Testing reveals that lldb and gdb have some problems with supporting
DW_OP_convert - gdb with Split DWARF tries to resolve the CU-relative
DIE offset relative to the skeleton DIE. lldb tries to treat the offset
as absolute, which judging by the llvm-dsymutil support for
DW_OP_convert, I guess works OK in MachO? (though probably llvm-dsymutil
is producing invalid DWARF by resolving the relative reference to an
absolute one?).
Specifically this disables DW_OP_convert usage in DWARFv5 if:
* Tuning for GDB and using Split DWARF
* Tuning for LLDB and not targeting MachO
Trace through multiple COPYs when looking for a physreg source. Add
hinting for vregs that will be copied into physregs (we only hinted
for vregs getting copied to a physreg previously). Give hinted a
register a bonus when deciding which value to spill. This is part of
my rewrite regallocfast series. In fact this one doesn't even have an
effect unless you also flip the allocation to happen from back to
front of a basic block. Nonetheless it helps to split this up to ease
review of D52010
Patch by Matthias Braun
llvm-svn: 360887
The condition !AddrPool.empty() is tested before attachRangesOrLowHighPC(), which may add an entry to AddrPool. We emit DW_AT_low_pc (DW_FORM_addrx) but may incorrectly omit DW_AT_addr_base for LineTablesOnly. This can be easily reproduced:
clang -gdwarf-5 -gmlt -c a.cc
Fix this by moving !AddrPool.empty() below.
This was discovered while investigating an lld crash (fixed by D61889) on such object files: ld.lld --gdb-index a.o
Reviewed By: probinson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61891
llvm-svn: 360678
David Blaikie