Commit Graph

7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Craig Topper 4eb4f8963f [RISCV] Use sign extend for i32 arguments and returns in makeLibCall on RV64.
As far as I know 32 bits arguments and returns on RV64 are always
sign extended to i64. So I think we should be taking this into
account around libcalls.

Reviewed By: luismarques

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95285
2021-01-25 09:33:48 -08:00
Michael Munday e28b6a60bc [RISCV][NFC] Regenerate RISCV CodeGen tests
Regenerated using:

./llvm/utils/update_llc_test_checks.py -u llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/*.ll

This has added comments to spill-related instructions and added @plt to
some symbols.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92841
2020-12-09 19:42:49 +00:00
Craig Topper 574de837d4 Recommit "[RISCV] Move some test cases from rv64i-single-softfloat.ll to a new rv64i-double-softfloat.ll. NFC""
With new test file this time.

Original message

This new test covers both with and without the F extension enabled.

This shows that the fptosi/fptoui for double->i32 use a different
libcall depending on whether the F extension is enabled. If it's
not enabled we use the 'si' library call. If it is enabled we use 'di'.
2020-11-04 19:58:11 -08:00
Craig Topper 7709d30641 Revert "[RISCV] Move some test cases from rv64i-single-softfloat.ll to a new rv64i-double-softfloat.ll. NFC"
I failed to git add the new test file.

This reverts commit 36072cc0a4.
2020-11-04 19:55:13 -08:00
Craig Topper 36072cc0a4 [RISCV] Move some test cases from rv64i-single-softfloat.ll to a new rv64i-double-softfloat.ll. NFC
This new test covers both with and without the F extension enabled.

This shows that the fptosi/fptoui for double->i32 use a different
libcall depending on whether the F extension is enabled. If it's
not enabled we use the 'si' library call. If it is enabled we use 'di'.
2020-11-04 19:51:43 -08:00
Kamlesh Kumar 7622ea5835 [RISCV64] Emit correct lib call for fp(float/double) to ui/si
Since i32 is not legal in riscv64,
it always promoted to i64 before emitting lib call and
for conversions like float/double to int and float/double to unsigned int
wrong lib call was emitted. This commit fix it using custom lowering.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80526
2020-06-18 19:34:16 +05:30
Shiva Chen b39876d8cd [RISCV] Avoid generating AssertZext for LP64 ABI when lowering floating LibCall
The patch fixed the issue that RV64 didn't clear the upper bits
when return complex floating value with lp64 ABI.

float _Complex
complex_add(float _Complex a, float _Complex b)
{
   return a + b;
}

RealResult = zero_extend(RealA + RealB)
ImageResult = ImageA + ImageB
Return (RealResult | (ImageResult << 32))

The patch introduces shouldExtendTypeInLibCall target hook to suppress
the AssertZext generation when lowering floating LibCall.

Thanks to Eli's comments from the Bugzilla
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42820

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65497

llvm-svn: 370275
2019-08-28 23:40:37 +00:00