This commit copies existing tests at llvm/Transforms containing
'shufflevector X, undef' and replaces them with 'shufflevector X, poison'.
The new copied tests have *-inseltpoison.ll suffix at its file name
(as db7a2f347f did)
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D93793
Test files listed using
grep -R -E "^[^;]*shufflevector <.*> .*, <.*> undef" | cut -d":" -f1 | uniq
Test files copied & updated using
file_org=llvm/test/Transforms/$1
if [[ "$file_org" = *-inseltpoison.ll ]]; then
file=$file_org
else
file=${file_org%.ll}-inseltpoison.ll
if [ ! -f $file ]; then
cp $file_org $file
fi
fi
sed -i -E 's/^([^;]*)shufflevector <(.*)> (.*), <(.*)> undef/\1shufflevector <\2> \3, <\4> poison/g' $file
head -1 $file | grep "Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py" -q
if [ "$?" == 1 ]; then
echo "$file : should be manually updated"
# The test is manually updated
exit 1
fi
python3 ./llvm/utils/update_test_checks.py --opt-binary=./build-releaseassert/bin/opt $file
This commit copies existing tests at llvm/Transforms and replaces
'insertelement undef' in those files with 'insertelement poison'.
(see https://reviews.llvm.org/D93586)
Tests listed using this script:
grep -R -E '^[^;]*insertelement <.*> undef,' . | cut -d":" -f1 | uniq |
wc -l
Tests updated:
file_org=llvm/test/Transforms/$1
file=${file_org%.ll}-inseltpoison.ll
cp $file_org $file
sed -i -E 's/^([^;]*)insertelement <(.*)> undef/\1insertelement <\2> poison/g' $file
head -1 $file | grep "Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py" -q
if [ "$?" == 1 ]; then
echo "$file : should be manually updated"
# I manually updated the script
exit 1
fi
python3 ./llvm/utils/update_test_checks.py --opt-binary=./build-releaseassert/bin/opt $file
optimizeGatherScatterInst does nothing specific to fixed length vectors
but uses FixedVectorType to extract the number of elements. This patch
simply updates the code to use VectorType and getElementCount instead.
For testing I just copied Transforms/CodeGenPrepare/X86/gather-scatter-opt.ll
replacing `<4 x ` with `<vscale x 4`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92572
This version fixes a buildbot failure cause by picking the wrong insert
point for XORs. We cannot pick the XOR binary operator as insert point,
as it is not guaranteed that both input operands for the overflow
intrinsic are defined before it.
This reverts the revert commit
c7fc0e5da6.
Instcombine folds (a + b <u a) to (a ^ -1 <u b) and that does not match
the expected pattern in CodeGenPerpare via UAddWithOverflow.
This causes a regression over Clang 7 on both X86 and AArch64:
https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/juhXYV
This patch extends UAddWithOverflow to also catch the XOR case, if the
XOR is only used in the ICMP. This covers just a single case, but I'd
like to make sure I am not missing anything before tackling the other
cases.
Reviewers: nikic, RKSimon, lebedev.ri, spatel
Reviewed By: nikic, lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74228
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).
This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.
llvm-svn: 358546
This patch improves code generation for some AArch64 ACLE intrinsics. It adds
support to CGP to duplicate and sink operands to their user, if they can be
folded into a target instruction, like zexts and sub into usubl. It adds a
TargetLowering hook shouldSinkOperands, which looks at the operands of
instructions to see if sinking is profitable.
I decided to add a new target hook, as for the sinking to be profitable,
at least on AArch64, we have to look at multiple operands of an
instruction, instead of looking at the users of a zext for example.
The sinking is done in CGP, because it works around an instruction
selection limitation. If instruction selection is not limited to a
single basic block, this patch should not be needed any longer.
Alternatively this could be done in the LoopSink pass, which tries to
undo LICM for instructions in blocks that are not executed frequently.
Note that we do not force the operands to sink to have a single user,
because we duplicate them before sinking. Therefore this is only
desirable if they really can be done for free. Additionally we could
consider the impact on live ranges later on.
This should fix https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40025.
As for performance, we have internal code that uses intrinsics and can
be speed up by 10% by this change.
Reviewers: SjoerdMeijer, t.p.northover, samparker, efriedma, RKSimon, spatel
Reviewed By: samparker
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57377
llvm-svn: 353152
Creating the IR builder, then modifying the CFG, leads to an IRBuilder
where the BB and insertion point are inconsistent, so new instructions
have the wrong parent.
Modified an existing test because the test wasn't covering anything
useful (the "invoke" was not actually an invoke by the time we hit the
code in question).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55729
llvm-svn: 349693
Summary:
Large GEP splitting, introduced in rL332015, uses a `DenseMap<AssertingVH<Value>, ...>`. This causes an assertion to fail (in debug builds) or undefined behaviour to occur (in release builds) when a value is RAUWed.
This manifested itself in the 7zip benchmark from the llvm test suite built on ARM with `-fstrict-vtable-pointers` enabled while RAUWing invariant group launders and splits in CodeGenPrepare.
This patch merges the large offsets of the argument and the result of an invariant.group strip/launder intrinsic before RAUWing.
Reviewers: Prazek, javed.absar, haicheng, efriedma
Reviewed By: Prazek, efriedma
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51936
llvm-svn: 344802
Accessing the members of a large data structures needs a lot of GEPs which
usually have large offsets due to the size of the underlying data structure. If
the offsets are too large to fit into the r+i addressing mode, these GEPs cannot
be sunk to their users' blocks and many extra registers are needed then to carry
the values of these GEPs.
