To accommodate frame layouts that have both fixed and scalable objects
on the stack, describing a stack location or offset using a pointer + uint64_t
is not sufficient. For this reason, we've introduced the StackOffset class,
which models both the fixed- and scalable sized offsets.
The TargetFrameLowering::getFrameIndexReference is made to return a StackOffset,
so that this can be used in other interfaces, such as to eliminate frame indices
in PEI or to emit Debug locations for variables on the stack.
This patch is purely mechanical and doesn't change the behaviour of how
the result of this function is used for fixed-sized offsets. The patch adds
various checks to assert that the offset has no scalable component, as frame
offsets with a scalable component are not yet supported in various places.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90018
This patch replaces the AArch64StackOffset class by the generic one
defined in TypeSize.h.
Reviewed By: david-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88983
Implement stack frame reordering in the AArch64 backend.
Unlike the X86 implementation, AArch64 does not seem to benefit from
"access density" based frame reordering, mainly because it has a much
smaller variety of addressing modes, and the fact that all instructions
are 4 bytes so each frame object is either in range of an instruction
(and then the access is "free") or not (and that has a code size cost
of 4 bytes).
This change improves Memory Tagging codegen by
* Placing an object that has been chosen as the base tagged pointer of
the function at SP + 0. This saves one instruction to setup the pointer
(IRG does not have an offset immediate), and more because that object
can now be referenced without materializing its tagged address in a
scratch register.
* Placing objects that go out of scope simultaneously together. This
exposes opportunities for instruction merging in tryMergeAdjacentSTG.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72366
Summary:
Pin the tagged base pointer to one of the stack slots, and (if
necessary) rewrite tag offsets so that an object that occupies that
slot has both address and tag offsets of 0. This allows ADDG
instructions for that object to be eliminated and their uses replaced
with the tagged base pointer itself.
This optimization must be done in machine instructions and not in the IR
instrumentation pass, because referring to a stack slot through an IRG
pointer would confuse the stack coloring pass.
The optimization makes a (pretty naive) attempt to find the slot that
would benefit the most by counting the uses of stack slots in the
function.
Reviewers: ostannard, pcc
Subscribers: merge_guards_bot, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72365
This makes the prologue match the windows canonical layout, for
cases without a frame pointer.
This can potentially be a slower (a longer dependency chain of the
sp register, and potentially one arithmetic operation more on some
cores), but gives notable size improvements.
The previous two commits shrinks a 166 KB xdata section by 49 KB,
and if the change from this commit is enabled, it shrinks the xdata
section by another 25 KB.
In total, since the start of the recent arm64 unwind info cleanups
and optimizations (since before commit 37ef743cbf), the xdata+pdata
sections of the same test DLL has shrunk from 407 KB in total
originally, to 163 KB now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88701
This saves one instruction per prologue/epilogue for any function with
an odd number of callee-saved GPRs, but more importantly, allows such
functions to match the packed unwind format.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88699
On windows, the callee saved registers in a canonical prologue are
ordered starting from a lower register number at a lower stack
address (with the possible gap for aligning the stack at the top);
this is the opposite order that llvm normally produces.
To achieve this, reverse the order of the registers in the
assignCalleeSavedSpillSlots callback, to get the stack objects
laid out by PrologEpilogInserter in the right order, and adjust
computeCalleeSaveRegisterPairs to lay them out from the bottom up.
This allows generated prologs more often to match the format that
allows the unwind info to be written as packed info.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88677
For these cases, we already omit the prologue directives, if
(!AFI->hasStackFrame() && !windowsRequiresStackProbe && !NumBytes).
When writing the epilogue (after the prolog has been written), if
the function doesn't have the WinCFI flag set (i.e. if no prologue
was generated), assume that no epilogue will be needed either,
and don't emit any epilog start pseudo instruction. After completing
the epilogue, make sure that it actually matched the prologue.
Previously, when epilogue start/end was generated, but no prologue,
the unwind info for such functions actually was huge; 12 bytes xdata
(4 bytes header, 4 bytes for one non-folded epilogue header, 4 bytes
for padded opcodes) and 8 bytes pdata. Because the epilog consisted of
one opcode (end) but the prolog was empty (no .seh_endprologue), the
epilogue couldn't be folded into the prologue, and thus couldn't be
considered for packed form either.
On a 6.5 MB DLL with 110 KB pdata and 166 KB xdata, this gets rid of
38 KB pdata and 62 KB xdata.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88641
The function already has a cleanup scope that calls the same whenever
the function is exited. When reading the code, seeing that this return
codepath has an explicit call while other return paths lack it is
confusing.
