The https://reviews.llvm.org/D53014 added CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE to
the list of BOOTSTRAP_DEFAULT_PASSTHROUGH variables.
The downside is that both stage-1 and stage-2 configurations
are the same. So it is not possible to build different stage
configurations.
This patch allow explicit bootstrap options to override any
passthrough ones.
For instance, the following settings would build:
stage-1 (Release) and stage-2(Debug)
-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DBOOTSTRAP_CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug
Reviewed By: @beanz
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131755
Seems this complicated lldb sufficiently for some cases that it hasn't
been worth supporting/fixing there - and it so far hasn't provided any
new use cases/value for debug info consumers, so let's remove it until
someone has a use case for it.
(side note: the original implementation of this still had a bug (I
should've caught it in review) that we still didn't produce
auto-returning function declarations in types where the function wasn't
instantiatied (that requires a fix to remove the `if
getContainedAutoType` condition in
`CGDebugInfo::CollectCXXMemberFunctions` - without that, auto returning
functions were still being handled the same as member function templates
and special member functions - never added to the member list, only
attached to the type via the declaration chain from the definition)
Further discussion about this in D123319
This reverts commit 5ff992bca208a0e37ca6338fc735aec6aa848b72: [DEBUG-INFO] Change how we handle auto return types for lambda operator() to be consistent with gcc
This reverts commit c83602fdf51b2692e3bacb06bf861f20f74e987f: [DWARF5][clang]: Added support for DebugInfo generation for auto return type for C++ member functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131933
Currently bpf supports calling kernel functions (x86_64, arm64, etc.)
in bpf programs. Tejun discovered a problem where the x86_64 func
return value (a unsigned char type) is stored in 8-bit subregister %al
and the other 56-bits in %rax might be garbage. But based on current
bpf ABI, the bpf program assumes the whole %rax holds the correct value
as the callee is supposed to do necessary sign/zero extension.
This mismatch between bpf and x86_64 caused the incorrect results.
To resolve this problem, this patch forced caller to do needed
sign/zero extension for 8/16-bit return values as well. Note that
32-bit return values already had sign/zero extension even without
this patch.
For example, for the test case attached to this patch:
$ cat t.c
_Bool bar_bool(void);
unsigned char bar_char(void);
short bar_short(void);
int bar_int(void);
int foo_bool(void) {
if (bar_bool() != 1) return 0; else return 1;
}
int foo_char(void) {
if (bar_char() != 10) return 0; else return 1;
}
int foo_short(void) {
if (bar_short() != 10) return 0; else return 1;
}
int foo_int(void) {
if (bar_int() != 10) return 0; else return 1;
}
Without this patch, generated call insns in IR looks like:
%call = call zeroext i1 @bar_bool()
%call = call zeroext i8 @bar_char()
%call = call signext i16 @bar_short()
%call = call i32 @bar_int()
So it is assumed that zero extension has been done for return values of
bar_bool()and bar_char(). Sign extension has been done for the return
value of bar_short(). The return value of bar_int() does not have any
assumption so caller needs to do necessary shifting to get correct
32bit values.
With this patch, generated call insns in IR looks like:
%call = call i1 @bar_bool()
%call = call i8 @bar_char()
%call = call i16 @bar_short()
%call = call i32 @bar_int()
There are no assumptions for return values of the above four function calls,
so necessary shifting is necessary for all of them.
The following is the objdump file difference for function foo_char().
Without this patch:
0000000000000010 <foo_char>:
2: 85 10 00 00 ff ff ff ff call -1
3: bf 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = r0
4: b7 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 r0 = 1
5: 15 01 01 00 0a 00 00 00 if r1 == 10 goto +1 <LBB1_2>
6: b7 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r0 = 0
0000000000000038 <LBB1_2>:
7: 95 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 exit
With this patch:
0000000000000018 <foo_char>:
3: 85 10 00 00 ff ff ff ff call -1
4: bf 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = r0
5: 57 01 00 00 ff 00 00 00 r1 &= 255
6: b7 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 r0 = 1
7: 15 01 01 00 0a 00 00 00 if r1 == 10 goto +1 <LBB1_2>
8: b7 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r0 = 0
0000000000000048 <LBB1_2>:
9: 95 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 exit
The zero extension of the return 'char' value is done here.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131598
Add initial support for NonNull attribute.
