The functionality is not posix specific. Also force the usage of the
gdb-remote process plugin in the gdb platform class.
This is not sufficient to make TestPlatformConnect pass on windows (it
seems it suffers from module loading issues, unrelated to this test),
but it at least makes it shut down correctly, so I change the skip to an
xfail.
The comment for ValueType claims that all values <1 are errors, but
not all switch statements take this into account. This patch
introduces an explicit Error case and deletes all default: cases, so
we get warned about incomplete switch coverage.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D96537
TargetList::CreateTarget automatically adds created target to the list, however,
CommandObjectTargetCreate does some additional preparation after creating a target
and which can fail. The command should remove created target if it failed. Since
the function has many ways to return, scope guard does this work safely.
Changes to the TargetList make target adding and selection more transparent.
Other changes remove unnecessary SetSelectedTarget after CreateTarget.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93052
Force gdb-remote plugin when attaching using the derivatives
of PlatformPOSIX class. This is consistent with the behavior
for launching processes (via DebugProcess() method) and guarantees
consistent plugin choice on FreeBSD.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92667
Add a 'can_connect' parameter to Process plugin initialization, and use
it to filter plugins to these capable of remote connections. This is
used to prevent 'process connect' from picking up a plugin that can only
be used locally, e.g. the legacy FreeBSD plugin.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91810
This patch redesigns the Target::GetUtilityFunctionForLanguage API:
- Use a unique_ptr instead of a raw pointer for the return type.
- Wrap the result in an llvm::Expected instead of using a Status object as an I/O parameter.
- Combine the action of "getting" and "installing" the UtilityFunction as they always get called together.
- Pass std::strings instead of const char* and std::move them where appropriate.
There's more room for improvement but I think this tackles the most
prevalent issues with the current API.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90011
Move common ::DebugProcess() implementation shared by Linux and NetBSD
(and to be shared by FreeBSD shortly) into PlatformPOSIX, and move
the old base implementation used only by Darwin to PlatformDarwin.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88852
The near-identical implementations of this function for posix-y
platforms were merged in r293910. PlatformWindows was left out of this
merge because at the time we did not have a suitable base class to sink
the code into. That is no longer true, so this commit finishes the job
by moving the code into RemoteAwarePlatform::ResolveExecutable.
Summary:
This change represents the move of ClangASTImporter, ClangASTMetadata,
ClangExternalASTSourceCallbacks, ClangUtil, CxxModuleHandler, and
TypeSystemClang from lldbSource to lldbPluginExpressionParserClang.h
This explicitly removes knowledge of clang internals from lldbSymbol,
moving towards a more generic core implementation of lldb.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, davide, aprantl, teemperor, clayborg, labath, jingham, shafik
Subscribers: emaste, mgorny, arphaman, jfb, usaxena95, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73661
This is how it should've been and brings it more in line with
std::string_view. There should be no functional change here.
This is mostly mechanical from a custom clang-tidy check, with a lot of
manual fixups. It uncovers a lot of minor inefficiencies.
This doesn't actually modify StringRef yet, I'll do that in a follow-up.
Summary:
A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this:
```
//===-- TestUtilities.cpp -------------------------------------------------===//
```
However in LLDB most of our source files have arbitrary changes to this format and
these changes are spreading through LLDB as folks usually just use the existing
source files as templates for their new files (most notably the unnecessary
editor language indicator `-*- C++ -*-` is spreading and in every review
someone is pointing out that this is wrong, resulting in people pointing out that this
is done in the same way in other files).
This patch removes most of these inconsistencies including the editor language indicators,
all the different missing/additional '-' characters, files that center the file name, missing
trailing `===//` (mostly caused by clang-format breaking the line).
Reviewers: aprantl, espindola, jfb, shafik, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, kbarton, MaskRay, atanasyan, arphaman, jfb, abidh, jsji, JDevlieghere, usaxena95, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73258
Summary:
This commit renames ClangASTContext to TypeSystemClang to better reflect what this class is actually supposed to do
(implement the TypeSystem interface for Clang). It also gets rid of the very confusing situation that we have both a
`clang::ASTContext` and a `ClangASTContext` in clang (which sometimes causes Clang people to think I'm fiddling
with Clang's ASTContext when I'm actually just doing LLDB work).
