The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For this tuple, measuring becomes problematic since there's a lot of spilling going on,
but apparently all these memory ops do not affect worst-case estimate at all here.
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/zP4hd8MT6 - for intels `Block RThroughput: =150.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=59`
So pick cost of `150`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/vKb8zTK8E - for intels `Block RThroughput: =32.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=24.0`
So pick cost of `64`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110548
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/Wd9cKab83 - for intels `Block RThroughput: =75.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=29.5`
So pick cost of `75`. (note that `# 32-byte Reload` does not affect throughput there.)
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/Wd9cKab83 - for intels `Block RThroughput: =32.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=12.0`
So pick cost of `32`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110543
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/dd8T5P471 - for intels `Block RThroughput: =33.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=14.5`
So pick cost of `33`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/zPxcKWhn4 - for intels `Block RThroughput: =10.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=6.0`
So pick cost of `10`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110541
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/rnsf639Wh - for intels `Block RThroughput: =17.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=7.5`
So pick cost of `17`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/565KKrcY6 - for intels `Block RThroughput: =6.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: =2.0`
So pick cost of `6`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110537
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/5EYc6r9nh - for intels `Block RThroughput: =6.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=3.0`
So pick cost of `6`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/z61e5d6GE - for intels `Block RThroughput: =2.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=1.0`
So pick cost of `2`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110536
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/q6GbK89br - for intels `Block RThroughput: =18.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=7.0`
So pick cost of `18`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/Yzfoo5TnW - for intels `Block RThroughput: =8.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=4.0`
So pick cost of `8`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110507
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/Y1E7qnjz8 - for intels `Block RThroughput: =9.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=3.5`
So pick cost of `9`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/Y1E7qnjz8 - for intels `Block RThroughput: =4.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=2.0`
So pick cost of `4`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110506
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/e5YE99a4P - for intels `Block RThroughput: =6.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: =2.0`
So pick cost of `6`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/3vM4KsE1n - for intels `Block RThroughput: =3.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=2.0`
So pick cost of `3`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110505
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/1j3nf3dro - for intels `Block RThroughput: =2.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=1.0`
So pick cost of `2`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/4n1zvP37j - for intels `Block RThroughput: =1.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=0.5`
So pick cost of `1`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110504
This intention of this code turns out to be superfluous as we can handle this with shuffle combining, and it has a critical flaw in that it doesn't check for dependencies.
Fixes PR51974
When AVX512FP16 is enabled, FROUND(f16) cannot be dealt with
TypeLegalize, and no libcall in libm is ready for fround(f16) now.
FROUNDEVEN(f16) has related instruction in AVX512FP16.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110312
The plan is to allow combineMulToPMADDWD to match illegal vector types (as long as they're still pow2), which should allow us to start removing the 128-bit limit on more of the PMADDWD combines.
Merge addition of VPMADDWD nodes if each element pair doesn't use the upper element in each pair (i.e. its zero) - we can generalize this to either element in the pair if we one day create VPMADDWD with zero lower elements.
There are still a number of issues with extending/shuffling with 256/512-bit VPMADDWD nodes so this initially only works for v2i32/v4i32 cases - I'm working on removing all these limitations but there's still a bit of yak shaving to go.....
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/M8vEKs5jY - for intels `Block RThroughput: =2.0`;
for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=1.0`
So pick cost of `2`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/Kx1nKz7je - for intels `Block RThroughput: =1.0`;
for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=0.5`
So pick cost of `1`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103144
Update the costs to match the codegen from combineMulToPMADDWD - not only can we use PMADDWD is its zero-extended, but also if its a constant or sign-extended from a vXi16 (which can be replaced with a zero-extension).
If we are multiplying by a sign-extended vXi32 constant, then we can mask off the upper 16 bits to allow folding to PMADDWD and make use of its implicit sign-extension from i16
We already do this on SSE41 targets where we have sext/zext instructions, now that combineShiftToPMULH handles SSE2 targets, we can enable this here as well.
With improved shuffle combines (in particular canonicalizeShuffleWithBinOps), we can now usefully perform this on any SSE2+ target.
We should be able to remove this entirely and just use DAGCombiner's combineShiftToMULH if we can someday get it to support illegal (pre-widened) types.
As suggested on D108522, if we're sign extending a v4i16 source before multiplying as a v4i32, then we can replace that with a zero extension and rely on the implicit sign-extension of PMADDWD.
This is motivated by the examples and discussion in:
https://llvm.org/PR51245
...and related bugs.
