Instructions.
We will switch all UndefValue to PoisonValue in follow up patches.
Thanks for Kito to help on verification with their interanl testsuite.
Reviewed By: kito-cheng
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126748
Instructions.
We will switch all UndefValue to PoisonValue in follow up patches.
Reviewed By: kito-cheng
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126746
vcompress.
We will switch all UndefValue to PoisonValue in follow up patches.
Reviewed By: kito-cheng
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126745
vwcvtu, vfabs and vfneg.
We will switch all UndefValue to PoisonValue in follow up patches.
Reviewed By: kito-cheng
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126744
1. Add policy functions support and tests for vadd, vmv, vfmv and all load
instructions except segment load. I didn't add all combination of policy
functions in test because it seem not to make sense.
2. Rename HasUnMaskedOverloaded to SupportOverloading.
3. vmv.s.x for ta policy could not have overloaded API.
4. This patch does not support all operations, I will have other follow-up
patches support all.
[RFC] https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/rvv-intrinsic-doc/pull/137
Reviewed By: kito-cheng, fakepaper56, fakepaper56
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126742
The vector.insert/extract intrinsics require an i64 immediate argument.
This fixes a crash on RV32.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128624
These intrinsics are now fundemental for SVE code generation and have been
present for a year and a half, hence move them out of the experimental
namespace.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127976
Some RISC-V builtins requires ICE operands. We should call
getIntegerConstantExpr instead of EmitScalarExpr to match other
targets.
This was made a little trickier by the vector intrinsics not having
a valid type string, but there are two that have ICE operands so
I specified them manually.
These two functions are described in RVV intrinsics doc
to read/write RVV CSRs. This matches what GCC does.
This reapply aebe24a which was reverted in 0f6f429 due
to missing REQUIRES in tests.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125875
These two functions are described in RVV intrinsics doc
to read/write RVV CSRs. This matches what GCC does.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125875
The goal is support tail and mask policy in RVV builtins.
We focus on IR part first.
If the passthru operand is undef, we use tail agnostic, otherwise
use tail undisturbed.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125323
clang emit wrong code sequence for `int16`(`short`) to `__fp16` conversion,
and that should fix the code gen directly is the right way I think,
but I found there is a FIXME comment in clang/Basic/TargetInfo.h say
that's should be removed in future so I think just let swich to using
generic LLVM IR rather than llvm.convert.to.fp16 intrinsics code gen
path is enough.
```
/// Check whether llvm intrinsics such as llvm.convert.to.fp16 should be used
/// to convert to and from __fp16.
/// FIXME: This function should be removed once all targets stop using the
/// conversion intrinsics.
virtual bool useFP16ConversionIntrinsics() const {
return true;
}
```
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124509
Test case to show the wrong code gen for `int16` -> `__fp16` conversion,
clang just emit a load and store without did conversion in the case,
and another case used for demonstrate the code gen change of `__fp16`
-> `int16`.
Reviewed By: khchen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124510
vslideup works by leaving elements 0<i<OFFSET undisturbed.
so it need the destination operand as input for correctness
regardless of policy. Add a operand to indicate policy.
We also add policy operand for unmaksed vslidedown to keep the interface consistent with vslideup
because vslidedown have only undisturbed at 0<i<vstart but user have no way to control of vstart.
Reviewed By: rogfer01, craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124186
Re-run the update_cc_test_checks.py to update expected result.
I'm not sure why those tests are passed before.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124062
This adds -no-opaque-pointers to clang tests whose output will
change when opaque pointers are enabled by default. This is
intended to be part of the migration approach described in
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/enabling-opaque-pointers-by-default/61322/9.
The patch has been produced by replacing %clang_cc1 with
%clang_cc1 -no-opaque-pointers for tests that fail with opaque
pointers enabled. Worth noting that this doesn't cover all tests,
there's a remaining ~40 tests not using %clang_cc1 that will need
a followup change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123115
Index of vset/vget must be a constant integer and be
located in right range.
Reviewed By: kito-cheng
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122629
This reverts commit 10fd2822b7.
I have a better implementation for those operations without the
additional policy operand.
masked compare and vmsbf/vmsif/vmsof are always tail agnostic so we could
assume undef maskedoff is mask agnostic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122455
intrinsics.
Those operations are updated under a tail agnostic policy, but they
could have mask agnostic or undisturbed.
Reviewed By: rogfer01
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120228
Currently we allow half types in vectors if the scalar Zfh extension
is enabled. This behavior is not inline with the vector spec. For f32
and f64 types, the Zve32f, Zve64f, Zve64d, and V explicitly control
the availablity of floating point types in vectors.
In order to make our compiler compliant, we either need to remove all support
for half in vectors or we need an extension to control it.
