This patch implements trap and FP to and from double conversions. The builtins
generate code that mirror what is generated from the XL compiler. Intrinsics
are named conventionally with builtin_ppc, but are aliased to provide the same
builtin names as the XL compiler.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103668
Original commit message:
[clang-repl] Implement partial translation units and error recovery.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D96033 contained a discussion regarding efficient
modeling of error recovery. @rjmccall has outlined the key ideas:
Conceptually, we can split the translation unit into a sequence of partial
translation units (PTUs). Every declaration will be associated with a unique PTU
that owns it.
The first key insight here is that the owning PTU isn't always the "active"
(most recent) PTU, and it isn't always the PTU that the declaration
"comes from". A new declaration (that isn't a redeclaration or specialization of
anything) does belong to the active PTU. A template specialization, however,
belongs to the most recent PTU of all the declarations in its signature - mostly
that means that it can be pulled into a more recent PTU by its template
arguments.
The second key insight is that processing a PTU might extend an earlier PTU.
Rolling back the later PTU shouldn't throw that extension away. For example, if
the second PTU defines a template, and the third PTU requires that template to
be instantiated at float, that template specialization is still part of the
second PTU. Similarly, if the fifth PTU uses an inline function belonging to the
fourth, that definition still belongs to the fourth. When we go to emit code in
a new PTU, we map each declaration we have to emit back to its owning PTU and
emit it in a new module for just the extensions to that PTU. We keep track of
all the modules we've emitted for a PTU so that we can unload them all if we
decide to roll it back.
Most declarations/definitions will only refer to entities from the same or
earlier PTUs. However, it is possible (primarily by defining a
previously-declared entity, but also through templates or ADL) for an entity
that belongs to one PTU to refer to something from a later PTU. We will have to
keep track of this and prevent unwinding to later PTU when we recognize it.
Fortunately, this should be very rare; and crucially, we don't have to do the
bookkeeping for this if we've only got one PTU, e.g. in normal compilation.
Otherwise, PTUs after the first just need to record enough metadata to be able
to revert any changes they've made to declarations belonging to earlier PTUs,
e.g. to redeclaration chains or template specialization lists.
It should even eventually be possible for PTUs to provide their own slab
allocators which can be thrown away as part of rolling back the PTU. We can
maintain a notion of the active allocator and allocate things like Stmt/Expr
nodes in it, temporarily changing it to the appropriate PTU whenever we go to do
something like instantiate a function template. More care will be required when
allocating declarations and types, though.
We would want the PTU to be efficiently recoverable from a Decl; I'm not sure
how best to do that. An easy option that would cover most declarations would be
to make multiple TranslationUnitDecls and parent the declarations appropriately,
but I don't think that's good enough for things like member function templates,
since an instantiation of that would still be parented by its original class.
Maybe we can work this into the DC chain somehow, like how lexical DCs are.
We add a different kind of translation unit `TU_Incremental` which is a
complete translation unit that we might nonetheless incrementally extend later.
Because it is complete (and we might want to generate code for it), we do
perform template instantiation, but because it might be extended later, we don't
warn if it declares or uses undefined internal-linkage symbols.
This patch teaches clang-repl how to recover from errors by disconnecting the
most recent PTU and update the primary PTU lookup tables. For instance:
```./clang-repl
clang-repl> int i = 12; error;
In file included from <<< inputs >>>:1:
input_line_0:1:13: error: C++ requires a type specifier for all declarations
int i = 12; error;
^
error: Parsing failed.
clang-repl> int i = 13; extern "C" int printf(const char*,...);
clang-repl> auto r1 = printf("i=%d\n", i);
i=13
clang-repl> quit
```
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104918
Support Narrowing conversions to bool in if constexpr condition
under C++23 language mode.
Only if constexpr is implemented as the behavior of static_assert
is already conforming. Still need to work on explicit(bool) to
complete support.
This reverts commit 6775fc6ffa.
It also reverts "[lldb] Fix compilation by adjusting to the new ASTContext signature."
This reverts commit 03a3f86071.
We see some failures on the lldb infrastructure, these changes might play a role
in it. Let's revert it now and see if the bots will become green.
Ref: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104918
https://reviews.llvm.org/D96033 contained a discussion regarding efficient
modeling of error recovery. @rjmccall has outlined the key ideas:
Conceptually, we can split the translation unit into a sequence of partial
translation units (PTUs). Every declaration will be associated with a unique PTU
that owns it.
The first key insight here is that the owning PTU isn't always the "active"
(most recent) PTU, and it isn't always the PTU that the declaration
"comes from". A new declaration (that isn't a redeclaration or specialization of
anything) does belong to the active PTU. A template specialization, however,
belongs to the most recent PTU of all the declarations in its signature - mostly
that means that it can be pulled into a more recent PTU by its template
arguments.
