Currently most of the test files have a separate dwarf and a separate
dsym test with almost identical content (only the build step is
different). With adding dwo symbol file handling to the test suit it
would increase this to a 3-way duplication. The purpose of this change
is to eliminate this redundancy with generating 2 test case (one dwarf
and one dsym) for each test function specified (dwo handling will be
added at a later commit).
Main design goals:
* There should be no boilerplate code in each test file to support the
multiple debug info in most of the tests (custom scenarios are
acceptable in special cases) so adding a new test case is easier and
we can't miss one of the debug info type.
* In case of a test failure, the debug symbols used during the test run
have to be cleanly visible from the output of dotest.py to make
debugging easier both from build bot logs and from local test runs
* Each test case should have a unique, fully qualified name so we can
run exactly 1 test with "-f <test-case>.<test-function>" syntax
* Test output should be grouped based on test files the same way as it
happens now (displaying dwarf/dsym results separately isn't
preferable)
Proposed solution (main logic in lldbtest.py, rest of them are test
cases fixed up for the new style):
* Have only 1 test fuction in the test files what will run for all
debug info separately and this test function should call just
"self.build(...)" to build an inferior with the right debug info
* When a class is created by python (the class object, not the class
instance), we will generate a new test method for each debug info
format in the test class with the name "<test-function>_<debug-info>"
and remove the original test method. This way unittest2 see multiple
test methods (1 for each debug info, pretty much as of now) and will
handle the test selection and the failure reporting correctly (the
debug info will be visible from the end of the test name)
* Add new annotation @no_debug_info_test to disable the generation of
multiple tests for each debug info format when the test don't have an
inferior
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13028
llvm-svn: 248883
Adds @skipIfPlatform and @skipUnlessPlatform decorators which will skip if /
unless the target platform is in the provided platform list.
Test Plan:
ninja check-lldb shows no regressions.
When running cross platform, tests which cannot run on the target platform are
skipped.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8665
llvm-svn: 233547
This has led to many test suite failures because of copy and paste where new test cases were based off of other test cases and the "mydir" variable wasn't updated.
Now you can call your superclasses "compute_mydir()" function with "__file__" as the sole argument and the relative path will be computed for you.
llvm-svn: 196985
This test is incorrect as functions that return lldb.SBThread objects never return None, they just return lldb.SBThread objects that contain invalid opaque classes.
llvm-svn: 177416
- New SBSection objects that are object file sections which can be accessed
through the SBModule classes. You can get the number of sections, get a
section at index, and find a section by name.
- SBSections can contain subsections (first find "__TEXT" on darwin, then
us the resulting SBSection to find "__text" sub section).
- Set load addresses for a SBSection in the SBTarget interface
- Set the load addresses of all SBSection in a SBModule in the SBTarget interface
- Add a new module the an existing target in the SBTarget interface
- Get a SBSection from a SBAddress object
This should get us a lot closer to being able to symbolicate using LLDB through
the public API.
llvm-svn: 140437
If two SBAddress's have the same module and file address, they are considered equal.
Add a test snippet 'sa1 == sa2' to exercise the rich comparison methods for SBAddress.
llvm-svn: 132807
those lldb objects which implement the IsValid() method, let's change the rest of
the test suite to use the more compact truth value testing pattern (the Python way).
llvm-svn: 131970
lldb::SymbolType SBSymbol::GetType();
lldb::SectionType SBAddress::GetSectionType ();
lldb::SBModule SBAddress::GetModule ();
Also add an lldb::SBModule::GetUUIDString() API which is easier for Python
to work with in the test script.
llvm-svn: 128695
among other things:
// When stopped on breakppint 1, we can get the line entry using SBFrame API
// SBFrame.GetLineEntry(). We'll get the start address for the the line entry
// with the SBAddress type, resolve the symbol context using the SBTarget API
// SBTarget.ResolveSymbolContextForAddress() in order to get the SBSymbol.
//
// We then stop at breakpoint 2, get the SBFrame, and the the SBFunction object.
//
// The address from calling GetStartAddress() on the symbol and the function
// should point to the same address, and we also verify that.
And add one utility function disassemble(target, function_or_symbol) to lldbutil.py:
"""Disassemble the function or symbol given a target.
It returns the disassembly content in a string object.
"""
TestDisasm.py uses the disassemble() function to do disassembly on the SBSymbol, and
then the SBFunction object.
llvm-svn: 126955
Tamas Berghammer