In the hypothetical case of a function having a prologue that
set the HasWinCFI flag in the MF, but the epilogue containing no
WinCFI instructions, the HasWinCFI flag in the MF would end up reset back
to false.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88636
PAC/BTI-related codegen in the AArch64 backend is controlled by a set
of LLVM IR function attributes, added to the function by Clang, based
on command-line options and GCC-style function attributes. However,
functions, generated in the LLVM middle end (for example,
asan.module.ctor or __llvm_gcov_write_out) do not get any attributes
and the backend incorrectly does not do any PAC/BTI code generation.
This patch record the default state of PAC/BTI codegen in a set of
LLVM IR module-level attributes, based on command-line options:
* "sign-return-address", with non-zero value means generate code to
sign return addresses (PAC-RET), zero value means disable PAC-RET.
* "sign-return-address-all", with non-zero value means enable PAC-RET
for all functions, zero value means enable PAC-RET only for
functions, which spill LR.
* "sign-return-address-with-bkey", with non-zero value means use B-key
for signing, zero value mean use A-key.
This set of attributes are always added for AArch64 targets (as
opposed, for example, to interpreting a missing attribute as having a
value 0) in order to be able to check for conflicts when combining
module attributed during LTO.
Module-level attributes are overridden by function level attributes.
All the decision making about whether to not to generate PAC and/or
BTI code is factored out into AArch64FunctionInfo, there shouldn't be
any places left, other than AArch64FunctionInfo, which directly
examine PAC/BTI attributes, except AArch64AsmPrinter.cpp, which
is/will-be handled by a separate patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85649
If d8 is saved, the fp is not actually adjacent to the SVE
spills/allocations. Fix the offset calculation to account for this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88117
This reverts commit bc9a29b9ee.
The reasoning that this patch was wrong was itself incorrect
(see discussion on llvm-commits). This patch does seem to be exposing
a latent SVE code generation bug on non-public tests, which should
not block a correctness fix for public, non-SVE use cases.
This reverts commit e9d9a61208.
This patch was previously revert by 04879086b4
with the reapplication being done after breaking the assert used to
ensure SP is always 16-byte aligned, which is a requirement of the AAPCS.
For extra context the latest patch caused runtime failures when
building with "-march=armv8-a+sve -mllvm -aarch64-sve-vector-bits-min=256".
Original Commit Message:
After the commit r368987 (rG643adb55769e) was landed, the frame record (FP and LR register)
may be placed in the middle of a stack frame if a function has both callee-saved
general-purpose registers and floating point registers. This will break the stack unwinders
that simply walk through the frame records (based on the guarantee from AAPCS64
"The Frame Pointer" section). This commit fixes the problem by adding the frame record offset.
Patch By: logan
Differential Revision: D70800
Original Commit Message:
After the commit r368987 (rG643adb55769e) was landed, the frame record (FP and LR register)
may be placed in the middle of a stack frame if a function has both callee-saved
general-purpose registers and floating point registers. This will break the stack unwinders
that simply walk through the frame records (based on the guarantee from AAPCS64
"The Frame Pointer" section). This commit fixes the problem by adding the frame record offset.
Patch By: logan
When floating point callee-saved registers were used, the frame pointer would
incorrectly point to the bottom of the CSR space (containing saved floating-point
registers), rather than to the frame record.
While all frame offsets were calculated consistently, resulting in working code,
this prevented stack walkers from being about to traverse the frame list.
This fixes an issue where the restore point of callee-saves in the
function epilogues was incorrectly calculated when the basic block
consisted of only a RET instruction. This caused dealloc instructions
to be inserted in between the block of callee-save restore instructions,
rather than before it.
Reviewed By: paulwalker-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86099
Introduced by fd6584a220
Following similar use of casts in AsmParser.cpp, for instance - ideally
this type would use unsigned chars as they're more representative of raw
data and don't get confused around implementation defined choices of
char's signedness, but this is what it is & the signed/unsigned
conversions are (so far as I understand) safe/bit preserving in this
usage and what's intended, given the API design here.
This patch adds a CFI entry for each SVE callee saved register
that needs unwind info at an offset from the CFA. The offset is
a DWARF expression because the offset is partly scalable.
The CFI entries only cover a subset of the SVE callee-saves and
only encodes the lower 64-bits, thus implementing the lowest
common denominator ABI. Existing unwinders may support VG but
only restore the lower 64-bits.
