a warning, instead of an error, when
asking the wrong question of a scalable vector, like asking for the
fixed number of elements.
This patch puts that behaviour under a flag. The default behaviour is
that the compiler will always error, which means that all LLVM unit
tests and regression tests will now fail when a code-path is taken that
still uses the wrong interface.
The behaviour to demote an error to a warning can be individually enabled
for tools that want to support experimental use of scalable vectors.
This patch enables that behaviour when driving compilation from Clang.
This means that for users who want to try out scalable-vector support,
fixed-width codegen support, or build user-code with scalable vector
intrinsics, Clang will not crash and burn when the compiler encounters
such a case.
This allows us to do away with the following pattern in many of the SVE tests:
RUN: .... 2>%t
RUN: cat %t | FileCheck --check-prefix=WARN
WARN-NOT: warning: ...
The behaviour to emit warnings is only temporary and we expect this flag
to be removed in the future when scalable vector support is more stable.
This patch also has fixes the following tests:
unittests:
ScalableVectorMVTsTest.SizeQueries
SelectionDAGAddressAnalysisTest.unknownSizeFrameObjects
AArch64SelectionDAGTest.computeKnownBitsSVE_ZERO_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG
regression tests:
Transforms/InstCombine/vscale_gep.ll
Reviewed By: paulwalker-arm, ctetreau
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98856
Currently needsStackRealignment returns false if canRealignStack returns false.
This means that the behavior of needsStackRealignment does not correspond to
it's name and description; a function might need stack realignment, but if it
is not possible then this function returns false. Furthermore,
needsStackRealignment is not virtual and therefore some backends have made use
of canRealignStack to indicate whether a function needs stack realignment.
This patch attempts to clarify the situation by separating them and introducing
new names:
- shouldRealignStack - true if there is any reason the stack should be
realigned
- canRealignStack - true if we are still able to realign the stack (e.g. we
can still reserve/have reserved a frame pointer)
- hasStackRealignment = shouldRealignStack && canRealignStack (not target
customisable)
Targets can now override shouldRealignStack to indicate that stack realignment
is required.
This change will make it easier in a future change to handle the case where we
need to realign the stack but can't do so (for example when the register
allocator creates an aligned spill after the frame pointer has been
eliminated).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98716
Change-Id: Ib9a4d21728bf9d08a545b4365418d3ffe1af4d87
Fraser Cormack