When expanding undeclared function parameters, we should initialize
the original number of expansions, if known, before trying to expand
them, otherwise a length mismatch with an outer pack might not be
diagnosed.
Fixes PR56094.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131802
DR692 handles two cases: pack expansion (for class/var template) and function parameter pack. The former needs DR1432 as a fix, and the latter needs DR1395 as a fix. However, DR1432 has not yet made a wording change. so I made a tentative fix for DR1432 with the same spirit as DR1395.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, erichkeane, #clang-language-wg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128745
Found during clang 15 RC1 testing due to the new diagnostic added by @royjacobson since clang 14. Uncertain if this fix meets the bar to also be applied to the release branch.
If accepted, I'll need someone with commit access to submit on my behalf.
Reviewed By: royjacobson, aaron.ballman, erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131730
Before this patch type traits are checked in Parser, so use type traits
directly did not cause assertion faults. However if type traits are initialized
from a template, we didn't perform arity checks before evaluating. This
patch moves arity checks from Parser to Sema, and performing arity
checks in Sema actions, so type traits get checked corretly.
Crash input:
```
template<class... Ts> bool b = __is_constructible(Ts...);
bool x = b<>;
```
After this patch:
```
clang/test/SemaCXX/type-trait-eval-crash-issue-57008.cpp:5:32: error: type trait requires 1 or more arguments; have 0 arguments
template<class... Ts> bool b = __is_constructible(Ts...);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
clang/test/SemaCXX/type-trait-eval-crash-issue-57008.cpp:6:10: note: in instantiation of variable template specialization 'b<>' requested here
bool x = b<>;
^
1 error generated.
```
See https://godbolt.org/z/q39W78hsK.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/57008
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131423
Followup patch for D128083
Previously, using a non-consteval constructor from an consteval constructor would code generates the consteval constructor.
Example
```
template <typename T>
struct S {
T i;
consteval S() = default;
};
struct Foo {
Foo() {}
};
void func() {
S<Foo> three; // incorrectly accepted by clang.
}
```
This happened because clang erroneously disregards `consteval` specifier for a `consteval explicitly defaulted special member functions in a class template` if it has dependent data members without a `consteval default constructor`.
According to
```
C++14 [dcl.constexpr]p6 (CWG DR647/CWG DR1358):
If the instantiated template specialization of a constexpr function
template or member function of a class template would fail to satisfy
the requirements for a constexpr function or constexpr constructor, that
specialization is still a constexpr function or constexpr constructor,
even though a call to such a function cannot appear in a constant
expression.
```
Therefore the `consteval defaulted constructor of a class template` should be considered `consteval` even if the data members' default constructors are not consteval.
Keeping this constructor `consteval` allows complaining while processing the call to data member constructors.
(Same applies for other special member functions).
This works fine even when we have more than one default constructors since we process the constructors after the templates are instantiated.
This does not address initialization issues raised in
[2602](https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#2602) and compiler divergence seen in https://godbolt.org/z/va9EMvvMe
Fixes: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/51593
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131479
Clang currently crashes when lowering a consteval list initialization
of a temporary. This is partially working around an issue in the
template instantiation code (TreeTransform::TransformCXXTemporaryObjectExpr())
that does not yet know how to handle list initialization of temporaries
in all cases. However, it's also helping reduce fragility by ensuring
we always have a valid QualType when trying to emit a constant
expression during IR generation.
Fixes#55871
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131194
Previously the table in LanguageExtensions said that sizeof worked on
SVE types but this is only correct for fixed-length vectors so a
clarification has been added.
For failed static assertions, try to take the expression apart and print
useful information about why it failed. In particular, look at binary
operators and print the compile-time evaluated value of the LHS/RHS.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130894
When clang includes a PCH, it tolerates some amount of differences
between the defines used when creating and when including the PCH
- this seems to be intentionally allowed in
c379c07240 (and later extended in
b636875196).
When using a PCH (or when picking a PCH out of a directory containing
multiple candidates) Clang used to accept the header if there were
defines on the command line when creating the PCH that are missing
when using the PCH, or vice versa, defines only set when using the
PCH.
The only cases where Clang explicitly rejected the use of a PCH
is if there was an explicit conflict between the options, e.g.
-DFOO=1 vs -DFOO=2, or -DFOO vs -UFOO.
The latter commit added a FIXME that we really should check whether
mismatched defines actually were used somewhere in the PCH, so that
the define would affect the outcome. This FIXME has stood unaddressed
since 2012.
This differs from GCC, which rejects PCH files if the defines differ
at all.
When explicitly including a single PCH file, the relaxed policy
of allowing minor differences is harmless for correct use cases
(but may fail to diagnose mismtaches), and potentially allow using
PCHs in wider cases (where the user intentionally know that the
differences in defines are harmless for the PCH).