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84044
The CFA is calculated as (SP/FP + offset), but when there are
SVE objects on the stack the SP offset is partly scalable and
should instead be expressed as the DWARF expression:
SP + offset + scalable_offset * VG
where VG is the Vector Granule register, containing the
number of 64bits 'granules' in a scalable vector.
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84043
While deallocating the stackframe, the offset used to reload the
callee-saved registers was not pointing to the SVE callee-saves,
but rather to the whole SVE area.
+--------------+
| GRP callee |
| saves |
+--------------+ <- FP
| SVE callee |
| saves |
+--------------+ <- Should restore SVE callee saves from here
| SVE Spills |
| and Locals |
+--------------+ <- instead of from here.
| |
: :
| |
+--------------+ <- SP
Reviewed By: paulwalker-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84539
Instead of aligning the last callee-saved-register slot to the stack
alignment (16 bytes), just align the SVE callee-saved block. This also
simplifies the code that allocates space for the callee-saves.
This change is needed to make sure the offset to which the callee-saved
register is spilled, corresponds to the offset used for e.g. unwind call
frame instructions.
Reviewers: efriedma, paulwalker-arm, david-arm, rengolin
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84042
Fixed stack objects are preallocated and defined to be allocated before
any of the regular stack objects. These are normally used to model stack
arguments.
The AAPCS does not support passing SVE registers on the stack by value
(only by reference). The current layout also doesn't place them before
all stack objects, but rather before all SVE objects. Removing this
simplifies the code that emits the allocation/deallocation
around callee-saved registers (D84042).
This patch also removes all uses of fixedStack from from
framelayout-sve.mir, where this was used purely for testing purposes.
Reviewers: paulwalker-arm, efriedma, rengolin
Reviewed By: paulwalker-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84538
The code already supports addressing a fixed-size stack object from
the frame-pointer, by first subtracting sizeof(SVE area) from FP.
Reviewers: efriedma, cameron.mcinally, david-arm, rengolin
Reviewed By: david-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83125
To make sure that no barrier gets placed on the architectural execution
path, each
BLR x<N>
instruction gets transformed to a
BL __llvm_slsblr_thunk_x<N>
instruction, with __llvm_slsblr_thunk_x<N> a thunk that contains
__llvm_slsblr_thunk_x<N>:
BR x<N>
<speculation barrier>
Therefore, the BLR instruction gets split into 2; one BL and one BR.
This transformation results in not inserting a speculation barrier on
the architectural execution path.
The mitigation is off by default and can be enabled by the
harden-sls-blr subtarget feature.
As a linker is allowed to clobber X16 and X17 on function calls, the
above code transformation would not be correct in case a linker does so
when N=16 or N=17. Therefore, when the mitigation is enabled, generation
of BLR x16 or BLR x17 is avoided.
As BLRA* indirect calls are not produced by LLVM currently, this does
not aim to implement support for those.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81402
Treat it as callee-saved, and always back it up. When windows code calls
entry points in unix code, marked with the windows calling convention,
that unix code can call other functions that isn't compiled with
-ffixed-x18 which may clobber x18 freely. By backing it up and restoring
it on return, we preserve the register across the function call,
fulfilling this part of the windows calling convention on another OS.
This isn't enough for making sure that x18 is preseved when non-windows
code does a callback to windows code, but is a clear improvement over
the current status quo. Additionally, wine is nowadays building many
modules as PE DLLs, which avoids the callback issue altogether for those
DLLs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61892
The UnwindHelp object is used during exception handling by runtime
code. It must be findable from a fixed offset from FP.
This change allocates the UnwindHelp object as a fixed object (as is
done for x86_64) to ensure that both the generated code and runtime
agree on the location of the object.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45346
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77016
The generated code for a funclet can have an add to sp in the epilogue
for which there is no corresponding sub in the prologue.
This patch removes the early return from emitPrologue that was
preventing the sub to sp, and instead conditionalizes the appropriate
parts of the rest of the function.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45345
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77015
Summary:
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: jholewinski, arsenm, dschuff, jyknight, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, aheejin, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, PkmX, jocewei, Jim, lenary, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, apazos, luismarques, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76348
Summary:
Detect a run of memory tagging instructions for adjacent stack frame slots,
and replace them with a shorter instruction sequence
* replace STG + STG with ST2G
* replace STGloop + STGloop with STGloop
This code needs to run when stack slot offsets are already known, but before
FrameIndex operands in STG instructions are eliminated; that's the
reason for the new hook in PrologueEpilogue.
