Apply changes from https://reviews.llvm.org/D91014 to other places where DWARF entries are being processed.
Test case is provided by @jankratochvil.
The test is marked to run only on x64 and exclude Windows and Darwin, because the assembly is not OS-independent.
(First attempt https://reviews.llvm.org/D96778 broke the build bots)
Reviewed By: jankratochvil
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97765
In DWARF v4 compile units go in .debug_info and type units go in
.debug_types. However, in v5 both kinds of units are in .debug_info.
Therefore we can't decide whether to use the CU or TU index just by
looking at which section we're reading from. We have to wait until we
have read the unit type from the header.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96194
The comment for ValueType claims that all values <1 are errors, but
not all switch statements take this into account. This patch
introduces an explicit Error case and deletes all default: cases, so
we get warned about incomplete switch coverage.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D96537
Finishing out the support (to the best of my knowledge/based on current
testing running the whole check-lldb with a clang forcibly using
DW_AT_ranges on all DW_TAG_subprograms) for this feature.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94064
gcc already produces debug info with this form
-freorder-block-and-partition
clang produces this sort of thing with -fbasic-block-sections and with a
coming-soon tweak to use ranges in DWARFv5 where they can allow greater
reuse of debug_addr than the low/high_pc forms.
This fixes the case of breaking on a function name, but leaves broken
printing a variable - a follow-up commit will add that and improve the
test case to match.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94063
In split DWARF v5 files, the DWO id is no longer in the DW_AT_GNU_dwo_id
attribute. It's in the CU header instead. This change makes lldb look in
both places.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93444
This patch introduces a LLDB_SCOPED_TIMER macro to hide the needlessly
repetitive creation of scoped timers in LLDB. It's similar to the
LLDB_LOG(F) macro.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93663
To get LLDB one step closer to fulfil the software redundancy requirements of
modern aircrafts, we apparently decided to have two separately maintained
implementations of `CreateTypedef` in TypeSystemClang. Let's pass on the idea of
an LLDB-powered jetliner and deleted one implementation.
On a more serious note: This function got duplicated a long time ago when the
idea of CompilerType with a backing TypeSystemClang subclass happened
(56939cb310). One implementation was supposed to
be called from CompilerType::CreateTypedef and the other has just always been
around to create typedefs. By accident one of the implementations is only used
by the PDB parser while the CompilerType::CreateTypedef backend is used by the
rest of LLDB.
We also had some patches over the year that only fixed one of the two functions
(D18099 for example only fixed up the CompilerType::CreateTypedef
implementation). D51162 and D86140 both fixed the same missing `addDecl` call
for one of the two implementations.
This patch:
* deletes the `CreateTypedefType` function as its only used by the PDB parser
and the `CreateTypedef` implementation is anyway needed as it's the backend
implementation of CompilerType.
* replaces the calls in the PDB parser by just calling the CompilerType wrapper.
* moves the documentation to the remaining function.
* moves the check for empty typedef names that was only in the deleted
implementation to the other (I don't think this fixes anything as I believe
all callers are already doing the same check).
I'll fix up the usual stuff (not using StringRef, not doing early exit) in a NFC
follow-up.
This patch is not NFC as the PDB parser now calls the function that has the fix
from D18099.
Reviewed By: labath, JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93382
We currently reject all templates that have either zero args or that have a
parameter pack without a name. Both cases are actually allowed in C++, so
rejecting them leads to LLDB instead falling back to a dummy 'void' type. This
leads to all kind of errors later on (most notable, variables that have such
template types appear to be missing as we can't have 'void' variables and
inheriting from such a template type will cause Clang to hit some asserts when
finding that the base class is 'void').
This just removes the too strict tests and adds a few tests for this stuff (+
some combinations of these tests with preceding template parameters).
Things that I left for follow-up patches:
* All the possible interactions with template-template arguments which seem like a whole new source of possible bugs.
* Function templates which completely lack sanity checks.
* Variable templates are not implemented.
* Alias templates are not implemented too.