(https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/57113)
Test plan:
verify that for
__thread int x;
int main() {
int* y = &x;
return *y;
}
(with this patch) clang -O -fsanitize=null -S -emit-llvm -o -
doesn't emit a null-pointer check
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131872
When aliasing a static array, the aliasee is going to be a GEP which
points to the value. We should strip pointer casts before forming the
reference. This was occluded by the use of opaque pointers.
This problem has existed since the introduction of the debug info
generation for aliases in b1ea0191a4. The
test case would assert due to the invalid cast with or without
`-no-opaque-pointers` at that revision.
Fixes: #57179
Instead of delaying the generation of command-lines to after all
dependencies are reported, compute them immediately. This is partly in
preparation for splitting the TU driver command into its constituent cc1
and other jobs, but it also just simplifies working with the compiler
invocation for modules if they are not "without paths".
Also change the computation of the default output path in
clang-scan-deps to scrape the implicit module cache from the
command-line rather than get it from the dependency, since that is now
unavailable at the time we make the callback.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131934
I accidentally broke friend destructor declarations in D130936.
Modify it to skip performing the destructor name check if we have a dependent friend declaration.
Reviewed By: hubert.reinterpretcast
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131541
Currently we treat initializers with init_seg(compiler/lib) as similar
to any other init_seg, they simply have a global variable in the proper
section (".CRT$XCC" for compiler/".CRT$XCL" for lib) and are added to
llvm.used. However, this doesn't match with how LLVM sees normal (or
init_seg(user)) initializers via llvm.global_ctors. This
causes issues like incorrect init_seg(compiler) vs init_seg(user)
ordering due to GlobalOpt evaluating constructors, and the
ability to remove init_seg(compiler/lib) initializers at all.
Currently we use 'A' for priorities less than 200. Use 200 for
init_seg(compiler) (".CRT$XCC") and 400 for init_seg(lib) (".CRT$XCL"),
which do not append the priority to the section name. Priorities
between 200 and 400 use ".CRT$XCC${Priority}". This allows for
some wiggle room for people/future extensions that want to add
initializers between compiler and lib.
Fixes#56922
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131910
I introduced a patch to handle unqualified templated base class
initialization in MSVC compatibility mode:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rGc894e85fc64dd8d83b460de81080fff93c5ca334
We identified a problem with this patch in the case where the base class
is partially specialized, which can lead to triggering an assertion in
the case of a mix between types and values.
The minimal test case is:
template <typename Type, int TSize> class Vec {};
template <int TDim> class Index : public Vec<int, TDim> {
Index() : Vec() {}
};
template class Index<0>;
The detailed problem is that I was using the
`InjectedClassNameSpecialization`, to which the class template arguments
were then applied in order. But in the process, we were losing all the
partial specializations of the base class and creating an index mismatch
between the expected and passed arguments.
Patch By: frederic-tingaud-sonarsource
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130709
Newer SDKs don't even provide libstdc++ headers, so it's effectively
never valid to build for libstdc++ unless the user explicitly asks
for it (in which case they will need to provide include paths and more).
This is a re-application of c5ccb78ade which had been reverted in
33171df9cc because it broke the Fuchsia CI bots. The issue was that
the test was XPASSing because it didn't fail anymore when the
CLANG_DEFAULT_CXX_LIB was set to libc++, which seems to be done for
Fuchsia. Instead, the test only fails if CLANG_DEFAULT_CXX_LIB is
set to libstdc++.
As a fly-by fix, also adjust the triple used by various tests to
something that is supported. Those tests were shown to fail on
internal bots.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131274
This fixes some fallout from D131282. Currently, add_tablegen() will add the tablegen target to LLVM_EXPORTS and associates the install with LLVMExports. For non-standalone builds, this means that you end up with mlir-tblgen and clang-tblgen in LLVMExports.