This change modifies STGloop and STZGloop pseudos to take the size as an
immediate integer operand, and adds _untied variants of those pseudos
that are allowed to take the base address as a FI operand. This is needed to
simplify recognizing an STGloop instruction as operating on a stack slot
post-regalloc.
This improves memtag code size by ~0.25%, and it looks like an additional ~0.1%
is possible by rearranging the stack frame such that consecutive STG
instructions reference adjacent slots (patch pending).
Reviewers: pcc, ostannard
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70286
Summary:
On Windows, when a function does not have an unwind table (for example, EH
filtering funclets), we don't correctly pair FP and LR to form the frame record
in all circumstances.
Fix this by invalidating a pair when the second register is FP when compiling
for Windows, even when CFI is not needed.
Fixes PR44271 introduced by D65653.
Reviewers: efriedma, sdesmalen, rovka, rengolin, t.p.northover, thegameg, greened
Reviewed By: rengolin
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71754
Summary:
Detect a run of memory tagging instructions for adjacent stack frame slots,
and replace them with a shorter instruction sequence
* replace STG + STG with ST2G
* replace STGloop + STGloop with STGloop
This code needs to run when stack slot offsets are already known, but before
FrameIndex operands in STG instructions are eliminated; that's the
reason for the new hook in PrologueEpilogue.
This change modifies STGloop and STZGloop pseudos to take the size as an
immediate integer operand, and base address as a FI operand when
possible. This is needed to simplify recognizing an STGloop instruction
as operating on a stack slot post-regalloc.
This improves memtag code size by ~0.25%, and it looks like an additional ~0.1%
is possible by rearranging the stack frame such that consecutive STG
instructions reference adjacent slots (patch pending).
Reviewers: pcc, ostannard
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70286
The commit r369122 may keep LR and FP register (aka. frame record) in
the middle of a frame, thus we must add the offsets to ensure the FP
register always points to innermost frame record on the stack.
According to AAPCS64[1], a conforming code shall construct a linked list
of stack frames that can be traversed with frame records. This commit
is also essential to frame-pointer-based stack unwinder (e.g. the stack
unwinder in linx-perf-tools.)
[1] https://github.com/ARM-software/software-standards/blob/master/abi/aapcs64/aapcs64.rst#the-frame-pointer
Test: llvm-lit ${LLVM_SRC}/test/CodeGen/AArch64/framelayout-frame-record.ll
Test: llvm-lit ${LLVM_SRC}/test/CodeGen/AArch64
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70800
The change allows clang -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer to disable frame
pointer elimination. This behavior matches X86 and Mips, and also GCC
AArch64.
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71168
Summary:
This patch fixes a few issues when large arrays are allocated on the
stack. Currently, clang has inconsistent behaviour, for debug builds
there is an assertion failure when the array size on stack is around 2GB
but there is no assertion when the stack is around 8GB. For release
builds there is no assertion, the compilation succeeds but generates
incorrect code. The incorrect code generated is due to using
int/unsigned int instead of their 64-bit counterparts. This patch,
1) Removes the assertion in frame legality check.
2) Converts int/unsigned int in some places to the 64-bit variants. This
helps in generating correct code and removes the inconsistent behaviour.
3) Adds a test which runs without optimisations.
Reviewers: sdesmalen, efriedma, fhahn, aemerson
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: eli.friedman, fpetrogalli, kristof.beyls, hiraditya,
llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70496
This caused asserts (and perhaps also miscompiles) while building for Windows
on AArch64. See the discussion on D68530 for details and reproducer.
Reverting until this can be investigated and fixed.
> For arm64, D18619 introduced the ability to combine bumping the stack pointer
> upfront in case it needs to be bumped for both the callee-save area as well as
> the local stack area.
>
> That diff already remarks that "This change can cause an increase in
> instructions", but argues that even when that happens, it should be still be a
> performance benefit because the number of micro-ops is reduced.
>
> We have observed that this code-size increase can be significant in practice.
> This diff disables combining stack bumping for methods that are marked as
> optimize-for-size.
>
> Example of a prologue with the behavior before this diff (combining stack bumping when possible):
> sub sp, sp, #0x40
> stp d9, d8, [sp, #0x10]
> stp x20, x19, [sp, #0x20]
> stp x29, x30, [sp, #0x30]
> add x29, sp, #0x30
> [... compute x8 somehow ...]
