Types that came from a Clang module are nested in DW_TAG_module tags
in DWARF. This patch recreates the Clang module hierarchy in LLDB and
1;95;0csets the owning module information accordingly. My primary motivation
is to facilitate looking up per-module APINotes for individual
declarations, but this likely also has other applications.
This reapplies the previously reverted commit, but without support for
ClassTemplateSpecializations, which I'm going to look into separately.
rdar://problem/59634380
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75488
Types that came from a Clang module are nested in DW_TAG_module tags
in DWARF. This patch recreates the Clang module hierarchy in LLDB and
sets the owning module information accordingly. My primary motivation
is to facilitate looking up per-module APINotes for individual
declarations, but this likely also has other applications.
rdar://problem/59634380
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75488
Summary:
This change represents the move of ClangASTImporter, ClangASTMetadata,
ClangExternalASTSourceCallbacks, ClangUtil, CxxModuleHandler, and
TypeSystemClang from lldbSource to lldbPluginExpressionParserClang.h
This explicitly removes knowledge of clang internals from lldbSymbol,
moving towards a more generic core implementation of lldb.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, davide, aprantl, teemperor, clayborg, labath, jingham, shafik
Subscribers: emaste, mgorny, arphaman, jfb, usaxena95, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73661
Summary:
This commit renames ClangASTContext to TypeSystemClang to better reflect what this class is actually supposed to do
(implement the TypeSystem interface for Clang). It also gets rid of the very confusing situation that we have both a
`clang::ASTContext` and a `ClangASTContext` in clang (which sometimes causes Clang people to think I'm fiddling
with Clang's ASTContext when I'm actually just doing LLDB work).
I also have plans to potentially have multiple clang::ASTContext instances associated with one ClangASTContext so
the ASTContext naming will then become even more confusing to people.
Reviewers: #lldb, aprantl, shafik, clayborg, labath, JDevlieghere, davide, espindola, jdoerfert, xiaobai
Reviewed By: clayborg, labath, xiaobai
Subscribers: wuzish, emaste, nemanjai, mgorny, kbarton, MaskRay, arphaman, jfb, usaxena95, jingham, xiaobai, abidh, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72684
Summary:
I often struggle to understand what exactly LLDB is doing by looking at our expression evaluation logging as our messages look like this:
```
CompleteTagDecl[2] on (ASTContext*)0x7ff31f01d240 Completing (TagDecl*)0x7ff31f01d568 named DeclName1
```
From the log messages it's unclear what this ASTContext is. Is it the scratch context, the expression context, some decl vendor context or a context from a module?
The pointer value isn't helpful for anyone unless I'm in a debugger where I could inspect the memory at the address. But even with a debugger it's not easy to
figure out what this ASTContext is without having deeper understanding about all the different ASTContext instances in LLDB (e.g., valid SourceLocation
from the file system usually means that this is the Objective-C decl vendor, a file name from multiple expressions is probably the scratch context, etc.).
This patch adds a name field to ClangASTContext instances that we can use to store a name which can be used for logging and debugging. With this
our log messages now look like this:
```
CompleteTagDecl[2] on scratch ASTContext. Completing (TagDecl*)0x7ff31f01d568 named Foo
```
We can now also just print a ClangASTContext from the debugger and see a useful name in the `m_display_name` field, e.g.
```
m_display_name = "AST for /Users/user/test/main.o";
```
Reviewers: shafik, labath, JDevlieghere, mib
Reviewed By: shafik
Subscribers: clayborg, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72391
ClangASTContext::getASTContext() currently returns a ptr but we have an assert there since a
while that the ASTContext is not a nullptr. This causes that we still have a lot of code
that is doing nullptr checks on the result of getASTContext() which is all unreachable code.
This patch changes the return value to a reference to make it clear this can't be a nullptr
and deletes all the nullptr checks.
Their naming is misleading as they only return the
ClangASTContext-owned variables. For ClangASTContext instances constructed
for a given clang::ASTContext they silently generated duplicated instances
(e.g., a second IdentifierTable) that were essentially unusable.
This removes all these getters as they are anyway not very useful in comparison
to just calling the clang::ASTContext getters. The initialization
code has been moved to the CreateASTContext initialization method so that all
code for making our own clang::ASTContext is in one place.
Adrian Prantl