Commit Graph

19 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Juneyoung Lee 9d70dbdc2b [InstCombine] use poison as placeholder for undemanded elems
Currently undef is used as a don’t-care vector when constructing a vector using a series of insertelement.
However, this is problematic because undef isn’t undefined enough.
Especially, a sequence of insertelement can be optimized to shufflevector, but using undef as its placeholder makes shufflevector a poison-blocking instruction because undef cannot be optimized to poison.
This makes a few straightforward optimizations incorrect, such as:

```
;  https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44185

define <4 x float> @insert_not_undef_shuffle_translate_commute(float %x, <4 x float> %y, <4 x float> %q) {
  %xv = insertelement <4 x float> %q, float %x, i32 2
  %r = shufflevector <4 x float> %y, <4 x float> %xv, <4 x i32> { 0, 6, 2, undef }
  ret <4 x float> %r ; %r[3] is undef
}
=>
define <4 x float> @insert_not_undef_shuffle_translate_commute(float %x, <4 x float> %y, <4 x float> %q) {
  %r = insertelement <4 x float> %y, float %x, i32 1
  ret <4 x float> %r ; %r[3] = %y[3], incorrect if %y[3] = poison
}

Transformation doesn't verify!
ERROR: Target is more poisonous than source
```

I’d like to suggest
1. Using poison as insertelement’s placeholder value (IRBuilder::CreateVectorSplat should be patched too)
2. Updating shufflevector’s semantics to return poison element if mask is undef

Note that poison is currently lowered into UNDEF in SelDag, so codegen part is okay.
m_Undef() matches PoisonValue as well, so existing optimizations will still fire.

The only concern is hidden miscompilations that will go incorrect when poison constant is given.
A conservative way is copying all tests having `insertelement undef` & replacing it with `insertelement poison` & run Alive2 on it, but it will create many tests and people won’t like it. :(

Instead, I’ll simply locally maintain the tests and run Alive2.
If there is any bug found, I’ll report it.

Relevant links: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43958 , http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-November/137242.html

Reviewed By: nikic

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93586
2020-12-28 08:58:15 +09:00
Sanjay Patel 856cc60bc1 [InstCombine] canonicalize bitcast after insertelement into undef
We have a transform in the opposite direction only for the x86 MMX type,
Other types are not handled either way before this patch.

The motivating case from PR45748:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45748
...is the last test diff. In that example, we are triggering an existing
bitcast transform, so we reduce the number of casts, and that should give
us the ideal x86 codegen.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79171
2020-05-10 11:37:47 -04:00
Sanjay Patel 2058c98715 [InstCombine] limit bitcast+insertelement transform to x86 MMX type
This is unusual for the general case because we are replacing
1 instruction with 2.

Splitting from a potential conflicting transform in D79171
2020-05-06 13:12:36 -04:00
Sanjay Patel 4a065a72ef [InstCombine] add tests for bitcast+inselt; NFC 2020-04-30 09:11:29 -04:00
Sanjay Patel 35fe2814cf [InstCombine] update auto-generated test checks; NFC 2020-04-30 08:39:02 -04:00
Craig Topper 5ebbabc1af [InstCombine] Revert aafde063aa and 6749dc3446 related to bitcast handling of x86_mmx
This reverts these two commits
[InstCombine] Turn (extractelement <1 x i64/double> (bitcast (x86_mmx))) into a single bitcast from x86_mmx to i64/double.
[InstCombine] Don't transform bitcasts between x86_mmx and v1i64 into insertelement/extractelement

We're seeing at least one internal test failure related to a
bitcast that was previously before an inline assembly block
containing emms being placed after it. This leads to the mmx
state ending up not empty after the emms. IR has no way to
make any specific guarantees about this. Reverting these patches
to get back to previous behavior which at least worked for this
test.
2019-12-03 14:02:22 -08:00
Craig Topper aafde063aa [InstCombine] Turn (extractelement <1 x i64/double> (bitcast (x86_mmx))) into a single bitcast from x86_mmx to i64/double.
The _m64 type is represented in IR as <1 x i64>. The x86-64 ABI
on Linux passes <1 x i64> as a double. MMX intrinsics use x86_mmx
type in IR.These things result in a lot of bitcasts in mmx code.
There's another instcombine that tries to turn bitcast <1 x i64>
to double into extractelement and a bitcast.