* The rather strange checks that just make sure that the separate list of
template arg names and values always have the same length. I believe those
ought to be asserts, but my current plan is to move both those things into a
single list that can't end up in this inconsistent state.
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere, shafik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92425
When parsing DWARF and laying out bit-fields we don't properly take into account when they are in a union, they will all have a zero offset.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91118
I found a few cases where entries in the debug_line for a specific line of code have invalid entries (the address is outside of a code section or no section at all) and also valid entries. When this happens lldb might not set the breakpoint because the first line entry it will find in the line table might be the invalid one and since it's range is "invalid" no location is resolved. To get around this I changed the way we parse the line sequences to ignore those starting at an address under the first code segment.
Greg suggested to implement it this way so we don't need to check all sections for every line sequence.
Reviewed By: clayborg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87172
This would be reproducible in future DWZ category of the testsuite as:
Failed Tests (1):
lldb-api :: python_api/symbol-context/two-files/TestSymbolContextTwoFiles.py
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91014
Current user_id_t format is:
63{isDebugTypes} 62..32{dwo || 7fffffff}
31..0 {die_offset}
while current DIERef format is (I have made up the bit positions but the
field widths do match):
63{m_section==isDebugTypes} 62{m_dwo_num_valid} 61..32{m_dwo_num}
31..0 {m_die_offset}
Proposing to change user_id_t to:
63{isDebugTypes} 62{dwo_is_valid} 61..32{dwo; 0 if !valid}
31..0 {die_offset}
There is no benefit of having 31-bits wide dwo_num in user_id_t when it
gets converted to 30-bits width in DIERef.
This patch is for future DWZ patchset which extends the dwo_is_valid bit
into a 2-bit field (normal, DWO, DWZ, DWZcommon) so that both user_id_t
and DIERef can be changed then the same way.
It would be best to somehow unify user_id_t and DIERef but I do not plan
to do that. user_id_t should probably remain a number for the Python API
compatibility while there still needs to be some class with all the
methods to access it.
SymbolFileDWARF::GetDwpSymbolFile() and SymbolFileDWARF::GetDIE use
0x3fffffff for DWP but that does not clash:
formerly:
31bits32..62:0x7fffffff = normal unit / not any DWO
31bits32..62:0x3fffffff = DWP
31bits32..62:others = DWO unit number
after this patch:
bit62=0 30bits32..61:any = normal unit / not any DWO
bit62=1 30bits32..61:0x3fffffff = DWP
bit62=1 30bits32..61:others = DWO unit number
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90413
SymbolFileDWARF::GetTypes was not handling dwo correctly. The fix is
simple -- adding a GetNonSkeletonUnit call -- but I've snuck in a small
refactor as well.
LookupAddress makes no sense for DWARFTypeUnit.
Also make GetNonSkeletonUnit to preserve the called type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89646
Only SymbolFileDWARF::ParseCompileUnit creates a CompileUnit and it uses
DWARFCompileUnit for that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89165
This is a polymorphic class, copying it is a bad idea.
This was not a problem because most classes inheriting from it were
deleting their copy operations themselves. However, this enables us to
delete those explicit deletions, and ensure noone forgets to add them in
the future.
Add an optimal thread strategy to execute specified amount of tasks.
This strategy should prevent us from creating too many threads if we
occasionaly have an unexpectedly small amount of tasks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87765
Code was added that used llvm error checking to parse .debug_aranges, but the error check after parsing the DWARFDebugArangesSet was reversed and was causing no error to be returned with no valid address ranges being actually used. This meant we always would fall back onto creating out own address ranges by parsing the compile unit's ranges. This was causing problems for cases where the DW_TAG_compile_unit had a single address range by using a DW_AT_low_pc and DW_AT_high_pc attribute pair (not using a DW_AT_ranges attribute), but the .debug_aranges had correct split ranges. In this case we would end up using the single range for the compile unit that encompassed all of the ranges from the .debug_aranges section and would cause address resolving issues in LLDB where address lookups would fail for certain addresses.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87626
`image dump symtab` seems to output the symbols in whatever order they appear in
the DenseMap that is used to filter out symbols with non-unique addresses. As
DenseMap is a hash map this order can change at any time so the output of this
command is pretty unstable. This also causes the `Breakpad/symtab.test` to fail
with enabled reverse iteration (which reverses the DenseMap order to find issues
like this).