I also have plans to potentially have multiple clang::ASTContext instances associated with one ClangASTContext so
the ASTContext naming will then become even more confusing to people.
Reviewers: #lldb, aprantl, shafik, clayborg, labath, JDevlieghere, davide, espindola, jdoerfert, xiaobai
Reviewed By: clayborg, labath, xiaobai
Subscribers: wuzish, emaste, nemanjai, mgorny, kbarton, MaskRay, arphaman, jfb, usaxena95, jingham, xiaobai, abidh, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72684
Target doesn't really need to know about ClangASTContext more than any
other TypeSystem. We can create a method ClangASTContext::GetScratch for
anything who needs a ClangASTContext specifically instead of just a
generic TypeSystem.
Summary:
The FileSpec class is often used as a sort of a pattern -- one specifies
a bare file name to search, and we check if in matches the full file
name of an existing module (for example).
These comparisons used FileSpec::Equal, which had some support for it
(via the full=false argument), but it was not a good fit for this job.
For one, it did a symmetric comparison, which makes sense for a function
called "equal", but not for typical searches (when searching for
"/foo/bar.so", we don't want to find a module whose name is just
"bar.so"). This resulted in patterns like:
if (FileSpec::Equal(pattern, file, pattern.GetDirectory()))
which would request a "full" match only if the pattern really contained
a directory. This worked, but the intended behavior was very unobvious.
On top of that, a lot of the code wanted to handle the case of an
"empty" pattern, and treat it as matching everything. This resulted in
conditions like:
if (pattern && !FileSpec::Equal(pattern, file, pattern.GetDirectory())
which are nearly impossible to decipher.
This patch introduces a FileSpec::Match function, which does exactly
what most of FileSpec::Equal callers want, an asymmetric match between a
"pattern" FileSpec and a an actual FileSpec. Empty paterns match
everything, filename-only patterns match only the filename component.
I've tried to update all callers of FileSpec::Equal to use a simpler
interface. Those that hardcoded full=true have been changed to use
operator==. Those passing full=pattern.GetDirectory() have been changed
to use FileSpec::Match.
There was also a handful of places which hardcoded full=false. I've
changed these to use FileSpec::Match too. This is a slight change in
semantics, but it does not look like that was ever intended, and it was
more likely a result of a misunderstanding of the "proper" way to use
FileSpec::Equal.
[In an ideal world a "FileSpec" and a "FileSpec pattern" would be two
different types, but given how widespread FileSpec is, it is unlikely
we'll get there in one go. This at least provides a good starting point
by centralizing all matching behavior.]
Reviewers: teemperor, JDevlieghere, jdoerfert
Subscribers: emaste, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70851
This removes the CleanUp class and replaces its usages with llvm's
ScopeExit, which has similar semantics.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67378
llvm-svn: 371474
This patch replaces explicit calls to log::Printf with the new LLDB_LOGF
macro. The macro is similar to LLDB_LOG but supports printf-style format
strings, instead of formatv-style format strings.
So instead of writing:
if (log)
log->Printf("%s\n", str);
You'd write:
LLDB_LOG(log, "%s\n", str);
This change was done mechanically with the command below. I replaced the
spurious if-checks with vim, since I know how to do multi-line
replacements with it.
find . -type f -name '*.cpp' -exec \
sed -i '' -E 's/log->Printf\(/LLDB_LOGF\(log, /g' "{}" +
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65128
llvm-svn: 366936
Summary:
NFC = [[ https://llvm.org/docs/Lexicon.html#nfc | Non functional change ]]
This commit is the result of modernizing the LLDB codebase by using
`nullptr` instread of `0` or `NULL`. See
https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/modernize-use-nullptr.html
for more information.
