This mostly copys the `<experimental/functional>` stuff and updates the code to current libc++ style.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: nlopes, adamdebreceni, arichardson, libcxx-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121074
When compiled with `-D_LIBCPP_ENABLE_CXX20_REMOVED_ALLOCATOR_MEMBERS`
uses of `allocator<void>::pointer` resulted in compiler errors after D104323.
If we instantiate the primary template, `allocator<void>::reference` produces
an error 'cannot form references to void'.
To workaround this, allow to bring back the `allocator<void>` specialization by defining the new `_LIBCPP_ENABLE_CXX20_REMOVED_ALLOCATOR_VOID_SPECIALIZATION` macro.
To make sure the code that uses `allocator<void>` and the removed members does not break,
both `_LIBCPP_ENABLE_CXX20_REMOVED_ALLOCATOR_MEMBERS` and `_LIBCPP_ENABLE_CXX20_REMOVED_ALLOCATOR_MEMBERS` have to be defined.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, philnik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126210
This removes all "TODO: remove these headers" comments from our headers.
Note there seem to be more headers that can be removed, that will be
done in separate commits.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127592
The flexibility around extern template instantiation declarations in
libc++ result in a very complicated model, especially when support for
slightly different configurations (like the debug mode or assertions
in the dylib) are taken into account. That results in unexpected bugs
like http://llvm.org/PR50534 (and there have been multiple similar
bugs in the past, notably around the debug mode).
This patch gets rid of the _LIBCPP_DISABLE_EXTERN_TEMPLATE knob, which
I don't think is fundamental. Indeed, the motivation for that knob was to
avoid taking a dependency on the library, however that can be done better
by linking against the static library instead. And in fact, some parts of
the headers will always depend on things defined in the library, which
defeats the original goal of _LIBCPP_DISABLE_EXTERN_TEMPLATE.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103960
The debug mode has been broken pretty much ever since it was shipped
because it was possible to enable the debug mode in user code without
actually enabling it in the dylib, leading to ODR violations that
caused various kinds of failures.
This commit makes the debug mode a knob that is configured when
building the library and which can't be changed afterwards. This is
less flexible for users, however it will actually work as intended
and it will allow us, in the future, to add various kinds of checks
that do not assume the same ABI as the normal library. Furthermore,
this will make the debug mode more robust, which means that vendors
might be more tempted to support it properly, which hasn't been the
case with the current debug mode.
This patch shouldn't break any user code, except folks who are building
against a library that doesn't have the debug mode enabled and who try
to enable the debug mode in their code. Such users will get a compile-time
error explaining that this configuration isn't supported anymore.
In the future, we should further increase the granularity of the debug
mode checks so that we can cherry-pick which checks to enable, like we
do for unspecified behavior randomization.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122941
After moving the std::to_chars base 10 implementation from the dylib to
the header the integral overloads of std::to_chars are available on all
platforms.
Remove the _LIBCPP_AVAILABILITY_TO_CHARS availability macro and update
the tests.
Depends on D125704
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125745
Currently, unary expressions involving valarray will create a temporary.
This leads to dangling references in expressions like `-a * b`, because
`-a` is a temporary and the resulting expression will refer to it. This
patch fixes the problem by creating a lazy expression to perform the unary
operation instead of eagerly creating a temporary valarray. This is
permitted by the Standard, which does not specify the exact type of
most expressions involving valarrays.
This is technically an ABI break, however I believe the actual potential
for breakage is very low.
rdar://90152242
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125019
Add a warning and tweak the release note to explain that the deprecation
targets libc++, libc++abi and libuwnind as well.
Also, as a fly-by, ensure that our CI runs the legacy testing configuration
for libc++, libc++abi and libunwind. This doesn't matter too much since
it's deprecated, but we might as well test it properly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126478
Quite a few C++20 LWG issues/papers related to the One Ranges Proposal
were already effectively implemented (or contain semantic-only wording
changes that don't affect the implementation), mark them as such.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125065
`vector<bool>::const_reference` and `vector<bool>::const_iterator::reference` should be the same type.
Reviewed By: Mordante, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123851
This patch implements P0674R1, i.e. support for arrays in std::make_shared
and std::allocate_shared.
Co-authored-by: Zoe Carver <z.zoelec2@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62641
This patch adds a lightweight assertion handler mechanism that can be
overriden at link-time in a fashion similar to `operator new`.
This is a third take on https://llvm.org/D121123 (which allowed customizing
the assertion handler at compile-time), and https://llvm.org/D119969
(which allowed customizing the assertion handler at runtime only).