This patch makes the DenseMap a std::vector and uses a separate DenseSet to do
the address filtering. The output order is now dependent on the order in which
the symbols are read (which should be deterministic). It might also avoid a bit
of work as all the work for creating the Symbol constructor parameters is only
done when we can actually emplace a new Symbol.
Reviewed By: labath
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87036
Class-level static constexpr variables can have both DW_AT_const_value
(in the "declaration") and a DW_AT_location (in the "definition")
attributes. Our code was trying to handle this, but it was brittle and
hard to follow (and broken) because it was processing the attributes in
the order in which they were found.
Refactor the code to make the intent clearer -- DW_AT_location trumps
DW_AT_const_value, and fix the bug which meant that we were not
displaying these variables properly (the culprit was the delayed parsing
of the const_value attribute due to a need to fetch the variable type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86615
This fixes several issues in handling of DW_AT_const_value attributes:
- the first is that the size of the data given by data forms does not
need to match the size of the underlying variable. We already had the
case to handle this for DW_FORM_(us)data -- this extends the handling
to other data forms. The main reason this was not picked up is because
clang uses leb forms in these cases while gcc prefers the fixed-size
ones.
- The handling of DW_AT_strp form was completely broken -- we would end
up using the pointer value as the result. I've reorganized this code
so that it handles all string forms uniformly.
- In case of a completely bogus form we would crash due to
strlen(nullptr).
Depends on D86311.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86348
This is very similar to D85968, only more elusive to since we were not
adding the typedef type to the relevant DeclContext until D86140, which
meant that the DeclContext was populated (and the relevant assertion
hit) only after importing the type into the expression ast in a
particular way.
I haven't checked whether this situation can be hit in the gmodules
case, but my money is on "yes".
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86216
Parsing DWARFv5 debug_loclist offsets when a CU is parsed is weighing
down memory usage of symbolizers that don't need to parse this data at
all. There's not much benefit to caching these anyway - since they are
O(1) lookup and reading once you know where the offset list starts (and
can do bounds checking with the offset list size too).
In general, I think it might be time to start paying down some of the
technical debt of loc/loclist/range/rnglist parsing to try to unify it a
bit more.
eg:
* Currently DWARFUnit has: RangeSection, RangeSectionBase, LocSection,
LocSectionBase, LocTable, RngListTable, LoclistTableHeader (be nice if
these were all wrapped up in two variables - one for loclists, one for
rnglists)
* rnglists and loclists are handled differently (see:
LoclistTableHeader, but no RnglistTableHeader)
* maybe all these types could be less stateful - lazily parse what they
need to, even reparsing rather than caching because it doesn't seem
too expensive, for instance. (though admittedly so long as it's
constantcost/overead per compilatiton that's probably adequate)
* Maybe implementing and using a DWARFDataExtractor that can be
sub-ranged (so we could slice it up to just the single contribution) -
though maybe that's not so useful because loc/ranges need to refer to
it by absolute, not contribution-relative mechanisms
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86110
CreateFunctionDeclaration should just take a StringRef. GetDeclarationName is
(only) used by CreateFunctionDeclaration so that's why now also takes a
StringRef.
With -flimit-debug-info, we can run into cases when we only have a class
as a declaration, but we do have a definition of a nested class. In this
case, clang will hit an assertion when adding a member to an incomplete
type (but only if it's adding a c++ class, and not C struct).
It turns out we already had code to handle a similar situation arising
in the -gmodules scenario. This extends the code to handle
-flimit-debug-info as well, and reorganizes bits of other code handling
completion of types to move functions doing similar things closer
together.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85968
Jan Kratochvil