However, these projects should instead be using MLIR_EXPORTS/MLIRTargets and CLANG_EXPORTS/ClangTargets. To fix this, add an extra EXPORT option and make use of get_target_export_arg() to create the correct export argument.
Reviewed By: ashay-github
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131565
- Modify TokenAnnotator to work fine with java-style array declarations.
- Add test for aligning of java declarations.
Fixes#55931.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129628
This patch adds a `Depth` field (default value 2) to `ContextSensitiveOptions`, allowing context-sensitive analysis of functions that call other functions. This also requires replacing the `DeclCtx` field on `Environment` with a `CallString` field that contains a vector of decl contexts, to ensure that the analysis doesn't try to analyze recursive or mutually recursive calls (which would result in a crash, due to the way we handle `StorageLocation`s).
Reviewed By: xazax.hun
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131809
The point of a constexpr if statement is to determine which branch to
take at compile time, so warning on unreachable code is meaningless in
these situations.
Fixes#57123.
Reviewed By: thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131818
When expanding undeclared function parameters, we should initialize
the original number of expansions, if known, before trying to expand
them, otherwise a length mismatch with an outer pack might not be
diagnosed.
Fixes PR56094.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131802
DR692 handles two cases: pack expansion (for class/var template) and function parameter pack. The former needs DR1432 as a fix, and the latter needs DR1395 as a fix. However, DR1432 has not yet made a wording change. so I made a tentative fix for DR1432 with the same spirit as DR1395.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, erichkeane, #clang-language-wg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128745
DiagnoseNullConversion is needlessly calling isNullPointerConstant which
is an expensive routine due to its calls to a constant evaluator --
which we don't need.
Building the Linux Kernel (x86_64) with this fix has improved build
times by ~2.1%. This is mainly due to the following methods no longer
needing to be called anywhere near as often:
1) ExprConstant::CheckICE (reduced CPU cycles by ~90%)
2) IntExprEvaluator::VisitBinaryOperator (reduced CPU cycles by ~50%)
Reviewed By: rtrieu, nickdesaulniers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131532
This patch fixes:
clang/lib/Sema/SemaType.cpp:9469:3: error: default label in switch
which covers all enumeration values
[-Werror,-Wcovered-switch-default]
Adds
* `__add_lvalue_reference`
* `__add_pointer`
* `__add_rvalue_reference`
* `__decay`
* `__make_signed`
* `__make_unsigned`
* `__remove_all_extents`
* `__remove_extent`
* `__remove_const`
* `__remove_volatile`
* `__remove_cv`
* `__remove_pointer`
* `__remove_reference`
* `__remove_cvref`
These are all compiler built-in equivalents of the unary type traits
found in [[meta.trans]][1]. The compiler already has all of the
information it needs to answer these transformations, so we can skip
needing to make partial specialisations in standard library
implementations (we already do this for a lot of the query traits). This
will hopefully improve compile times, as we won't need use as much
memory in such a base part of the standard library.
[1]: http://wg21.link/meta.trans
Co-authored-by: zoecarver
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116203
Found during clang 15 RC1 testing due to the new diagnostic added by @royjacobson since clang 14. Uncertain if this fix meets the bar to also be applied to the release branch.
If accepted, I'll need someone with commit access to submit on my behalf.
Reviewed By: royjacobson, aaron.ballman, erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131730
Currently, the field just emit map info for this pointer variable. It is
failed at run time. For the fields, the PartialStruct is created and it
needs call to emitCombinedEntry which create the base that covers all
the pieces.
The change is to generate map info as regular fields.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129608
In Android API < 30 there is no HWAsan instrumentation support for globals
so the test fails if API < 30 or if the target triple does not specify the API version.
Add -triple=aarch64-linux-android31 to enable global instrumentation. This is the
same triple as is used in the RUN line for -fsanitize=memtag-globals.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131806
Change-Id: I300703bd126b10e3c52505e23c78c5a48acb0309
Inside `ExprEngine::VisitLambdaExpr()` we wasn't prepared for a
copy elided initialized capture's `InitExpr`. This patch teaches
the analyzer how to handle such situation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131784
Yuanfang Chen