We have the same fold in InstCombine - though implemented via OrZero flag on isKnownToBePowerOfTwo. The reasoning here is that either a) the result of the lshr is a power-of-two, or b) we have a div-by-zero triggering UB which we can ignore.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129606
As suggested in the post-commit feedback for D128123,
we can ease the mask constraint to ignore the MSB
(and make the code easier to read by adjusting the check).
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/bbvqWv
This patch restores calls to has_value to make it clear that we are
checking the presence of an optional value, not the underlying value.
This patch partially reverts d08f34b592.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129454
We already handled this case for add with a constant RHS. A
similar pattern can occur for sub with a constant left hand side.
Test cases use add and a mul representing (neg (shl X, C)) because
that's what I saw in the wild. The mul will be decomposed and then
the new transform can kick in.
Tests have not been committed, but this patch shows the changes.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128769
This is almost the same as the abandoned D48529, but it
allows splat vector constants too.
This replaces the x86-specific code that was added with
the alternate patch D48557 with the original generic
combine.
This transform is a less restricted form of an existing
InstCombine and the proposed SDAG equivalent for that
in D128080:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/OUm6N_
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128123
Similar to the existing (shl (srl x, c1), c2) fold
Part of the work to fix the regressions in D77804
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125836
The VT we want to shrink to may not be legal especially after type
legalization.
Fixes PR56110.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128135
Another issue unearthed by D127115
We take a long time to canonicalize an insert_vector_elt chain before being able to convert it into a build_vector - even if they are already in ascending insertion order, we fold the nodes one at a time into the build_vector 'seed', leaving plenty of time for other folds to alter it (in particular recognising when they come from extract_vector_elt resulting in a shuffle_vector that is much harder to fold with).
D127115 makes this particularly difficult as we're almost guaranteed to have the lost the sequence before all possible insertions have been folded.
This patch proposes to begin at the last insertion and attempt to collect all the (oneuse) insertions right away and create the build_vector before its too late.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127595
This should fix a number of shuffle regressions in D127115 where the re-ordered combines mean we fail to fold a EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT/INSERT_VECTOR_ELT sequence into a BUILD_VECTOR if we extract from more than one vector source.
As noticed on D127115 - we were missing this fold, instead just having the shuffle(shuffle(x,undef,splatmask),undef) fold. We should be able to merge these into one using SelectionDAG::isSplatValue, but we'll need to match the shuffle's undef handling first.
This also exposed an issue in SelectionDAG::isSplatValue which was incorrectly propagating the undef mask across a bitcast (it was trying to just bail with a APInt::isSubsetOf if it found any undefs but that was actually the wrong way around so didn't fire for partial undef cases).
I can't remove the function just yet as it is used in the generated .inc files.
I would also like to provide a way to compare alignment with TypeSize since it came up a few times.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126910
These assert that there are no "useless" assertzext/assertsext nodes
(that assert a wider width than a following trunc), but I don't think
there is anything preventing such nodes from reaching this code.
I don't think the assertion is relevant for correctness of this
transform either -- if such an assert is present, then the other
one will always be to a smaller width, and we'll pick that one.
The assertion dates back to D37017.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/55846.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126952
When promoting a shift, make sure we only fetch the second operand
after promoting the first. Load promotion may replace users of the
old load, and we don't want to be left with a dangling reference to
the old load instruction.
The crashing test case is from https://reviews.llvm.org/D126689#3553212.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126886
If the VT is i2, then 2 is really -2.
Test has not been commited yet, but diff shows the change.
Fixes PR55644.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126213
Most clients only used these methods because they wanted to be able to
extend or truncate to the same bit width (which is a no-op). Now that
the standard zext, sext and trunc allow this, there is no reason to use
the OrSelf versions.
The OrSelf versions additionally have the strange behaviour of allowing
extending to a *smaller* width, or truncating to a *larger* width, which
are also treated as no-ops. A small amount of client code relied on this
(ConstantRange::castOp and MicrosoftCXXNameMangler::mangleNumber) and
needed rewriting.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125557
This function tries to match (a >> 8) | (a << 8) as (bswap a) >> 16.
If the SRL isn't masked and the high bits aren't demanded, we still
need to ensure that bits 23:16 are zero. After the right shift they
will be in bits 15:8 which is where the important bits from the SHL
end up. It's only a bswap if the OR on bits 15:8 only takes the bits
from the SHL.
Fixes PR55484.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125641
If we're using shift pairs to mask, then relax the one use limit if the shift amounts are equal - we'll only be generating a single AND node.
AArch64 has a couple of regressions due to this, so I've enforced the existing one use limit inside a AArch64TargetLowering::shouldFoldConstantShiftPairToMask callback.
