The non-strict variants are already handled because they are canonicalized
to strict variants by swapping hands in both the select and icmp,
and the fold simply considers that strictness is irrelevant here.
But that isn't actually true for the last pattern, as PR48390 reports.
Some IRBuilder methods that were originally defined on
IRBuilderBase do not respect custom IRBuilder inserters/folders,
because those were not accessible prior to D73835. Fix this by
making use of existing (and now accessible) IRBuilder methods,
which will handle inserters/folders correctly.
There are some changes in OpenMP and Instrumentation tests, where
bitcasts now get constant folded. I've also highlighted one
InstCombine test which now finishes in two rather than three
iterations, thanks to new instructions being inserted into the
worklist.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74787
Some IRBuilder methods that were originally defined on
IRBuilderBase do not respect custom IRBuilder inserters/folders,
because those were not accessible prior to D73835. Fix this by
making use of existing (and now accessible) IRBuilder methods,
which will handle inserters/folders correctly.
There are some changes in OpenMP tests, where bitcasts now get
constant folded. I've also highlighted one InstCombine test which
now finishes in two rather than three iterations, thanks to new
instructions being inserted into the worklist.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74787
This is an extra fold for a canonical form of uadd_sat, as shown in
D68651. It essentially selects uadd from an add and a select.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69244
This adds folds for comparing uadd.sat/usub.sat with zero:
* uadd.sat(a, b) == 0 => a == 0 && b == 0 => (a | b) == 0
* usub.sat(a, b) == 0 => a <= b
And inverted forms for !=.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69224
llvm-svn: 375374
This reverts commit rL365999 / 0f6148df23.
The tests already exist in this file, and the hoped-for transform
(mentioned in D62871) is invalid because of undef as discussed in
D63060.
llvm-svn: 366000
Based on the overflow direction information added in D62463, we can
now fold always overflowing signed saturating add/sub to signed min/max.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62544
llvm-svn: 362006
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).
This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.
llvm-svn: 358546
This is the same change as D60420 but for signed sub rather than
signed add: Range information is intersected into the known bits
result, allows to detect more no/always overflow conditions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60469
llvm-svn: 358020
This is D59386 for the signed add case. The computeConstantRange()
result is now intersected into the existing known bits information,
allowing to detect additional no-overflow/always-overflow conditions
(though the latter isn't used yet).
This (finally...) covers the motivating case from D59071.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60420
llvm-svn: 358014
Start using the uadd.sat and usub.sat intrinsics for the existing
canonicalizations. These intrinsics should optimize better than
expanded IR, have better handling in the X86 backend and should
be no worse than expanded IR in other backends, as far as we know.
rL357012 already introduced use of uadd.sat for the add+umin pattern.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58872
llvm-svn: 357103
This is the last step towards solving the examples shown in:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14613
With this change, x86 should end up with psubus instructions
when those are available.
All known codegen issues with expanding the saturating intrinsics
were resolved with:
D59006 / rL356855
We also have some early evidence in D58872 that using the intrinsics
will lead to better perf. If some target regresses from this, custom
lowering of the intrinsics (as in the above for x86) may be needed.
llvm-svn: 357012
Improve computeOverflowForUnsignedAdd/Sub in ValueTracking by
intersecting the computeConstantRange() result into the ConstantRange
created from computeKnownBits(). This allows us to detect some
additional never/always overflows conditions that can't be determined
from known bits.
This revision also adds basic handling for constants to
computeConstantRange(). Non-splat vectors will be handled in a followup.
The signed case will also be handled in a followup, as it needs some
more groundwork.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59386
llvm-svn: 356489
Second part of D58593.
Compute precise overflow conditions based on all known bits, rather
than just the sign bits. Unsigned a - b overflows iff a < b, and we
can determine whether this always/never happens based on the minimal
and maximal values achievable for a and b subject to the known bits
constraint.
llvm-svn: 355109
Part of D58593.
Compute precise overflow conditions based on all known bits, rather
than just the sign bits. Unsigned a + b overflows iff a > ~b, and we
can determine whether this always/never happens based on the minimal
and maximal values achievable for a and ~b subject to the known bits
constraint.
llvm-svn: 355072
This is no-functional-change-intended, but that was also
true when it was part of rL354276, and I managed to lose
2 predicates for the fold with constant...causing much bot
distress. So this time I'm adding a couple of negative tests
to avoid that.
llvm-svn: 354384
The pattern-matching from rL354221 / rL354224 doesn't cover
these, so we're up to 8 different commuted possibilities.
There may still be 1 more variant of this pattern.
llvm-svn: 354236
We want to use the sum in the icmp to allow matching with
m_UAddWithOverflow and eliminate the 'not'. This is discussed
in D51929 and is another step towards solving PR14613:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14613
(The matching here is incomplete. Trying to take minimal steps
to make sure we don't induce infinite looping from existing
canonicalizations of the 'select'.)
llvm-svn: 354221
I'm circling back around to a loose end from D51929.
The backend (either CGP or DAG) doesn't recognize this pattern, so we end up with different asm for these IR variants.
Regardless of any future changes to canonicalize to saturation/overflow intrinsics, we want to get raw IR variations
into the minimal number of raw IR forms. If/when we can canonicalize to intrinsics, that will make that step easier.
Pre: C2 == ~C1
%a = add i32 %x, C1
%c = icmp ugt i32 %x, C2
%r = select i1 %c, i32 -1, i32 %a
=>
%a = add i32 %x, C1
%c2 = icmp ult i32 %x, C2
%r = select i1 %c2, i32 %a, i32 -1
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/pkH
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57352
llvm-svn: 352536
Extend ssub.sat(X, C) -> sadd.sat(X, -C) canonicalization to also
support non-splat vector constants. This is done by generalizing
the implementation of the isNotMinSignedValue() helper to return
true for constants that are non-splat, but don't contain any
signed min elements.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55011
llvm-svn: 348072
Combine
sat(sat(X + C1) + C2) -> sat(X + (C1+C2))
and
sat(sat(X - C1) - C2) -> sat(X - (C1+C2))
if the sign of C1 and C2 matches.
In the unsigned case we can compute C1+C2 with saturating arithmetic,
and InstSimplify will reduce this just to the saturation value. For
the signed case, we cannot perform the simplification if the result
of the addition overflows.
This change is part of https://reviews.llvm.org/D54534.
llvm-svn: 347773
Canonicalize ssub.sat(X, C) to ssub.sat(X, -C) if C is constant and
not signed minimum. This will help further optimizations to apply.
This change is part of https://reviews.llvm.org/D54534.
llvm-svn: 347772
Always-overflow was already determined for unsigned addition, but
not subtraction. This patch establishes parity.
This allows us to perform some additional simplifications for
signed saturating subtractions.
This change is part of https://reviews.llvm.org/D54534.
llvm-svn: 347771
If ValueTracking can determine that the add/sub can newer overflow,
replace it with the corresponding nuw/nsw add/sub.
Additionally, for the unsigned case, if ValueTracking determines
that the add/sub always overflows, replace the result with the
saturation value.
This change is part of https://reviews.llvm.org/D54534.
llvm-svn: 347770
If a saturating add intrinsic has one constant argument, make sure
it is on the RHS. This will simplify further transformations.
This change is part of https://reviews.llvm.org/D54534.
llvm-svn: 347769
Roman Lebedev