The combine here tries to reverse this extractelement conversion
if we see an mmx type.
2019-11-10 16:25:25 -08:00
Craig Topper d37db750c2 [InstCombine] Add a test case for suboptimal handling of (double (bitcast (<1 x i64> (bitcast (x86_mmx)))))
The outer bitcast gets turned into an extractelement and another
bitcast rather than combining away to a single bitcast from mmx
to double.
2019-11-10 16:25:25 -08:00
Craig Topper 6749dc3446 [InstCombine] Don't transform bitcasts between x86_mmx and v1i64 into insertelement/extractelement
x86_mmx is conceptually a vector already. Don't introduce an extra conversion between it and scalar i64.

I'm using VectorType::isValidElementType which checks for floating point, integer, and pointers to hopefully make this more readable than just blacklisting x86_mmx.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69964
2019-11-07 15:14:13 -08:00
Craig Topper 96119586c9 [InstCombine] Add test cases to show bad canonicalization of bitcasts between x86_mmx and <1 x i64>.
As the test cases show, we end up with an insert/extract and a
bitcast to/from i64. x86_mmx is for some purposes conceptually a
vector. We shouldn't be adding scalar conversions around it.

Since _m64 is defined as <1 x i64> and intrinsics use x86_mmx
as their input/output these extra scalar operations prevent
the X86 backend from generating good code especially on 32-bit
targets where i64 gets split.
2019-11-07 12:41:57 -08:00
Eric Christopher cee313d288 Revert "Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass.""
The reversion apparently deleted the test/Transforms directory.

Will be re-reverting again.

llvm-svn: 358552
2019-04-17 04:52:47 +00:00
Eric Christopher a863435128 Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass."
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).

This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.

llvm-svn: 358546
2019-04-17 02:12:23 +00:00
Sanjay Patel b0244b5c9a [InstCombine] auto-generate test checks; NFC
llvm-svn: 303663
2017-05-23 17:51:22 +00:00
Sanjay Patel 1d49fc9b27 [InstCombine] canonicalize (bitcast (extractelement X)) --> (extractelement(bitcast X))
This change was discussed in D15392. It allows us to remove the fold that was added
in:
http://reviews.llvm.org/r255261

...and it will allow us to generalize this fold:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL112232

while preserving the order of bitcast + extract that it produces and testing shows
is better handled by the backend.

Note that the existing check for "isVectorTy()" wasn't strong enough in general
and specifically because: x86_mmx. It's not a vector, but it's not vectorizable
either. So here we check VectorType::isValidElementType() directly before 
proceeding with the transform.

llvm-svn: 255433
2015-12-12 16:44:48 +00:00
Sanjay Patel ffde9e14a2 use FileCheck for better checking
llvm-svn: 255394
2015-12-12 00:01:10 +00:00
Dan Gohman 1880092722 Change tests from "opt %s" to "opt < %s" so that opt doesn't see the
input filename so that opt doesn't print the input filename in the
output so that grep lines in the tests don't unintentionally match
strings in the input filename.

llvm-svn: 81537
2009-09-11 18:01:28 +00:00
Dan Gohman 72a13d2476 Use opt -S instead of piping bitcode output through llvm-dis.
llvm-svn: 81257
2009-09-08 22:34:10 +00:00
Dan Gohman 9737a63ed8 Change these tests to feed the assembly files to opt directly, instead
of using llvm-as, now that opt supports this.

llvm-svn: 81226
2009-09-08 16:50:01 +00:00
Eli Friedman 048e78fc5b Canonicalize bitcasts between types like <1 x i64> and i64 to
insertelement/extractelement.

I'm not entirely sure this is precisely what we want to do: should we 
prefer bitcast(insertelement) or insertelement(bitcast)?  Similarly. should we 
prefer extractelement(bitcast) or bitcast(extractelement)?

llvm-svn: 76345
2009-07-18 23:06:53 +00:00