> stp x0, x8, [sp]
>
> And after this diff, if the method is marked as optimize-for-size:
> stp d9, d8, [sp, #-0x30]!
> stp x20, x19, [sp, #0x10]
> stp x29, x30, [sp, #0x20]
> add x29, sp, #0x20
> [... compute x8 somehow ...]
> stp x0, x8, [sp, #-0x10]!
>
> Note that without combining the stack bump there are two auto-decrements,
> nicely folded into the stp instructions, whereas otherwise there is a single
> sub sp, ... instruction, but not folded.
>
> Patch by Nikolai Tillmann!
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68530
Summary:
The insertion of most CFI instructions during AArch64 frame lowering can
be disabled (e.g. using the function attribute `nounwind`).
This patch enables conditional insertion for one more CFI instruction.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, ostannard
Reviewed By: ostannard
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70129
This patch adds a target interface to set the StackID for a given type,
which allows scalable vectors (e.g. `<vscale x 16 x i8>`) to be assigned a
'sve-vec' StackID, so it is allocated in the SVE area of the stack frame.
Reviewers: ostannard, efriedma, rengolin, cameron.mcinally
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70080
This adds a flag to LLVM and clang to always generate a .debug_frame
section, even if other debug information is not being generated. In
situations where .eh_frame would normally be emitted, both .debug_frame
and .eh_frame will be used.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67216
llvm/test/DebugInfo/MIR/X86/live-debug-values-reg-copy.mir failed with
EXPENSIVE_CHECKS enabled, causing the patch to be reverted in
rG2c496bb5309c972d59b11f05aee4782ddc087e71.
This patch relands the patch with a proper fix to the
live-debug-values-reg-copy.mir tests, by ensuring the MIR encodes the
callee-saves correctly so that the CalleeSaved info is taken from MIR
directly, rather than letting it be recalculated by the PEI pass. I've
done this by running `llc -stop-before=prologepilog` on the LLVM
IR as captured in the test files, adding the extra MOV instructions
that were manually added in the original test file, then running `llc
-run-pass=prologepilog` and finally re-added the comments for the MOV
instructions.
Commit message from D66935:
This patch fixes a bug exposed by D65653 where a subsequent invocation
of `determineCalleeSaves` ends up with a different size for the callee
save area, leading to different frame-offsets in debug information.
In the invocation by PEI, `determineCalleeSaves` tries to determine
whether it needs to spill an extra callee-saved register to get an
emergency spill slot. To do this, it calls 'estimateStackSize' and
manually adds the size of the callee-saves to this. PEI then allocates
the spill objects for the callee saves and the remaining frame layout
is calculated accordingly.
A second invocation in LiveDebugValues causes estimateStackSize to return
the size of the stack frame including the callee-saves. Given that the
size of the callee-saves is added to this, these callee-saves are counted
twice, which leads `determineCalleeSaves` to believe the stack has
become big enough to require spilling an extra callee-save as emergency
spillslot. It then updates CalleeSavedStackSize with a larger value.
Since CalleeSavedStackSize is used in the calculation of the frame
offset in getFrameIndexReference, this leads to incorrect offsets for
variables/locals when this information is recalculated after PEI.
This patch fixes the lldb unit tests in `functionalities/thread/concurrent_events/*`
Changes after D66935:
Ensures AArch64FunctionInfo::getCalleeSavedStackSize does not return
the uninitialized CalleeSavedStackSize when running `llc` on a specific
pass where the MIR code has already been expected to have gone through PEI.
Instead, getCalleeSavedStackSize (when passed the MachineFrameInfo) will try
to recalculate the CalleeSavedStackSize from the CalleeSavedInfo. In debug
mode, the compiler will assert the recalculated size equals the cached
size as calculated through a call to determineCalleeSaves.
This fixes two tests:
test/DebugInfo/AArch64/asan-stack-vars.mir
test/DebugInfo/AArch64/compiler-gen-bbs-livedebugvalues.mir
that otherwise fail when compiled using msan.
Reviewed By: omjavaid, efriedma
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68783
llvm-svn: 375425
For arm64, D18619 introduced the ability to combine bumping the stack pointer
upfront in case it needs to be bumped for both the callee-save area as well as
the local stack area.
That diff already remarks that "This change can cause an increase in
instructions", but argues that even when that happens, it should be still be a
performance benefit because the number of micro-ops is reduced.
We have observed that this code-size increase can be significant in practice.
