Introduce basic schedule model for AMD Zen 3 CPU's, a.k.a `znver3`.
This is fully built from scratch, from llvm-mca measurements
and documented reference materials.
Nothing was copied from `znver2`/`znver1`.
I believe this is in a reasonable state of completion for inclusion,
probably better than D52779 `bdver2` was :)
Namely:
* uops are pretty spot-on (at least what llvm-mca can measure)
{F16422596}
* latency is also pretty spot-on (at least what llvm-mca can measure)
{F16422601}
* throughput is within reason
{F16422607}
I haven't run much benchmarks with this,
however RawSpeed benchmarks says this is beneficial:
{F16603978}
{F16604029}
I'll call out the obvious problems there:
* i didn't really bother with X87 instructions
* i didn't really bother with obviously-microcoded/system instructions
* There are large discrepancy in throughput for `mr` and `rm` instructions.
I'm not really sure if it's a modelling defect that needs to be fixed,
or it's a defect of measurments.
* Pipe distributions are probably bad :)
I can't do much here until AMD allows that to be fixed
by documenting the appropriate counters and updating libpfm
That being said, as @RKSimon notes:
>>! In D94395#2647381, @RKSimon wrote:
> I'll mention again that all the znver* models appear to be very inaccurate wrt SIMD/FPU instructions <...>
so how much worse this could possibly be?!
Things that aren't there:
* Various tunings: zero idioms, etc. That is follow-ups.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94395
The patch gives out the details of the znver2 scheduler model.
There are few improvements with respect to execution units, latencies and
throughput when compared with znver1.
The tests that were present for znver1 for llvm-mca tool were replicated.
The latencies, execution units, timeline and throughput information are updated for znver2.
Reviewers: craig.topper, Simon Pilgrim
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66088
It makes more sense to print out the number of micro opcodes that are issued
every cycle rather than the number of instructions issued per cycle.
This behavior is also consistent with the dispatch-stats: numbers from the two
views can now be easily compared.
llvm-svn: 357919
Adding the baseline tests in a preparatory NFC commit,
so that the actual commit shows the *diff*.
Yes, i'm aware that a few of these codegen-based sched tests
are testing wrong instructions, i will fix that afterwards.
For https://reviews.llvm.org/D52779
llvm-svn: 345462
Before this patch, the SchedulerStatistics only printed the maximum number of
buffer entries consumed in each scheduler's queue at a given point of the
simulation.
This patch restructures the reported table, and adds an extra field named
"Average number of used buffer entries" to it.
This patch also uses different colors to help identifying bottlenecks caused by
high scheduler's buffer pressure.
llvm-svn: 340746
Summary:
First off: i do not have any access to that processor,
so this is purely theoretical, no benchmarks.
I have been looking into b**d**ver2 scheduling profile, and while cross-referencing
the existing b**t**ver2, znver1 profiles, and the reference docs
(`Software Optimization Guide for AMD Family {15,16,17}h Processors`),
i have noticed that only b**t**ver2 scheduling profile specifies these.
Also, there is no mca test coverage.
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, courbet, GGanesh, andreadb
Reviewed By: GGanesh
Subscribers: gbedwell, vprasad, ddibyend, shivaram, Ashutosh, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47676
llvm-svn: 335099
Summary:
While that is indeed a quite interesting summary stat,
there are cases where it does not really add anything
other than consuming extra lines.
Declutters the output of D48190.
Reviewers: RKSimon, andreadb, courbet, craig.topper
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: javed.absar, gbedwell, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48209
llvm-svn: 334833
Summary:
There does not seem to be any other tests for this.
Split off from D47676.
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, courbet, andreadb
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: javed.absar, gbedwell, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48190
llvm-svn: 334832
Roman Lebedev