Currently most of the test files have a separate dwarf and a separate
dsym test with almost identical content (only the build step is
different). With adding dwo symbol file handling to the test suit it
would increase this to a 3-way duplication. The purpose of this change
is to eliminate this redundancy with generating 2 test case (one dwarf
and one dsym) for each test function specified (dwo handling will be
added at a later commit).
Main design goals:
* There should be no boilerplate code in each test file to support the
multiple debug info in most of the tests (custom scenarios are
acceptable in special cases) so adding a new test case is easier and
we can't miss one of the debug info type.
* In case of a test failure, the debug symbols used during the test run
have to be cleanly visible from the output of dotest.py to make
debugging easier both from build bot logs and from local test runs
* Each test case should have a unique, fully qualified name so we can
run exactly 1 test with "-f <test-case>.<test-function>" syntax
* Test output should be grouped based on test files the same way as it
happens now (displaying dwarf/dsym results separately isn't
preferable)
Proposed solution (main logic in lldbtest.py, rest of them are test
cases fixed up for the new style):
* Have only 1 test fuction in the test files what will run for all
debug info separately and this test function should call just
"self.build(...)" to build an inferior with the right debug info
* When a class is created by python (the class object, not the class
instance), we will generate a new test method for each debug info
format in the test class with the name "<test-function>_<debug-info>"
and remove the original test method. This way unittest2 see multiple
test methods (1 for each debug info, pretty much as of now) and will
handle the test selection and the failure reporting correctly (the
debug info will be visible from the end of the test name)
* Add new annotation @no_debug_info_test to disable the generation of
multiple tests for each debug info format when the test don't have an
inferior
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13028
llvm-svn: 248883
Test fails with:
error: Process 1 was reported after connecting to
'connect://localhost:42922', but no stop reply packet was received
llvm.org/pr24896
llvm-svn: 248157
These tests work when run locally. They had been occasionally failing
on the FreeBSD buildbot due to pexpect issues. That buildbot is
currently down, and I expect the replacement will not have this issue.
llvm.org/pr22784
llvm-svn: 246490
I'm not yet sure what's wrong with pexpect and I cannot reproduce this
problem locally. XFAIL these tests for now to reduce buildbot noise so
I can track down the remaining buildbot failures.
llvm.org/pr22784
llvm-svn: 236857
At some point we will need to either provide a pexpect equivalent
on Windows, or provide some other method of doing out-of-process
tests.
Even with a pexpect replacement, it may be worth re-evaluating
some of these tests to see if they would be better served as
in-process tests. The larger issue of coming up with a pexpect
replacement on Windows is tracked in http://llvm.org/pr22274.
llvm-svn: 226614
99% of this CL is simply moving calls to "import pexpect" to a more
narrow scope - i.e. the function that actually runs a particular
test. This way the test suite can run on Windows, which doesn't have
pexpect, and the individual tests that use pexpect can be disabled on
a platform-specific basis.
Additionally, this CL fixes a few other cases of non-portability.
Notably, using "ps" to get the command line, and os.uname() to
determine the architecture don't work on Windows. Finally, this
also adds a stubbed out builder_win32 module.
The full test suite runs correctly on Windows after this CL, although
there is still some work remaining on the C++ side to fix one-shot
script commands from LLDB (e.g. script print "foo"), which currently
deadlock.
Reviewed by: Todd Fiala
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4573
llvm-svn: 213343
This has led to many test suite failures because of copy and paste where new test cases were based off of other test cases and the "mydir" variable wasn't updated.
Now you can call your superclasses "compute_mydir()" function with "__file__" as the sole argument and the relative path will be computed for you.
llvm-svn: 196985
Tamas Berghammer