Currently most of the test files have a separate dwarf and a separate
dsym test with almost identical content (only the build step is
different). With adding dwo symbol file handling to the test suit it
would increase this to a 3-way duplication. The purpose of this change
is to eliminate this redundancy with generating 2 test case (one dwarf
and one dsym) for each test function specified (dwo handling will be
added at a later commit).
Main design goals:
* There should be no boilerplate code in each test file to support the
multiple debug info in most of the tests (custom scenarios are
acceptable in special cases) so adding a new test case is easier and
we can't miss one of the debug info type.
* In case of a test failure, the debug symbols used during the test run
have to be cleanly visible from the output of dotest.py to make
debugging easier both from build bot logs and from local test runs
* Each test case should have a unique, fully qualified name so we can
run exactly 1 test with "-f <test-case>.<test-function>" syntax
* Test output should be grouped based on test files the same way as it
happens now (displaying dwarf/dsym results separately isn't
preferable)
Proposed solution (main logic in lldbtest.py, rest of them are test
cases fixed up for the new style):
* Have only 1 test fuction in the test files what will run for all
debug info separately and this test function should call just
"self.build(...)" to build an inferior with the right debug info
* When a class is created by python (the class object, not the class
instance), we will generate a new test method for each debug info
format in the test class with the name "<test-function>_<debug-info>"
and remove the original test method. This way unittest2 see multiple
test methods (1 for each debug info, pretty much as of now) and will
handle the test selection and the failure reporting correctly (the
debug info will be visible from the end of the test name)
* Add new annotation @no_debug_info_test to disable the generation of
multiple tests for each debug info format when the test don't have an
inferior
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13028
llvm-svn: 248883
This test was very inconspicuosly skipped on linux, when it was crashing for local debugging. It
seems to work fine with LLGS, so I'm enabling it.
llvm-svn: 238816
Some have been marked as skipIfLinux for years.
The seem to be passing so I've enabled them.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9428
llvm-svn: 236403
There was a lot of code that was checking "if self.getPlatform() == 'darwin'" which is not correct. I fixed this by adding a:
lldbtest.platformIsDarwin()
which returns true if the current platform's OS is "macosx", "ios" or "darwin". These three valid darwin are now returned by a static function:
lldbtest.getDarwinOSTriples()
Fixed up all places that has 'if self.getPlatform() == "darwin":' with "if self.platformIsDarwin()" and all instances of 'if self.getPlatform() != "darwin":' with "if not self.platformIsDarwin()". I also fixed some darwin decorator functions to do the right thing as well.
llvm-svn: 233933
Adds @skipIfPlatform and @skipUnlessPlatform decorators which will skip if /
unless the target platform is in the provided platform list.
Test Plan:
ninja check-lldb shows no regressions.
When running cross platform, tests which cannot run on the target platform are
skipped.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8665
llvm-svn: 233547
Summary:
If we do not mark them as skip, they are still executed, which in
turn is leading to an assertion failure. The change also adds
skipIfLinux to a testlet which was not previously marked with
skipIfLinux. This is because running even that test let leads to an
assertion failure.
Test Plan: dotest.py -C clang -p TestEvents.py
Reviewers: vharron
Reviewed By: vharron
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6715
llvm-svn: 224644
The following lldb unit tests fail check-lldb on ubuntu:
TestDataFormatterStdMap.py
TestDataFormatterStdVBool.py
TestDataFormatterStdVector.py
TestDataFormatterSynthVal.py
TestEvents.py
TestInitializerList.py
TestMemoryHistory.py
TestReportData.py
TestValueVarUpdate.py
These unit test failures are for non-core functionality. The intent is to
reduce the check-lldb FAILS to core functionality FAILS and then circle
back later and fix these FAILS at a later date.
llvm-svn: 222608
Issues were:
1 - It isn't good to have more than one listener for the process events, just supply a listener at launch instead of making a one then have the process broadcaster add a new listener
2 - run in async mode
llvm-svn: 220113
This has led to many test suite failures because of copy and paste where new test cases were based off of other test cases and the "mydir" variable wasn't updated.
Now you can call your superclasses "compute_mydir()" function with "__file__" as the sole argument and the relative path will be computed for you.
llvm-svn: 196985
is just wrong and resulted in the inferior's output getting mixed into the GDB remote communication's
log file. Change all test cases to not pass os.ctermid() and either use SBTarget.LaunchSimple() or
SBTarget.Launch() and pass None as stdin_path/stdout_path/srderr_path to use a pseudo terminal.
rdar://problem/9716499 program output is getting mixed into the GDB remote communications
llvm-svn: 134940
Add a usage example of SBEvent APIs.
o SBEvent.h and SBListener.h:
Add method docstrings for SBEvent.h and SBListener.h, and example usage of SBEvent into
the class docstring of SBEvent.
o lldb.swig:
Add typemap for SBEvent::SBEvent (uint32_t event, const char *cstr, uint32_t cstr_len)
so that we can use, in Python, obj2 = lldb.SBEvent(0, "abc") to create an SBEvent.
llvm-svn: 134766
those lldb objects which implement the IsValid() method, let's change the rest of
the test suite to use the more compact truth value testing pattern (the Python way).
llvm-svn: 131970
Tamas Berghammer