However, for GCC style PCH directories, with a directory containing
multiple PCH variants and the compiler should pick the correct match
out of them, Clang's relaxed logic was problematic. The directory
could contain two otherwise identical PCHs, but one built with -DFOO
and one without. When attempting to include a PCH and iterating over
the candidates in the directory, Clang would essentially pick the
first one out of the two, even if there existed a better, exact
match in the directory.
Keep the relaxed checking when specificlly including one named
PCH file, but require strict matches when trying to pick the right
candidate out of a GCC style directory with alternatives.
This fixes https://github.com/lhmouse/mcfgthread/issues/63.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126676
Implicitly converting between incompatible function pointers in C is
currently a default-on warning (it is an error in C++). However, this
is very poor security posture. A mismatch in parameters or return
types, or a mismatch in calling conventions, etc can lead to
exploitable security vulnerabilities. Rather than allow this unsafe
practice with a warning, this patch strengthens the warning to be an
error (while still allowing users the ability to disable the error or
the warning entirely to ease migration). Users should either ensure the
signatures are correctly compatible or they should use an explicit cast
if they believe that's more reasonable.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131351
Previously the language extension documentation didn't mention SVE and
was incomplete in listing the C/C++ operators supported on NEON. This
corrects the documentation to be in line with the implementation.
A one-bit signed bit-field can only hold the values 0 and -1; this
corrects the diagnostic behavior accordingly.
Fixes#53253
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131255
In D130058 we diagnose the undefined behavior of setting the value outside the
range of the enumerations values for an enum without a fixed underlying type.
Based on feedback we will provide users to the ability to downgrade this
diagnostic to a waring to allow for a transition period. We expect to turn this
diagnostic to an error in the next release.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131307
The header from 62e0681afb does something with
LLVM_FALLTHROUGH. Now that llvm-project has switched to C++17 and
LLVM_FALLTHROUGH uses have been migrated to [[fallthrough]], the header is
unneeded.
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131422
Along with the new documentation this also re-organizes the HLSL docs
to a subdirectory. The hope is to continue to expand this documentation
as the HLSL implementation advances.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130794
Support for functions wmempcpy, wmemmove, wmemcmp is added to the checker.
The same tests are copied that exist for the non-wide versions, with
non-wide functions and character types changed to the wide version.
Reviewed By: martong
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130470
Consider:
A == 5 && A != 5
IfA is 5, the old collectConjunctionTerms() would call itself again for
the LHS (which it ignores), then the RHS (which it also ignores) and
then just return without ever adding anything to the Terms array.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131070
In D130807 we added the `skipprofile` attribute. This commit
changes the format so we can either `forbid` or `skip` profiling
functions by adding the `noprofile` or `skipprofile` attributes,
respectively. The behavior of the original format remains
unchanged.
Also, add the `skipprofile` attribute when using
`-fprofile-function-groups`.
This was originally landed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D130808 but was
reverted due to a Windows test failure.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131195
We would like to make the ACLE NEON and SVE intrinsics more useable by
gating them on the target, not by ifdef preprocessor macros. In order to
do this the types they use need to be available. This patches makes
__bf16 always available under AArch64 not just when the bf16
architecture feature is present. This bringing it in-line with GCC. In
subsequent patches the NEON bfloat16x8_t and SVE svbfloat16_t types
(along with bfloat16_t used in arm_sve.h) will be made unconditional
too.
The operations valid on the types are still very limited. They can be
used as a storage type, but the intrinsics used for convertions are
still behind an ifdef guard in arm_neon.h/arm_bf16.h.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130973
Close#56885: WG14 N2630 added %b to fprintf/fscanf and recommended %B for
fprintf. This patch teaches -Wformat %b for the printf/scanf family of functions
and %B for the printf family of functions.
glibc 2.35 and latest Android bionic added %b/%B printf support. From
https://www.openwall.com/lists/libc-coord/2022/07/ no scanf support is available
yet.
Like GCC, we don't test library support.
GCC 12 -Wformat -pedantic emits a warning:
> warning: ISO C17 does not support the ‘%b’ gnu_printf format [-Wformat=]
The behavior is not ported.
Note: `freebsd_kernel_printf` uses %b differently.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, dim, enh
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131057
In D130807 we added the `skipprofile` attribute. This commit
changes the format so we can either `forbid` or `skip` profiling
functions by adding the `noprofile` or `skipprofile` attributes,
respectively. The behavior of the original format remains
unchanged.
Also, add the `skipprofile` attribute when using
`-fprofile-function-groups`.
Reviewed By: phosek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130808
This patch enhances clang's ability to check compile-time determinable
string literals as format strings, and can give FixIt hints at literals
(unlike gcc). Issue https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/55805
mentiond two compile-time string cases. And this patch partially fixes
one.
```
constexpr const char* foo() {
return "%s %d";
}
int main() {
printf(foo(), "abc", "def");
return 0;
}
```
This patch enables clang check format string for this:
```
<source>:4:24: warning: format specifies type 'int' but the argument has type 'const char *' [-Wformat]
printf(foo(), "abc", "def");
~~~~~ ^~~~~
<source>:2:42: note: format string is defined here
constexpr const char *foo() { return "%s %d"; }
^~
%s
1 warning generated.