This approach is, I think, the best of all three explored approaches.
Indeed, replacing the assertion handler in user code is ergonomic,
yet we retain the ability to provide a custom assertion handler when
deploying to older platforms that don't have a default handler in
the dylib.
As-is, this patch provides a pretty good amount of backwards compatibility
with the previous debug mode:
- Code that used to set _LIBCPP_DEBUG=0 in order to get basic assertions
in their code will still get basic assertions out of the box, but
those assertions will be using the new assertion handler support.
- Code that was previously compiled with references to __libcpp_debug_function
and friends will work out-of-the-box, no changes required. This is
because we provide the same symbols in the dylib as we used to.
- Code that used to set a custom __libcpp_debug_function will stop
compiling, because we don't provide that declaration anymore. Users
will have to migrate to the new way of setting a custom assertion
handler, which is extremely easy. I suspect that pool of users is
very limited, so breaking them at compile-time is probably acceptable.
The main downside of this approach is that code being compiled with
assertions enabled but deploying to an older platform where the assertion
handler didn't exist yet will fail to compile. However users can easily
fix the problem by providing a custom assertion handler and defining
the _LIBCPP_AVAILABILITY_CUSTOM_ASSERTION_HANDLER_PROVIDED macro to
let the library know about the custom handler. In a way, this is
actually a feature because it avoids a load-time error that one would
otherwise get when trying to run the code on the older target.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121478
We've been meaning to remove support for the legacy testing configuration
for a long time. This patch switches the default from the legacy config
to the appropriate new-style configuration based on a few hints.
We've been running with the new-style configuration for more than a year
in our CI, however it's possible that this will uncover issues with some
users that run the tests on platforms that we don't support yet with the
new-style configs. Unfortunately, there is no way to know about it other
than to land this patch and see whether anything breaks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121632
It's the role of the C++ ABI library to install its own headers, not libc++.
This fixes an existing issue causing spurious CI failures where both libc++
and libc++abi would try to install <cxxabi.h> & friends in the same location,
leading to failures during the installation step.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121706
This reverts commit 276ca873. That commit has quite a history at this
point. It was first landed in dbc647643577, which broke std::shared_ptr<T const>
and was reverted in 9138666f5. It was then re-applied in 276ca873, with
the std::shared_ptr issue fixed, but it caused widespread breakage at
Google (which suggests it would cause similar breakage in the wild too),
so now I'm reverting again.
Instead, I will add a escape hatch that vendors can turn on to enable
the extension and perform a phased transition over one or two releases
like we sometimes do when things become non-trivial.
This extension is a portability trap for users, since no other standard
library supports it. Furthermore, the Standard explicitly allows
implementations to reject std::allocator<cv T>, so allowing it is
really going against the current.
This was discovered in D120684: this extension required `const_cast`ing
in `__construct_range_forward`, a fishy bit of code that can be removed
if we don't support the extension anymore.
This is a re-application of dbc647643577, which was reverted in 9138666f5
because it broke std::shared_ptr<T const>. Tests have now been added and
we've made sure that std::shared_ptr<T const> wouldn't be broken in this
version.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120996
If LIBCXX_ENABLE_SHARED isn't explicitly set on the cmake command
line, isn't set in the cache, and the libcxxabi project is configured
before libcxx, then LIBCXX_ENABLE_SHARED isn't defined yet. Once
the libcxx cmake project has been parsed, LIBCXX_ENABLE_SHARED would
have been set to its default value of ON.
This makes sure that the symbols are properly dllexported in such
a configuration scenario.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120982
This extension is a portability trap for users, since no other standard
library supports it. Furthermore, the Standard explicitly allows
implementations to reject std::allocator<cv T>, so allowing it is
really going against the current.
This was discovered in D120684: this extension required `const_cast`ing
in `__construct_range_forward`, a fishy bit of code that can be removed
if we don't support the extension anymore.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120996
Move `__quoted_output_proxy` into the one file that uses it.
A `const char*` has no associated traits class, so `std::quoted("literal")`
should be printable into any basic_ostream regardless of traits.
Use hidden-friend `operator<<` and `operator>>`, since we're permitted to.
(The exact signature is unspecified because the class itself is unspecified.)
We shouldn't support `std::quoted("literal")` in C++03 or C++11 mode.
