Currently we allow half types in vectors if the scalar Zfh extension
is enabled. This behavior is not inline with the vector spec. For f32
and f64 types, the Zve32f, Zve64f, Zve64d, and V explicitly control
the availablity of floating point types in vectors.
In order to make our compiler compliant, we either need to remove all support
for half in vectors or we need an extension to control it.
Draft spec here https://github.com/riscv/riscv-v-spec/pull/780
Reviewed By: kito-cheng
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121345
Clang computes the default ABI if -mabi is empty
and encode it in LLVM IR module flag since D105555.
For correctness, llc need to give the same target-abi
(Options.MCOptions.ABIName) with ABI encoded in IR.
The getSubtargetImpl already has a check for them only if
Options.MCOptions.ABIName is not empty.
In order to get more robustness we could have a check for
explicit ABI, but now we have two different logic to
compute the default ABI.
The front-end ABI is defautl to the ilp32/ilp32e/lp64, and
ilp32d/lp64d when hardware support for extension D.
The backend ABI is default to the ilp32/ilp32e/lp64.
Reviewed by: asb, jrtc27
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118333
Add the passthru operand for
VMV_V_X_VL, VFMV_V_F_VL and SPLAT_VECTOR_SPLIT_I64_VL also.
The goal is support tail and mask policy in RVV builtins.
We focus on IR part first.
If the passthru operand is undef, we use tail agnostic, otherwise
use tail undisturbed.
Reviewed By: rogfer01
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119688
Since we're changing VTYPE, we may change VLMAX which could
invalidate the previous VL. If we can't tell if it is safe we
should use an AVL of 1 instead of keeping the old VL.
This is a quick fix. We may want to thread VL to the pseudo
instruction instead of making up a value. That will require ISD
opcode changes and changes to the C intrinsic interface.
This fixes the issue raised in D106286.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106403
In most of cases, it has a single space after comma in assembly operands.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103790
We aren't going to connect the result to anything so we might
as well avoid allocating a register.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck, HsiangKai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102031
Craig Topper