This patch enhances the secondary allocator to be able to detect buffer
overflow, and (on hardware supporting memory tagging) use-after-free
and buffer underflow.
Use-after-free detection is implemented by setting memory page
protection to PROT_NONE on free. Because this must be done immediately
rather than after the memory has been quarantined, we no longer use the
combined allocator quarantine for secondary allocations. Instead, a
quarantine has been added to the secondary allocator cache.
Buffer overflow detection is implemented by aligning the allocation
to the right of the writable pages, so that any overflows will
spill into the guard page to the right of the allocation, which
will have PROT_NONE page protection. Because this would require the
secondary allocator to produce a header at the correct position,
the responsibility for ensuring chunk alignment has been moved to
the secondary allocator.
Buffer underflow detection has been implemented on hardware supporting
memory tagging by tagging the memory region between the start of the
mapping and the start of the allocation with a non-zero tag. Due to
the cost of pre-tagging secondary allocations and the memory bandwidth
cost of tagged accesses, the allocation itself uses a tag of 0 and
only the first four pages have memory tagging enabled.
This is a reland of commit 7a0da88943 which was reverted in commit
9678b07e42. This reland includes the following changes:
- Fix the calculation of BlockSize which led to incorrect statistics
returned by mallinfo().
- Add -Wno-pedantic to silence GCC warning.
- Optionally add some slack at the end of secondary allocations to help
work around buggy applications that read off the end of their
allocation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93731
This patch enhances the secondary allocator to be able to detect buffer
overflow, and (on hardware supporting memory tagging) use-after-free
and buffer underflow.
Use-after-free detection is implemented by setting memory page
protection to PROT_NONE on free. Because this must be done immediately
rather than after the memory has been quarantined, we no longer use the
combined allocator quarantine for secondary allocations. Instead, a
quarantine has been added to the secondary allocator cache.
Buffer overflow detection is implemented by aligning the allocation
to the right of the writable pages, so that any overflows will
spill into the guard page to the right of the allocation, which
will have PROT_NONE page protection. Because this would require the
secondary allocator to produce a header at the correct position,
the responsibility for ensuring chunk alignment has been moved to
the secondary allocator.
Buffer underflow detection has been implemented on hardware supporting
memory tagging by tagging the memory region between the start of the
mapping and the start of the allocation with a non-zero tag. Due to
the cost of pre-tagging secondary allocations and the memory bandwidth
cost of tagged accesses, the allocation itself uses a tag of 0 and
only the first four pages have memory tagging enabled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93731
Here "memory initialization" refers to zero- or pattern-init on
non-MTE hardware, or (where possible to avoid) memory tagging on MTE
hardware. With shared TSD the per-thread memory initialization state
is stored in bit 0 of the TLS slot, similar to PointerIntPair in LLVM.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87739
Summary:
Partners have requested the ability to configure more parts of Scudo
at runtime, notably the Secondary cache options (maximum number of
blocks cached, maximum size) as well as the TSD registry options
(the maximum number of TSDs in use).
This CL adds a few more Scudo specific `mallopt` parameters that are
passed down to the various subcomponents of the Combined allocator.
- `M_CACHE_COUNT_MAX`: sets the maximum number of Secondary cached items
- `M_CACHE_SIZE_MAX`: sets the maximum size of a cacheable item in the Secondary
- `M_TSDS_COUNT_MAX`: sets the maximum number of TSDs that can be used (Shared Registry only)
Regarding the TSDs maximum count, this is a one way option, only
allowing to increase the count.
In order to allow for this, I rearranged the code to have some `setOption`
member function to the relevant classes, using the `scudo::Option` class
enum to determine what is to be set.
This also fixes an issue where a static variable (`Ready`) was used in
templated functions without being set back to `false` every time.
Reviewers: pcc, eugenis, hctim, cferris
Subscribers: jfb, llvm-commits, #sanitizers
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84667
Summary:
Implement pattern initialization of memory (excluding the secondary
allocator because it already has predictable memory contents).
Expose both zero and pattern initialization through the C API.
Reviewers: pcc, cryptoad
Subscribers: #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79133
Introduce a function __scudo_get_error_info() that may be called to interpret
a crash resulting from a memory error, potentially in another process,
given information extracted from the crashing process. The crash may be
interpreted as a use-after-free, buffer overflow or buffer underflow.
Also introduce a feature to optionally record a stack trace for each
allocation and deallocation. If this feature is enabled, a stack trace for
the allocation and (if applicable) the deallocation will also be available
via __scudo_get_error_info().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77283
Summary:
In some configuration, `sched_getaffinity` can fail. Some reasons for
that being the lack of `CAP_SYS_NICE` capability or some syscall
filtering and so on.