This is the command I ran and I to fix and format the code base:
```
run-clang-tidy.py \
-header-filter='.*' \
-checks='-*,modernize-use-nullptr' \
-fix ~/dev/llvm-project/lldb/.* \
-format \
-style LLVM \
-p ~/llvm-builds/debug-ninja-gcc
```
NOTE: There were also changes to `llvm/utils/unittest` but I did not
include them because I felt that maybe this library shall be updated in
isolation somehow.
NOTE: I know this is a rather large commit but it is a nobrainer in most
parts.
Reviewers: martong, espindola, shafik, #lldb, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: arsenm, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, JDevlieghere, teemperor, rnkovacs, emaste, kubamracek, nemanjai, ki.stfu, javed.absar, arichardson, kbarton, jrtc27, MaskRay, atanasyan, dexonsmith, arphaman, jfb, jsji, jdoerfert, lldb-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #lldb, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61847
llvm-svn: 361484
A lot of comments in LLDB are surrounded by an ASCII line to delimit the
begging and end of the comment.
Its use is not really consistent across the code base, sometimes the
lines are longer, sometimes they are shorter and sometimes they are
omitted. Furthermore, it looks kind of weird with the 80 column limit,
where the comment actually extends past the line, but not by much.
Furthermore, when /// is used for Doxygen comments, it looks
particularly odd. And when // is used, it incorrectly gives the
impression that it's actually a Doxygen comment.
I assume these lines were added to improve distinguishing between
comments and code. However, given that todays editors and IDEs do a
great job at highlighting comments, I think it's worth to drop this for
the sake of consistency. The alternative is fixing all the
inconsistencies, which would create a lot more churn.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60508
llvm-svn: 358135
Since these timeouts guard against catastrophic error in debugserver,
I also increased all of them to the maximum value among them.
The motivation for this test was the observation that an asanified
LLDB would often exhibit seemingly random test failures that could be
traced back to debugserver packets getting out of sync. With this path
applied I can no longer reproduce the one particular failure mode that
I was investigating.
rdar://problem/49441261
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60340
llvm-svn: 357829
Summary:
Implement a few routines for Windows to support some basic process interaction and file system operations.
Reviewers: zturner, llvm-commits, labath, jingham
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: emaste, jdoerfert, Hui, labath, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56232
llvm-svn: 354010
Summary:
The two classes contained a lot of duplicated code, but there wasn't a
good place to factor it to. It couldn't be the base Platform class,
since we also have platforms which are only remote (such as
PlatformGDBRemoteServer), and so it did not make sense for those to have
an m_remote_platform member.
This patch creates a new class, RemoteAwarePlatform, which can serve as
a base class for platforms which can both serve as a host, and forward
actions to a remote system. It is motivated partly by D56232 (which was
about to add a bunch of additional duplicated methods), and partly by my
own need to modify a function which happens to be implemented in both
places identically.
The patch moves the methods which are trivially identical in the two
classes into the common base class, there were one or two more methods
which could probably be merged into one, but this wasn't completely
trivial, so I did not attempt to do that now.
Reviewers: jingham, zturner, clayborg, asmith
Subscribers: emaste, mgorny, Hui, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58052
llvm-svn: 353812
Summary:
These classes describe the details of the process we are about to
launch, and so they are naturally used by the launching code in the Host
module. Previously they were present in Target because that is the most
important (but by far not the only) user of the launching code.
Since the launching code has other customers, must of which do not care
about Targets, it makes sense to move these classes to the Host layer,
next to the launching code.
This move reduces the number of times that Target is included from host
to 8 (it used to be 14).
Reviewers: zturner, clayborg, jingham, davide, teemperor
Subscribers: emaste, mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56602
llvm-svn: 353047
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
This patch removes the comments grouping header includes. They were
added after running IWYU over the LLDB codebase. However they add little
value, are often outdates and burdensome to maintain.
llvm-svn: 346626
This patch removes the logic for resolving paths out of FileSpec and
updates call sites to rely on the FileSystem class instead.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53915
llvm-svn: 345890
This patch removes the Exists method from FileSpec and updates its uses
with calls to the FileSystem.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53845
llvm-svn: 345854
This patch removes the ResolveExecutableLocation method from FileSpec
and updates its uses with calls to the FileSystem.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53834
llvm-svn: 345853
This patch removes the GetPermissions and GetReadable methods from
FileSpec and updates its uses with calls to the FileSystem.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53831
llvm-svn: 345843
This patch extends the FileSystem class with a bunch of functions that
are currently implemented as methods of the FileSpec class. These
methods will be removed in future commits and replaced by calls to the
file system.
