This broke the check-profile tests on Mac, see comment on the code
review.
> This is no longer needed, we can add __llvm_profile_runtime directly
> to llvm.compiler.used or llvm.used to achieve the same effect.
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98325
This reverts commit c7712087cb.
Also reverting the dependent follow-up commit:
Revert "[InstrProfiling] Generate runtime hook for ELF platforms"
> When using -fprofile-list to selectively apply instrumentation only
> to certain files or functions, we may end up with a binary that doesn't
> have any counters in the case where no files were selected. However,
> because on Linux and Fuchsia, we pass -u__llvm_profile_runtime, the
> runtime would still be pulled in and incur some non-trivial overhead,
> especially in the case when the continuous or runtime counter relocation
> mode is being used. A better way would be to pull in the profile runtime
> only when needed by declaring the __llvm_profile_runtime symbol in the
> translation unit only when needed.
>
> This approach was already used prior to 9a041a7522, but we changed it
> to always generate the __llvm_profile_runtime due to a TAPI limitation.
> Since TAPI is only used on Mach-O platforms, we could use the early
> emission of __llvm_profile_runtime there, and on other platforms we
> could change back to the earlier approach where the symbol is generated
> later only when needed. We can stop passing -u__llvm_profile_runtime to
> the linker on Linux and Fuchsia since the generated undefined symbol in
> each translation unit that needed it serves the same purpose.
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98061
This reverts commit 87fd09b25f.
When using -fprofile-list to selectively apply instrumentation only
to certain files or functions, we may end up with a binary that doesn't
have any counters in the case where no files were selected. However,
because on Linux and Fuchsia, we pass -u__llvm_profile_runtime, the
runtime would still be pulled in and incur some non-trivial overhead,
especially in the case when the continuous or runtime counter relocation
mode is being used. A better way would be to pull in the profile runtime
only when needed by declaring the __llvm_profile_runtime symbol in the
translation unit only when needed.
This approach was already used prior to 9a041a7522, but we changed it
to always generate the __llvm_profile_runtime due to a TAPI limitation.
Since TAPI is only used on Mach-O platforms, we could use the early
emission of __llvm_profile_runtime there, and on other platforms we
could change back to the earlier approach where the symbol is generated
later only when needed. We can stop passing -u__llvm_profile_runtime to
the linker on Linux and Fuchsia since the generated undefined symbol in
each translation unit that needed it serves the same purpose.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98061
Make the virtual method Toolchain::GetDefaultStackProtectorLevel()
return an explict enum value rather than an integral constant. This
makes the code subjectively easier to read, and should help prevent bugs
that may (or may never) arise from changing the enum values. Previously,
these were just kept in sync via a comment, which is brittle. The trade
off is including a additional header in a few new places. It is not
necessary, but in my opinion helps the readability.
Split off from https://reviews.llvm.org/D90194 to help cut down on lines
changed in code review.
Reviewed By: phosek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90271
Follow the model used on Linux, where the clang driver passes the
linker a -u switch to force the profile runtime to be linked in,
rather than having every TU emit a dead function with a reference.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79835
Follow the model used on Linux, where the clang driver passes the
linker a -u switch to force the profile runtime to be linked in,
rather than having every TU emit a dead function with a reference.
Patch By: mcgrathr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79835
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
The support for relax relocations is dependent on the linker and
different toolchains within the same compiler can be using different
linkers some of which may or may not support relax relocations.
Give toolchains the option to control whether they want to use relax
relocations in addition to the existing (global) build system option.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39831
llvm-svn: 318816
Passing a flavor to LLD requires command line argument, but if these
are being passed through a response file, this will fail because LLD
needs to know which driver to use before processing the response file.
Use ld.lld directly instead to avoid this issue.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39176
llvm-svn: 316379
This regressed for x86-64 in r307856 because it's no longer inherited
from Generic_GCC. We'd never noticed that it was missing other
targets (i.e. aarch64), but Fuchsia is uniform across all machines.
Patch by Roland McGrath
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37723
llvm-svn: 312989
Several improvements to the Fuchsia driver:
* Search for C++ library headers and libraries in directories that
are part of the toolchain distribution rather than sysroot.
* Use LLVM support utlities to construct paths to make sure the driver
is also usable on Windows for cross-compiling.
* Change the driver to inherit directly from ToolChain rather than
Generic_GCC since we don't need any of the GCC related multilib logic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35328
llvm-svn: 307856
Several improvements to the Fuchsia driver:
* Search for C++ library headers and libraries in directories that
are part of the toolchain distribution rather than sysroot.
* Use LLVM support utlities to construct paths to make sure the driver
is also usable on Windows for cross-compiling.
* Change the driver to inherit directly from ToolChain rather than
Generic_GCC since we don't need any of the GCC related multilib logic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32613
llvm-svn: 307830
Summary: Pass the type of the device offloading when building the tool chain for a particular target architecture. This is required when supporting multiple tool chains that target a single device type. In our particular use case, the OpenMP and CUDA tool chains will use the same ```addClangTargetOptions ``` method. This enables the reuse of common options and ensures control over options only supported by a particular tool chain.
Reviewers: arpith-jacob, caomhin, carlo.bertolli, ABataev, jlebar, hfinkel, tstellar, Hahnfeld
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Subscribers: jgravelle-google, aheejin, rengolin, jfb, dschuff, sbc100, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29647
llvm-svn: 307272
Summary:
(This is a move-only refactoring patch. There are no functionality changes.)
This patch splits apart the Clang driver's tool and toolchain implementation
files. Each target platform toolchain is moved to its own file, along with the
closest-related tools. Each target platform toolchain has separate headers and
implementation files, so the hierarchy of classes is unchanged.
There are some remaining shared free functions, mostly from Tools.cpp. Several
of these move to their own architecture-specific files, similar to r296056. Some
of them are only used by a single target platform; since the tools and
toolchains are now together, some helpers now live in a platform-specific file.
The balance are helpers related to manipulating argument lists, so they are now
in a new file pair, CommonArgs.h and .cpp.
I've tried to cluster the code logically, which is fairly straightforward for
most of the target platforms and shared architectures. I think I've made
reasonable choices for these, as well as the various shared helpers; but of
course, I'm happy to hear feedback in the review.
There are some particular things I don't like about this patch, but haven't been
able to find a better overall solution. The first is the proliferation of files:
there are several files that are tiny because the toolchain is not very
different from its base (usually the Gnu tools/toolchain). I think this is
mostly a reflection of the true complexity, though, so it may not be "fixable"
in any reasonable sense. The second thing I don't like are the includes like
"../Something.h". I've avoided this largely by clustering into the current file
structure. However, a few of these includes remain, and in those cases it
doesn't make sense to me to sink an existing file any deeper.
Reviewers: rsmith, mehdi_amini, compnerd, rnk, javed.absar
Subscribers: emaste, jfb, danalbert, srhines, dschuff, jyknight, nemanjai, nhaehnle, mgorny, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30372
llvm-svn: 297250
Hans Wennborg