Seems this complicated lldb sufficiently for some cases that it hasn't
been worth supporting/fixing there - and it so far hasn't provided any
new use cases/value for debug info consumers, so let's remove it until
someone has a use case for it.
(side note: the original implementation of this still had a bug (I
should've caught it in review) that we still didn't produce
auto-returning function declarations in types where the function wasn't
instantiatied (that requires a fix to remove the `if
getContainedAutoType` condition in
`CGDebugInfo::CollectCXXMemberFunctions` - without that, auto returning
functions were still being handled the same as member function templates
and special member functions - never added to the member list, only
attached to the type via the declaration chain from the definition)
Further discussion about this in D123319
This reverts commit 5ff992bca208a0e37ca6338fc735aec6aa848b72: [DEBUG-INFO] Change how we handle auto return types for lambda operator() to be consistent with gcc
This reverts commit c83602fdf51b2692e3bacb06bf861f20f74e987f: [DWARF5][clang]: Added support for DebugInfo generation for auto return type for C++ member functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131933
Currently bpf supports calling kernel functions (x86_64, arm64, etc.)
in bpf programs. Tejun discovered a problem where the x86_64 func
return value (a unsigned char type) is stored in 8-bit subregister %al
and the other 56-bits in %rax might be garbage. But based on current
bpf ABI, the bpf program assumes the whole %rax holds the correct value
as the callee is supposed to do necessary sign/zero extension.
This mismatch between bpf and x86_64 caused the incorrect results.
To resolve this problem, this patch forced caller to do needed
sign/zero extension for 8/16-bit return values as well. Note that
32-bit return values already had sign/zero extension even without
this patch.
For example, for the test case attached to this patch:
$ cat t.c
_Bool bar_bool(void);
unsigned char bar_char(void);
short bar_short(void);
int bar_int(void);
int foo_bool(void) {
if (bar_bool() != 1) return 0; else return 1;
}
int foo_char(void) {
if (bar_char() != 10) return 0; else return 1;
}
int foo_short(void) {
if (bar_short() != 10) return 0; else return 1;
}
int foo_int(void) {
if (bar_int() != 10) return 0; else return 1;
}
Without this patch, generated call insns in IR looks like:
%call = call zeroext i1 @bar_bool()
%call = call zeroext i8 @bar_char()
%call = call signext i16 @bar_short()
%call = call i32 @bar_int()
So it is assumed that zero extension has been done for return values of
bar_bool()and bar_char(). Sign extension has been done for the return
value of bar_short(). The return value of bar_int() does not have any
assumption so caller needs to do necessary shifting to get correct
32bit values.
With this patch, generated call insns in IR looks like:
%call = call i1 @bar_bool()
%call = call i8 @bar_char()
%call = call i16 @bar_short()
%call = call i32 @bar_int()
There are no assumptions for return values of the above four function calls,
so necessary shifting is necessary for all of them.
The following is the objdump file difference for function foo_char().
Without this patch:
0000000000000010 <foo_char>:
2: 85 10 00 00 ff ff ff ff call -1
3: bf 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = r0
4: b7 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 r0 = 1
5: 15 01 01 00 0a 00 00 00 if r1 == 10 goto +1 <LBB1_2>
6: b7 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r0 = 0
0000000000000038 <LBB1_2>:
7: 95 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 exit
With this patch:
0000000000000018 <foo_char>:
3: 85 10 00 00 ff ff ff ff call -1
4: bf 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = r0
5: 57 01 00 00 ff 00 00 00 r1 &= 255
6: b7 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 r0 = 1
7: 15 01 01 00 0a 00 00 00 if r1 == 10 goto +1 <LBB1_2>
8: b7 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r0 = 0
0000000000000048 <LBB1_2>:
9: 95 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 exit
The zero extension of the return 'char' value is done here.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131598
Add initial support for NonNull attribute.
