One of the exit criteria of computeKnownBits is whether we reach the max
recursive call depth. Before this patch we would check that the
depth is exactly equal to max depth to exit.
Depth may get bigger than max depth if it gets passed to a different
GISelKnownBits object.
This may happen when say a generic part uses a GISelKnownBits object
with some max depth, but then we hit TL.computeKnownBitsForTargetInstr
which creates a new GISelKnownBits object with a different and smaller
depth. In that situation, when we hit the max depth check for the first
time in the target specific GISelKnownBits object, depth may already
be bigger than the current max depth. Hence we would continue to compute
the known bits, until we ran through the full depth of the chain of
computation or ran out of stack space.
For instance, let say we have
GISelKnownBits Info(/*MaxDepth*/ = 10);
Info.getKnownBits(Foo)
// 9 recursive calls to computeKnownBitsImpl.
// Then we hit a target specific instruction.
// The target specific GISelKnownBits does this:
GISelKnownBits TargetSpecificInfo(/*MaxDepth*/ = 6)
TargetSpecificInfo.computeKnownBitsImpl() // <-- next max depth checks would
// always return false.
This commit does not have any test case, none of the in-tree targets
use computeKnownBitsForTargetInstr.
Summary:
This is mostly NFC. computeForAddSub may give more precise results in
some cases, but that doesn't seem to affect any existing GlobalISel
tests.
Subscribers: rovka, hiraditya, volkan, Petar.Avramovic, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73431
Teach the GISelKnowBits analysis how to deal with PHI operations.
PHIs are essentially COPYs happening on edges, so we can just reuse
the code for COPY.
This is NFC COPY-wise has we leave Depth untouched when calling
computeKnownBitsImpl for COPYs, like it was before this patch.
Increasing Depth is however required for PHIs as they may loop back to
themselves and we would end up in an infinite loop if we were not
increasing Depth.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73317
Summary:
G_GEP is rather poorly named. It's a simple pointer+scalar addition and
doesn't support any of the complexities of getelementptr. I therefore
propose that we rename it. There's a G_PTR_MASK so let's follow that
convention and go with G_PTR_ADD
Reviewers: volkan, aditya_nandakumar, bogner, rovka, arsenm
Subscribers: sdardis, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, hiraditya, jrtc27, atanasyan, arphaman, Petar.Avramovic, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69734
Summary:
It seems we missed that the target hook can't query the known-bits for the
inputs to a target instruction. Fix that oversight
Reviewers: aditya_nandakumar
Subscribers: rovka, hiraditya, volkan, Petar.Avramovic, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67380
llvm-svn: 373264
Now that we look through copies, it's possible to visit registers that
have a register class constraint but not a type constraint. Avoid looking
through copies when this occurs as the SrcReg won't be able to determine
it's bit width or any known bits.
Along the same lines, if the initial query is on a register that doesn't
have a type constraint then the result is a default-constructed KnownBits,
that is, a 1-bit fully-unknown value.
llvm-svn: 371116
https://reviews.llvm.org/D66039
We were using getIndexSize instead of getIndexSizeInBits().
Added test case for G_PTRTOINT and G_INTTOPTR.
llvm-svn: 368618
https://reviews.llvm.org/D65698
This adds a KnownBits analysis pass for GISel. This was done as a
pass (compared to static functions) so that we can add other features
such as caching queries(within a pass and across passes) in the future.
This patch only adds the basic pass boiler plate, and implements a lazy
non caching knownbits implementation (ported from SelectionDAG). I've
also hooked up the AArch64PreLegalizerCombiner pass to use this - there
should be no compile time regression as the analysis is lazy.
llvm-svn: 368065
Quentin Colombet