This implements the last step of
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/parallel-input-file-parsing/60164 for the ELF port.
For an ELF object file, we previously did: parse, (parallel) initializeLocalSymbols, (parallel) postParseObjectFile.
Now we do: parse, (parallel) initSectionsAndLocalSyms, (parallel) postParseObjectFile.
initSectionsAndLocalSyms does most of input section initialization.
The sequential `parse` does SHT_ARM_ATTRIBUTES/SHT_RISCV_ATTRIBUTES/SHT_GROUP initialization for now.
Performance linking some programs with --threads=8 (glibc 2.33 malloc and mimalloc):
* clang: 1.05x as fast with glibc malloc, 1.03x as fast with mimalloc
* chrome: 1.04x as fast with glibc malloc, 1.03x as fast with mimalloc
* internal search program: 1.08x as fast with glibc malloc, 1.05x as fast with mimalloc
Reviewed By: peter.smith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130810
makeThreadLocal/makeThreadLocalN are moved from D130810 ([ELF] Parallelize input
section initialization) here to make D130810 more focused on the refactor:
* COFF has some needs for multiple linker contexts. D108850 partially removed
global states from lldCommon but left the global variable `lctx`.
* To the best of my knowledge, all multiple-linker-context feature requests to
ELF are more from user convenience, with no very strong argument.
* In practice, ELF port is very difficult to remove global states without
introducing significant performance regression/hurting code readability.
* Per-thread allocators from D122922/D123879 are too expensive and will not
really benefit ELF.
This patch adds a simple thread_local based makeThreadLocal to
lld/Common/Memory.h. It will enable further optimization in ELF.
I went over the output of the following mess of a command:
`(ulimit -m 2000000; ulimit -v 2000000; git ls-files -z | parallel --xargs -0 cat | aspell list --mode=none --ignore-case | grep -E '^[A-Za-z][a-z]*$' | sort | uniq -c | sort -n | grep -vE '.{25}' | aspell pipe -W3 | grep : | cut -d' ' -f2 | less)`
and proceeded to spend a few days looking at it to find probable typos
and fixed a few hundred of them in all of the llvm project (note, the
ones I found are not anywhere near all of them, but it seems like a
good start).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130982
The error used to look like this:
ld64.lld: error: undefined symbol: _foo
>>> referenced by /path/to/bar.o:(symbol _baz+0x4)
If DWARF line information is available, we now show where in the source
the references are coming from:
ld64.lld: error: unreferenced symbol: _foo
>>> referenced by: bar.cpp:42 (/path/to/bar.cpp:42)
>>> /path/to/bar.o:(symbol _baz+0x4)
The reland is identical to the first time this landed. The fix was in D128294.
This reverts commit 0cc7ad4175.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128184
The error used to look like this:
ld64.lld: error: undefined symbol: _foo
>>> referenced by /path/to/bar.o:(symbol _baz+0x4)
If DWARF line information is available, we now show where in the source
the references are coming from:
ld64.lld: error: unreferenced symbol: _foo
>>> referenced by: bar.cpp:42 (/path/to/bar.cpp:42)
>>> /path/to/bar.o:(symbol _baz+0x4)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128184
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/parallel-input-file-parsing/60164
initializeSymbols currently sets Defined::section and handles non-prevailing
COMDAT groups. Move the code to the parallel postParse to reduce work from the
single-threading code path and make parallel section initialization infeasible.
Postpone reporting duplicate symbol errors so that the messages have the
section information. (`Defined::section` is assigned in postParse and another
thread may not have the information).
* duplicated-synthetic-sym.s: BinaryFile duplicate definition (very rare) now
has no section information
* comdat-binding: `%t/w.o %t/g.o` leads to an undesired undefined symbol. This
is not ideal but we report a diagnostic to inform that this is unsupported.
(See release note)
* comdat-discarded-lazy.s: %tdef.o is unextracted. The new behavior (discarded
section error) makes more sense
* i386-comdat.s: switched to a better approach working around
.gnu.linkonce.t.__x86.get_pc_thunk.bx in glibc<2.32 for x86-32.
Drop the ancient no-longer-relevant workaround for __i686.get_pc_thunk.bx
Depends on D120640
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120626
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/parallel-input-file-parsing/60164
initializeSymbols currently sets Defined::section and handles non-prevailing
COMDAT groups. Move the code to the parallel postParse to reduce work from the
single-threading code path and make parallel section initialization infeasible.
Postpone reporting duplicate symbol errors so that the messages have the
section information. (`Defined::section` is assigned in postParse and another
thread may not have the information).
* duplicated-synthetic-sym.s: BinaryFile duplicate definition (very rare) now
has no section information
* comdat-binding: `%t/w.o %t/g.o` leads to an undesired undefined symbol. This
is not ideal but we report a diagnostic to inform that this is unsupported.