Part of the work to fix the regressions in D77804
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125607
During early gather/scatter enablement two different approaches
were taken to represent scaled indices:
* A Scale operand whereby byte_offsets = Index * Scale
* An IndexType whereby byte_offsets = Index * sizeof(MemVT.ElementType)
Having multiple representations is bad as shown by this patch which
fixes instances where the two are out of sync. The dedicated scale
operand is more flexible and pervasive so this patch removes the
UNSCALED values from IndexType. This means all indices are scaled
but the scale can be one, hence unscaled. SDNodes now use the scale
operand to answer the "isScaledIndex" question.
I toyed with the idea of keeping the UNSCALED enums and helper
functions but because they will have no uses and force SDNodes to
validate the set of supported values I figured it's best to remove
them. We can re-add them if there's a real need. For similar
reasons I've kept the IndexType enum when a bool could be used as I
think being explicitly looks better.
Depends On D123347
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123381
SelectionDAG::FoldConstantArithmetic determines if operands are foldable constants, so we don't need to bother with isConstantOrConstantVector / Opaque tests before calling it directly.
SelectionDAG::FoldConstantArithmetic determines if operands are foldable constants, so we don't need to bother with isConstantOrConstantVector / Opaque tests before calling it directly.
As suggested from 02f8519502, this uses the
isAnyConstantBuildVector method in lieu of separate
isBuildVectorOfConstantSDNodes calls. It should
otherwise be an NFC.
This prevents an infinite loop from D123801, where code trying to reduce
the total number of bitcasts, but also handling constants, could create
the opposite transform. Prevent the transform in these case to let the
bitcast of a constant transform naturally.
Fixes#55345
This is part of an ongoing effort toward making DAGCombine process the nodes in topological order.
This is able to discover a couple of new optimizations, but also causes a couple of regression. I nevertheless chose to submit this patch for review as to start the discussion with people working on the backend so we can find a good way forward.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124743
Add helper functions to query the signed and scaled properties
of ISD::IndexType along with functions to change them.
Remove setIndexType from MaskedGatherSDNode because it only has
one usage and typically should only be changed alongside its
index operand.
Minimise the direct use of the enum values to lay the groundwork
for more refactoring.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123347
Something is going wrong with the BigEndian PowerPC bot. It is hard to
tell what is wrong from here, but attempt to fix it by disabling the
combineShuffleOfBitcast combine for bigendian.
If the mask is made up of elements that form a mask in the higher type
we can convert shuffle(bitcast into the bitcast type, simplifying the
instruction sequence. A v4i32 2,3,0,1 for example can be treated as a
1,0 v2i64 shuffle. This helps clean up some of the AArch64 concat load
combines, along with helping simplify a number of other tests.
The PowerPC combine for v16i8 splat vector loads needed some fixes to
keep it working for v16i8 vectors. This improves the handling of v2i64
shuffles to match too, hopefully improving them in general.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123801
This extends the (X & ~Y) | Y to X | Y fold to also work if ~Y is
a truncated not (when taking into account the mask X). This is
done by exporting the infrastructure added in D124856 and reusing
it here.
I've retained the old value of AllowUndefs=false, though probably
this can be switched to true with extra test coverage.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124930
Don't assume the rotation amounts have been correctly normalized - do it as part of the constant folding.
Also, the normalization should be performed with UREM not SREM.
When looking for memory uses,
reassociationCanBreakAddressingModePattern should check uses of
the outer ADD rather than the inner ADD. We want to know if the
two ops we're reassociating are used by a load/store.
In practice, the existing check usually works because CodeGenPrepare
will make one of the load/stores have an offset of 0 relative to
split GEP. That will make the inner add have a memory use.
To test this, I've manually split the GEPs so there is no 0 offset
store.
This issue was recently discussed in the original review D60294.
Reviewed By: luismarques
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124644
We try to match as a disguised rotate by constant of these forms
(shl (X | Y), C1) | (srl X, C2) --> (rotl X, C1) | (shl Y, C1)
(shl X, C1) | (srl (X | Y), C2) --> (rotl X, C1) | (srl Y, C2)
We may have also looked through an AND to find the shift. If we
did, we need to apply a mask to the result.
I'll add an AArch64 test and pre-commit it and the RISC-V test
tomorrow.
Fixes PR55201.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124711
When looking through extends of gather/scatter indices it's safe
to convert a known positive signed index to unsigned, but unsigned
indices must remain unsigned.
Depends On D123318
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123326
refineUniformBase and selectGatherScatterAddrMode both attempt the
transformation:
base(0) + index(A+splat(B)) => base(B) + index(A)
However, this is only safe when index is not implicitly scaled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123222
This is a very specific fold to fix an upstream poor codegen issue.
InstCombine has the much more flexible pushFreezeToPreventPoisonFromPropagating but I don't think we're quite there with DAG/TLI handling for canCreateUndefOrPoison/isGuaranteedNotToBeUndefOrPoison value tracking yet.