This patch tries to split a large data struct starting from %base like the
following.
Before:
BB0:
%base =
BB1:
%gep0 = gep %base, off0
%gep1 = gep %base, off1
%gep2 = gep %base, off2
BB2:
%load1 = load %gep0
%load2 = load %gep1
%load3 = load %gep2
After:
BB0:
%base =
%new_base = gep %base, off0
BB1:
%new_gep0 = %new_base
%new_gep1 = gep %new_base, off1 - off0
%new_gep2 = gep %new_base, off2 - off0
BB2:
%load1 = load i32, i32* %new_gep0
%load2 = load i32, i32* %new_gep1
%load3 = load i32, i32* %new_gep2
In the above example, the struct is split into two parts. The first part still
starts from %base and the second part starts from %new_base. After the
splitting, %new_gep1 and %new_gep2 have smaller offsets and then can be sunk to
BB2 and folded into their users.
The algorithm to split data structure is simple and very similar to the work of
merging SExts. First, it collects GEPs that have large offsets when iterating
the blocks. Second, it splits the underlying data structures and updates the
collected GEPs to use smaller offsets.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42759
llvm-svn: 332015
This is recommit of r287553 after fixing the invalid loop info after eliminating an empty block and unit test failures in AVR and WebAssembly :
Summary: Merging an empty case block into the header block of switch could cause ISel to add COPY instructions in the header of switch, instead of the case block, if the case block is used as an incoming block of a PHI. This could potentially increase dynamic instructions, especially when the switch is in a loop. I added a test case which was reduced from the benchmark I was targetting.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, mcrosier, manmanren, wmi, joerg, davidxl
Subscribers: joerg, qcolombet, danielcdh, hfinkel, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22696
llvm-svn: 289988
This is recommit of r287553 after fixing the invalid loop info after eliminating an empty block:
Summary: Merging an empty case block into the header block of switch could cause ISel to add COPY instructions in the header of switch, instead of the case block, if the case block is used as an incoming block of a PHI. This could potentially increase dynamic instructions, especially when the switch is in a loop. I added a test case which was reduced from the benchmark I was targetting.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, mcrosier, manmanren, wmi, joerg, davidxl
Subscribers: joerg, qcolombet, danielcdh, hfinkel, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22696
llvm-svn: 289951
Summary: Merging an empty case block into the header block of switch could cause
ISel to add COPY instructions in the header of switch, instead of the case
block, if the case block is used as an incoming block of a PHI. This could
potentially increase dynamic instructions, especially when the switch is in a
loop. I added a test case which was reduced from the benchmark I was targetting.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, mcrosier, manmanren, wmi, davidxl
Subscribers: qcolombet, danielcdh, hfinkel, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22696
llvm-svn: 287553
This is a redo of r251849 except the tests have been split into arch-specific folders
to hopefully make the bots happy.
This is a follow-up from the discussion in D12965. The block-at-a-time limitation of
SelectionDAG also came up in D13297.
Without the InstCombine change from D12965, I don't expect this patch to make any
difference in the real world because InstCombine does not shrink cases like this in
visitSwitchInst(). But we need to have this CGP safety harness in place before
proceeding with any shrinkage in D12965, so we won't generate extra extends for compares.
I've opted for IR regression tests in the patch because that seems like a clearer way to
test the transform, but PowerPC CodeGen for an i16 widening test is shown below. x86
will need more work to solve: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=22473
Before:
BB#0:
mr 4, 3
extsh. 3, 4
ble 0, .LBB0_5
BB#1:
cmpwi 3, 99
bgt 0, .LBB0_9
BB#2:
rlwinm 4, 4, 0, 16, 31 <--- 32-bit mask/extend
li 3, 0
cmplwi 4, 1
beqlr 0
BB#3:
cmplwi 4, 10
bne 0, .LBB0_12
BB#4:
li 3, 1
blr
.LBB0_5:
rlwinm 3, 4, 0, 16, 31 <--- 32-bit mask/extend
cmplwi 3, 65436
beq 0, .LBB0_13
BB#6:
cmplwi 3, 65526
beq 0, .LBB0_15
BB#7:
cmplwi 3, 65535
bne 0, .LBB0_12
BB#8:
li 3, 4
blr
.LBB0_9:
rlwinm 3, 4, 0, 16, 31 <--- 32-bit mask/extend
cmplwi 3, 100
beq 0, .LBB0_14
...
After:
BB#0:
rlwinm 4, 3, 0, 16, 31 <--- mask/extend to 32-bit and then use that for comparisons
cmpwi 4, 999
ble 0, .LBB0_5
BB#1:
lis 3, 0
ori 3, 3, 65525
cmpw 4, 3
bgt 0, .LBB0_9
BB#2:
cmplwi 4, 1000
beq 0, .LBB0_14
BB#3:
cmplwi 4, 65436
bne 0, .LBB0_13
BB#4:
li 3, 6
blr
.LBB0_5:
li 3, 0
cmplwi 4, 1
beqlr 0
BB#6:
cmplwi 4, 10
beq 0, .LBB0_12
BB#7:
cmplwi 4, 100
bne 0, .LBB0_13
BB#8:
li 3, 2
blr
.LBB0_9:
cmplwi 4, 65526
beq 0, .LBB0_15
BB#10:
cmplwi 4, 65535
bne 0, .LBB0_13
...
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13532
llvm-svn: 251857
The test being performed is just an approximation anyway, so it really
shouldn't crash when things don't go entirely as expected.
Should fix PR20474.
llvm-svn: 214177
Juneyoung Lee