When preamble contains #undef, indexing code finds the matching #define
and uses that during indexing. However, it would only look for local
definitions. If the macro was defined in a module, MacroInfo
would be nullptr and clangd would crash.
This change makes clangd ignore any #undef without a matching #define
inside the same TU.
The indexing of macros happens for preamble only, so then #undef must be
in the preamble, which is why we need two .h files in a test.
Note that clangd is currently not ready for module support, but this
brings us one step closer.
This was previously attempted in
4061d9e42c, but had to be reverted due to
broken test. This version fixes that test-only bug by setting a custom module
cache path to avoid re-use of modules across test invocations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85923
This reverts commit 4061d9e42c.
Tests are failing in some configuration, likely due to not cleaning up
module cache path before running the test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85907
Summary:
When preamble contains #undef, indexing code finds the matching #define
and uses that during indexing. However, it would only look for local
definitions. If the macro was defined in a module, MacroInfo
would be nullptr and clangd would crash.
This change makes clangd ignore any #undef without a matching #define
inside the same TU.
The indexing of macros happens for preamble only, so then #undef must be
in the preamble, which is why we need two .h files in a test.
Note that clangd is currently not ready for module support, but this
brings us one step closer.
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80525
Summary:
The Provider extension point is designed to also be implemented by
ClangdLSPServer (to inject config-over-lsp) and likely by embedders.
Reviewers: kadircet
Subscribers: mgorny, ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, jfb, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82964
Summary:
By making all overloads non-virtual and delegating to a differently-named
private method, we avoid any (harmless) name-hiding in the subclasses.
Reviewers: kadircet
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, usaxena95, cfe-commits, Quuxplusone, dblaikie
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82793
Summary:
Clangd uses FSProvider to get threadsafe views into file systems. This
patch changes naming to make that more explicit.
Depends on D81920
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81998
Summary:
We've faced a couple of problems when the returned FS didn't have the
proper working directory. New signature makes the API safer against such
problems.
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81920
This was reverted in rL365678, the failure was due to YAML parsing of
compile_commands.json.
Converting backslashes to forward slashes to fix the issue in unittest.
llvm-svn: 365748
Summary:
Motivation:
- this layout is a pain to work with
- without a common root, it's painful to express things like "disable clangd" (D61122)
- CMake/lit configs are a maintenance hazard, and the more the one-off hacks
for various tools are entangled, the more we see apathy and non-ownership.
This attempts to use the bare-minimum configuration needed (while still
supporting the difficult cases: windows, standalone clang build, dynamic libs).
In particular the lit.cfg.py and lit.site.cfg.py.in are merged into lit.cfg.in.
The logic in these files is now minimal.
(Much of clang-tools-extra's lit configs can probably be cleaned up by reusing
lit.llvm.llvm_config.use_clang(), and every llvm project does its own version of
LDPATH mangling. I haven't attempted to fix any of those).
Docs are still in clang-tools-extra/docs, I don't have any plans to touch those.
Reviewers: gribozavr
Subscribers: mgorny, javed.absar, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, jfb, cfe-commits, ilya-biryukov, thakis
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61187
llvm-svn: 359424
Adam Czachorowski