(https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/57113)
Test plan:
verify that for
__thread int x;
int main() {
int* y = &x;
return *y;
}
(with this patch) clang -O -fsanitize=null -S -emit-llvm -o -
doesn't emit a null-pointer check
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131872
When aliasing a static array, the aliasee is going to be a GEP which
points to the value. We should strip pointer casts before forming the
reference. This was occluded by the use of opaque pointers.
This problem has existed since the introduction of the debug info
generation for aliases in b1ea0191a4. The
test case would assert due to the invalid cast with or without
`-no-opaque-pointers` at that revision.
Fixes: #57179
I accidentally broke friend destructor declarations in D130936.
Modify it to skip performing the destructor name check if we have a dependent friend declaration.
Reviewed By: hubert.reinterpretcast
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131541
Currently we treat initializers with init_seg(compiler/lib) as similar
to any other init_seg, they simply have a global variable in the proper
section (".CRT$XCC" for compiler/".CRT$XCL" for lib) and are added to
llvm.used. However, this doesn't match with how LLVM sees normal (or
init_seg(user)) initializers via llvm.global_ctors. This
causes issues like incorrect init_seg(compiler) vs init_seg(user)
ordering due to GlobalOpt evaluating constructors, and the
ability to remove init_seg(compiler/lib) initializers at all.
Currently we use 'A' for priorities less than 200. Use 200 for
init_seg(compiler) (".CRT$XCC") and 400 for init_seg(lib) (".CRT$XCL"),
which do not append the priority to the section name. Priorities
between 200 and 400 use ".CRT$XCC${Priority}". This allows for
some wiggle room for people/future extensions that want to add
initializers between compiler and lib.
Fixes#56922
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131910
I introduced a patch to handle unqualified templated base class
initialization in MSVC compatibility mode:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rGc894e85fc64dd8d83b460de81080fff93c5ca334
We identified a problem with this patch in the case where the base class
is partially specialized, which can lead to triggering an assertion in
the case of a mix between types and values.
The minimal test case is:
template <typename Type, int TSize> class Vec {};
template <int TDim> class Index : public Vec<int, TDim> {
Index() : Vec() {}
};
template class Index<0>;
The detailed problem is that I was using the
`InjectedClassNameSpecialization`, to which the class template arguments
were then applied in order. But in the process, we were losing all the
partial specializations of the base class and creating an index mismatch
between the expected and passed arguments.
Patch By: frederic-tingaud-sonarsource
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130709
Newer SDKs don't even provide libstdc++ headers, so it's effectively
never valid to build for libstdc++ unless the user explicitly asks
for it (in which case they will need to provide include paths and more).
This is a re-application of c5ccb78ade which had been reverted in
33171df9cc because it broke the Fuchsia CI bots. The issue was that
the test was XPASSing because it didn't fail anymore when the
CLANG_DEFAULT_CXX_LIB was set to libc++, which seems to be done for
Fuchsia. Instead, the test only fails if CLANG_DEFAULT_CXX_LIB is
set to libstdc++.
As a fly-by fix, also adjust the triple used by various tests to
something that is supported. Those tests were shown to fail on
internal bots.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131274
The point of a constexpr if statement is to determine which branch to
take at compile time, so warning on unreachable code is meaningless in
these situations.
Fixes#57123.
Reviewed By: thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131818
When expanding undeclared function parameters, we should initialize
the original number of expansions, if known, before trying to expand
them, otherwise a length mismatch with an outer pack might not be
diagnosed.
Fixes PR56094.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131802
DR692 handles two cases: pack expansion (for class/var template) and function parameter pack. The former needs DR1432 as a fix, and the latter needs DR1395 as a fix. However, DR1432 has not yet made a wording change. so I made a tentative fix for DR1432 with the same spirit as DR1395.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, erichkeane, #clang-language-wg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128745
Adds
* `__add_lvalue_reference`
* `__add_pointer`
* `__add_rvalue_reference`
* `__decay`
* `__make_signed`
* `__make_unsigned`
* `__remove_all_extents`
* `__remove_extent`
* `__remove_const`
* `__remove_volatile`
* `__remove_cv`
* `__remove_pointer`
* `__remove_reference`
* `__remove_cvref`
These are all compiler built-in equivalents of the unary type traits
found in [[meta.trans]][1]. The compiler already has all of the
information it needs to answer these transformations, so we can skip
needing to make partial specialisations in standard library
implementations (we already do this for a lot of the query traits). This
will hopefully improve compile times, as we won't need use as much
memory in such a base part of the standard library.
