When F calls G calls H, G is nounwind, and G is inlined into F, then the
inlined call-site to H should be effectively nounwind so as not to lose
information during inlining.
If H itself is nounwind (which often happens when H is an intrinsic), we
no longer mark the callsite explicitly as nounwind. Previously, there
were cases where the inlined call-site of H differs from a pre-existing
call-site of H in F *only* in the explicitly added nounwind attribute,
thus preventing common subexpression elimination.
v2:
- just check CI->doesNotThrow
v3 (resubmit after revert at 3443788087):
- update Clang tests
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129860
These features require that all object files are compiled with the support. When
the feature is disabled for an object file, the merge behavior should treat the
file having a value of 0 (see D129911).
Reviewed By: xiangzhangllvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130065
When assertions are enabled, clang will perform RoundTrip for CompilerInvocation argument generation. ibt-seal flags are currently missing in this argument generation, and because of that, the feature doesn't get enabled for these cases. Performing RoundTrip is the default for assert builds, rendering the feature broken in these scenarios.
This patch fixes this and adds a test to properly verify that modules are being generated with the flag when -mibt-seal is used.
Please, add any known relevant reviewer which I may have missed.
[1] - https://reviews.llvm.org/D116070
Reviewed By: pengfei, gftg, aaron.ballman, nickdesaulniers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118052
C89 had a questionable feature where the compiler would implicitly
declare a function that the user called but was never previously
declared. The resulting function would be globally declared as
extern int func(); -- a function without a prototype which accepts zero
or more arguments.
C99 removed support for this questionable feature due to severe
security concerns. However, there was no deprecation period; C89 had
the feature, C99 didn't. So Clang (and GCC) both supported the
functionality as an extension in C99 and later modes.
C2x no longer supports that function signature as it now requires all
functions to have a prototype, and given the known security issues with
the feature, continuing to support it as an extension is not tenable.
This patch changes the diagnostic behavior for the
-Wimplicit-function-declaration warning group depending on the language
mode in effect. We continue to warn by default in C89 mode (due to the
feature being dangerous to use). However, because this feature will not
be supported in C2x mode, we've diagnosed it as being invalid for so
long, the security concerns with the feature, and the trivial
workaround for users (declare the function), we now default the
extension warning to an error in C99-C17 mode. This still gives users
an easy workaround if they are extensively using the extension in those
modes (they can disable the warning or use -Wno-error to downgrade the
error), but the new diagnostic makes it more clear that this feature is
not supported and should be avoided. In C2x mode, we no longer allow an
implicit function to be defined and treat the situation the same as any
other lookup failure.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122983
This adds -no-opaque-pointers to clang tests whose output will
change when opaque pointers are enabled by default. This is
intended to be part of the migration approach described in
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/enabling-opaque-pointers-by-default/61322/9.
The patch has been produced by replacing %clang_cc1 with
%clang_cc1 -no-opaque-pointers for tests that fail with opaque
pointers enabled. Worth noting that this doesn't cover all tests,
there's a remaining ~40 tests not using %clang_cc1 that will need
a followup change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123115
compiler is allowed to use optimizations that allow reassociation and
transformations that don’t guaranty accuracy.
For example (x+y)+z is transformed into x+(y+z) . Although
mathematically equivalent, these two expressions may not lead to the
same final result due to errors of summation.
Or x/x is transformed into 1.0 but x could be 0.0, INF or NaN. And so
this transformation also may not lead to the same final result.
Setting the eval method 'ffp-eval-method' or via '#pragma clang fp
eval_method' in this mode, doesn’t have any effect.
This patch adds code to warn the user of this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122155
We have some discission in D99152 and llvm-dev and finially come up with
a solution to add amx specific cast intrinsics. We've support the
intrinsics in llvm IR. This patch is to replace bitcast with amx cast
intrinsics in code emitting in FE.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122567
Currently, the regcall calling conversion in Clang doesn't match with
ICC when passing / returning structures. https://godbolt.org/z/axxKMKrW7
This patch tries to fix the problem to match with ICC.
Reviewed By: LuoYuanke
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122104
Clang is crashing on the following statement
char var[9];
__asm__ ("" : "=r" (var) : "0" (var));
This is similar to existing test: crbug_999160_regtest
The issue happens when EmitAsmStmt is trying to convert input to match
output type length. However, that is not guaranteed to be successful all the
time and if the statement itself is invalid like having an array type in
the example, we should give a regular error message here instead of
using assert().
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120596
This patch adds -Wno-strict-prototypes to all of the test cases that
use functions without prototypes, but not as the primary concern of the
test. e.g., attributes testing whether they can/cannot be applied to a
function without a prototype, etc.
This is done in preparation for enabling -Wstrict-prototypes by
default.
A significant number of our tests in C accidentally use functions
without prototypes. This patch converts the function signatures to have
a prototype for the situations where the test is not specific to K&R C
declarations. e.g.,
void func();
becomes
void func(void);
This is the final batch of tests being updated to add prototypes,
hopefully.
MSVC currently doesn't support 80 bits long double. But ICC does support
it on Windows. Besides, there're also some users asked for this feature.
We can find the discussions from stackoverflow, msdn etc.
Given Clang has already support `-mlong-double-80`, extending it to
support for Windows seems worthwhile.
Reviewed By: rnk, erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115441
without prototypes. This patch converts the function signatures to have
a prototype for the situations where the test is not specific to K&R C
declarations. e.g.,
void func();
becomes
void func(void);
This is the ninth batch of tests being updated (there are a
significant number of other tests left to be updated).
Freddy Ye