Rules:
1. SCEVUnknown is a pointer if and only if the LLVM IR value is a
pointer.
2. SCEVPtrToInt is never a pointer.
3. If any other SCEV expression has no pointer operands, the result is
an integer.
4. If a SCEVAddExpr has exactly one pointer operand, the result is a
pointer.
5. If a SCEVAddRecExpr's first operand is a pointer, and it has no other
pointer operands, the result is a pointer.
6. If every operand of a SCEVMinMaxExpr is a pointer, the result is a
pointer.
7. Otherwise, the SCEV expression is invalid.
I'm not sure how useful rule 6 is in practice. If we exclude it, we can
guarantee that ScalarEvolution::getPointerBase always returns a
SCEVUnknown, which might be a helpful property. Anyway, I'll leave that
for a followup.
This is basically mop-up at this point; all the changes with significant
functional effects have landed. Some of the remaining changes could be
split off, but I don't see much point.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105510
As part of making ScalarEvolution's handling of pointers consistent, we
want to forbid multiplying a pointer by -1 (or any other value). This
means we can't blindly subtract pointers.
There are a few ways we could deal with this:
1. We could completely forbid subtracting pointers in getMinusSCEV()
2. We could forbid subracting pointers with different pointer bases
(this patch).
3. We could try to ptrtoint pointer operands.
The option in this patch is more friendly to non-integral pointers: code
that works with normal pointers will also work with non-integral
pointers. And it seems like there are very few places that actually
benefit from the third option.
As a minimal patch, the ScalarEvolution implementation of getMinusSCEV
still ends up subtracting pointers if they have the same base. This
should eliminate the shared pointer base, but eventually we'll need to
rewrite it to avoid negating the pointer base. I plan to do this as a
separate step to allow measuring the compile-time impact.
This doesn't cause obvious functional changes in most cases; the one
case that is significantly affected is ICmpZero handling in LSR (which
is the source of almost all the test changes). The resulting changes
seem okay to me, but suggestions welcome. As an alternative, I tried
explicitly ptrtoint'ing the operands, but the result doesn't seem
obviously better.
I deleted the test lsr-undef-in-binop.ll becuase I couldn't figure out
how to repair it to test what it was actually trying to test.
Recommitting with fix to MemoryDepChecker::isDependent.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104806
As part of making ScalarEvolution's handling of pointers consistent, we
want to forbid multiplying a pointer by -1 (or any other value). This
means we can't blindly subtract pointers.
There are a few ways we could deal with this:
1. We could completely forbid subtracting pointers in getMinusSCEV()
2. We could forbid subracting pointers with different pointer bases
(this patch).
3. We could try to ptrtoint pointer operands.
The option in this patch is more friendly to non-integral pointers: code
that works with normal pointers will also work with non-integral
pointers. And it seems like there are very few places that actually
benefit from the third option.
As a minimal patch, the ScalarEvolution implementation of getMinusSCEV
still ends up subtracting pointers if they have the same base. This
should eliminate the shared pointer base, but eventually we'll need to
rewrite it to avoid negating the pointer base. I plan to do this as a
separate step to allow measuring the compile-time impact.
This doesn't cause obvious functional changes in most cases; the one
case that is significantly affected is ICmpZero handling in LSR (which
is the source of almost all the test changes). The resulting changes
seem okay to me, but suggestions welcome. As an alternative, I tried
explicitly ptrtoint'ing the operands, but the result doesn't seem
obviously better.
I deleted the test lsr-undef-in-binop.ll becuase I couldn't figure out
how to repair it to test what it was actually trying to test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104806
Zero factor leads to division by zero and failure of corresponding
assert as shown in PR50765. We should filter out such factors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104702
Reviewed By: huihuiz, reames
Currently, Loop strengh reduce is not handling loops with scalable stride very well.
Take loop vectorized with scalable vector type <vscale x 8 x i16> for instance,
(refer to test/CodeGen/AArch64/sve-lsr-scaled-index-addressing-mode.ll added).
Memory accesses are incremented by "16*vscale", while induction variable is incremented
by "8*vscale". The scaling factor "2" needs to be extracted to build candidate formula
i.e., "reg(%in) + 2*reg({0,+,(8 * %vscale)}". So that addrec register reg({0,+,(8*vscale)})
can be reused among Address and ICmpZero LSRUses to enable optimal solution selection.
