Inside `ExprEngine::VisitLambdaExpr()` we wasn't prepared for a
copy elided initialized capture's `InitExpr`. This patch teaches
the analyzer how to handle such situation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131784
This completes the implementation of P1091R3 and P1381R1.
This patch allow the capture of structured bindings
both for C++20+ and C++17, with extension/compat warning.
In addition, capturing an anonymous union member,
a bitfield, or a structured binding thereof now has a
better diagnostic.
We only support structured bindings - as opposed to other kinds
of structured statements/blocks. We still emit an error for those.
In addition, support for structured bindings capture is entirely disabled in
OpenMP mode as this needs more investigation - a specific diagnostic indicate the feature is not yet supported there.
Note that the rest of P1091R3 (static/thread_local structured bindings) was already implemented.
at the request of @shafik, i can confirm the correct behavior of lldb wit this change.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54300
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54300
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/52720
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122768
This completes the implementation of P1091R3 and P1381R1.
This patch allow the capture of structured bindings
both for C++20+ and C++17, with extension/compat warning.
In addition, capturing an anonymous union member,
a bitfield, or a structured binding thereof now has a
better diagnostic.
We only support structured bindings - as opposed to other kinds
of structured statements/blocks. We still emit an error for those.
In addition, support for structured bindings capture is entirely disabled in
OpenMP mode as this needs more investigation - a specific diagnostic indicate the feature is not yet supported there.
Note that the rest of P1091R3 (static/thread_local structured bindings) was already implemented.
at the request of @shafik, i can confirm the correct behavior of lldb wit this change.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54300
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54300
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/52720
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122768
In ExprEngine::bindReturnValue() we cast an SVal to DefinedOrUnknownSVal,
however this SVal can also be Undefined, which leads to an assertion failure.
Fixes: #56873
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130974
I went over the output of the following mess of a command:
(ulimit -m 2000000; ulimit -v 2000000; git ls-files -z |
parallel --xargs -0 cat | aspell list --mode=none --ignore-case |
grep -E '^[A-Za-z][a-z]*$' | sort | uniq -c | sort -n |
grep -vE '.{25}' | aspell pipe -W3 | grep : | cut -d' ' -f2 | less)
and proceeded to spend a few days looking at it to find probable typos
and fixed a few hundred of them in all of the llvm project (note, the
ones I found are not anywhere near all of them, but it seems like a
good start).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130827
This patch introduces a new `ConstructionContext` for
lambda capture. This `ConstructionContext` allows the
analyzer to construct the captured object directly into
it's final region, and makes it possible to capture
non-POD arrays.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129967
This patch introduces the evaluation of ArrayInitLoopExpr
in case of structured bindings and implicit copy/move
constructor. The idea is to call the copy constructor for
every element in the array. The parameter of the copy
constructor is also manually selected, as it is not a part
of the CFG.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129496
Summary: Get rid of explicit function splitting in favor of specifically designed Visitor. Move logic from a family of `evalCastKind` and `evalCastSubKind` helper functions to `SValVisitor`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130029
Some code [0] consider that trailing arrays are flexible, whatever their size.
Support for these legacy code has been introduced in
f8f6324983 but it prevents evaluation of
__builtin_object_size and __builtin_dynamic_object_size in some legit cases.
Introduce -fstrict-flex-arrays=<n> to have stricter conformance when it is
desirable.
n = 0: current behavior, any trailing array member is a flexible array. The default.
n = 1: any trailing array member of undefined, 0 or 1 size is a flexible array member
n = 2: any trailing array member of undefined or 0 size is a flexible array member
This takes into account two specificities of clang: array bounds as macro id
disqualify FAM, as well as non standard layout.
Similar patch for gcc discuss here: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101836
[0] https://docs.freebsd.org/en/books/developers-handbook/sockets/#sockets-essential-functions
Summary: Introduce a new function 'clang_analyzer_value'. It emits a report that in turn prints a RangeSet or APSInt associated with SVal. If there is no associated value, prints "n/a".
Summary: Sorted some handler-functions into more appropriate visitor functions of the SymbolicRangeInferrer.
- Spread `getRangeForNegatedSub` body over several visitor functions: `VisitSymExpr`, `VisitSymIntExpr`, `VisitSymSymExpr`.
- Moved `getRangeForComparisonSymbol` from `infer` to `VisitSymSymExpr`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129678
Introducing the support for evaluating the constructor
of every element in an array. The idea is to record the
index of the current array member being constructed and
create a loop during the analysis. We looping over the
same CXXConstructExpr as many times as many elements
the array has.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127973
In method `TypeRetrievingVisitor::VisitConcreteInt`, `ASTContext::getIntTypeForBitwidth` is used to get the type for `ConcreteInt`s.
However, the getter in ASTContext cannot handle the boolean type with the bit width of 1, which will make method `SVal::getType` return a Null `Type`.
In this patch, a check for this case is added to fix this problem by returning the bool type directly when the bit width is 1.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129737
Depends on D128068.
Added a new test code that fails an assertion in the baseline.
That is because `getAPSIntType` works only with integral types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126779
In `RegionStore::getBinding` we call `evalCast` unconditionally to align
the stored value's type to the one that is being queried. However, the
stored type might be the same, so we may end up having redundant
`SymbolCasts` emitted.
The solution is to check whether the `to` and `from` type are the same
in `makeNonLoc`.
Note, we can't just do type equivalence check at the beginning of `evalCast`
because when `evalCast` is called from `getBinding` then the original type
(`OriginalTy`) is not set, so one operand is missing for the comparison. In
`evalCastSubKind(nonloc::SymbolVal)` when the original type is not set,
we get the `from` type via `SymbolVal::getType()`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128068
This patch gives basic parsing and semantic support for
"parallel masked taskloop simd" construct introduced in
OpenMP 5.1 (section 2.16.10)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128946
This patch gives basic parsing and semantic support for
"parallel masked taskloop" construct introduced in
OpenMP 5.1 (section 2.16.9)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128834
The case when the bound variable is reference type in a
BindingDecl wasn't handled, which lead to false positives.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128716
This patch gives basic parsing and semantic support for
"masked taskloop simd" construct introduced in OpenMP 5.1 (section 2.16.8)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128693
This patch gives basic parsing and semantic support for "masked taskloop"
construct introduced in OpenMP 5.1 (section 2.16.7)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128478
Some code [0] consider that trailing arrays are flexible, whatever their size.
Support for these legacy code has been introduced in
f8f6324983 but it prevents evaluation of
__builtin_object_size and __builtin_dynamic_object_size in some legit cases.
Introduce -fstrict-flex-arrays=<n> to have stricter conformance when it is
desirable.
n = 0: current behavior, any trailing array member is a flexible array. The default.
n = 1: any trailing array member of undefined, 0 or 1 size is a flexible array member
n = 2: any trailing array member of undefined or 0 size is a flexible array member
n = 3: any trailing array member of undefined size is a flexible array member (strict c99 conformance)
Similar patch for gcc discuss here: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101836
[0] https://docs.freebsd.org/en/books/developers-handbook/sockets/#sockets-essential-functions
Introducing structured binding to data members and more.
To handle binding to arrays, ArrayInitLoopExpr is also
evaluated, which enables the analyzer to store information
in two more cases. These are:
- when a lambda-expression captures an array by value
- in the implicit copy/move constructor for a class
with an array member
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126613
If a lazyCompoundVal to a struct is bound to the store, there is a policy which decides
whether a copy gets created instead.
This patch introduces a similar policy for arrays, which is required to model structured
binding to arrays without false negatives.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128064
isuckatcs