Following some recent discussions, this changes the representation
of callbrs in IR. The current blockaddress arguments are replaced
with `!` label constraints that refer directly to callbr indirect
destinations:
; Before:
%res = callbr i8* asm "", "=r,r,i"(i8* %x, i8* blockaddress(@test8, %foo))
to label %asm.fallthrough [label %foo]
; After:
%res = callbr i8* asm "", "=r,r,!i"(i8* %x)
to label %asm.fallthrough [label %foo]
The benefit of this is that we can easily update the successors of
a callbr, without having to worry about also updating blockaddress
references. This should allow us to remove some limitations:
* Allow unrolling/peeling/rotation of callbr, or any other
clone-based optimizations
(https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/41834)
* Allow duplicate successors
(https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/45248)
This is just the IR representation change though, I will follow up
with patches to remove limtations in various transformation passes
that are no longer needed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129288
Reject the following IR as malformed (assuming that %entry, %next are
not in a loop):
next:
%y = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ]
%x = phi i32 [ %y, %entry ]
Such PHI nodes came up in PR26718. While there was no consensus on
whether or not this is valid IR, most opinions on that bug and in a
discussion on the llvm-dev mailing list tended towards a
"strict interpretation" (term by Joseph Tremoulet) of PHI node uses.
Also, the language reference explicitly states that "the use of each
incoming value is deemed to occur on the edge from the corresponding
predecessor block to the current block" and
`DominatorTree::dominates(Instruction*, Use&)` uses this definition as
well.
For the code mentioned in PR15384, clang does not compile to such PHIs
(anymore?). The test case still hangs when replacing `%tmp6` with `%tmp`
in revisions before r176366 (where PR15384 has been fixed). The
occurrence of %tmp6 therefore was probably unintentional. Its value is
not used except in other PHIs.
Reviewers: majnemer, reames, JosephTremoulet, bkramer, grosser, jdoerfert, kparzysz, sanjoy
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18443
llvm-svn: 264528
The personality routine currently lives in the LandingPadInst.
This isn't desirable because:
- All LandingPadInsts in the same function must have the same
personality routine. This means that each LandingPadInst beyond the
first has an operand which produces no additional information.
- There is ongoing work to introduce EH IR constructs other than
LandingPadInst. Moving the personality routine off of any one
particular Instruction and onto the parent function seems a lot better
than have N different places a personality function can sneak onto an
exceptional function.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10429
llvm-svn: 239940
versions of Bash. In addition, I can back out the change to the lit
built-in shell test runner to support this.
This should fix the majority of fallout on Darwin, but I suspect there
will be a few straggling issues.
llvm-svn: 159544
This removes a bit of context from the verifier erros, but reduces code
duplication in a fairly critical part of LLVM and makes dominates easier to test.
llvm-svn: 157845
Nikita Popov