(See release note)
* comdat-discarded-lazy.s: %tdef.o is unextracted. The new behavior (discarded
section error) makes more sense
Depends on D120640
Reviewed By: peter.smith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120626
ObjFile::parse combines symbol initialization and resolution. Many tasks
unrelated to symbol resolution can be postponed and parallelized. This patch
extracts local symbol initialization and parallelizes it.
Technically the new function initializeLocalSymbols can be merged into
ObjFile::postParse, but functions like getSrcMsg may access the
uninitialized (all nullptr) local part of InputFile::symbols.
Linking chrome: 1.02x as fast with glibc malloc, 1.04x as fast with mimalloc
Depends on f456c3ae3f and D119908
Reviewed By: ikudrin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119909
ObjFile::parse combines symbol initialization and resolution. Many tasks
unrelated to symbol resolution can be postponed and parallelized. This patch
extracts local symbol initialization and parallelizes it.
Technically the new function initializeLocalSymbols can be merged into
ObjFile::postParse, but functions like getSrcMsg may access the
uninitialized (all nullptr) local part of InputFile::symbols.
Linking chrome: 1.02x as fast with glibc malloc, 1.04x as fast with mimalloc
Reviewed By: ikudrin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119909
* detect `def_tls.o undef_nontls.o` violation
* place error checking code (checking duplicate symbol) together
* allow `--defsym tls1=tls2 def_tls.o`
As a degraded error checking, `--defsym tls1=42` violation will not be detected.
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/parallel-input-file-parsing/60164
To decouple symbol initialization and section initialization, `Defined::section`
assignment should be postponed after input file parsing. To avoid spurious
duplicate definition error due to two definitions in COMDAT groups of the same
signature, we should postpone the duplicate symbol check.
The function is called postScan instead of a more specific name like
checkDuplicateSymbols, because we may merge Symbol::mergeProperties into
postScan. It is placed after compileBitcodeFiles to apply to ET_REL files
produced by LTO. This causes minor diagnostic regression
for skipLinkedOutput configurations: ld.lld --thinlto-index-only a.bc b.o
(bitcode definition prevails) won't detect duplicate symbol error. I think this
is an acceptable compromise. The important cases where (a) both files are
bitcode or (b) --thinlto-index-only is unused are still detected.
Reviewed By: ikudrin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119908
In many call sites we know uncompression cannot happen (non-SHF_ALLOC, or the
data (even if compressed) must have been uncompressed by a previous pass).
Prefer rawData in these cases. data() increases code size and prevents
optimization on rawData.
https://maskray.me/blog/2022-01-16-archives-and-start-lib
For every definition in an extracted archive member, we intern the symbol twice,
once for the archive index entry, once for the .o symbol table after extraction.
This is inefficient.
Symbols in a --start-lib ObjFile/BitcodeFile are only interned once because the
result is cached in symbols[i].
Just handle an archive using the --start-lib code path. We can therefore remove
ArchiveFile and LazyArchive. For many projects, archive member extraction ratio
is high and it is a net performance win. Linking a Release build of clang is
1.01x as fast.
Note: --start-lib scans symbols in the same order that llvm-ar adds them to the
index, so in the common case the semantics should be identical. If the archive
symbol table was created in a different order, or is incomplete, this strategy
may have different semantics. Such cases are considered user error.
The `is neither ET_REL nor LLVM bitcode` error is changed to a warning.
Previously an archive may have such members without a diagnostic. Using a
warning prevents breakage.
* For some tests, the diagnostics get improved where we did not consider
the archive member name: `b.a:` => `b.a(b.o):`.
* `no-obj.s`: the link is now allowed, matching GNU ld
* `archive-no-index.s`: the `is neither ET_REL nor LLVM bitcode` diagnostic is
demoted to a warning.
* `incompatible.s`: even when an archive is unextracted, we may report an
"incompatible with" error.
---
I recently decreased sizeof(SymbolUnion) by 8 and decreased memory usage quite a
bit, so retaining `symbols` for un-extracted archive members should not cause a
memory usage problem.
Reviewed By: peter.smith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119074
SharedSymbol::SharedSymbol initializes verdefIndex and Symbol::replace
copies verdefIndex.
By move verdefIndex assignment outside of ctor, Symbol::replace can be changed
to not copy verdefIndex. This can be used to decrease work for for
ObjKind/BitcodeKind.
Currently `this->getName() == newSym.getName()`.
By keeping the old nameData/nameSize, newSym's nameData/nameSize will be
ignored. The call sites can avoid calling getName().
printTraceSymbol needs to take the symbol name since `other`'s name is empty.
When processing dependent libraries, if there's a directory of the same
name as the library being searched for, either in the current directory
or earlier in the search order, LLD will try to open it and report an
error. This is because LLD uses file existence check. To address this
issue we reverse the order, searching the library by basename first
and only considering search paths later, and current directory last.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118498
Fangrui Song