This patch allow LSR getExactSDiv to recognize special cases like "C1*X*Y /s C2*X*Y",
and pull out "C1 /s C2" as scaling factor whenever possible. Without this change, LSR
is missing candidate formula with proper scaled factor to leverage target scaled-index
addressing mode.
Note: This patch doesn't fully fix AArch64 isLegalAddressingMode for scalable
vector. But allow simple valid scale to pass through.
Reviewed By: sdesmalen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103939
During Loop Strength Reduce, if the terminating condition for the loop
is not immediately adjacent to the terminating branch and it has more
than one use, a clone of the condition will be created just before the
terminating branch and will be used as the branch condition. Currently,
whether the instructions are "immediately adjacent" is determined by
checking whether the next instruction after the condition is the
terminating branch; this is incorrect however, as the presence of a
debug intrinsic between the two will result in a change to the output.
This is fixed by using getNextNonDebugInstruction() instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103033
When transforming a loop terminating condition into a "max" comparison,
the DebugLoc from the old condition should be set on the newly created
comparison. They are the same operation, just optimized. Fixes PR48067.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98218
This patch changed the isLegalUse check to ensure that
LSRInstance::GenerateConstantOffsetsImpl generates an
offset that results in a legal addressing mode and
formula. The check is changed to look similar to the
assert check used for illegal formulas.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100383
Change-Id: Iffb9e32d59df96b8f072c00f6c339108159a009a
During LoopStrengthReduce, some of the SSA values that are used by debug values
may be lost and/or salvaged. After LSR we attempt to recover any undef debug
values, including any that were salvaged but then lost their values afterwards,
by replacing the lost values with any live equal values (plus a possible
constant offset) that have been gathered prior to running LSR. When we do this
we restore the debug value's original DIExpression, to undo any salvaging (as we
have gone back to using the original debug value).
This process can currently produce invalid debug info if the number of operands
has changed by salvaging during LSR. Replacing old values during the
applyEqualValues step does not change the number of location operands, which
means that when we restore the old DIExpression we may have a mismatch between
the number of operands used by the debug value and the number of operands
referenced by the DIExpression. This patch fixes this by restoring the full
original location metadata at the start of the applyEqualValues step, so that
there is no mismatch in operand count between the debug value and its
DIExpression.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98644
Fixed section of code that iterated through a SmallDenseMap and added
instructions in each iteration, causing non-deterministic code; replaced
SmallDenseMap with MapVector to prevent non-determinism.
This reverts commit 01ac6d1587.
This caused non-deterministic compiler output; see comment on the
code review.
> This patch updates the various IR passes to correctly handle dbg.values with a
> DIArgList location. This patch does not actually allow DIArgLists to be produced
> by salvageDebugInfo, and it does not affect any pass after codegen-prepare.
> Other than that, it should cover every IR pass.
>
> Most of the changes simply extend code that operated on a single debug value to
> operate on the list of debug values in the style of any_of, all_of, for_each,
> etc. Instances of setOperand(0, ...) have been replaced with with
> replaceVariableLocationOp, which takes the value that is being replaced as an
> additional argument. In places where this value isn't readily available, we have
> to track the old value through to the point where it gets replaced.
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88232
This reverts commit df69c69427.
The added test case crashes before this fix:
```
opt: /repositories/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopStrengthReduce.cpp:5172: BasicBlock::iterator (anonymous namespace)::LSRInstance::AdjustInsertPositionForExpand(BasicBlock::iterator, const (anonymous namespace)::LSRFixup &, const (anonymous namespace)::LSRUse &, llvm::SCEVExpander &) const: Assertion `!isa<PHINode>(LowestIP) && !LowestIP->isEHPad() && !isa<DbgInfoIntrinsic>(LowestIP) && "Insertion point must be a normal instruction"' failed.
```
This is fully analogous to the previous commit,
with the pointer constant replaced to be something non-null.
The comparison here can be strength-reduced,
but the second operand of the comparison happens to be identical
to the constant pointer in the `catch` case of `landingpad`.
While LSRInstance::CollectLoopInvariantFixupsAndFormulae()
already gave up on uses in blocks ending up with EH pads,
it didn't consider this case.
Eventually, `LSRInstance::AdjustInsertPositionForExpand()`
will be called, but the original insertion point it will get
is the user instruction itself, and it doesn't want to
deal with EH pads, and asserts as much.
