Reimplement the RemoveBracesLLVM feature which handles a
single-statement block that would get wrapped.
Fixes#53543.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125137
Due to how parseBracedList always stopped on the first closing angle
bracket and was used in parsing angle bracketed expression inside concept
definition, nested brackets inside concepts were parsed incorrectly.
nextToken() call before calling parseBracedList is required because
we were processing opening angle bracket inside parseBracedList second
time leading to incorrect logic after my fix.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54943
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54837
Reviewed By: HazardyKnusperkeks, curdeius
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123896
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54522.
This fixes regression introduced in 5e5efd8a91.
Before the culprit commit, macros in WhitespaceSensitiveMacros were correctly formatted even if their closing parenthesis weren't followed by semicolon (or, to be precise, when they were followed by a newline).
That commit changed the type of the macro token type from TT_UntouchableMacroFunc to TT_FunctionLikeOrFreestandingMacro.
Correct formatting (with `WhitespaceSensitiveMacros = ['FOO']`):
```
FOO(1+2)
FOO(1+2);
```
Regressed formatting:
```
FOO(1 + 2)
FOO(1+2);
```
Reviewed By: HazardyKnusperkeks, owenpan, ksyx
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123676
The ShouldShiftBeAdded lambda checks if extra space should be
added before the wrapped part of a braced list. If the first
element of the list is wrapped, no extra space should be added.
Fixes#55161.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124956
This reverts commit d46fa023ca.
Regressed include order in some cases with trailing comments, see the
comments on https://reviews.llvm.org/D121370. Will add a regression test
in a follow-up commit.
There was some duplicate code in determineStarAmpUsage and
determinePlusMinusCaretUsage
Now a `-` or `+` following `;`, `sizeof`, `co_await`, or `delete` is
regarded as a unary operator.
Now a `*` or `&` following `case` is also a unary operator.
Reviewed By: curdeius, MyDeveloperDay, HazardyKnusperkeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121754
Fixes [[ https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/38995 | #38995 ]]
This is an attempt to modify the regular expression to identify
`@import` and `import` alongside the regular `#include`. The challenging
part was not to support `@` in addition to `#` but how to handle
everything that comes after the `include|import` keywords. Previously
everything that wasn't `"` or `<` was consumed. But as you can see in
this example from the issue #38995, there is no `"` or `<` following the
keyword:
```
@import Foundation;
```
I experimented with a lot of fancy and useful expressions in [this
online regex tool](https://regex101.com) only to find out that some
things are simply not supported by the regex implementation in LLVM.
* For example the beginning `[\t\ ]*` should be replacable by the
horizontal whitespace character `\h*` but this will break the
`SortIncludesTest.LeadingWhitespace` test.
That's why I've chosen to come back to the basic building blocks.
The essential change in this patch is the change from this regular
expression:
```
^[\t\ ]*#[\t\ ]*(import|include)[^"<]*(["<][^">]*[">])
~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
^ ^
| |
only support # prefix not @ |
only support "" and <> as
delimiters
no support for C++ modules and ;
ending. Also this allows for ">
or <" or "" or <> which all seems
either off or wrong.
```
to this:
```
^[\t\ ]*[@#][\t\ ]*(import|include)([^"]*("[^"]+")|[^<]*(<[^>]+>)|[\t\
]*([^;]+;))
~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
^ ^ ^ ^ ^
| | | | |
Now support @ and #. Clearly support "" and <> as
well as an
include name without enclosing
characters.
Allows for no mixture of "> or
<" or
empty include names.
```
Here is how I've tested this patch:
```
ninja clang-Format
ninja FormatTests
./tools/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTests
--gtest_filter=SortIncludesTest*
```
And if that worked I doubled checked that nothing else broke by running
all format checks:
```
./tools/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTests
```
One side effect of this change is it should partially support
[C++20 Module](https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/modules)
`import` lines without the optional `export` in front. Adding
this can be a change on its own that shouldn't be too hard. I say
partially because the `@` or `#` are currently *NOT* optional in the
regular expression.
I see an opportunity to optimized the matching to exclude `@include` for
example. But eventually these should be caught by the compiler, so...
With my change, the matching group is not at a fixed position any
longer. I decided to
choose the last match (group) that is not empty.
Reviewed By: HazardyKnusperkeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121370
With D117142, we would now format
```
struct A {
#define A
void f() { a(); }
#endif
};
```
into
```
struct A {
#ifdef A
void f() {
a();
}
#endif
};
```
because we were looking for the record lbrace without skipping preprocess lines.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54901.
