The `intrinsics_gen` target exists in the CMake exports since r309389
(see LLVMConfig.cmake.in), hence projects can depend on `intrinsics_gen`
even it they are built separately from LLVM.
Reviewed By: MaskRay, JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83454
This prevents calling Breakpoint::shared_from_this of an object that is not owned by any shared_ptr.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74557
Summary:
All of our lookup APIs either use `CompilerDeclContext &` or `CompilerDeclContext *` semi-randomly it seems.
This leads to us constantly converting between those two types (and doing nullptr checks when going from
pointer to reference). It also leads to the confusing situation where we have two possible ways to express
that we don't have a CompilerDeclContex: either a nullptr or an invalid CompilerDeclContext (aka a default
constructed CompilerDeclContext).
This moves all APIs to use references and gets rid of all the nullptr checks and conversions.
Reviewers: labath, mib, shafik
Reviewed By: labath, shafik
Subscribers: shafik, arphaman, abidh, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74607
LLDB has a few different styles of header guards and they're not very
consistent because things get moved around or copy/pasted. This patch
unifies the header guards across LLDB and converts everything to match
LLVM's style.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74743
This is a step towards making the initialize and terminate calls be
generated by CMake, which in turn is towards making it possible to
disable plugins at configuration time.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74245
LanguageRuntime::GetOverrideExprOptions is specific to clang and was
only overridden in RenderScriptRuntime. LanguageRuntime in shouldn't
have any knowledge of clang, so remove it from LanguageRuntime and leave
it only in RenderScriptRuntime.
This is how it should've been and brings it more in line with
std::string_view. There should be no functional change here.
This is mostly mechanical from a custom clang-tidy check, with a lot of
manual fixups. It uncovers a lot of minor inefficiencies.
This doesn't actually modify StringRef yet, I'll do that in a follow-up.
Summary:
A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this:
```
//===-- TestUtilities.cpp -------------------------------------------------===//
```
However in LLDB most of our source files have arbitrary changes to this format and
these changes are spreading through LLDB as folks usually just use the existing
source files as templates for their new files (most notably the unnecessary
editor language indicator `-*- C++ -*-` is spreading and in every review
someone is pointing out that this is wrong, resulting in people pointing out that this
is done in the same way in other files).
This patch removes most of these inconsistencies including the editor language indicators,
all the different missing/additional '-' characters, files that center the file name, missing
trailing `===//` (mostly caused by clang-format breaking the line).
Reviewers: aprantl, espindola, jfb, shafik, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, kbarton, MaskRay, atanasyan, arphaman, jfb, abidh, jsji, JDevlieghere, usaxena95, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73258
Summary:
Adds support for doing range-based for-loops on LLDB's VariableList and
modernises all the index-based for-loops in LLDB where possible.
Reviewers: labath, jdoerfert
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70668
Summary:
The SearchCallback has a bool parameter that we always set to false, we never use in any callback implementation and that also changes its name
from one file to the other (either `containing` and `complete`). It was added in the original LLDB check in, so there isn't any history what
this was supposed to be, so let's just remove it.
Reviewers: jingham, JDevlieghere, labath
Reviewed By: jingham, labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68696
llvm-svn: 374313
Link against clang-cpp dylib rather than split libs when
CLANG_LINK_CLANG_DYLIB is enabled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68456
llvm-svn: 373734
Summary:
This patch converts FileSystem::Open from this prototype:
Status
Open(File &File, const FileSpec &file_spec, ...);
to this one:
llvm::Expected<std::unique_ptr<File>>
Open(const FileSpec &file_spec, ...);
This is beneficial on its own, as llvm::Expected is a more modern
and recommended error type than Status. It is also a necessary step
towards https://reviews.llvm.org/D67891, and further developments
for lldb_private::File.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, jasonmolenda, labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67996
llvm-svn: 373003
I find as a good cleanup to drop the Compile method. As I do not find TIMTOWTDI
as an advantage and there is already constructor parameter to compile the
regex.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66392
llvm-svn: 369352
Originally I wanted to remove the RegularExpression class in Utility and
replace it with llvm::Regex. However, during that transition I noticed
that there are several places where need the regular expression string.
