Clang 3.7 and below is not actively used or supported in the test suite now, so
remove the workaround in the test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126603
Since we officially don't support several older compilers now, we can
drop a lot of the markup in the test suite. This helps keep the test
suite simple and makes sure that UNSUPPORTED annotations don't rot.
This is the first patch of a series that will remove annotations for
compilers that are now unsupported.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107787
All supported compilers have been supporting __is_aggregate for a long
time now, so it's reasonable to remove this workaround.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107833
After this patch, we can use `--param std=c++20` even if the compiler only
supports -std=c++2a. The test suite will handle that for us. The only Lit
feature that isn't fully baked will always be the "in development" one,
since we don't know exactly what year the standard will be ratified in.
This is another take on https://reviews.llvm.org/D99789.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100210
In previous versions of clang, __is_signed and __is_unsigned builtins did not
correspond to is_signed and is_unsigned behaviour for enums. The builtins were
fixed in D67897 and D98104.
* Disable the fast path of is_unsigned for clang versions < 13
* Add more tests for is_signed, is_unsigned and is_arithmetic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97283
We don't support GCC in C++03 mode, and Clang provides variadic templates
even in C++03 mode. So there's effectively no supported compiler that
doesn't support variadic templates.
This effectively gets rid of all uses of _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_VARIADICS, but
some workarounds for the lack of variadics remain.
C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned.
As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is
just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing
both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do.
This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test
suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926
The libc++ test suite has a lot of old Lit features used to XFAIL tests
and mark them as UNSUPPORTED. Many of them are to workaround problems on
old compilers or old platforms. As time goes by, it is good to go and
clean those up to simplify the configuration of the test suite, and also
to reflect the testing reality. It's not useful to have markup that gives
the impression that e.g. clang-3.3 is supported, when we don't really
test on it anymore (and hence several new tests probably don't have the
necessary markup on them).
This allows both the old and the new testing formats to handle these
tests with modules enabled.
We also include the modules flags in the %{flags} substitution, which
means that .sh.cpp tests in the old format and all tests in the new
format will use modules flags when enabled.
The testing script used to test libc++ historically did not like directories
without any testing files, so these tests had been added. Since this is
not necessary anymore, we can now remove these files. This has the benefit
that the total number of tests reflects the real number of tests more
closely, and we also skip some unnecessary work (especially relevant when
running tests over SSH).
However, some nothing_to_do.pass.cpp tests actually serve the purpose of
documenting that an area of the Standard doesn't need to be tested, or is
tested elsewhere. These files are not removed by this commit.
Removal done with:
import os
import itertools
for (dirpath, dirnames, filenames) in itertools.chain(os.walk('./libcxx/test'),
os.walk('./libcxxabi/test')):
if len(filenames + dirnames) > 1 and \
any(p == 'nothing_to_do.pass.cpp' for p in filenames):
os.remove(os.path.join(dirpath, 'nothing_to_do.pass.cpp'))
We don't support GCC 4 and older according to the documentation, so
we should pretend it doesn't exist.
This is a re-application of r372787.
llvm-svn: 372916
This also reverts:
- r372778: [libc++] Implement LWG 3158
- r372782: [libc++] Try fixing tests that fail on GCC 5 and older
- r372787: Purge mentions of GCC 4 from the test suite
Reason: the change breaks compilation of LLVM with libc++, for details see
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/libcxx-dev/2019-September/000599.html
llvm-svn: 372832
Teach libcxx to stop using various deprecated __has_* type traits, in favor of
the ("modern", C++11 era) __is_* type traits.
This is mostly just a simplification, but fixes at least one bug: _Atomic T
should be considered trivially-destructible, but is not considered to be POD by
Clang, and __has_trivial_destructor is specified in the GCC documentation as
returning false for non-POD non-class types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48292
llvm-svn: 359159
When the whole test only works starting at some version of the Standard,
use UNSUPPORTED lit markup instead of #ifdef TEST_STD_VER. This provides
more visibility into the test suite.
Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D57704.
Thanks to Andrey Maksimov for the patch.
llvm-svn: 353206
Summary:
Freestanding is *weird*. The standard allows it to differ in a bunch of odd
manners from regular C++, and the committee would like to improve that
situation. I'd like to make libc++ behave better with what freestanding should
be, so that it can be a tool we use in improving the standard. To do that we
need to try stuff out, both with "freestanding the language mode" and
"freestanding the library subset".
Let's start with the super basic: run the libc++ tests in freestanding, using
clang as the compiler, and see what works. The easiest hack to do this:
In utils/libcxx/test/config.py add:
self.cxx.compile_flags += ['-ffreestanding']
Run the tests and they all fail.
