There already exists cl_khr_fp64 extension. So OpenCL C 3.0
and higher should use the feature, earlier versions still
use the extension. OpenCL C 3.0 API spec states that extension
will be not described in the option string if corresponding
optional functionality is not supported (see 4.2. Querying Devices).
Due to that fact the usage of features for OpenCL C 3.0 must
be as follows:
```
$ clang -Xclang -cl-ext=+cl_khr_fp64,+__opencl_c_fp64 ...
$ clang -Xclang -cl-ext=-cl_khr_fp64,-__opencl_c_fp64 ...
```
e.g. the feature and the equivalent extension (if exists)
must be set to the same values
Reviewed By: Anastasia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96524
This reverts r348083. This was based on a misreading of the spec
for printf specifiers.
Also revert r343653, as without a subsequent patch, a correctly
specified format for a vector will incorrectly warn.
Fixes bug 40491.
llvm-svn: 352539
The spec is ambiguous on whether vector types are allowed to be
implicitly converted. The only legal context I think this can
be used for OpenCL is printf, where it seems necessary.
llvm-svn: 348083
Anton Zabaznov