The second key insight is that processing a PTU might extend an earlier PTU.
Rolling back the later PTU shouldn't throw that extension away. For example, if
the second PTU defines a template, and the third PTU requires that template to
be instantiated at float, that template specialization is still part of the
second PTU. Similarly, if the fifth PTU uses an inline function belonging to the
fourth, that definition still belongs to the fourth. When we go to emit code in
a new PTU, we map each declaration we have to emit back to its owning PTU and
emit it in a new module for just the extensions to that PTU. We keep track of
all the modules we've emitted for a PTU so that we can unload them all if we
decide to roll it back.
Most declarations/definitions will only refer to entities from the same or
earlier PTUs. However, it is possible (primarily by defining a
previously-declared entity, but also through templates or ADL) for an entity
that belongs to one PTU to refer to something from a later PTU. We will have to
keep track of this and prevent unwinding to later PTU when we recognize it.
Fortunately, this should be very rare; and crucially, we don't have to do the
bookkeeping for this if we've only got one PTU, e.g. in normal compilation.
Otherwise, PTUs after the first just need to record enough metadata to be able
to revert any changes they've made to declarations belonging to earlier PTUs,
e.g. to redeclaration chains or template specialization lists.
It should even eventually be possible for PTUs to provide their own slab
allocators which can be thrown away as part of rolling back the PTU. We can
maintain a notion of the active allocator and allocate things like Stmt/Expr
nodes in it, temporarily changing it to the appropriate PTU whenever we go to do
something like instantiate a function template. More care will be required when
allocating declarations and types, though.
We would want the PTU to be efficiently recoverable from a Decl; I'm not sure
how best to do that. An easy option that would cover most declarations would be
to make multiple TranslationUnitDecls and parent the declarations appropriately,
but I don't think that's good enough for things like member function templates,
since an instantiation of that would still be parented by its original class.
Maybe we can work this into the DC chain somehow, like how lexical DCs are.
We add a different kind of translation unit `TU_Incremental` which is a
complete translation unit that we might nonetheless incrementally extend later.
Because it is complete (and we might want to generate code for it), we do
perform template instantiation, but because it might be extended later, we don't
warn if it declares or uses undefined internal-linkage symbols.
This patch teaches clang-repl how to recover from errors by disconnecting the
most recent PTU and update the primary PTU lookup tables. For instance:
```./clang-repl
clang-repl> int i = 12; error;
In file included from <<< inputs >>>:1:
input_line_0:1:13: error: C++ requires a type specifier for all declarations
int i = 12; error;
^
error: Parsing failed.
clang-repl> int i = 13; extern "C" int printf(const char*,...);
clang-repl> auto r1 = printf("i=%d\n", i);
i=13
clang-repl> quit
```
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104918
This change is intended as initial setup. The plan is to add
more semantic checks later. I plan to update the documentation
as more semantic checks are added (instead of documenting the
details up front). Most of the code closely mirrors that for
the Swift calling convention. Three places are marked as
[FIXME: swiftasynccc]; those will be addressed once the
corresponding convention is introduced in LLVM.
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95561
This reverts commit 52aeacfbf5.
There isn't full agreement on a path forward yet, but there is agreement that
this shouldn't land as-is. See discussion on https://reviews.llvm.org/D105338
Also reverts unreviewed "[clang] Improve `-Wnull-dereference` diag to be more in-line with reality"
This reverts commit f4877c78c0.
And all the related changes to tests:
This reverts commit 9a0152799f.
This reverts commit 3f7c9cc274.
This reverts commit 329f8197ef.
This reverts commit aa9f58cc2c.
This reverts commit 2df37d5ddd.
This reverts commit a72a441812.
C++23 will make these conversions ambiguous - so fix them to make the
codebase forward-compatible with C++23 (& a follow-up change I've made
will make this ambiguous/invalid even in <C++23 so we don't regress
this & it generally improves the code anyway)
When building the member call to a user conversion function during an
implicit cast, the expression was not being checked for immediate
invocation, so we were never adding the ConstantExpr node to AST.
This would cause the call to the user conversion operator to be emitted
even if it was constantexpr evaluated, and this would even trip an
assert when said user conversion was declared consteval:
`Assertion failed: !cast<FunctionDecl>(GD.getDecl())->isConsteval() && "consteval function should never be emitted", file clang\lib\CodeGen\CodeGenModule.cpp, line 3530`
Fixes PR48855.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105446
The Microsoft STL currently has some issues with P2266.