Reviewed By: curdeius, owenpan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123737
[clang-format] Indent import statements in JavaScript.
Take for example this piece of code found at
<https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Statements/import>.
```
for (const link of document.querySelectorAll("nav > a")) {
link.addEventListener("click", e => {
e.preventDefault();
import('/modules/my-module.js')
.then(module => {
module.loadPageInto(main);
})
.catch(err => {
main.textContent = err.message;
});
});
}
```
Previously the import line would be unindented, looking like this.
```
for (const link of document.querySelectorAll("nav > a")) {
link.addEventListener("click", e => {
e.preventDefault();
import('/modules/my-module.js')
.then(module => {
module.loadPageInto(main);
})
.catch(err => {
main.textContent = err.message;
});
});
}
```
Actually we were going to fix this along with fixing Verilog import
statements. But the patch got too big.
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay, curdeius
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121906
I have lost count of the number of times this has been reported, but it fundamentally comes down to the fact that the "AlignArrayLeft/Right" function is fundamentally broken for non-square arrays.
As a result, a pointer can end up running off the end of the array structure, I've spent the last 2 weekends trying to rewrite this algorithm but I've struggled to get it aligned correctly.
This is an interim fix, that ignores all array that are non-square and leaves them alone. I think this can allow us to close out most of the crashes (if not all).
I think this can help reduce the number of bugs coming in that are duplicates.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53748https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/51767https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/51277
Reviewed By: curdeius, HazardyKnusperkeks, feg208
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121069
Before, the code:
```
int Value { get; } = 0;
int Value { init; } = 0;
```
was formatted incoherently:
```
int Value { get; } = 0;
int Value { init; }
= 0;
```
because `init` was not recognised as an accessor specifier.
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay, HazardyKnusperkeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121132
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54147.
When handling `AllowShortFunctionsOnASingleLine`, we were searching for the last line with a smaller level than the current line. The search was incorrect when the first line had the same level as the current one. This led to an unsatisfied assumption about the existence of a brace (non-comment token).
Reviewed By: HazardyKnusperkeks, owenpan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120902
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53981
Reorder the qualifiers inside the template argument. This should handle the simple cases of
```
<const T>
<T const>
```
But only by relaxing that single letter capital variables are not possible macros
Fixes: #53981
Reviewed By: HazardyKnusperkeks, curdeius
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120710
Originally filed at crbug.com/1184570.
When the name of a namespace is a macro that takes arguments,
- It fixed the indentation.
- It fixed the namepsace end comments.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120931
We have a little problem. TokenAnnotator::resetTokenMetadata() resets
the type, except for a (growing) whitelist. This is because the
TokenAnnotator visits some tokens multiple times. E.g. trying to
identify if a < is an operator less or a template opener. And in some
runs, which are bascially "reverted" the types are reset.
On the other hand, if the parser does already know the type, it should
be able to set it, without it being reset. So we introduce the ability
to set a type and make that final.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120511
Why put "InMacros" in the name? We test other things to, and I will add
more, withut macros.
Also all our tests are regression tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120401
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53876.
This is a solution for standard C++ casts: const_cast, dynamic_cast, reinterpret_cast, static_cast.
A general approach handling all possible casts is not possible without semantic information.
Consider the code:
```
static_cast<T>(*function_pointer_variable)(arguments);
```
vs.
```
some_return_type<T> (*function_pointer_variable)(parameters);
// Later used as:
function_pointer_variable = &some_function;
return function_pointer_variable(args);
```
In the latter case, it's not a cast but a variable declaration of a pointer to function.
Without knowing what `some_return_type<T>` is (and clang-format does not know it), it's hard to distinguish between the two cases. Theoretically, one could check whether "parameters" are types (not a cast) and "arguments" are value/expressions (a cast), but that might be inefficient (needs lots of lookahead).
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay, HazardyKnusperkeks, owenpan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120140
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53962.
Given the config:
```
BasedOnStyle: LLVM
QualifierAlignment: Custom
QualifierOrder: ['constexpr', 'type']
```
The code:
```
template <typename F>
requires std::invocable<F>
constexpr constructor();
```
was incorrectly formatted to:
```
template <typename F>
requires
constexpr std::invocable<F> constructor();
```
because we considered `std::invocable<F> constexpr` as a type, not recognising the requires clause.