This diff disables combining stack bumping for methods that are marked as
optimize-for-size.
Example of a prologue with the behavior before this diff (combining stack bumping when possible):
sub sp, sp, #0x40
stp d9, d8, [sp, #0x10]
stp x20, x19, [sp, #0x20]
stp x29, x30, [sp, #0x30]
add x29, sp, #0x30
[... compute x8 somehow ...]
stp x0, x8, [sp]
And after this diff, if the method is marked as optimize-for-size:
stp d9, d8, [sp, #-0x30]!
stp x20, x19, [sp, #0x10]
stp x29, x30, [sp, #0x20]
add x29, sp, #0x20
[... compute x8 somehow ...]
stp x0, x8, [sp, #-0x10]!
Note that without combining the stack bump there are two auto-decrements,
nicely folded into the stp instructions, whereas otherwise there is a single
sub sp, ... instruction, but not folded.
Patch by Nikolai Tillmann!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68530
llvm-svn: 375217
Materialize accesses to SVE frame objects from SP or FP, whichever is
available and beneficial.
This patch still assumes the objects are pre-allocated. The automatic
layout of SVE objects within the stackframe will be added in a separate
patch.
Reviewers: greened, cameron.mcinally, efriedma, rengolin, thegameg, rovka
Reviewed By: cameron.mcinally
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67749
llvm-svn: 374772
Adds support to AArch64FrameLowering to allocate fixed-stack SVE objects.
The focus of this patch is purely to allow the stack frame to
allocate/deallocate space for scalable SVE objects. More dynamic
allocation (at compile-time, i.e. determining placement of SVE objects
on the stack), or resolving frame-index references that include
scalable-sized offsets, are left for subsequent patches.
SVE objects are allocated in the stack frame as a separate region below
the callee-save area, and above the alignment gap. This is done so that
the SVE objects can be accessed directly from the FP at (runtime)
VL-based offsets to benefit from using the VL-scaled addressing modes.
The layout looks as follows:
+-------------+
| stack arg |
+-------------+
| Callee Saves|
| X29, X30 | (if available)
|-------------| <- FP (if available)
| : |
| SVE area |
| : |
+-------------+
|/////////////| alignment gap.
| : |
| Stack objs |
| : |
+-------------+ <- SP after call and frame-setup
SVE and non-SVE stack objects are distinguished using different
StackIDs. The offsets for objects with TargetStackID::SVEVector should be
interpreted as purely scalable offsets within their respective SVE region.
Reviewers: thegameg, rovka, t.p.northover, efriedma, rengolin, greened
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61437
llvm-svn: 373585
This patch fixes a bug exposed by D65653 where a subsequent invocation
of `determineCalleeSaves` ends up with a different size for the callee
save area, leading to different frame-offsets in debug information.
In the invocation by PEI, `determineCalleeSaves` tries to determine
whether it needs to spill an extra callee-saved register to get an
emergency spill slot. To do this, it calls 'estimateStackSize' and
manually adds the size of the callee-saves to this. PEI then allocates
the spill objects for the callee saves and the remaining frame layout
is calculated accordingly.
A second invocation in LiveDebugValues causes estimateStackSize to return
the size of the stack frame including the callee-saves. Given that the
size of the callee-saves is added to this, these callee-saves are counted
twice, which leads `determineCalleeSaves` to believe the stack has
become big enough to require spilling an extra callee-save as emergency
spillslot. It then updates CalleeSavedStackSize with a larger value.
Since CalleeSavedStackSize is used in the calculation of the frame
offset in getFrameIndexReference, this leads to incorrect offsets for
variables/locals when this information is recalculated after PEI.
Reviewers: omjavaid, eli.friedman, thegameg, efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66935
llvm-svn: 372204
Changes:
There was a condition for `!NeedsFrameRecord` missing in the assert. The
assert in question has changed to:
+ assert((!RPI.isPaired() || !NeedsFrameRecord || RPI.Reg2 != AArch64::FP ||
+ RPI.Reg1 == AArch64::LR) &&
+ "FrameRecord must be allocated together with LR");
This addresses PR43016.
llvm-svn: 369122
This patch changes the location of the frame-record (FP, LR) to the
bottom of the callee-saved area. According to the AAPCS the location of
the frame-record within the stackframe is unspecified (section 5.2.3 The
Frame Pointer), so the compiler should be free to choose a different
location.
The reason for changing the location of the frame-record is to prepare
the frame for allocating an SVE area below the callee-saves. This way the
compiler can use the VL-scaled addressing modes to directly access SVE
objects from the frame-pointer.