So instead I propose to keep the RegularExpression class and make it a
thin wrapper around llvm::Regex.
This patch also removes the workaround for empty regular expressions.
The result is that we are now (more or less) POSIX conformant.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66174
llvm-svn: 369153
This patch replaces explicit calls to log::Printf with the new LLDB_LOGF
macro. The macro is similar to LLDB_LOG but supports printf-style format
strings, instead of formatv-style format strings.
So instead of writing:
if (log)
log->Printf("%s\n", str);
You'd write:
LLDB_LOG(log, "%s\n", str);
This change was done mechanically with the command below. I replaced the
spurious if-checks with vim, since I know how to do multi-line
replacements with it.
find . -type f -name '*.cpp' -exec \
sed -i '' -E 's/log->Printf\(/LLDB_LOGF\(log, /g' "{}" +
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65128
llvm-svn: 366936
Summary: This seems better suited to be in a plugin.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, clayborg, jingham, compnerd, labath
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64599
llvm-svn: 365951
Summary:
Using llvm-style rtti gives us stronger guarantees around casting
LanguageRuntimes.
As discussed in D62755
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62934
llvm-svn: 362884
Summary:
According to [C128] "Virtual functions should specify exactly one
of `virtual`, `override`, or `final`", I've added override where a
virtual function is overriden but the explicit `override` keyword
was missing. Whenever both `virtual` and `override` were specified,
I removed `virtual`. As C.128 puts it:
> [...] writing more than one of these three is both redundant and
> a potential source of errors.
I anticipate a discussion about whether or not to add `override` to
destructors but I went for it because of an example in [ISOCPP1000].
Let me repeat the comment for you here:
Consider this code:
```
struct Base {
virtual ~Base(){}
};
struct SubClass : Base {
~SubClass() {
std::cout << "It works!\n";
}
};
int main() {
std::unique_ptr<Base> ptr = std::make_unique<SubClass>();
}
```
If for some odd reason somebody removes the `virtual` keyword from the
`Base` struct, the code will no longer print `It works!`. So adding
`override` to destructors actively protects us from accidentally
breaking our code at runtime.
[C128]: https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/blob/master/CppCoreGuidelines.md#c128-virtual-functions-should-specify-exactly-one-of-virtual-override-or-final
[ISOCPP1000]: https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/issues/1000#issuecomment-476951555
Reviewers: teemperor, JDevlieghere, davide, shafik
Reviewed By: teemperor
Subscribers: kwk, arphaman, kadircet, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61440
llvm-svn: 359868
A lot of comments in LLDB are surrounded by an ASCII line to delimit the
begging and end of the comment.
Its use is not really consistent across the code base, sometimes the
lines are longer, sometimes they are shorter and sometimes they are
omitted. Furthermore, it looks kind of weird with the 80 column limit,
where the comment actually extends past the line, but not by much.
Furthermore, when /// is used for Doxygen comments, it looks
particularly odd. And when // is used, it incorrectly gives the
impression that it's actually a Doxygen comment.
I assume these lines were added to improve distinguishing between
comments and code. However, given that todays editors and IDEs do a
great job at highlighting comments, I think it's worth to drop this for
the sake of consistency. The alternative is fixing all the
inconsistencies, which would create a lot more churn.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60508
llvm-svn: 358135
My apologies for the large patch. With the exception of ConstString.h
itself it was entirely produced by sed.
ConstString has exactly one const char * data member, so passing a
ConstString by reference is not any more efficient than copying it by
value. In both cases a single pointer is passed. But passing it by
value makes it harder to accidentally return the address of a local
object.