This patch avoids moving the qualifier across the boundary of the requires clause (checking `ClosesRequiresClause`).
Reviewed By: HazardyKnusperkeks, owenpan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120309
In 529aa4b011
by setting the identifier info to nullptr, we started to subtly
interfere with the parts in the beginning of the function,
529aa4b011/clang/lib/Format/UnwrappedLineParser.cpp (L991)
causing the preprocessor nesting to change in some cases. E.g., for the
added regression test, clang-format started incorrectly guessing the
language as C++.
This tries to address this by introducing an internal identifier info
element to use instead.
Reviewed By: curdeius, MyDeveloperDay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120315
Adds a new option InsertBraces to insert the optional braces after
if, else, for, while, and do in C++.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120217
This reverts commit e021987273.
This commit provokes failures in formatting tests of polly.
Cf. https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/205/builds/3320.
That's probably because of `)` being annotated as `CastRParen` instead of `Unknown` before, hence being kept on the same line with the next token.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53876.
This is a solution for standard C++ casts: const_cast, dynamic_cast, reinterpret_cast, static_cast.
A general approach handling all possible casts is not possible without semantic information.
Consider the code:
```
static_cast<T>(*function_pointer_variable)(arguments);
```
vs.
```
some_return_type<T> (*function_pointer_variable)(parameters);
// Later used as:
function_pointer_variable = &some_function;
return function_pointer_variable(args);
```
In the latter case, it's not a cast but a variable declaration of a pointer to function.
Without knowing what `some_return_type<T>` is (and clang-format does not know it), it's hard to distinguish between the two cases. Theoretically, one could check whether "parameters" are types (not a cast) and "arguments" are value/expressions (a cast), but that might be inefficient (needs lots of lookahead).
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay, HazardyKnusperkeks, owenpan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120140
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/24781.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/38160.
This patch splits `TT_RecordLBrace` for classes/enums/structs/unions (and other records, e.g. interfaces) and uses the brace type to avoid the error-prone scanning for record token.
The mentioned bugs were provoked by the scanning being too limited (and so not considering `const` or `constexpr`, or other qualifiers, on an anonymous struct variable declaration).
Moreover, the proposed solution is more efficient as we parse tokens once only (scanning being parsing too).
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay, HazardyKnusperkeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119785
We can now configure the space between requires and the following paren,
seperate for clauses and expressions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113369
Detect requires expressions in more unusable contexts. This is far from
perfect, but currently we have no good metric to decide between a
requires expression and a trailing requires clause.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119138
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53758.
Braces in loops and in `if` statements with leading (block) comments were formatted according to `BraceWrapping.AfterFunction` and not `AllowShortBlocksOnASingleLine`/`AllowShortLoopsOnASingleLine`/`AllowShortIfStatementsOnASingleLine`.
Previously, the code:
```
while (true) {
f();
}
/*comment*/ while (true) {
f();
}
```
was incorrectly formatted to:
```
while (true) {
f();
}
/*comment*/ while (true) { f(); }
```
when using config:
```
BasedOnStyle: LLVM
BreakBeforeBraces: Custom
BraceWrapping:
AfterFunction: false
AllowShortBlocksOnASingleLine: false
AllowShortLoopsOnASingleLine: false
```
and it was (correctly but by chance) formatted to:
```
while (true) {
f();
}
/*comment*/ while (true) {
f();
}
```
when using enabling brace wrapping after functions:
```
BasedOnStyle: LLVM
BreakBeforeBraces: Custom
BraceWrapping:
AfterFunction: true
AllowShortBlocksOnASingleLine: false
AllowShortLoopsOnASingleLine: false
```
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay, HazardyKnusperkeks, owenpan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119649
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53576.
There was an inconsistency in formatting of delete expressions.
Before:
```
delete (void*)a;
delete[](void*) a;
```
After this patch:
```
delete (void*)a;
delete[] (void*)a;
```
Reviewed By: HazardyKnusperkeks, owenpan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119117
- Add or remove empty lines surrounding union blocks.
- Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53229, in which
keywords like class and struct in a line ending with left brace or
whose next line is left brace only, will be falsely recognized as
definition line, causing extra empty lines inserted surrounding blocks
with no need to be formatted.
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay, curdeius, HazardyKnusperkeks, owenpan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119067
The l_brace token in a macro definition should not be set to
TT_FunctionLBrace.
This patch could have fixed#42087.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118969
owenca