[1]: http://wg21.link/meta.trans
Co-authored-by: zoecarver
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116203
Found during clang 15 RC1 testing due to the new diagnostic added by @royjacobson since clang 14. Uncertain if this fix meets the bar to also be applied to the release branch.
If accepted, I'll need someone with commit access to submit on my behalf.
Reviewed By: royjacobson, aaron.ballman, erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131730
Currently, the field just emit map info for this pointer variable. It is
failed at run time. For the fields, the PartialStruct is created and it
needs call to emitCombinedEntry which create the base that covers all
the pieces.
The change is to generate map info as regular fields.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129608
In Android API < 30 there is no HWAsan instrumentation support for globals
so the test fails if API < 30 or if the target triple does not specify the API version.
Add -triple=aarch64-linux-android31 to enable global instrumentation. This is the
same triple as is used in the RUN line for -fsanitize=memtag-globals.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131806
Change-Id: I300703bd126b10e3c52505e23c78c5a48acb0309
Inside `ExprEngine::VisitLambdaExpr()` we wasn't prepared for a
copy elided initialized capture's `InitExpr`. This patch teaches
the analyzer how to handle such situation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131784
Before this patch type traits are checked in Parser, so use type traits
directly did not cause assertion faults. However if type traits are initialized
from a template, we didn't perform arity checks before evaluating. This
patch moves arity checks from Parser to Sema, and performing arity
checks in Sema actions, so type traits get checked corretly.
Crash input:
```
template<class... Ts> bool b = __is_constructible(Ts...);
bool x = b<>;
```
After this patch:
```
clang/test/SemaCXX/type-trait-eval-crash-issue-57008.cpp:5:32: error: type trait requires 1 or more arguments; have 0 arguments
template<class... Ts> bool b = __is_constructible(Ts...);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
clang/test/SemaCXX/type-trait-eval-crash-issue-57008.cpp:6:10: note: in instantiation of variable template specialization 'b<>' requested here
bool x = b<>;
^
1 error generated.
```
See https://godbolt.org/z/q39W78hsK.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/57008
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131423
Followup patch for D128083
Previously, using a non-consteval constructor from an consteval constructor would code generates the consteval constructor.
Example
```
template <typename T>
struct S {
T i;
consteval S() = default;
};
struct Foo {
Foo() {}
};
void func() {
S<Foo> three; // incorrectly accepted by clang.
}
```
This happened because clang erroneously disregards `consteval` specifier for a `consteval explicitly defaulted special member functions in a class template` if it has dependent data members without a `consteval default constructor`.
According to
```
C++14 [dcl.constexpr]p6 (CWG DR647/CWG DR1358):
If the instantiated template specialization of a constexpr function
template or member function of a class template would fail to satisfy
the requirements for a constexpr function or constexpr constructor, that
specialization is still a constexpr function or constexpr constructor,
even though a call to such a function cannot appear in a constant
expression.
```
Therefore the `consteval defaulted constructor of a class template` should be considered `consteval` even if the data members' default constructors are not consteval.
Keeping this constructor `consteval` allows complaining while processing the call to data member constructors.
(Same applies for other special member functions).
This works fine even when we have more than one default constructors since we process the constructors after the templates are instantiated.
This does not address initialization issues raised in
[2602](https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#2602) and compiler divergence seen in https://godbolt.org/z/va9EMvvMe
Fixes: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/51593
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131479
Closing https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/56329
The problem happens when we try to simplify the suspend points. We might
break the assumption that the final suspend lives in the last slot of
Shape.CoroSuspends. This patch tries to main the assumption and fixes
the problem.