Why? Because in freestanding `main` isn't special. This "not special" property
has two effects: main doesn't get mangled, and main isn't allowed to omit its
`return` statement. The first means main gets mangled and the linker can't
create a valid executable for us to test. The second means we spew out warnings
(ew) and the compiler doesn't insert the `return` we omitted, and main just
falls of the end and does whatever undefined behavior (if you're luck, ud2
leading to non-zero return code).
Let's start my work with the basics. This patch changes all libc++ tests to
declare `main` as `int main(int, char**` so it mangles consistently (enabling us
to declare another `extern "C"` main for freestanding which calls the mangled
one), and adds `return 0;` to all places where it was missing. This touches 6124
files, and I apologize.
The former was done with The Magic Of Sed.
The later was done with a (not quite correct but decent) clang tool:
https://gist.github.com/jfbastien/793819ff360baa845483dde81170feed
This works for most tests, though I did have to adjust a few places when e.g.
the test runs with `-x c`, macros are used for main (such as for the filesystem
tests), etc.
Once this is in we can create a freestanding bot which will prevent further
regressions. After that, we can start the real work of supporting C++
freestanding fairly well in libc++.
<rdar://problem/47754795>
Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, arphaman, miyuki, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57624
llvm-svn: 353086
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351648
* Remove unused type from is_assignable.pass.cpp
* Don't specialize `common_type<::X<float>>` in common_type.pass.cpp, which violates the requirements of [meta.trans.other]/5
llvm-svn: 336618
Clang previously reported an empty union as having a unique object
representation. This was incorrect and was fixed in a recent Clang commit.
This patch fixes the libc++ tests.
llvm-svn: 324153
Summary:
After rL319736 for D28253 (which fixes PR28929), gcc cannot compile `<memory>` anymore in pre-C+11 modes, complaining:
```
In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/memory:648:0,
from test.cpp:1:
/usr/include/c++/v1/memory: In static member function 'static std::__1::shared_ptr<_Tp> std::__1::shared_ptr<_Tp>::make_shared(_A0&, _A1&, _A2&)':
/usr/include/c++/v1/memory:4365:5: error: wrong number of template arguments (4, should be at least 1)
static_assert((is_constructible<_Tp, _A0, _A1, _A2>::value), "Can't construct object in make_shared" );
^
In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/memory:649:0,
from test.cpp:1:
/usr/include/c++/v1/type_traits:3198:29: note: provided for 'template<class _Tp, class _A0, class _A1> struct std::__1::is_constructible'
struct _LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_VIS is_constructible
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/memory:648:0,
from test.cpp:1:
/usr/include/c++/v1/memory:4365:5: error: template argument 1 is invalid
static_assert((is_constructible<_Tp, _A0, _A1, _A2>::value), "Can't construct object in make_shared" );
^
/usr/include/c++/v1/memory: In static member function 'static std::__1::shared_ptr<_Tp> std::__1::shared_ptr<_Tp>::allocate_shared(const _Alloc&, _A0&, _A1&, _A2&)':
/usr/include/c++/v1/memory:4444:5: error: wrong number of template arguments (4, should be at least 1)
static_assert((is_constructible<_Tp, _A0, _A1, _A2>::value), "Can't construct object in allocate_shared" );
^
In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/memory:649:0,
from test.cpp:1:
/usr/include/c++/v1/type_traits:3198:29: note: provided for 'template<class _Tp, class _A0, class _A1> struct std::__1::is_constructible'
struct _LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_VIS is_constructible
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/memory:648:0,
from test.cpp:1:
/usr/include/c++/v1/memory:4444:5: error: template argument 1 is invalid
static_assert((is_constructible<_Tp, _A0, _A1, _A2>::value), "Can't construct object in allocate_shared" );
^
```
This is also reported in https://bugs.freebsd.org/224946 (FreeBSD is apparently one of the very few projects that regularly builds programs against libc++ with gcc).
The reason is that the static assertions are invoking `is_constructible` with three arguments, while gcc does not have the built-in `is_constructible` feature, and the pre-C++11 `is_constructible` wrappers in `<type_traits>` only provide up to two arguments.
I have added additional wrappers for three arguments, modified the `is_constructible` entry point to take three arguments instead, and added a simple test to is_constructible.pass.cpp.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: krytarowski, cfe-commits, emaste
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41805
llvm-svn: 321963
Clang 5.0 implements these changes here: 87cd035326
MSVC++ will implement these changes in the first toolset update to 2017.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33021
llvm-svn: 302710
On Windows the function template `template <class T> void test()` has
the same mangled name when instantiated with the distinct types `void()`
and `void() noexcept`. When this occurs Clang emits an error. This error
was causing two type-traits tests to fail.
However this can be worked around by using class templates instead of
function templates, which is what this patch does to fix the errors.
llvm-svn: 302380
Joe Loser