As with other Attributor interfaces we often want to know if assumed
information was used to answer a query. This is important if only
known information is allowed or if known information can lead to an
early fixpoint. The users have been adjusted but none of them utilizes
the new information yet.
AllocationInfo and DeallocationInfo objects themselves are allocated
with the Attributor bump allocator and do not need to be deallocated.
That said, the sets in AllocationInfo and DeallocationInfo need to be
destroyed to avoid memory leaks.
When we talk to outside analyse, e.g., LVI and ScalarEvolution, we need
to be careful with the query. The particular error occurred because we
folded a PHI node before the LVI query but the context location was now
not dominated by the value anymore. This is not supported by LVI so we
have to filter these situations before we query the outside analyses.
In order to simplify future extensions, e.g., the merge of
AAHeapToShared in to AAHeapToStack, we reorganize AAHeapToStack and the
state we keep for each malloc-like call. The result is also less
confusing as we only track malloc-like calls, not all calls. Further, we
only perform the updates necessary for a malloc-like to argue it can go
to the stack, e.g., we won't check all uses if we moved on to the
"must-be-freed" argument.
This patch also uses Attributor helps to simplify the allocated size,
alignment, and the potentially freed objects.
Overall, this is mostly a reorganization and only the use of the
optimistic helpers should change (=improve) the capabilities a bit.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104993
We have to be careful when we replace values to not use a non-dominating
instruction. It makes sense that simplification offers those as
"simplified values" but we can't manifest them in the IR without PHI
nodes. In the future we should consider potentially adding those PHI
nodes.
We should use AAValueSimplify for all value simplification, however
there was some leftover logic that predates AAValueSimplify in
AAReturnedValues. This remove the AAReturnedValues part and provides a
replacement by making AAValueSimplifyReturned strong enough to handle
all previously covered cases. Further, this improve
AAValueSimplifyCallSiteReturned to handle returned arguments.
AAReturnedValues is now much easier and the collected returned
values/instructions are now from the associated function only, making it
much more sane. We also do not have the brittle logic anymore that looks
for unresolved calls. Instead, we use AAValueSimplify to handle
recursion.
Useful code has been split into helper functions, e.g., an Attributor
interface to get a simplified value.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103860
As the `llvm::getUnderlyingObjects` helper, the optimistic version
collects objects that might be the base of a given pointer. In contrast
to the llvm variant, the optimistic one will use assumed information,
e.g., about select conditions or dead blocks, to provide a more precise
result.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103859
Not all attributes are able to handle the interprocedural step and
follow the uses into a call site. Let them be able to combine call site
uses instead. This might result in some unused values/arguments being
leftover but it removes problems where we misused "is dead" even though
it was actually "is simplified/replaced".
We explicitly check for dead values due to constant propagation in
`AAIsDeadValueImpl::areAllUsesAssumedDead` instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103858
Broke check-clang, see https://reviews.llvm.org/D102307#2869065
Ran `git revert -n ebbe149a6f08535ede848a531a601ae6591cfbc5..269416d41908bb670f67af689155d5ab8eea689a`
As with other Attributor interfaces we often want to know if assumed
information was used to answer a query. This is important if only
known information is allowed or if known information can lead to an
early fixpoint. The users have been adjusted but none of them utilizes
the new information yet.
When we talk to outside analyse, e.g., LVI and ScalarEvolution, we need
to be careful with the query. The particular error occurred because we
folded a PHI node before the LVI query but the context location was now
not dominated by the value anymore. This is not supported by LVI so we
have to filter these situations before we query the outside analyses.
We have to be careful when we replace values to not use a non-dominating
instruction. It makes sense that simplification offers those as
"simplified values" but we can't manifest them in the IR without PHI
nodes. In the future we should consider potentially adding those PHI
nodes.
In order to simplify future extensions, e.g., the merge of
AAHeapToShared in to AAHeapToStack, we reorganize AAHeapToStack and the
state we keep for each malloc-like call. The result is also less
confusing as we only track malloc-like calls, not all calls. Further, we
only perform the updates necessary for a malloc-like to argue it can go
to the stack, e.g., we won't check all uses if we moved on to the
"must-be-freed" argument.
This patch also uses Attributor helps to simplify the allocated size,
alignment, and the potentially freed objects.
Overall, this is mostly a reorganization and only the use of the
optimistic helpers should change (=improve) the capabilities a bit.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104993
We should use AAValueSimplify for all value simplification, however
there was some leftover logic that predates AAValueSimplify in
AAReturnedValues. This remove the AAReturnedValues part and provides a
replacement by making AAValueSimplifyReturned strong enough to handle
all previously covered cases. Further, this improve
AAValueSimplifyCallSiteReturned to handle returned arguments.
AAReturnedValues is now much easier and the collected returned
values/instructions are now from the associated function only, making it
much more sane. We also do not have the brittle logic anymore that looks
for unresolved calls. Instead, we use AAValueSimplify to handle
recursion.