Closing https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/56826.
The root cause for pr56826 is: when we collect the template args for the
friend, we need to judge if the friend lives in file context. However,
if the friend lives in ExportDecl lexically, the judgement here is
invalid.
The solution is easy. We should judge the non transparent context and
the ExportDecl is transparent context. So the solution should be good.
A main concern may be the patch doesn't handle all the places of the
same defect. I think it might not be bad since the patch itself should
be innocent.
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131651
The `File` might point to an invalid `FileID` when the AST is broken. That leads to clang/clangd crashes while processing comments. The relevant part of the crash is below
```
#4 0x00007f1d7fbf95bc std::_Rb_tree<unsigned int, std::pair<unsigned int const, clang::RawComment*>, std::_Select1st<std::pair<unsigned int const, clang::RawComment*>>, std::less<unsigned int>, std::allocator<std::pair<unsigned int const
, clang::RawComment*>>>::_M_lower_bound(std::_Rb_tree_node<std::pair<unsigned int const, clang::RawComment*>> const*, std::_Rb_tree_node_base const*, unsigned int const&) const /usr/include/c++/8/bits/stl_tree.h:1911:2
#5 0x00007f1d7fbf95bc std::_Rb_tree<unsigned int, std::pair<unsigned int const, clang::RawComment*>, std::_Select1st<std::pair<unsigned int const, clang::RawComment*>>, std::less<unsigned int>, std::allocator<std::pair<unsigned int const, clang::RawComment*>>>::lower_bound(unsigned int const&) const /usr/include/c++/8/bits/stl_tree.h:1214:56
#6 0x00007f1d7fbf95bc std::map<unsigned int, clang::RawComment*, std::less<unsigned int>, std::allocator<std::pair<unsigned int const, clang::RawComment*>>>::lower_bound(unsigned int const&) const /usr/include/c++/8/bits/stl_map.h:1264:36
#7 0x00007f1d7fbf95bc clang::ASTContext::getRawCommentForDeclNoCacheImpl(clang::Decl const*, clang::SourceLocation, std::map<unsigned int, clang::RawComment*, std::less<unsigned int>, std::allocator<std::pair<unsigned int const, clang::RawComment*>>> const&) const /home/ivanmurashko/local/llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/ASTContext.cpp:226:57
```
The corresponding LIT test that reproduces the crash was also added
Same issue is described at https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49707
Reviewed By: gribozavr2
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131675
In D131528 using Info.EvalMode == EvalInfo::EM_ConstantExpression is not strict
enough to restrict the diagnostic to only constant expression contexts. It is
sometimes set in cases where we are still determining if we are in a constant
expression context.
Using InConstantContext will tighten the restriction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131704
Clang currently crashes when lowering a consteval list initialization
of a temporary. This is partially working around an issue in the
template instantiation code (TreeTransform::TransformCXXTemporaryObjectExpr())
that does not yet know how to handle list initialization of temporaries
in all cases. However, it's also helping reduce fragility by ensuring
we always have a valid QualType when trying to emit a constant
expression during IR generation.
Fixes#55871
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131194
Previously a diagnostic was given if the expression was not strictly a
DeclRef. Now also allow use of data members inside member functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131222
The __ARM_FEATURE_SVE_VECTOR_OPERATORS macro should be changed to
indicate that this feature is now supported on VLA vectors as well as
VLS vectors. There is a complementary PR to the ACLE spec here
https://github.com/ARM-software/acle/pull/213
Reviewed By: peterwaller-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131573
At the moment, Clang only considers errno when deciding if a builtin
is const. This ignores the fact that some library functions may raise
floating point exceptions, which may modify global state, e.g. when
updating FP status registers.