We disable it for now in that mode, but we might come back later with a
more targetted approach.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105518
When there is unknown type in a struct in code compiled with
-Wcast-align, the compiler crashes due to
clang::ASTContext::getASTRecordLayout() failing an assert.
Added check that the RecordDecl is valid before calling
getASTRecordLayout().
Named return of a variable with aligned attribute would
trip an assert in case alignment was dependent.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105380
This patch implaments the load and reserve and store conditional
builtins for the PowerPC target, in order to have feature parody with
xlC on AIX.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105236
Named return of a variable with aligned attribute would
trip an assert in case alignment was dependent.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105380
Ignore top-level qualifiers in casts, which fixes issues in reinterpret_cast.
This rule comes from [expr.type]/8.2.2 which explains that casting to a
pr-qualified type should actually cast to the unqualified type. In C++
this is only done for types that aren't classes or arrays.
Fixes: PR49221
Reviewed By: Anastasia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102689
A user reported an issue to me via email that Clang was accepting some
code that GCC was rejecting. After investigation, it turned out to be a
general problem of us failing to properly reject attributes written in
the type position in C when they don't apply to types. The root cause
was a terminology issue -- we sometimes use "CXX11Attr" to mean [[]] in
C++11 mode and sometimes [[]] in general -- and this came back to bite
us because in this particular case, it really meant [[]] in C++ mode.
I fixed the issue by introducing a new function
AttributeCommonInfo::isStandardAttributeSyntax() to represent [[]] in
either C or C++ mode.
This fix pointed out that we've had the issue in some of our existing
tests, which have all been corrected. This resolves
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50954.
Before this patch, the dependence of CallExpr was only computed in the
constructor, the dependence bits might not reflect truth -- some arguments might
be not set (nullptr) during this time, e.g. CXXDefaultArgExpr will be set via
the setArg method in the later parsing stage, so we need to recompute the
dependence bits.
This extends the effects of [[ http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2019/p1825r0.html | P1825 ]] to all C++ standards from C++11 up to C++20.
According to Motion 23 from Cologne 2019, P1825R0 was accepted as a Defect Report, so we retroactively apply this all the way back to C++11.
Note that we also remove implicit moves from C++98 as an extension
altogether, since the expanded first overload resolution from P1825
can cause some meaning changes in C++98.
For example it can change which copy constructor is picked when both const
and non-const ones are available.
This also rips out warn_return_std_move since there are no cases where it would be worthwhile to suggest it.
This also fixes a bug with bailing into the second overload resolution
when encountering a non-rvref qualified conversion operator.
This was unnoticed until now, so two new test cases cover these.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104500
This patch adds a new clang builtin, __arithmetic_fence. The purpose of the
builtin is to provide the user fine control, at the expression level, over
floating point optimization when -ffast-math (-ffp-model=fast) is enabled.
The builtin prevents the optimizer from rearranging floating point expression
evaluation. The new option fprotect-parens has the same effect on
parenthesized expressions, forcing the optimizer to respect the parentheses.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, kpn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100118
No need to try to create the default constructor for private copy, it
will be called automatically in the initializer of the declare
reduction. Fixes balance between constructors/destructors calls.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105143
Hi,
In function TransformTemplateArgument,
would it be better to add line break at the end of "if" expressions?
I use clang-format to do the job for me.
Thanks a lot
Reviewed By: pengfei
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104604
Added the option `-altivec-src-compat=[mixed,gcc,xl]`. The default at this time is `mixed`.
The default behavior for clang is for all vector compares to return a scalar unless the vectors being
compared are vector bool or vector pixel. In that case the compare returns a
vector. With the gcc case all vector compares return vectors and in the xl case
all vector compares return scalars.
This patch does not change the default behavior of clang.
This option will be used in future patches to implement behaviour compatibility for the vector bool/pixel types.
Reviewed By: bmahjour
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103615
This reverts commit c3fe847f9d.
Tests fail in non-asserts builds because they assume named IR, by the
looks of it (testing for the "entry" label, for instance). I don't know
enough about the update_cc_test_checks.py stuff to know how to manually
fix these tests, so reverting for now.
This patch adds a new clang builtin, __arithmetic_fence. The purpose of the
builtin is to provide the user fine control, at the expression level, over
floating point optimization when -ffast-math (-ffp-model=fast) is enabled.
The builtin prevents the optimizer from rearranging floating point expression
evaluation. The new option fprotect-parens has the same effect on
parenthesized expressions, forcing the optimizer to respect the parentheses.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, kpn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100118
Added the option `-altivec-src-compat=[mixed,gcc,xl]`. The default at this time is `mixed`.
The default behavior for clang is for all vector compares to return a scalar unless the vectors being
compared are vector bool or vector pixel. In that case the compare returns a
vector. With the gcc case all vector compares return vectors and in the xl case
all vector compares return scalars.
