Commit Graph

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Matt Arsenault 89baeaef2f Reapply "RegAllocFast: Rewrite and improve"
This reverts commit 73a6a164b8.
2020-09-30 10:35:25 -04:00
Muhammad Omair Javaid 73a6a164b8 Revert "Reapply Revert "RegAllocFast: Rewrite and improve""
This reverts commit 55f9f87da2.

Breaks following buildbots:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lldb-arm-ubuntu/builds/4306
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/builds/9154
2020-09-22 14:40:06 +05:00
Matt Arsenault 55f9f87da2 Reapply Revert "RegAllocFast: Rewrite and improve"
This reverts commit dbd53a1f0c.

Needed lldb test updates
2020-09-21 15:45:27 -04:00
Eric Christopher dbd53a1f0c Temporarily Revert "RegAllocFast: Rewrite and improve"
as it's breaking a few tests in the lldb test suite.

Bot: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lldb-arm-ubuntu/builds/4226/steps/test/logs/stdio

This reverts commit c8757ff3aa.
2020-09-18 18:11:21 -07:00
Matt Arsenault c8757ff3aa RegAllocFast: Rewrite and improve
This rewrites big parts of the fast register allocator. The basic
strategy of doing block-local allocation hasn't changed but I tweaked
several details:

Track register state on register units instead of physical
registers. This simplifies and speeds up handling of register aliases.
Process basic blocks in reverse order: Definitions are known to end
register livetimes when walking backwards (contrary when walking
forward then uses may or may not be a kill so we need heuristics).

Check register mask operands (calls) instead of conservatively
assuming everything is clobbered.  Enhance heuristics to detect
killing uses: In case of a small number of defs/uses check if they are
all in the same basic block and if so the last one is a killing use.
Enhance heuristic for copy-coalescing through hinting: We check the
first k defs of a register for COPYs rather than relying on there just
being a single definition.  When testing this on the full llvm
test-suite including SPEC externals I measured:

average 5.1% reduction in code size for X86, 4.9% reduction in code on
aarch64. (ranging between 0% and 20% depending on the test) 0.5%
faster compiletime (some analysis suggests the pass is slightly slower
than before, but we more than make up for it because later passes are
faster with the reduced instruction count)

Also adds a few testcases that were broken without this patch, in
particular bug 47278.

Patch mostly by Matthias Braun
2020-09-18 14:05:18 -04:00
Kang Zhang 86e3abc9e6 [PowerPC] Add some InstAlias definitions
Summary:
This patch add the InstAlias definitions for below instructions.

ADDI ADDIS ADDI8 ADDIS8
RLWINM8
ISEL ISEL8
OR OR_rec ORI ORI8 XORI8
CNTLZW8 CNTLZW8_rec
TEND TSR
RFEBB
NOR NOR_rec
MTCRF
SUBF SUBF_rec SUBFC SUBFC_rec
RLDICL_32_64
TW

Reviewed By: steven.zhang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77559
2020-05-24 14:05:28 +00:00
Francis Visoiu Mistrih 0503add6da [CodeGen] Don't resolve the stack protector frame accesses until PEI
Currently, stack protector loads and stores are resolved during
LocalStackSlotAllocation (if the pass needs to run). When this is the
case, the base register assigned to the frame access is going to be one
of the vregs created during LocalStackSlotAllocation. This means that we
are keeping a pointer to the stack protector slot, and we're using this
pointer to load and store to it.

In case register pressure goes up, we may end up spilling this pointer
to the stack, which can be a security concern.

Instead, leave it to PEI to resolve the frame accesses. In order to do
that, we make all stack protector accesses go through frame index
operands, then PEI will resolve this using an offset from sp/fp/bp.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64759

llvm-svn: 367068
2019-07-25 22:23:48 +00:00
Francis Visoiu Mistrih 9f2b290add [PEI] Don't re-allocate a pre-allocated stack protector slot
The LocalStackSlotPass pre-allocates a stack protector and makes sure
that it comes before the local variables on the stack.

We need to make sure that later during PEI we don't re-allocate a new
stack protector slot. If that happens, the new stack protector slot will
end up being **after** the local variables that it should be protecting.

Therefore, we would have two slots assigned for two different stack
protectors, one at the top of the stack, and one at the bottom. Since
PEI will overwrite the assigned slot for the stack protector, the load
that is used to compare the value of the stack protector will use the
slot assigned by PEI, which is wrong.

For this, we need to check if the object is pre-allocated, and re-use
that pre-allocated slot.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64757

llvm-svn: 366371
2019-07-17 20:46:19 +00:00
Francis Visoiu Mistrih 39fc2843e4 [CodeGen] Add stack protector tests where the guard gets re-assigned
In preparation of a fix, add tests for multiple backends.

llvm-svn: 366370
2019-07-17 20:46:16 +00:00