It would seem that this basically never happens in-the-wild,
otherwise it would have been reported already,
so it seems safe to take the cautious approach,
and just not deal with such users.
This patch updates the various IR passes to correctly handle dbg.values with a
DIArgList location. This patch does not actually allow DIArgLists to be produced
by salvageDebugInfo, and it does not affect any pass after codegen-prepare.
Other than that, it should cover every IR pass.
Most of the changes simply extend code that operated on a single debug value to
operate on the list of debug values in the style of any_of, all_of, for_each,
etc. Instances of setOperand(0, ...) have been replaced with with
replaceVariableLocationOp, which takes the value that is being replaced as an
additional argument. In places where this value isn't readily available, we have
to track the old value through to the point where it gets replaced.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88232
This patch updates DbgVariableIntrinsics to support use of a DIArgList for the
location operand, resulting in a significant change to its interface. This patch
does not update all IR passes to support multiple location operands in a
dbg.value; the only change is to update the DbgVariableIntrinsic interface and
its uses. All code outside of the intrinsic classes assumes that an intrinsic
will always have exactly one location operand; they will still support
DIArgLists, but only if they contain exactly one Value.
Among other changes, the setOperand and setArgOperand functions in
DbgVariableIntrinsic have been made private. This is to prevent code from
setting the operands of these intrinsics directly, which could easily result in
incorrect/invalid operands being set. This does not prevent these functions from
being called on a debug intrinsic at all, as they can still be called on any
CallInst pointer; it is assumed that any code directly setting the operands on a
generic call instruction is doing so safely. The intention for making these
functions private is to prevent DIArgLists from being overwritten by code that's
naively trying to replace one of the Values it points to, and also to fail fast
if a DbgVariableIntrinsic is updated to use a DIArgList without a valid
corresponding DIExpression.
Probably should have done this before landing, but I forgot.
Basic idea is to avoid using the SCEV predicate when it doesn't buy us anything. Also happens to set us up for handling non-add recurrences in the future if desired.
LSR goes to some lengths to schedule IV increments such that %iv and %iv.next never need to overlap. This is fairly fundamental to LSRs cost model. LSR assumes that an addrec can be represented with a single register. If %iv and %iv.next have to overlap, then that assumption does not hold.
The bug - which this patch is fixing - is that LSR only does this scheduling for IVs which it inserts, but it's cost model assumes the same for existing IVs that it reuses. It will rewrite existing IV users such that the no-overlap property holds, but will not actually reschedule said IV increment.
As you can see from the relatively lack of test updates, this doesn't actually impact codegen much. The main reason for doing it is to make a follow up patch series which improves post-increment use and scheduling easier to follow.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97219
This adds a new flag -lsr-preferred-addressing-mode to override the target's
preferred addressing mode. It replaces flag -lsr-backedge-indexing, which is
equivalent to preindexed addressing that is one of the options that
-lsr-preferred-addressing-mode accepts.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96855
This is a follow up D96600 and cleans up most calls to
getPreferredAddresingMode. I.e., we really don't need to query the same things
again and again, but get the preferred addressing mode once for each loop. So
this should be a lot friendlier for compile times, especially if we start
implementing getPreferredAddresingMode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96772
This refactors shouldFavorPostInc() and shouldFavorBackedgeIndex() into
getPreferredAddressingMode() so that we have one interface to steer LSR in
generating the preferred addressing mode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96600
Loop strength reduction tries to recover debug variable values by looking
for simple offsets from PHI values. In really extreme conditions there may
be an offset used that won't fit in an int64_t, hitting an APInt assertion.
This patch adds a regression test and adjusts the equivalent value
collecting code to filter out any values where the offset can't be
represented by an int64_t. This means that for very large integers with
very large offsets, the variable location will become undef, which is the
same behaviour as before 2a6782bb9f / D87494.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94016
Use SCEV to salvage additional @llvm.dbg.value that have turned into
referencing undef after transformation (and traditional
salvageDebugInfo). Before rewrite (but after introduction of new
induction variables) use SCEV to compute an equivalent set of values for
each @llvm.dbg.value in the loop body (among the loop header PHI-nodes).
After rewrite (and dead PHI elimination) update those @llvm.dbg.value
now referencing undef by picking a remaining value from its equivalence
set. Allow match with offset by inserting compensation code in the
DIExpression.