The new functions are operated in terms of the virtual file system which
was recently moved from clang into LLVM so it could be reused in lldb.
Because the VFS is stateful, we turned the FileSystem class into a
singleton.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53532
llvm-svn: 345783
This is an NFC commit to refactor the "load dependent files" parameter
from a boolean to an enum value. We want to be able to specify a
default, in which case we decide whether or not to load the dependent
files based on whether the target is an executable or not (i.e. a
dylib).
This is a dependency for D51934.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51859
llvm-svn: 342633
Summary:
D48465 is currently blocked by the fact that tab-completing the first expression is deadlocking LLDB.
The reason for this deadlock is that when we push the ProcessIO handler for reading the Objective-C runtime
information from the executable (which is triggered when we parse the an expression for the first time),
the IOHandler can't be pushed as the Editline::Cancel method is deadlocking.
The deadlock in Editline is coming from the m_output_mutex, which is locked before we go into tab completion.
Even without this lock, calling Cancel on Editline will mean that Editline cleans up behind itself and deletes the
current user-input, which is screws up the console when we are tab-completing at the same time.
I think for now the most reasonable way of fixing this is to just not call Cancel on the current IOHandler when we push
the IOHandler for running an internal utility function.
As we can't really write unit tests for IOHandler itself (due to the hard dependency on an initialized Debugger including
all its global state) and Editline completion is currently also not really testable in an automatic fashion, the test for this has
to be that the expression command completion in D48465 doesn't fail when requesting completion the first time.
A more precise test plan for this is:
1. Apply D48465.
2. Start lldb and break in some function.
3. Type `expr foo` and press tab to request completion.
4. Without this patch, we deadlock and LLDB stops responding.
I'll provide an actual unit test for this once I got around and made the IOHandler code testable,
but for now unblocking D48465 is more critical.
Thanks to Jim for helping me debugging this.
Reviewers: jingham
Reviewed By: jingham
Subscribers: emaste, clayborg, abidh, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50912
llvm-svn: 340988
This provides an efficient (at least on Posix platforms) way to offload to the
target process the search & loading of a library when all we have are the
library name and a set of potential candidate locations.
<rdar://problem/40905971>
llvm-svn: 335912
Summary:
This has multiple advantages:
- we need only one function argument/instance variable instead of three
- no need to default initialize variables
- no custom parsing code
- VersionTuple has comparison operators, which makes version comparisons much
simpler
Reviewers: zturner, friss, clayborg, jingham
Subscribers: emaste, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47889
llvm-svn: 334950
SetFile has an optional style argument which defaulted to the native
style. This patch makes that argument mandatory so clients of the
FileSpec class are forced to think about the correct syntax.
At the same time this introduces a (protected) convenience method to
update the file from within the FileSpec class that keeps the current
style.
These two changes together prevent a potential pitfall where the style
might be forgotten, leading to the path being updated and the style
unintentionally being changed to the host style.
llvm-svn: 334663
The first fix wasn't enough, there is still a missing
ProcessInstanceInfo include in Host.mm. I won't be able to test a fix
before leaving work, so I am reverting both commits.
This reverts commit r332250 and the subsequent fix attempt.
llvm-svn: 332261
The Process class was only being referenced because of the last-ditch
effort in the process launchers to set a process death callback in case
one isn't set already.
Although launching a process for debugging is the most important kind of
"launch" we are doing, it is by far not the only one, so assuming this
particular callback is the one to be used is not a good idea (besides
breaking layering). Instead of assuming a particular exit callback, I
change the launcher code to require the callback to be set by the user (and fix
up the two call sites which did not set the callback already).
Reviewers: jingham, davide
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46395
llvm-svn: 332250
Summary:
Multiple threads could be calling into DoLoadImage concurrently,
only one should be allowed to create the UtilityFunction.
