Currently most of the test files have a separate dwarf and a separate
dsym test with almost identical content (only the build step is
different). With adding dwo symbol file handling to the test suit it
would increase this to a 3-way duplication. The purpose of this change
is to eliminate this redundancy with generating 2 test case (one dwarf
and one dsym) for each test function specified (dwo handling will be
added at a later commit).
Main design goals:
* There should be no boilerplate code in each test file to support the
multiple debug info in most of the tests (custom scenarios are
acceptable in special cases) so adding a new test case is easier and
we can't miss one of the debug info type.
* In case of a test failure, the debug symbols used during the test run
have to be cleanly visible from the output of dotest.py to make
debugging easier both from build bot logs and from local test runs
* Each test case should have a unique, fully qualified name so we can
run exactly 1 test with "-f <test-case>.<test-function>" syntax
* Test output should be grouped based on test files the same way as it
happens now (displaying dwarf/dsym results separately isn't
preferable)
Proposed solution (main logic in lldbtest.py, rest of them are test
cases fixed up for the new style):
* Have only 1 test fuction in the test files what will run for all
debug info separately and this test function should call just
"self.build(...)" to build an inferior with the right debug info
* When a class is created by python (the class object, not the class
instance), we will generate a new test method for each debug info
format in the test class with the name "<test-function>_<debug-info>"
and remove the original test method. This way unittest2 see multiple
test methods (1 for each debug info, pretty much as of now) and will
handle the test selection and the failure reporting correctly (the
debug info will be visible from the end of the test name)
* Add new annotation @no_debug_info_test to disable the generation of
multiple tests for each debug info format when the test don't have an
inferior
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13028
llvm-svn: 248883
Summary:
Before:
AssertionError: False is not True : Process is launched successfully
After:
AssertionError: False is not True : Command 'run a.out' failed.
>>> error: invalid target, create a target using the 'target create' command
>>> Process could not be launched successfully
Reviewers: clayborg
Reviewed By: clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits, vharron
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9948
llvm-svn: 238363
Summary:
`-lpthread` was removed for `g++ -std=c++11` on Linux due to llvm.org/pr21553,
but the original issue doesn't seem to be reproducible anymore. Even if it were,
it had nothing to do with compiling inferiors.
Reviewers: sbest, sivachandra, chying
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8991
llvm-svn: 234770
This has led to many test suite failures because of copy and paste where new test cases were based off of other test cases and the "mydir" variable wasn't updated.
Now you can call your superclasses "compute_mydir()" function with "__file__" as the sole argument and the relative path will be computed for you.
llvm-svn: 196985
Fix confusing error message about "expression did not evaluate to an address" when doing 'watchpoint set expression".
Instead of using 0 as the fail_value when invoking ValueObject::GetValueAsUnsigned(), modify the API to take an addition
bool pointer (defaults to NULL) to indicate success/failure of value conversion.
llvm-svn: 158016
with subcommand 'expression' and 'variable'. The first subcommand is for supplying an expression to
be evaluated into an address to watch for, while the second is for watching a variable.
'watchpoint set expression' is a raw command, which means that you need to use the "--" option terminator
to end the '-w' or '-x' option processing and to start typing your expression.
Also update several test cases to comply and add a couple of test cases into TestCompletion.py,
in particular, test that 'watchpoint set ex' completes to 'watchpoint set expression ' and that
'watchpoint set var' completes to 'watchpoint set variable '.
llvm-svn: 150109
the '-e' option (for watching of an address) to be present.
Update some existing test cases with the required option and add some more test cases.
Since the '-v' option takes <variable-name> and the '-e' option takes <expr> as the command arg,
the existing infrastructure for generating the option usage can produce confusing help message,
like:
watchpoint set -e [-w <watch-type>] [-x <byte-size>] <variable-name | expr>
watchpoint set -v [-w <watch-type>] [-x <byte-size>] <variable-name | expr>
The solution adopted is to provide an extra member field to the struct CommandArgumentData called
(uint32_t)arg_opt_set_association, whose purpose is to link this particular argument data with some
option set(s). Also modify the signature of CommandObject::GetFormattedCommandArguments() to:
GetFormattedCommandArguments (Stream &str, uint32_t opt_set_mask = LLDB_OPT_SET_ALL)
it now takes an additional opt_set_mask which can be used to generate a filtered formatted command
args for help message.
Options::GenerateOptionUsage() impl is modified to call the GetFormattedCommandArguments() appropriately.
So that the help message now looks like:
watchpoint set -e [-w <watch-type>] [-x <byte-size>] <expr>
watchpoint set -v [-w <watch-type>] [-x <byte-size>] <variable-name>
rdar://problem/10703256
llvm-svn: 150032
Tamas Berghammer