Fixes : PR38815
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87494
1. Removed #include "...AliasAnalysis.h" in other headers and modules.
2. Cleaned up includes in AliasAnalysis.h.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92489
The main tricky thing here is forward-declaring the enum:
we have to specify it's underlying data type.
In particular, this avoids the danger of switching over the SCEVTypes,
but actually switching over an integer, and not being notified
when some case is not handled.
I have updated most of such switches to be exaustive and not have
a default case, where it's pretty obvious to be the intent,
however not all of them.
All existing SCEV cast types operate on integers.
D89456 will add SCEVPtrToIntExpr cast expression type.
I believe this is best for consistency.
Reviewed By: mkazantsev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89455
Use SCEV to salvage additional @llvm.dbg.value that have turned into
referencing undef after transformation (and traditional
salvageDebugInfo). Before transformation compute SCEV for each
@llvm.dbg.value in the loop body and store it (along side its current
DIExpression). After transformation update those @llvm.dbg.value now
referencing undef by comparing its stored SCEV to the SCEV of the
current loop-header PHI-nodes. Allow match with offset by inserting
compensation code in the DIExpression.
Includes fix for the nullptr deref that caused the original commit
to be reverted in 9d63029770.
Fixes : PR38815
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87494
This reverts commit a3caf7f610.
The ReleaseLTO-g test-suite configuration has been failing
to build since this commit, because clang segfaults while
building 7zip.
Use SCEV to salvage additional @llvm.dbg.value that have turned into
referencing undef after transformation (and traditional
salvageDebugInfo). Before transformation compute SCEV for each
@llvm.dbg.value in the loop body and store it (along side its current
DIExpression). After transformation update those @llvm.dbg.value now
referencing undef by comparing its stored SCEV to the SCEV of the
current loop-header PHI-nodes. Allow match with offset by inserting
compensation code in the DIExpression.
Fixes : PR38815
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87494
LSR claims to MemorySSA, but we also have to make sure it is preserved
when splitting critical edges. This can be done by passing MSSAU to
SplitCriticalEdge.
Fixes PR47557.
In GenerateConstantOffsetsImpl, we may generate non canonical Formula
if BaseRegs of that Formula is updated and includes a recurrent expr reg
related with current loop while its ScaledReg is not.
Patched by: mdchen
Reviewed By: qcolombet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86939
This reverts the revert commit dc28675768.
It includes a fix for Polly, which uses SCEVExpander on IR that is not
in LCSSA form. Set PreserveLCSSA = false in that case, to ensure we do
not introduce LCSSA phis where there were none before.
This reverts commit 99166fd4fb, because it
breaks the polly builders.
polly/test/Isl/CodeGen/invariant_load_escaping_second_scop.ll fails
because a apparently unnecessary LCSSA phi node is introduced.
Make the bots green again, while I take a closer look.
This patch teaches SCEVExpander to directly preserve LCSSA.
As it is currently, SCEV does not look through PHI nodes in loops,
as it might break LCSSA form. Once SCEVExpander can preserve
LCSSA form, it should be safe for SCEV to look through PHIs.
To preserve LCSSA form, this patch uses formLCSSAForInstructions
on operands of newly created instructions, if the definition is inside
a different loop than the new instruction.
The final value we return from expandCodeFor may also need LCSSA
phis, depending on the insert point. As no user for it exists there yet,
create a temporary instruction at the insert point, which can be passed
to formLCSSAForInstructions. This temporary instruction is removed
after LCSSA construction.
Reviewed By: mkazantsev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71538
In more complicated loops we can easily hit the complexity limits of
loop strength reduction. If we do and filtering occurs, it's all too
easy to remove the wrong formulae for post-inc preferring accesses due
to it attempting to maximise register re-use. The patch adds an
alternative filtering step when the target is preferring postinc to pick
postinc formulae instead, hopefully lowering the complexity to below the
limit so that aggressive filtering is not needed.
There is also a change in here to stop considering existing addrecs as
free under postinc. We should already be modelling them as a reg so
don't want it to cause us to get the cost wrong. (I'm not sure that code
makes sense in general, but there are X86 tests specifically for it
where it seems to be helping so have left it around for the standard
non-post-inc case).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80273
Eli Friedman