Reviewers: jingham
Subscribers: emaste, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46733
llvm-svn: 332115
This is intended as a clean up after the big clang-format commit
(r280751), which unfortunately resulted in many of the comment
paragraphs in LLDB being very hard to read.
FYI, the script I used was:
import textwrap
import commands
import os
import sys
import re
tmp = "%s.tmp"%sys.argv[1]
out = open(tmp, "w+")
with open(sys.argv[1], "r") as f:
header = ""
text = ""
comment = re.compile(r'^( *//) ([^ ].*)$')
special = re.compile(r'^((([A-Z]+[: ])|([0-9]+ )).*)|(.*;)$')
for line in f:
match = comment.match(line)
if match and not special.match(match.group(2)):
# skip intentionally short comments.
if not text and len(match.group(2)) < 40:
out.write(line)
continue
if text:
text += " " + match.group(2)
else:
header = match.group(1)
text = match.group(2)
continue
if text:
filled = textwrap.wrap(text, width=(78-len(header)),
break_long_words=False)
for l in filled:
out.write(header+" "+l+'\n')
text = ""
out.write(line)
os.rename(tmp, sys.argv[1])
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46144
llvm-svn: 331197
That way we won't have to compile a new expression every time we want
dlopen a library.
<rdar://problem/32626584>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45703
llvm-svn: 330214
Summary:
There was some confusion in the code about how to represent process
environment. Most of the code (ab)used the Args class for this purpose,
but some of it used a more basic StringList class instead. In either
case, the fact that the underlying abstraction did not provide primitive
operations for the typical environment operations meant that even a
simple operation like checking for an environment variable value was
several lines of code.
This patch adds a separate Environment class, which is essentialy a
llvm::StringMap<std::string> in disguise. To standard StringMap
functionality, it adds a couple of new functions, which are specific to
the environment use case:
- (most important) envp conversion for passing into execve() and likes.
Instead of trying to maintain a constantly up-to-date envp view, it
provides a function which creates a envp view on demand, with the
expectation that this will be called as the very last thing before
handing the value to the system function.
- insert(StringRef KeyEqValue) - splits KeyEqValue into (key, value)
pair and inserts it into the environment map.
- compose(value_type KeyValue) - takes a map entry and converts in back
into "KEY=VALUE" representation.
With this interface most of the environment-manipulating code becomes
one-liners. The only tricky part was maintaining compatibility in
SBLaunchInfo, which expects that the environment entries are accessible
by index and that the returned const char* is backed by the launch info
object (random access into maps is hard and the map stores the entry in
a deconstructed form, so we cannot just return a .c_str() value). To
solve this, I have the SBLaunchInfo convert the environment into the
"envp" form, and use it to answer the environment queries. Extra code is
added to make sure the envp version is always in sync.
(This also improves the layering situation as Args was in the Interpreter module
whereas Environment is in Utility.)
Reviewers: zturner, davide, jingham, clayborg
Subscribers: emaste, lldb-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41359
llvm-svn: 322174
To detect the correct function name based on the list of available symbols instead of the SDK version
Reviewers: tberghammer, clayborg
Subscribers: jaydeep, bhushan, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36445
llvm-svn: 310856
Summary:
On older android targets, we needed a dlopen rename workaround to get
"process load" working. Since API 26 this is not required as the targets
have a proper libdl so with the function names one would expect.
To make this work I've had to remove the const qualifier from the
GetLibdlFunctionDeclarations function (as now the declarations can
depend on the connected target). Since I was already modifying the
prototype (and the lower levels were already converted to StringRef) I
took the oportunity to convert this function as well.
llvm-svn: 307160
This renames the LLDB error class to Status, as discussed
on the lldb-dev mailing list.
A change of this magnitude cannot easily be done without
find and replace, but that has potential to catch unwanted
occurrences of common strings such as "Error". Every effort
was made to find all the obvious things such as the word "Error"
appearing in a string, etc, but it's possible there are still
some lingering occurences left around. Hopefully nothing too
serious.
llvm-svn: 302872
Pavel Labath