(This fixes rdar://problem/48640859 for the Apple folks)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59030
llvm-svn: 355553
The `ap` suffix is a remnant of lldb's former use of auto pointers,
before they got deprecated. Although all their uses were replaced by
unique pointers, some variables still carried the suffix.
In r353795 I removed another auto_ptr remnant, namely redundant calls to
::get for unique_pointers. Jim justly noted that this is a good
opportunity to clean up the variable names as well.
I went over all the changes to ensure my find-and-replace didn't have
any undesired side-effects. I hope I didn't miss any, but if you end up
at this commit doing a git blame on a weirdly named variable, please
know that the change was unintentional.
llvm-svn: 353912
Unlike std::make_unique, which is only available since C++14,
std::make_shared is available since C++11. Not only is std::make_shared
a lot more readable compared to ::reset(new), it also performs a single
heap allocation for the object and control block.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57990
llvm-svn: 353764
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
This patch simplifies boolean expressions acorss LLDB. It was generated
using clang-tidy with the following command:
run-clang-tidy.py -checks='-*,readability-simplify-boolean-expr' -format -fix $PWD
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55584
llvm-svn: 349215
This patch removes the comments grouping header includes. They were
added after running IWYU over the LLDB codebase. However they add little
value, are often outdates and burdensome to maintain.
llvm-svn: 346626
This moves construction of data buffers into the FileSystem class. Like
some of the previous refactorings we don't translate the path yet
because the functionality hasn't been landed in LLVM yet.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54272
llvm-svn: 346598
This patch modifies how we open File instances in LLDB. Rather than
passing a path or FileSpec to the constructor, we now go through the
virtual file system. This is needed in order to make things work with
the VFS in the future.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54020
llvm-svn: 346049
This patch removes the logic for resolving paths out of FileSpec and
updates call sites to rely on the FileSystem class instead.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53915
llvm-svn: 345890
This patch removes the Exists method from FileSpec and updates its uses
with calls to the FileSystem.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53845
llvm-svn: 345854
This patch removes the GetPermissions and GetReadable methods from
FileSpec and updates its uses with calls to the FileSystem.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53831
llvm-svn: 345843
When we get the `resolve_scope` parameter from the SB API, it's a
`uint32_t`. We then pass it through all of LLDB this way, as a uint32.
This is unfortunate, because it means the user of an API never actually
knows what they're dealing with. We can call it something like
`resolve_scope` and have comments saying "this is a value from the
`SymbolContextItem` enumeration, but it makes more sense to just have it
actually *be* the correct type in the actual C++ type system to begin
with. This way the person reading the code just knows what it is.
The reason to use integers instead of enumerations for flags is because
when you do bitwise operations on enumerations they get promoted to
integers, so it makes it tedious to constantly be casting them back
to the enumeration types, so I've introduced a macro to make this
happen magically. By writing LLDB_MARK_AS_BITMASK_ENUM after defining
an enumeration, it will define overloaded operators so that the
returned type will be the original enum. This should address all
the mechanical issues surrounding using rich enum types directly.
This way, we get a better debugger experience, and new users to
the codebase can get more easily acquainted with the codebase because
their IDE features can help them understand what the types mean.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53597
llvm-svn: 345313
This reverts commit r344647.
This causes build failures with [-Werror, -Wswitch]. Some cases where the newly
introduced enum value is not handled in particular are in:
lldb/source/Expression/REPL.cpp:350
lldb/source/Interpreter/CommandInterpreter.cpp:1529
(maybe there could be more)
As I don't understand lldb to make sure the likely trivial fixes are
correct and also as they might need additional tests, leaving to the
author to resolve.
llvm-svn: 344722
Before we returned an error that was not exposed in the SB API and no useful
error message. This change returns eExpressionProducedNoResult and an
appropriate error string.
<rdar://problem/44539514>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53309
llvm-svn: 344647
In a subsequent commit, I will need to expose the search depth
to the SB API's, so I'm moving this define into lldb-enumerations
where it will get added to the lldb module.
llvm-svn: 341690
Michele Scandale