Useful code has been split into helper functions, e.g., an Attributor
interface to get a simplified value.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103860
As the `llvm::getUnderlyingObjects` helper, the optimistic version
collects objects that might be the base of a given pointer. In contrast
to the llvm variant, the optimistic one will use assumed information,
e.g., about select conditions or dead blocks, to provide a more precise
result.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103859
Not all attributes are able to handle the interprocedural step and
follow the uses into a call site. Let them be able to combine call site
uses instead. This might result in some unused values/arguments being
leftover but it removes problems where we misused "is dead" even though
it was actually "is simplified/replaced".
We explicitly check for dead values due to constant propagation in
`AAIsDeadValueImpl::areAllUsesAssumedDead` instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103858
We often need to deal with the value lattice that contains none and
undef as special values. A simple helper makes this much nicer.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103857
When we do simplification via AAPotentialValues or AAValueConstantRange
we need to simplify the operands of an instruction we deconstruct first.
This does not only improve the result, see for example range.ll, but is
required as we allow outside AAs to provide simplification rules via
callbacks. If we do ignore the simplification rules and base other
simplifications on the IR instead we can create an inconsistent state.
This patch adds additional remarks, suggesting the use of `noescape` for failed
globalization and indicating when internalization failed.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105150
This attribute uses Attributor's internal 'optimistic' call graph
information to answer queries about function call reachability.
Functions can become reachable over time as new call edges are
discovered.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104599
Summary:
This patch adds support for the Attributor to emit remarks on behalf of some
other pass. The attributor can now optionally take a callback function that
returns an OptimizationRemarkEmitter object when given a Function pointer. If
this is availible then a remark will be emitted for the corresponding pass
name.
Depends on D102197
Reviewed By: sstefan1 thegameg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102444
This looks like not a practical pattern in our codebase (it could fail
in some sandbox environement).
Instead we print it via standard output, and it is controled by the
-attributor-print-call-graph, this follows a similiar pattern of attributor-print-dep.
To allow outside AAs that simplify values we need to ensure all value
simplification goes through the Attributor, not AAValueSimplify (or any
of the other AAs we have already like AAPotentialValues). This patch
also introduces an interface for the outside AAs to register
simplification callbacks for an IRPosition. To make this work as
expected we have to pass IRPositions instead of Values in
AAValueSimplify, which makes sense by itself.
If we simplify values we sometimes end up with type mismatches. If the
value is a constant we can often cast it though to still allow
propagation. The logic is now put into a helper and it replaces some
ad hoc things we did before.
This also introduces the AA namespace for abstract attribute related
functions and types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103856
If the target stack is not accessible between different running
"threads" we have to make sure not to create allocas for mallocs
that might be used by multiple "threads". The "use check" is
sufficient to prevent this but if we apply the "free check" we have
to make sure the pointer is not communicated to others before
the free is reached.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98608
We invalidated AAReachabilityImpl directly which is not helpful and
confusing as we still used it regardless. We now avoid invalidating it
(not needed anyway) and add checks for the state. This has by itself no
actual effect but prepares for later extensions.
This attribute computes the optimistic live call edges using the attributor
liveness information. This attribute will be used for deriving a
inter-procedural function reachability attribute.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104059
Summary:
The current implementation of AANoFreeFloating will incorrectly list floating
point loads and stores as may-free. This prevents other attributor instances
like HeapToStack from pushing some allocations to the stack.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103975
This patch changes the `isKnownHeapToStack` and `isAssumedHeapToStack`
member functions to return if a function call is going to be altered by
HeapToStack.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103574
If we simplify values we sometimes end up with type mismatches. If the
value is a constant we can often cast it though to still allow
propagation. The logic is now put into a helper and it replaces some
ad hoc things we did before.
This also introduces the AA namespace for abstract attribute related
functions and types.
The constant value lattice looks like this
```
<None>
|
<undef>
/ | \
... <0> ...
\ | /
<unknown>
```
We did not account for the undef and assumed a value meant we could not
change anymore. Now we actually check if we have the same value as
before, which will signal CHANGED to the users when we go from undef to
a specific constant.
This fixes, among other things, the bug exposed by @ipccp4 in
`value-simplify.ll`.
The state of AAPotentialValues tracks if undef is contained. It should
fold undef into the first non-undef value. However we missed a case
before. There was also a shadowing definition of two variables that
caused trouble. The test exposes both problems.
This patch makes it possible to do call site specific deductions
for AAValueSimplification and AAIsDead.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84722
"Does the predicate hold between two ranges?"
Not very surprisingly, some places were already doing this check,
without explicitly naming the algorithm, cleanup them all.
"Does the predicate hold between two ranges?"
Not very surprisingly, some places were already doing this check,
without explicitly naming the algorithm, cleanup them all.
We have this logic duplicated in several cases, none of which were exhaustive. Consolidate it in one place.
I don't believe this actually impacts behavior of the callers. I think they all filter their inputs such that their partial implementations were correct. If not, this might be fixing a cornercase bug.
Johannes Doerfert