Summary:
Currently these function return the raw content of the appropriate table
header, which means they are relative to the DW_AT_{loc,rng}list_base,
and one has to relocate them in order to do anything.
This changes the functions to perform the relocation themselves, which
seems more clearer, particularly as they are sitting right next to the
find{Rng,Loc}listFromOffset functions, but one *cannot* simply take the
result of these functions and take pass them there.
The only effect of this patch is to change what value is dumped for the
DW_AT_ranges attribute, which I think is for the better, as previously
the values appeared to point into thin air.
(The main reason I am looking at this is because I was trying to
implement equivalent functionality in lldb's DWARFUnit, and was stumped
by this behavior.
Reviewers: dblaikie, JDevlieghere, aprantl
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits, SouraVX
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71006
The test was fully rewritten for simplification.
New test code was suggested by David Blaikie.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55261
llvm-svn: 348464
When there is no .debug_addr section for some reason,
llvm-dwarfdump would print the bogus empty section name when dumping ranges
in .debug_info:
DW_AT_ranges [DW_FORM_rnglistx] (indexed (0x0) rangelist = 0x00000004
[0x0000000000000000, 0x0000000000000001) ""
[0x0000000000000000, 0x0000000000000002) "")
That happens because of the code which uses 0 (zero) as a section index as a default value.
The code should use -1ULL instead because technically 0 is a valid zero section index
in ELF and -1ULL is a special constant used that means "no section available".
This is mostly a fix for the overall correctness/safety of the code,
but a test case is provided too.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55113
llvm-svn: 348115
Pavel Labath