: :
| stack | | stack |
| args | | args |
+-------+ +-------+
| x30 | | x19 |
| x29 | | x20 |
FP -> |- - - -| | x21 |
| x19 | ==> | x22 |
| x20 | |- - - -|
| x21 | | x30 |
| x22 | | x29 |
+-------+ +-------+ <- FP
|///////| |///////| // realignment gap
|- - - -| |- - - -|
|spills/| |spills/|
| locals| | locals|
SP -> +-------+ +-------+ <- SP
Things to point out:
- The algorithm to find a paired register should be prevented from
accidentally pairing some callee-saved register with LR that is not
FP, since they should always be paired together when the frame
has a frame-record.
- For Darwin platforms the location of the frame-record is unchanged,
since the unwind encoding does not allow for encoding this position
dynamically and other tools currently depend on the former layout.
Reviewers: efriedma, rovka, rengolin, thegameg, greened, t.p.northover
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65653
llvm-svn: 368987
To support spilling/filling of scalable vectors we need a more generic
representation of a stack offset than simply 'int'.
For this we introduce the StackOffset struct, which comprises multiple
offsets sized by their respective MVTs. Byte-offsets will thus be a simple
tuple such as { offset, MVT::i8 }. Adding two byte-offsets will result in a
byte offset { offsetA + offsetB, MVT::i8 }. When two offsets have different
types, we can canonicalise them to use the same MVT, as long as their
runtime sizes are guaranteed to have the same size-ratio as they would have
at compile-time.
When we have both scalable- and fixed-size objects on the stack, we can
create an offset that is:
({ offset_fixed, MVT::i8 } + { offset_scalable, MVT::nxv1i8 })
The struct also contains a getForFrameOffset() method that is specific to
AArch64 and decomposes the frame-offset to be used directly in instructions
that operate on the stack or index into the stack.
Note: This patch adds StackOffset as an AArch64-only concept, but we would
like to make this a generic concept/struct that is supported by all
interfaces that take or return stack offsets (currently as 'int'). Since
that would be a bigger change that is currently pending on D32530 landing,
we thought it makes sense to first show/prove the concept in the AArch64
target before proposing to roll this out further.
Reviewers: thegameg, rovka, t.p.northover, efriedma, greened
Reviewed By: rovka, greened
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61435
llvm-svn: 368024
Fix an issue where the compiler still allocates an emergency spill slot even
though it already decided to spill an extra callee-save register to use
as a scratch register.
Reviewers: gberry, thegameg, mstorsjo, t.p.northover
Reviewed By: thegameg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65504
llvm-svn: 367540
Implement IR intrinsics for stack tagging. Generated code is very
unoptimized for now.
Two special intrinsics, llvm.aarch64.irg.sp and llvm.aarch64.tagp are
used to implement a tagged stack frame pointer in a virtual register.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64172
llvm-svn: 366360
Split AArch64FrameLowering::resolveFrameIndexReference in two parts
* Finding frame offset for the index.
* Finding base register and offset to that register.
The second part will be used to implement a virtual frame pointer in
armv8.5 MTE stack instrumentation lowering.
Reviewers: pcc, vitalybuka, hctim, ostannard
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64171
llvm-svn: 365958
To help produce better diagnostics for stack use-after-return, we'd like
to be able to determine the addresses of each HWASANified function's local
variables given a small amount of information recorded on entry to the
function. Currently we require all HWASANified functions to use frame pointers
and record (PC, FP) on function entry. This works better than recording SP
because FP cannot change during the function, unlike SP which can change
e.g. due to dynamic alloca.
However, most variables currently end up using SP-relative locations in their
debug info. This prevents us from recomputing the address of most variables
because the distance between SP and FP isn't recorded in the debug info. To
address this, make the AArch64 backend prefer FP-relative debug locations
when producing debug info for HWASANified functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63300
llvm-svn: 364117
Summary:
Otherwise, we emit directives for CFI without any actual CFI opcodes to
go with them, which causes tools to malfunction. The technique is
similar to what the x86 backend already does.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40876
Patch by: froydnj (Nathan Froyd)
Reviewers: mstorsjo, eli.friedman, rnk, mgrang, ssijaric
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits, dmajor
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61960
llvm-svn: 360816
In certain cases, the first non-frame-setup instruction in a function is
a branch. For example, it could be a cbz on an argument. Make sure we
correctly allocate the UnwindHelp, and find an appropriate register to
use to initialize it.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40184
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58752
llvm-svn: 355136
Summary: This fixes using the correct stack registers for SEH when stack realignment is needed or when variable size objects are present.