This should not be fatal to the allocator, so in this situation, we
will fallback to the `MaxTSDCount` value specified in the allocator
configuration.
Reviewers: cferris, eugenis, hctim, morehouse, pcc
Subscribers: #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Tags: #sanitizers, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73055
When the hardware and operating system support the ARM Memory Tagging
Extension, tag primary allocation granules with a random tag. The granules
either side of the allocation are tagged with tag 0, which is normally
excluded from the set of tags that may be selected randomly. Memory is
also retagged with a random tag when it is freed, and we opportunistically
reuse the new tag when the block is reused to reduce overhead. This causes
linear buffer overflows to be caught deterministically and non-linear buffer
overflows and use-after-free to be caught probabilistically.
This feature is currently only enabled for the Android allocator
and depends on an experimental Linux kernel branch available here:
https://github.com/pcc/linux/tree/android-experimental-mte
All code that depends on the kernel branch is hidden behind a macro,
ANDROID_EXPERIMENTAL_MTE. This is the same macro that is used by the Android
platform and may only be defined in non-production configurations. When the
userspace interface is finalized the code will be updated to use the stable
interface and all #ifdef ANDROID_EXPERIMENTAL_MTE will be removed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70762
The macros INLINE and COMPILER_CHECK always expand to the same thing (inline
and static_assert respectively). Both expansions are standards compliant C++
and are used consistently in the rest of LLVM, so let's improve consistency
with the rest of LLVM by replacing them with the expansions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70793
Summary:
We ran into a problem on Fuchsia where yielding threads would never
be deboosted, ultimately resulting in several threads spinning on the
same TSD, and no possibility for another thread to be scheduled,
dead-locking the process.
While this was fixed in Zircon, this lead to discussions about if
spinning without a break condition was a good decision, and settled on
a new hybrid model that would spin for a while then block.
Currently we are using a number of iterations for spinning that is
mostly arbitrary (based on sanitizer_common values), but this can
be tuned in the future.
Since we are touching `common.h`, we also use this change as a vehicle
for an Android optimization (the page size is fixed in Bionic, so use
a fixed value too).
Reviewers: morehouse, hctim, eugenis, dvyukov, vitalybuka
Reviewed By: hctim
Subscribers: srhines, delcypher, jfb, #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm, #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64358
llvm-svn: 365790
Summary:
As with the sanitizer_common allocator, the SCM allows for efficient
mapping between sizes and size-classes, table-free.
It doesn't depart significantly from the original, except that we
allow the use of size-class 0 for other purposes (as opposed to
chunks of size 0). The Primary will use it to hold TransferBatches.
Reviewers: vitalybuka, eugenis, hctim, morehouse
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Subscribers: srhines, mgorny, delcypher, #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm, #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61088
llvm-svn: 359199
Summary:
The Secondary allocator wraps the platform allocation primitives. It is
meant to be used for larger sizes that the Primary can't fullfill, as
it will be slower, and sizes are multiple of the system page size.
This also changes some of the existing code, notably the opaque
platform data being passed to the platform specific functions: we can
shave a couple of syscalls on Fuchsia by storing additional data (this
addresses a TODO).
Reviewers: eugenis, vitalybuka, hctim, morehouse
Reviewed By: morehouse
Subscribers: mgorny, delcypher, jfb, #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm, #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60787
llvm-svn: 359097
Summary:
This CL adds a standalone vector class that will be used by the scoped
strings when they land. We reimplement our own vector class because we
can't use the std library one.
It's mostly borrowed from the current sanitizer_common one, with LLVM
code style changes.
Additionnally a casing change in a function name that slipped through
the previous review (the function isn't used yet).
Reviewers: vitalybuka, eugenis, flowerhack, dmmoore415, mcgrathr, morehouse
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Subscribers: mgorny, delcypher, #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm, #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58689
llvm-svn: 354999
Summary:
This CL adds the platform specific code for Fuchsia, Linux & Android,
as well as some tests related to those (more tests to come later).
While some of it is pretty much a straight port of the existing scudo &
sanitizer_common code, the memory mapping functions have been reworked
a bit to fit the limited usage scenario that Scudo has for them.
For Fuchsia, I can now track the Vmar/Vmo pair for memory mappings if
there is an intent to grow or decommit some mapping (that will be
useful for the Primary).
Reviewers: eugenis, vitalybuka, mcgrathr, phosek, flowerhack, morehouse, dmmoore415
Reviewed By: vitalybuka, morehouse
Subscribers: kcc, dvyukov, srhines, mgorny, delcypher, jfb, jdoerfert, #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm, #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58184
llvm-svn: 354895
Peter Collingbourne