Make the virtual method Toolchain::GetDefaultStackProtectorLevel()
return an explict enum value rather than an integral constant. This
makes the code subjectively easier to read, and should help prevent bugs
that may (or may never) arise from changing the enum values. Previously,
these were just kept in sync via a comment, which is brittle. The trade
off is including a additional header in a few new places. It is not
necessary, but in my opinion helps the readability.
Split off from https://reviews.llvm.org/D90194 to help cut down on lines
changed in code review.
Reviewed By: phosek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90271
specified at Command creation, rather than as part of the Tool.
This resolves the hack I just added to allow Darwin toolchain to vary
its level of support based on `-mlinker-version=`.
The change preserves the _current_ settings for response-file support.
Some tools look likely to be declaring that they don't support
response files in error, however I kept them as-is in order for this
change to be a simple refactoring.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82782
I didn't realize HIP was a distinct offloading kind, so the subtarget
was looking for -march, which isn't correct for HIP. We also have the
possibility of different denormal defaults in the case of multiple
offload targets, so we need to thread the JobAction through the target
hook.
This is to avoid performance regressions when the default attribute
behavior is fixed to assume ieee.
I tested the default on x86_64 ubuntu, which seems to default to
FTZ/DAZ, but am guessing for x86 and PS4.
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
NFC for targets other than PS4.
Simplify users' workflow when enabling asan or ubsan and calling the linker separately.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47375
llvm-svn: 334096
This allows toolchain drivers to add multiple libc++ include paths akin
to libstdc++. This is useful in multiarch setup when some headers might
be in target specific include directory. There should be no functional
change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45422
llvm-svn: 329748
Summary:
(This is a move-only refactoring patch. There are no functionality changes.)
This patch splits apart the Clang driver's tool and toolchain implementation
files. Each target platform toolchain is moved to its own file, along with the
closest-related tools. Each target platform toolchain has separate headers and
implementation files, so the hierarchy of classes is unchanged.
There are some remaining shared free functions, mostly from Tools.cpp. Several
of these move to their own architecture-specific files, similar to r296056. Some
of them are only used by a single target platform; since the tools and
toolchains are now together, some helpers now live in a platform-specific file.
The balance are helpers related to manipulating argument lists, so they are now
in a new file pair, CommonArgs.h and .cpp.
I've tried to cluster the code logically, which is fairly straightforward for
most of the target platforms and shared architectures. I think I've made
reasonable choices for these, as well as the various shared helpers; but of
course, I'm happy to hear feedback in the review.
There are some particular things I don't like about this patch, but haven't been
able to find a better overall solution. The first is the proliferation of files:
there are several files that are tiny because the toolchain is not very
different from its base (usually the Gnu tools/toolchain). I think this is
mostly a reflection of the true complexity, though, so it may not be "fixable"
in any reasonable sense. The second thing I don't like are the includes like
"../Something.h". I've avoided this largely by clustering into the current file
structure. However, a few of these includes remain, and in those cases it
doesn't make sense to me to sink an existing file any deeper.
Reviewers: rsmith, mehdi_amini, compnerd, rnk, javed.absar
Subscribers: emaste, jfb, danalbert, srhines, dschuff, jyknight, nemanjai, nhaehnle, mgorny, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30372
llvm-svn: 297250
Nick Desaulniers