Reviewers: rnk, efriedma, ssijaric, TomTan
Reviewed By: rnk, efriedma
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57183
llvm-svn: 352923
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
EXPENSIVE_CHECKS buildbots are failing due to r351404.
Add x1 as live in to the funclet basic block for SEH funclets, as well as
-verify-machineinstrs to the test case that triggered the failure.
llvm-svn: 351472
Summary:
This patch supports MS SEH extensions __try/__except/__finally. The intrinsics localescape and localrecover are responsible for communicating escaped static allocas from the try block to the handler.
We need to preserve frame pointers for SEH. So we create a new function/property HasLocalEscape.
Reviewers: rnk, compnerd, mstorsjo, TomTan, efriedma, ssijaric
Reviewed By: rnk, efriedma
Subscribers: smeenai, jrmuizel, alex, majnemer, ssijaric, ehsan, dmajor, kristina, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, chrib, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53540
llvm-svn: 351370
- When signing return addresses with -msign-return-address=<scope>{+<key>},
either the A key instructions or the B key instructions can be used. To
correctly authenticate the return address, the unwinder/debugger must know
which key was used to sign the return address.
- When and exception is thrown or a break point reached, it may be necessary to
unwind the stack. To accomplish this, the unwinder/debugger must be able to
first authenticate an the return address if it has been signed.
- To enable this, the augmentation string of CIEs has been extended to allow
inclusion of a 'B' character. Functions that are signed using the B key
variant of the instructions should have and FDE whose associated CIE has a 'B'
in the augmentation string.
- One must also be able to preserve these semantics when first stepping from a
high level language into assembly and then, as a second step, into an object
file. To achieve this, I have introduced a new assembly directive
'.cfi_b_key_frame ', that tells the assembler the current frame uses return
address signing with the B key.
- This ensures that the FDE is associated with a CIE that has 'B' in the
augmentation string.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51798
llvm-svn: 349895
- Reapply changes intially introduced in r343089
- The archtecture info is no longer loaded whenever a DWARFContext is created
- The runtimes libraries (santiziers) make use of the dwarf context classes but
do not intialise the target info
- The architecture of the object can be obtained without loading the target info
- Adding a method to the dwarf context to get this information and multiplex the
string printing later on
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55774
llvm-svn: 349472
The comment was misplaced, and the code didn't do what the comment indicated,
namely ignoring the varargs portion when computing the local stack size of a
funclet in emitEpilogue. This results in incorrect offset computations within
funclets that are contained in vararg functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55096
llvm-svn: 348222
All that you can legitimately do with the CFI for a nounwind function
is get a backtrace, and adjusting the SCS register is not (currently)
required for this purpose.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54988
llvm-svn: 348035
When unwinding past a function that uses shadow call stack, we must
subtract 8 from the value of the x18 register. This patch causes us
to emit a call frame instruction that causes that to happen.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54609
llvm-svn: 347089
This patch adds support for funclets in frame lowering and ISel
lowering. Together with D50288 and D50166, it enables C++ exception
handling.
Patch by Sanjin Sijaric, with some fixes by me.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51524
llvm-svn: 346568
Emit pseudo instructions indicating unwind codes corresponding to each
instruction inside the prologue/epilogue. These are used by the MCLayer to
populate the .xdata section.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50288
llvm-svn: 345701
- Add support to generate AUTIBSP, PACIBSP, RETAB instructions for return
address signing
- The key used to sign the function is controlled by the function attribute
"sign-return-address-key"
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51427
llvm-svn: 345511
When branch target identification is enabled, all indirectly-callable
functions start with a BTI C instruction. this instruction can only be
the target of certain indirect branches (direct branches and
fall-through are not affected):
- A BLR instruction, in either a protected or unprotected page.
- A BR instruction in a protected page, using x16 or x17.
- A BR instruction in an unprotected page, using any register.
Without BTI, we can use any non call-preserved register to hold the
address for an indirect tail call. However, when BTI is enabled, then
the code being compiled might be loaded into a BTI-protected page, where
only x16 and x17 can be used for indirect tail calls.
Legacy code withiout this restriction can still indirectly tail-call
BTI-protected functions, because they will be loaded into an unprotected
page, so any register is allowed.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52868
llvm-svn: 343968
Jay Foad