Since 4468e5b899 clang will prefer
the last one it finds of "-mimplicit-it" or "-Wa,-mimplicit-it".
Due to a mistake in that patch the compiler argument "-mimplicit-it"
was never marked as used, even if it was the last one and was passed
to llvm.
Move the Claim call back to the start of the loop and update
the testing to check we don't get any unused argument warnings.
Reviewed By: mstorsjo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103086
If multiple instances of the -arm-implicit-it option is passed to
the backend, it errors out.
Also fix cases where there are multiple -Wa,-mimplicit-it; the existing
tests indicate that the last one specified takes effect, while in
practice it passed double options, which didn't work as intended.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102812
This reverts commit 2919222d80.
That commit broke backwards compatibility. Additionally, the
replacement, -Wa,-mimplicit-it, isn't yet supported by any stable
release of Clang.
See D102812 for a fix for the error cases when callers specify both
-mimplicit-it and -Wa,-mimplicit-it.
This is a GNU as and Clang cc1as option, not a GCC option.
Users should specify `-Wa,-mimplicit-it=` instead.
Note: mixing the -m option and the -Wa, option doesn't work
`-Wa,-mimplicit-it=never -mimplicit-it=always` =>
`clang (LLVM option parsing): for the --arm-implicit-it option: may only occur zero or one times!`
Reviewed By: nickdesaulniers, raj.khem
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102568
Fangrui Song