Draft spec here https://github.com/riscv/riscv-v-spec/pull/780
Reviewed By: kito-cheng
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121345
The llvm pre-merge test got timeout due to large test files, this commit
split up the files that have over 10k lines under clang/test/CodeGen/RISCV
into even smaller ones.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121431
This commit divides the large test files(over 30k lines) under clang/test/CodeGen/RISCV including:
rvv-intrinsics/vloxseg.c
rvv-intrinsics/vluxseg.c
rvv-intrinsics-overloaded/vloxseg.c
rvv-intrinsics-overloaded/vluxseg.c
into "non-masked" version and "masked" version which can reduce the test cases by 50% in a single file.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120967
The goal is support tail and mask policy in RVV builtins.
We focus on IR part first.
The nomask vector Multiply-Add need a policy operand
because merge value could not be undef.
Reviewed By: monkchiang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119727
Add the passthru operand for
VMV_V_X_VL, VFMV_V_F_VL and SPLAT_VECTOR_SPLIT_I64_VL also.
The goal is support tail and mask policy in RVV builtins.
We focus on IR part first.
If the passthru operand is undef, we use tail agnostic, otherwise
use tail undisturbed.
Reviewed By: rogfer01
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119688
The goal is support tail and mask policy in RVV builtins.
We focus on IR part first.
If the passthru operand is undef, we use tail agnostic, otherwise
use tail undisturbed.
Reviewed By: rogfer01
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119686
The goal is support tail and mask policy in RVV builtins.
We focus on IR part first.
If the passthru operand is undef, we use tail agnostic, otherwise
use tail undisturbed.
My plan is to handle more complex operations in follow-up patches.
Reviewers: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118253
The goal is support tail and mask policy in RVV builtins.
We focus on IR part first.
If the passthru operand is undef, we use tail agnostic, otherwise
use tail undisturbed.
Add passthru operand for VSLIDE1UP_VL and VSLIDE1DOWN_VL to support
i64 scalar in rv32.
The masked VSLIDE1 would only emit mask undisturbed policy regardless
of giving mask agnostic policy until InsertVSETVLI supports mask agnostic.
Reviewed by: craig.topper, rogfer01
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117989
without prototypes. This patch converts the function signatures to have
a prototype for the situations where the test is not specific to K&R C
declarations. e.g.,
void func();
becomes
void func(void);
This is the ninth batch of tests being updated (there are a
significant number of other tests left to be updated).
Masked reduction intrinsics are specical cases which don't need to have policy
operand. The mask only affects which elements are read. It doesn't effect the
destination register.
The reduction intrinsics have a dedicated destination operand. If it
is undef, we use tail agnostic. If it not undef we use tail
undisturbed.
Co-Authored-by: Craig Topper <craig.topper@sifive.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117681
The goal is support tail and mask policy in RVV builtins.
We focus on IR part first.
If the passthru operand is undef, we use tail agnostic, otherwise
use tail undisturbed.
Co-Authored-by: Hsiangkai Wang <Hsiangkai@gmail.com>
Reviewers: craig.topper, frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117647
According to v-spec 1.0, `vmulh`, `vmulhu`, `vmulhsu` and `vsmul` are
NOT supported for EEW=64 in Zve64*.
This patch tries to guard it correctly.
Authored by: Craig Topper <craig.topper@sifive.com> @craig.topper
Co-Authored by: Eop Chen <eop.chen@sifive.com> @eopXD
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117913
According to the spec, there are some difference between V and Zve64d. For example, the vmulh integer multiply variants that return the high word of the product (vmulh.vv, vmulh.vx, vmulhu.vv, vmulhu.vx, vmulhsu.vv, vmulhsu.vx) are not included for EEW=64 in Zve64*, but V extension does support these instructions. So we should decouple Zve* extensions and the V extension.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117854
This string no longer appears in the Vector Extension specification.
The segment load/store instructions are just part of the vector
instruction set.
Reviewed By: asb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117724
Turning on `enable_noundef_analysis` flag allows better codegen by removing freeze instructions.
I modified clang by renaming `enable_noundef_analysis` flag to `disable-noundef-analysis` and turning it off by default.
Test updates are made as a separate patch: D108453
Reviewed By: eugenis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105169
Agreed policy is that RISC-V extensions that have not yet been ratified
should be marked as experimental, and enabling them requires the use of
the -menable-experimental-extensions flag when using clang alongside the
version number. These extensions have now been ratified, so this is no
longer necessary, and the target feature names can be renamed to no
longer be prefixed with "experimental-".
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117131
This implements the clang side of D116531. The elementtype
attribute is added for all indirect constraints (*) and tests are
updated accordingly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116666
Alex Bradbury