The code previously used two BUILD_PAIRs to concatenate the two UMULO
results with 0s in the lower bits to match original VT. Then it created
an ADD and a UADDO with the original bit width. Each of those operations
need to be expanded since they have illegal types.
Since we put 0s in the lower bits before the ADD, the lower half of the
ADD result will be 0. So the lower half of the UADDO result is
solely determined by the other operand. Since the UADDO need to
be split in half, we don't really needd an operation for the lower
bits. Unfortunately, we don't see that in type legalization and end up
creating something more complicated and DAG combine or
lowering aren't always able to recover it.
This patch directly generates the narrower ADD and UADDO to avoid
needing to legalize them. Now only the MUL is done on the original
type.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97440
Even if the first computeKnownBits call doesn't have any zero
bits it is possible the other operand has bitwidth-1 leading zero.
In that case overflow is still impossible. So always call computeKnownBits
for both operands.
Using ComputeNumSignBits or computeKnownBits we might be able
to determine that overflow is impossible.
This especially helps after type legalization if the type was
promoted from a type with half the bits or more. Type legalization
conservatively creates a promoted smulo/umulo and an overflow
check for the promoted bits. The overflow from the promoted
smulo/umulo is ORed with the result of the promoted bits
overflow check. Proving that the promoted smulo/umulo can never
overflow will leave us with just the promoted bits overflow check.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97160
(CMTST A, A) will only set elements to 0 if the element is 0 in A. Use
it for != 0 compares, which currently use (vnot (CMEQz A)). This saves a
mvn instruction.
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97303
vnot (xor -1) should be equivalent to the AArch64 specific AArch64ISD::NOT
node, but allow more folding thanks to all the target independent
optimizations. Specifically this allows select(icmp ne, x, y) to
become "cmeq; bsl y, x" as opposed to needing to convert the predicate
with "cmeq; mvn; bsl x, y"
Unfortunately there is a regression in a cmtst test, but the code it
selected from was already non-canonical, with instcombine preferring to
use an eq predicate instead. Plus the more common case of icmp ne is
improved.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90126
Split out from D61692 per RKSimon's suggestion. Vector op
legalization will automatically recursively legalize the returned
SDValue, but we need to take care of the other results ourselves.
Otherwise it will end up getting legalized only during op
legalization, by which point it might be too late (though I'm not
aware of any specific cases right now).
There are codegen differences because expansion occurs earlier now
and we don't get a DAGCombiner run in between.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61744
llvm-svn: 360470
Summary:
When promoting the over flow vector for these ops we should use the target's desired setcc result type. This way a v8i32 result type will use a v8i32 overflow vector instead of a v8i16 overflow vector. A v8i16 overflow vector will cause LegalizeDAG/LegalizeVectorOps to have to use v8i32 and truncate to v8i16 in its expansion. By doing this in type legalization instead, we get the truncate into the DAG earlier and give DAG combine more of a chance to optimize it.
We also have to fix unrolling to use the scalar setcc result type for the scalarized operation, and convert it to the required vector element type after the scalar operation. We have to observe the vector boolean contents when doing this conversion. The previous code was just taking the scalar result and putting it in the vector. But for X86 and AArch64 that would have only put a the boolean value in bit 0 of the element and left all other bits in the element 0. We need to ensure all bits in the element are the same. I'm using a select with constants here because that's what setcc unrolling in LegalizeVectorOps used.
Reviewers: spatel, RKSimon, nikic
Reviewed By: nikic
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, dmgreen, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58567
llvm-svn: 354753
Second part of https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40442.
This adds an extra UnrollVectorOverflowOp() method to SDAG, because
the general UnrollOverflowOp() method can't deal with multiple results.
Additionally we need to expand UMULO/SMULO during vector op
legalization, as it may result in unrolling, which may need additional
type legalization.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57997
llvm-svn: 354513
Craig Topper