Over in D105657, we started dropping instruction numbers (that become
variable locations) from call instructions, as we can't correctly represent
the x87 FP stack. Unfortunately, it turns out that the "special FP
instructions" that this pass transforms includes "every call instruction"
[0]. Thus, we've ended up dropping all return values from all calls. Ouch.
This patch adds a filter: only drop instruction numbers from calls if they
return something on the FP stack. Seeing how LLVM only allows a single
return value, this should drop instruction numbers on anything that returns
a float, and nothing else.
Rather than writing a new test, I've modified the original one to have a
positive and negative case: drop instruction number on a call with an
FP-stack modification, keep it on a plain call.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108580
Avoid a crash when using instruction referencing if x87 floating point
instructions are used. These instructions are significantly mutated when
they're rewritten from referring to registers, to referring to
floating-point-stack positions. As a result, their operands are re-ordered,
and (InstrRef) LiveDebugValues asserts when it sees a DBG_INSTR_REF
referring to a non-reg non-def register operand.
To fix this, drop the instruction numbers, and thus variable locations.
This patch adds a helper utility do do that.
Dropping the variable locations is sub-optimal, but applying DBG_VALUEs to
the $fp0 and similar registers is dropped on emission too. It seems we've
never done well at describing variables that live in x87 registers, at all.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105657
Jeremy Morse