Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Nikita Popov 2a721374ae [IR] Don't use blockaddresses as callbr arguments
Following some recent discussions, this changes the representation
of callbrs in IR. The current blockaddress arguments are replaced
with `!` label constraints that refer directly to callbr indirect
destinations:

    ; Before:
    %res = callbr i8* asm "", "=r,r,i"(i8* %x, i8* blockaddress(@test8, %foo))
    to label %asm.fallthrough [label %foo]
    ; After:
    %res = callbr i8* asm "", "=r,r,!i"(i8* %x)
    to label %asm.fallthrough [label %foo]

The benefit of this is that we can easily update the successors of
a callbr, without having to worry about also updating blockaddress
references. This should allow us to remove some limitations:

* Allow unrolling/peeling/rotation of callbr, or any other
  clone-based optimizations
  (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/41834)
* Allow duplicate successors
  (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/45248)

This is just the IR representation change though, I will follow up
with patches to remove limtations in various transformation passes
that are no longer needed.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129288
2022-07-15 10:18:17 +02:00
Nikita Popov b51638b3fb [Bitcode] Add additional callbr tests (NFC)
Additional coverage for the auto-upgrade code in D129288.
2022-07-11 16:46:21 +02:00
Nick Desaulniers 79ebc3b0dd [llvm][test] rewrite callbr to use i rather than X constraint NFC
In D115311, we're looking to modify clang to emit i constraints rather
than X constraints for callbr's indirect destinations. Prior to doing
so, update all of the existing tests in llvm/ to match.

Reviewed By: void, jyknight

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115410
2022-01-11 11:31:08 -08:00
Roman Lebedev 62b1682570
[Opaqueptrs][IR Serialization] Improve inlineasm [de]serialization
The bitcode reader expected that the pointers are typed,
so that it can extract the function type for the assembly
so `bitc::CST_CODE_INLINEASM` did not explicitly store said function type.

I'm not really sure how the upgrade path will look for existing bitcode,
but i think we can easily support opaque pointers going forward,
by simply storing the function type.

Reviewed By: #opaque-pointers, nikic

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116341
2021-12-30 13:54:37 +03:00
Craig Topper 784929d045 Implementation of asm-goto support in LLVM
This patch accompanies the RFC posted here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-October/127239.html

This patch adds a new CallBr IR instruction to support asm-goto
inline assembly like gcc as used by the linux kernel. This
instruction is both a call instruction and a terminator
instruction with multiple successors. Only inline assembly
usage is supported today.

This also adds a new INLINEASM_BR opcode to SelectionDAG and
MachineIR to represent an INLINEASM block that is also
considered a terminator instruction.

There will likely be more bug fixes and optimizations to follow
this, but we felt it had reached a point where we would like to
switch to an incremental development model.

Patch by Craig Topper, Alexander Ivchenko, Mikhail Dvoretckii

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53765

llvm-svn: 353563
2019-02-08 20:48:56 +00:00