```
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Signed-off-by: YingChi Long <me@inclyc.cn>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130906
This completes the implementation of P1091R3 and P1381R1.
This patch allow the capture of structured bindings
both for C++20+ and C++17, with extension/compat warning.
In addition, capturing an anonymous union member,
a bitfield, or a structured binding thereof now has a
better diagnostic.
We only support structured bindings - as opposed to other kinds
of structured statements/blocks. We still emit an error for those.
In addition, support for structured bindings capture is entirely disabled in
OpenMP mode as this needs more investigation - a specific diagnostic indicate the feature is not yet supported there.
Note that the rest of P1091R3 (static/thread_local structured bindings) was already implemented.
at the request of @shafik, i can confirm the correct behavior of lldb wit this change.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54300
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54300
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/52720
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122768
We already correctly rejected:
typedef __attribute__((vector_size(16))) _BitInt(4) Ty;
but we would assert with:
typedef __attribute__((ext_vector_type(4))) _BitInt(4) Ty;
Now we issue the same error in both cases.
This completes the implementation of P1091R3 and P1381R1.
This patch allow the capture of structured bindings
both for C++20+ and C++17, with extension/compat warning.
In addition, capturing an anonymous union member,
a bitfield, or a structured binding thereof now has a
better diagnostic.
We only support structured bindings - as opposed to other kinds
of structured statements/blocks. We still emit an error for those.
In addition, support for structured bindings capture is entirely disabled in
OpenMP mode as this needs more investigation - a specific diagnostic indicate the feature is not yet supported there.
Note that the rest of P1091R3 (static/thread_local structured bindings) was already implemented.
at the request of @shafik, i can confirm the correct behavior of lldb wit this change.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54300
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54300
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/52720
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122768
VisitCXXConstructExpr() will later do something similar, but for large
arrays, we should try to do it once an not for every element.
Fixes#56774
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130791
We didn't check that a destructor's name matches the directly enclosing class if the class was dependent.
I enabled the check we already had for non-dependent types, which seems to work. Added appropriate tests.
Fixes GitHub issue #56772
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130936
This reverts commit 0cc3c184c7.
The changes did not account for templated code where one instantiation
may trigger the diagnostic but other instantiations will not, as in:
```
template <int I, class T>
void foo(int x) {
bool b1 = (x & sizeof(T)) == 8;
bool b2 = (x & I) == 8;
bool b3 = (x & 4) == 8;
}
void run(int x) {
foo<4, int>(8);
}
```
I went over the output of the following mess of a command:
(ulimit -m 2000000; ulimit -v 2000000; git ls-files -z |
parallel --xargs -0 cat | aspell list --mode=none --ignore-case |
grep -E '^[A-Za-z][a-z]*$' | sort | uniq -c | sort -n |
grep -vE '.{25}' | aspell pipe -W3 | grep : | cut -d' ' -f2 | less)
and proceeded to spend a few days looking at it to find probable typos
and fixed a few hundred of them in all of the llvm project (note, the
ones I found are not anywhere near all of them, but it seems like a
good start).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130827
This is a follow-up to D130058 to fix how we handle the Max value we obtain from
getValueRange(...) in IntExprEvaluator::VisitCastExpr(...) which in the case of
an enum that contains an enumerator with the max integer value will overflow by
one.
The fix is to decrement the value of Max and use slt and ult for comparison Vs
sle and ule.`
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130811
C99 6.7.4p2 clarifies that a function specifier can only be used in the
declaration of a function. _Noreturn is a function specifier, so it is
a constraint violation to write it on a structure or union field, but
we missed that case.
Fixes#56800
DR2338 clarified that it was undefined behavior to set the value outside the
range of the enumerations values for an enum without a fixed underlying type.
We should diagnose this with a constant expression context.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130058
The patch mainly focuses on the lack of warnings for
-Wtautological-compare. It works fine for positive numbers but doesn't
for negative numbers. This is because the warning explicitly checks for
an IntegerLiteral AST node, but -1 is represented by a UnaryOperator
with an IntegerLiteral sub-Expr.
For the below code we have warnings:
if (0 == (5 | x)) {}
but not for
if (0 == (-5 | x)) {}
This patch changes the analysis to not look at the AST node directly to
see if it is an IntegerLiteral, but instead attempts to evaluate the
expression to see if it is an integer constant expression. This handles
unary negation signs, but also handles all the other possible operators
as well.
Fixes#42918
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130510
DR2338 clarified that it was undefined behavior to set the value outside the
range of the enumerations values for an enum without a fixed underlying type.
We should diagnose this with a constant expression context.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130058
Add the support for `atomic compare` and `atomic compare capture` in the
release note of clang.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129211
YingChi Long