By using vector compares and vector logic, we can convert 2 'set'
instructions into 1 'movd' or 'movmsk' and generally improve
throughput/reduce instructions.
Unfortunately, we don't have a complete vector compare ISA before
AVX, so I left SSE-only out of this patch. Ie, we'd need extra logic
ops to simulate the missing predicates for SSE 'cmpp*', so it's not
as clearly a win.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110342
Testing on a SLM box suggests these can run on either port, but the throughput is 4cy on either (inc MMX versions). Confirmed with Intel AoM / Agner / InstLatX64.
We should use IMAGE_REL_I386_SECREL in the i386 section of this file.
IMAGE_REL_I386_SECREL and IMAGE_REL_AMD64_SECREL have the same
numeric value 0xB, so this doesn't change behavior.
This function can be adapted to solve bugs like PR51245,
but it could require differentiating the combiner timing
between the existing and new transforms.
Only the most recent cpus support really 1cy 64-bit multiplies, and the X64 cost table represents a realistic worst case. The 1cy value was also discouraging vectorization when most vXi64 PMULDQ expansions aren't actually slower than scalarization.
Noticed while investigating PR51436.
This simplifies the API and addresses a FIXME in
TwoAddressInstructionPass::convertInstTo3Addr.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110229
This patch is to support transform something like
_mm512_add_ph(acc, _mm512_fmadd_pch(a, b, _mm512_setzero_ph()))
to _mm512_fmadd_pch(a, b, acc).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109953
Currenlty PseudoProbeInserter is a pass conditioned on a target switch. It works well with a single clang invocation. It doesn't work so well when the backend is called separately (i.e, through the linker or llc), where user has always to pass -pseudo-probe-for-profiling explictly. I'm making the pass a default pass that requires no command line arg to trigger, but will be actually run depending on whether the CU comes with `llvm.pseudo_probe_desc` metadata.
Reviewed By: wenlei
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110209
Based off a discussion on D110100, we should be avoiding default CostKinds whenever possible.
This initial patch removes them from the 'inner' target implementation callbacks - these should only be used by the main TTI calls, so this should guarantee that we don't cause changes in CostKind by missing it in an inner call. This exposed a few missing arguments in getGEPCost and reduction cost calls that I've cleaned up.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110242
This change adds the ASan intrinsic to the list whihc are setting hasCopyImplyingStackAdjustment.
Reviewed By: eugenis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110012
This time with the right bug number.
When we rewrite the setcc we replace set old setcc output register
with the new CondReg. But since CondReg can be shared by other
replacements, we don't know if the kill flags for the old register
are valid for CondReg. So be conservative and remove them.
The test case has a SETCCr and a SETCCm on the same condition so
they end up sharing the same CondReg. The SETCCr had one use with
a kill flag. This kill flag isn't valid after the replacement because
CondReg needs a live range extending to the later SETCCm replacment.
Fixes PR51903.
When we rewrite the setcc we replace set old setcc output register
with the new CondReg. But since CondReg can be shared by other
replacements, we don't know if the kill flags for the old register
are valid for CondReg. So be conservative and remove them.
The test case has a SETCCr and a SETCCm on the same condition so
they end up sharing the same CondReg. The SETCCr had one use with
a kill flag. This kill flag isn't valid after the replacement because
CondReg needs a live range extending to the later SETCCm replacment.
Fixes PR51908.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110046
For x86 Darwin, we have a stack checking feature which re-uses some of this
machinery around stack probing on Windows. Renaming this to be more appropriate
for a generic feature.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109993
Both ports are required in most cases. Update the uops counts + port usage based off the most recent llvm-exegesis captures (PR36895) and what Intel AoM / Agner / InstLatX64 reports as well.
Noticed while trying to improve fp costs for vectorization via the D103695 helper script.
We can combine unary shuffles into either of SHUFPS's inputs and adjust the shuffle mask accordingly.
Unlike general shuffle combining, we can be more aggressive and handle multiuse cases as we're not going to accidentally create additional shuffles.
Apparently this has no test coverage before D108382,
but D108382 itself shows a few regressions that this fixes.
It doesn't seem worthwhile breaking apart broadcasts,
assuming we want the broadcasted value to be preset in several elements,
not just the 0'th one.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108411
Split off from D108253.
Broadcast is simpler than any other shuffle we might produce
to do what we want to do here, so prefer it.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108382
Both ports are required, for reg and mem variants - we can also use the WriteFComX class directly and remove the unnecessary InstRW overrides. Matches what Intel AoM / Agner / InstLatX64 report as well.
Liu, Chen3