To model the fact that some library functions/builtins may raise
floating point exceptions, this patch adds a new 'g' modifier for
builtins. If a builtin is marked with 'g', it cannot be considered
const, unless FP exceptions are ignored.
So far I've not added CHECK lines for all calls in math-libcalls.c. I'll
do that once we agree on the overall direction.
A consequence seems to be that we fail to select some of the constrained
math builtins now, but I am not entirely sure what's going on there.
Reviewed By: john.brawn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129231
For failed static assertions, try to take the expression apart and print
useful information about why it failed. In particular, look at binary
operators and print the compile-time evaluated value of the LHS/RHS.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130894
When clang includes a PCH, it tolerates some amount of differences
between the defines used when creating and when including the PCH
- this seems to be intentionally allowed in
c379c07240 (and later extended in
b636875196).
When using a PCH (or when picking a PCH out of a directory containing
multiple candidates) Clang used to accept the header if there were
defines on the command line when creating the PCH that are missing
when using the PCH, or vice versa, defines only set when using the
PCH.
The only cases where Clang explicitly rejected the use of a PCH
is if there was an explicit conflict between the options, e.g.
-DFOO=1 vs -DFOO=2, or -DFOO vs -UFOO.
The latter commit added a FIXME that we really should check whether
mismatched defines actually were used somewhere in the PCH, so that
the define would affect the outcome. This FIXME has stood unaddressed
since 2012.
This differs from GCC, which rejects PCH files if the defines differ
at all.
When explicitly including a single PCH file, the relaxed policy
of allowing minor differences is harmless for correct use cases
(but may fail to diagnose mismtaches), and potentially allow using
PCHs in wider cases (where the user intentionally know that the
differences in defines are harmless for the PCH).
However, for GCC style PCH directories, with a directory containing
multiple PCH variants and the compiler should pick the correct match
out of them, Clang's relaxed logic was problematic. The directory
could contain two otherwise identical PCHs, but one built with -DFOO
and one without. When attempting to include a PCH and iterating over
the candidates in the directory, Clang would essentially pick the
first one out of the two, even if there existed a better, exact
match in the directory.
Keep the relaxed checking when specificlly including one named
PCH file, but require strict matches when trying to pick the right
candidate out of a GCC style directory with alternatives.
This fixes https://github.com/lhmouse/mcfgthread/issues/63.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126676
Since D129389 (and downstream PR https://github.com/apple/llvm-project/pull/4965), the dependency scanner is responsible for generating full command-lines, including the modules paths. This patch removes the flag that was making this an opt-in behavior in clang-scan-deps.
Reviewed By: benlangmuir
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131420
In D131307 we allowed the diagnostic to be turned into a warning for a
transition period.
This had the side effect of triggering the warning in contexts not required to
be constant expression. This change will restrict the diagnostic to constant
expression contexts. This should reduce the fallout of this diagnostic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131528
Implicitly converting between incompatible function pointers in C is
currently a default-on warning (it is an error in C++). However, this
is very poor security posture. A mismatch in parameters or return
types, or a mismatch in calling conventions, etc can lead to
exploitable security vulnerabilities. Rather than allow this unsafe
practice with a warning, this patch strengthens the warning to be an
error (while still allowing users the ability to disable the error or
the warning entirely to ease migration). Users should either ensure the
signatures are correctly compatible or they should use an explicit cast
if they believe that's more reasonable.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131351
Summary: Cover `ConstraintAssignor::assign(EquivalenceClass, RangeSet)` function with more regression tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131514
Refactor baremetal driver code to reduce the bespoke
additions and base class overrides.
This lets us use the per target runtimes like other clang
targets. E.g. clang -target armv7m-cros-none-eabi will now
be able to use the runtimes installed at
<resource_dir>/lib/armv7m-cros-none-eabi instead of the hardcoded
path <resource_dir>/lib/baremetal.
The older code paths should still continue to work as before if
<resource_dir>/lib/<tuple> does not exist.
Reviewed By: MaskRay, barannikov88
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131225
Denis Fatkulin