This patch does not change the default behavior of clang.
This option will be used in future patches to implement behaviour compatibility for the vector bool/pixel types.
Reviewed By: bmahjour
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103615
Word on the grapevine was that the committee had some discussion that
ended with unanimous agreement on eliminating relational function pointer comparisons.
We wanted to be bold and just ban all of them cold turkey.
But then we chickened out at the last second and are going for
eliminating just the spaceship overload candidate instead, for now.
See D104680 for reference.
This should be fine and "safe", because the only possible semantic change this
would cause is that overload resolution could possibly be ambiguous if
there was another viable candidate equally as good.
But to save face a little we are going to:
* Issue an "error" for three-way comparisons on function pointers.
But all this is doing really is changing one vague error message,
from an "invalid operands to binary expression" into an
"ordered comparison of function pointers", which sounds more like we mean business.
* Otherwise "warn" that comparing function pointers like that is totally
not cool (unless we are told to keep quiet about this).
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104892
These allow getting a whole register from a larger lmul. Or
inserting a whole register into a larger lmul register. Fractional
lmuls are not supported as they would require a vslide.
Based on this update to the intrinsic doc
https://github.com/riscv/rvv-intrinsic-doc/pull/99
Reviewed By: HsiangKai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104822
This is mostly a mechanical change, but a testcase that contains
parts of the StringRef class (clang/test/Analysis/llvm-conventions.cpp)
isn't touched.
Although clang is able to defer overloading resolution
diagnostics for common functions. It does not defer
overloading resolution caused diagnostics for overloaded
operators.
This patch extends the existing deferred
diagnostic mechanism and defers a diagnostic caused
by overloaded operator.
Reviewed by: Artem Belevich
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104505
According to https://eel.is/c++draft/over.literal
> double operator""_Bq(long double); // OK: does not use the reserved identifier _Bq ([lex.name])
> double operator"" _Bq(long double); // ill-formed, no diagnostic required: uses the reserved identifier _Bq ([lex.name])
Obey that rule by keeping track of the operator literal name status wrt. leading whitespace.
Fix: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50644
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104299
During template instantiation involving templated lambdas, clang
could hit an assertion in `TemplateDeclInstantiator::SubstFunctionType`
since the functions are not associated with any `TypeSourceInfo`:
`assert(OldTInfo && "substituting function without type source info");`
This path is triggered when using templated lambdas like the one added as
a test to this patch. To fix this:
- Create `TypeSourceInfo`s for special members and make sure the template
instantiator can get through all patterns.
- Introduce a `SpecialMemberTypeInfoRebuilder` tree transform to rewrite
such member function arguments. Without this, we get errors like:
`error: only special member functions and comparison operators may be defaulted`
since `getDefaultedFunctionKind` can't properly recognize these functions
as special members as part of `SetDeclDefaulted`.
Fixes PR45828 and PR44848
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88327
Cleanup sema checking for 64bit builtins or builtins that require
specific feature support.
Reviewed By: NeHuang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104664
Fixes bug 50263
When "unused-private-field" flag is on if you have a struct with private
members and only defaulted comparison operators clang will warn about
unused private fields.
If you where to write the comparison operators by hand no warning is
produced.
This is a bug since defaulting a comparison operator uses all private
members .
The fix is simple, in CheckExplicitlyDefaultedFunction just clear the
list of unused private fields if the defaulted function is a comparison
function.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102186
This reverts commit 5013131875.
This patch didn't end up being the solution to the problem. It "fixed"
our issue but the actual correct solution is something else. Reverting
as this ends up being unnecessary/extra noise.
Discovered in our downstream, this function that is used to get the type
of the kernel parameter type needs to be unqualified, otherwise when our
downstream uses this function in a slightly different way, the kernel
types no longer match.
Hi,
I think it will be more beautiful to adjust indentation of statements with more than one lines.
In function TreeTransform<Derived>::TransformDependentScopeDeclRefExpr
the second line of statement
NestedNameSpecifierLoc QualifierLoc \newline = getDerived().TransformNestedNameSpecifierLoc(E->getQualifierLoc());
is no more indent than the first line
There is a similar case in function TreeTransform<Derived>::TransformUnresolvedMemberExpr
Also I use clang-format to fix above functions
Thanks alot
Reviewed By: pengfei
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104145
This implements a more comprehensive fix than was done at D95409.
Instead of excluding just function pointer subobjects, we also
exclude any user-defined function pointer conversion operators.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103855
Fixed crash when doing pointer math on a void pointer.
Also, reworked test to use -verify rather than FileCheck.
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104424
Albion Fung