(We do need `std::__quoted(s)` and `std::__quoted(cs)` in C++11 mode,
because they're used by `std::__fs::filesystem::path`.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120135
Instead, folks can use the equivalent variables provided by CMake
to set those. This removal aims to reduce complexity and potential
for confusion when setting the target triple for building the runtimes,
and make it correct when `CMAKE_OSX_ARCHITECTURES` is used (right now
both `-arch` and `--target=` will end up being passed, which is downright
incorrect).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112155
`uniform_int_distribution<T>` is UB unless `T` is one of the non-character,
non-boolean integer types (`short` or larger). However, libc++ has never
enforced this. D114129 accidentally made `uniform_int_distribution<bool>`
into an error. Make it now *intentionally* an error; and likewise for the
character types and all user-defined class and enum types; but permit
`__[u]int128_t` to continue working.
Apply the same static_assert to all the integer distributions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114920
`<filesystem>` header has been around for a while now, so we can safely remove
`<experimental/filesystem>` header. `_LIBCPP_DEPRECATED_EXPERIMENTAL_FILESYSTEM`
suggests we were going to remove `<experimental/filesystem>` in llvm 11 release,
but we never did. So, remove the experimental header now, its associated tests,
and the `_LIBCPP_DEPRECATED_EXPERIMENTAL_FILESYSTEM` macro.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119603
Standalone build have been deprecated for some time now, so this
commit removes support for those builds entirely from libc++, libc++abi
and libunwind.
This, along with the removal of other legacy ways to build, will allow
for major build system simplifications.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119255
Previously, _LIBCPP_ABI_UNSTABLE would be used interchangeably with
_LIBCPP_ABI_VERSION >= 2. This was confusing and creating unnecessary
complexity.
This patch removes _LIBCPP_ABI_UNSTABLE -- instead, the LIBCXX_ABI_UNSTABLE
CMake option will result in the LIBCXX_ABI_VERSION being set to '2', the
current unstable ABI. As a result, in the code, we only have _LIBCPP_ABI_VERSION
to check in order to query the current ABI version.
As a fly-by, this also defines the ABI namespace during CMake configuration
to reduce complexity in __config. I believe it was previously done this
way because we used to try to use __config_site as seldom as possible.
Now that we always ship a __config_site, it doesn't really matter and
I think being explicit about how the library is configured in the __config_site
is actually a feature.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119173
Back in https://reviews.llvm.org/D109459, we stopped using the C++03
emulation for std::nullptr_t by default, which was an ABI break. We
still left a knob for users to turn it back on if they were broken by
the change, with a note that we would remove that knob after one release.
The time has now come to remove the knob and clean up the std::nullptr_t
emulation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114786
There is no practical difference between `_VSTD` and `std` so we should just remove `_VSTD`. This is the first step.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: jeroen.dobbelaere, wmaxey, EricWF, lebedev.ri, __simt__, dim, mgrang, sstefan1, wenlei, smeenai, libcxx-commits, #libc_vendors
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117811
I had a look at the changes since the last release and updated the
release notes with interesting changes.
It seems this time the release notes were already rather up to date :-)
If there are more interesting changes, please let me know and I'll
update the patch. I'd like to commit these changes latest next weekend
so they land before branching the 14.0 release.
I've added most active libc++ contributors. If I forgot anybody please add them.
Reviewed By: Quuxplusone, ldionne, philnik, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117948
Since basic_string::reserve(n) is instantiated in the shared library but also
available to the compiler for inlining, its definition should not depend on
things like the Standard mode in use. Indeed, that flag may not match between
how the shared library is compiled and how users are compiling their own code,
resulting in ODR violations.
However, note that we retain the behavior of basic_string::reserve() to
shrink the string for backwards compatibility reasons. While it would
technically be conforming to not shrink, we believe user expectation is
for it to shrink, and so existing code might have been written based on
that assumption. We prefer to not break such code, even though that makes
basic_string::reserve() and basic_string::reserve(0) not equivalent anymore.
Fixes llvm-project#53170
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117332
This adjust the version macro and sets it as completed. All parts of the paper
have been implemented, except for the parts replaced by later papers and
LWG-issues.
Adjusted the synopsis to match the synopsis in the Standard. Not yet
implemented parts of P2216 and P2418 still use the P0645 wording.
Completes:
- P0645 Text Formatting
Depends on D115991
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115999
It was not in P0355R7, nor has it ever been so in a working draft.
Drive-by:
* tests should test something: fix loop bounds so initial value is not >= final value
* calender type streaming tests are useless - let's remove them
* don't declare printf, especially if you don't intend to use it
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117638
Nikolas Klauser