Fixes#54911
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124185
We can process the long shuffles (working across several actual
vector registers) in the best way if we take the actual register
represantion into account. We can build more correct representation of
register shuffles, improve number of recognised buildvector sequences.
Also, same function can be used to improve the cost model for the
shuffles. in future patches.
Part of D100486
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115653
We can process the long shuffles (working across several actual
vector registers) in the best way if we take the actual register
represantion into account. We can build more correct representation of
register shuffles, improve number of recognised buildvector sequences.
Also, same function can be used to improve the cost model for the
shuffles. in future patches.
Part of D100486
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115653
1. X%C to the equivalent of X-X/C*C is not always fastest path if there is no SDIV pair exist. So check target have faster for srem only first.
2. Add AArch64 faster path for SREM only pow2 case.
Fix https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54649
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122968
hasOneUse is not cheap on nodes with chain results that might have
many uses. By checking the opcode first, we can avoid a costly walk
of the use list on nodes we aren't interested in.
Found by investigating calls to hasNUsesOfValue from the example
provided in D123857.
As far as I know getNode will never return a null SDValue.
I'm guessing this was modeled after the FoldConstantArithmetic
call earlier.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123550
Accord the discussion in D122281, we missing an ISD::AND combine for MLOAD
because it relies on BuildVectorSDNode is fails for scalable vectors.
This patch is intend to handle that, so we can circle back the type MVT::nxv2i32
Reviewed By: paulwalker-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122703
As raised on PR52267, XOR(X,MIN_SIGNED_VALUE) can be treated as ADD(X,MIN_SIGNED_VALUE), so let these cases use the 'AddLike' folds, similar to how we perform no-common-bits OR(X,Y) cases.
define i8 @src(i8 %x) {
%r = xor i8 %x, 128
ret i8 %r
}
=>
define i8 @tgt(i8 %x) {
%r = add i8 %x, 128
ret i8 %r
}
Transformation seems to be correct!
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/qV46E2
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122754
When shifting by a byte-multiple:
bswap (shl X, C) --> lshr (bswap X), C
bswap (lshr X, C) --> shl (bswap X), C
This is the backend version of D122010 and an alternative
suggested in D120648.
There's an extra check to make sure the shift amount is
valid that was not in the rough draft.
I'm not sure if there is a larger motivating case for RISCV (bug report?),
but the ARM diffs show a benefit from having a late version of the
transform (because we do not combine the loads in IR).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122655
Modified DAGCombiner to pass the shift the bittest input and the shift amount
to hasBitTest. This matches the other call to hasBitTest in TargetLowering.h
This is an alternative to D122454.
Reviewed By: luismarques
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122458
Trying to reduce the number of masked loads in favour of more unpklo/hi
instructions. Both ISD::ZEXTLOAD and ISD::SEXTLOAD are supported to extensions
from legal types.
Both of normal and masked loads test cases added to guard compile crash.
Reviewed By: paulwalker-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120953
Add shl/srl/sra to the list of ops that we canonicalize with a select to expose an identity merge
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122070
RISCV strong prefers i32 values be sign extended to i64. This combine
was always zero extending the constant using APInt methods.
This adjusts the code so that it calls getNode using ISD::ANY_EXTEND instead.
getNode will call TLI.isSExtCheaperThanZExt to decide how to handle
the constant.
Tests were copied from D121598 where I noticed that we were creating
constants that were hard to materialize.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121650
We do not have general reassociation here (and probably
do not need it), but I noticed these were missing in
patches/tests motivated by D111530, so we can at
least handle the simplest patterns.
The VE test diff looks correct, but we miss that
pattern in IR currently:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/u66_PM
This is another fold generalized from D111530.
We can find a common source for a rotate operation hidden inside an 'or':
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/9pV8hn
Deciding when this is profitable vs. a funnel-shift is tricky, but this
does not show any regressions: if a target has a rotate but it does not
have a funnel-shift, then try to form the rotate here. That is why we
don't have x86 test diffs for the scalar tests that are duplicated from
AArch64 ( 74a65e3834 ) - shld/shrd are available. That also makes it
difficult to show vector diffs - the only case where I found a diff was
on x86 AVX512 or XOP with i64 elements.
There's an additional check for a legal type to avoid a problem seen
with x86-32 where we form a 64-bit rotate but then it gets split
inefficiently. We might avoid that by adding more rotate folds, but
I didn't check to see what is missing on that path.
This gets most of the motivating patterns for AArch64 / ARM that are in
D111530.
We still need a couple of enhancements to setcc pattern matching with
rotate/funnel-shift to get the rest.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120933
When inserting undef into buildvectors created from shuffles of
buildvectors, we convert elements to the largest needed type. This had
the effect of converting undef into 0, which isn't needed as the
buildvector implicitly truncates and trunc(zext(undef)) == undef.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121002
Simon Pilgrim